green button Click the green + button to read more details on each candidate.

2024 U.S. Senate Incumbents

NameTermsStatePartyPositionLeadershipPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVote [Expanding Dirty and Dangerous Offshore Drilling]Vote [Build Back Better Budget Resolution]Vote [Eliminating Safeguards on Fossil Fuel Production]Vote [Repealing Assault on Methane Pollution Safeguards]Vote [Inflation Reduction Act]
Baldwin, Tammy2WisconsinDSenator Baldwin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release opposing the confirmation of Administration Scott Pruitt Senator Baldwin stated, “Let there be no doubt, global climate change is real. It is a fact and no ‘alternative facts’ can change it...In Wisconsin, climate change is causing big changes in both the Great Lakes ecosystem and economy. Climate change has facilitated the growth of invasive species like Asian carp, which pose a major threat to the ecology and economy of the Great Lakes by devastating the food chain and causing major damage to our ports, pipes and water infrastructure." Senator Baldwin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release she stated, "There is no doubt that global climate change poses a growing threat to our planet, our country, our Great Lakes and Wisconsin. Turning our back on the world and backing out of the Paris Agreement is bad for our environment and bad for our economy in Wisconsin. The U.S. must show strong leadership on climate change, reaffirm our commitment to future generations and take action to address this challenge.” In a speech on the Senate floor, Senator Baldwin stated, "Let there be no doubt climate change is real the question is not whether it's happening but how we will address it are we going to do all that we can to leave the next generation a safer and healthier world as my friend from Rhode Island has impressed upon us with due urgency week in and week out climate change will be tremendously costly to our economy and to our very way of life." The Senator has a 97% lifetime score with the LCV, and has co-sponsored pro-climate legislation such as the EMIT LESS Act of 2024.100100100Senator Baldwin supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted for an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt, 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). She voted against an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution).7593.75https://www.baldwin.senate.gov/press-releases/statement-pruitt-epa https://www.baldwin.senate.gov/press-releases/baldwin-joins-colleagues-to-reaffirm-support-for-paris-climate-agreement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7zgggaYHAQ https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollution https://www.baldwin.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-baldwin-marks-51st-anniversary-of-roe-v-wade-leading-fight-to-restore-reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Barrasso, John4WyomingRSenator John Barrasso disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to The Hill, when asked about human induced climate change Senator Barrasso responded, "The climate is constantly changing. The role human activity plays is not known."Senator Barrasso demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He supported President Trump's rollback of the Clean Power Plan. In an interview with PBS, Senator Barrasso, stated, "Well, I think it was a bold and decisive action by Donald Trump. I think is going to be helpful to energy independence for America, energy security for our country, and certainly for jobs. That, to me, is the key driver." The Senator also does not make prominent public statements on climate action, nor does he make the issue a priority. In an op-ed published on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Senator supported the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement writing, "The international climate deal was negotiated badly and signed out of desperation. In fact, there was enough bipartisan opposition to the pact that Mr. Obama bypassed sending it to the Senate for ratification as a treaty. The agreement rests on little more than the former president’s handshake. The Paris deal imposed on the United States unrealistic targets for reducing our carbon emissions. It set America’s standards higher than for much of the world, while giving countries like China a free pass for years to come."000Senator Barrasso makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt. 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). He voted for an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution). Barrasso wrote an article where he stated "Bipartisan, workable climate solutions exist, and they do not include creating new carbon taxes [...] Some in Washington have suggested that Americans could receive dividend checks from collected carbon taxes — an idea that’s wishful thinking at best. Just as far-fetched is the idea that establishing a carbon tax would roll back regulations. Any new carbon tax would add red tape, not reduce it."00http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/208431-gop-leader-climate-change-science-not-known https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/barrasso-trump-climate-rollback-helps-u-s-energy-superpower https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2017/3/barrasso-op-ed-toward-a-better-climate-sans-paris https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollution https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/2/icymi-barrasso-climate-solutions-include-free-market-innovation-not-taxation https://www.barrasso.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2022/6/barrasso-statement-on-scotus-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-healthOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Blackburn, Marsha1TennesseeRSenator Marsha Blackburn disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Doubting the scientific consensus, Blackburn said "Neither [Bill Nye] nor I are a climate scientist. He is an engineer and actor, I am a member of Congress. And what we have to do is look at the information that we get from climate scientists. There is not agreement around the fact of exactly what is causing this.”Senator Blackburn demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has repeatedly criticized climate action as "''green' gimmicks", a "crusade", "climate cover-up", and "climate panic", decrying President Biden's climate plan as "sinister." Blackburn has strong history of opposing climate action, with a 3% lifetime score with the LCV, and having co-sponsored numerous resolutions condemning various EPA and Fish & Wildlife Regulations.000Senator Blackburn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congresswoman Blackburn voted in favor of a 2013 amendment by Rep. Scalise that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H.Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). 256.25https://www.congress.gov/member/marsha-blackburn/B001243?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://time.com/7975/bill-nye-global-warming-marsha-blackburn/ https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/8/don-t-be-fooled-by-the-left-s-green-gimmicks https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 http://www.ontheissues.org/Notebook/Note_10-AFP.htm https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/6/video-release-senator-blackburn-praises-pro-life-movement-following-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Brown, Sherrod3OhioDSenator Sherrod Brown understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an address to a Senate committee, the Senator said "Climate change is here – and the country knows it." He later adds "What I hope to hear from all our witnesses is a recognition of the risk to our communities – and to the lives and livelihoods of our fellow citizens – from these real and present threats. I hope we’ll hear honest assessments of the state of the world we’re in, and constructive suggestions about how we can make it better. And I hope we’ll come away from this hearing thinking about how we can help towns and cities in Ohio and around the country, that are living on borrowed time, prepare for what’s coming."Senator Brown does not oppose climate action. Although with a 94% LCV lifetime score he has a strong history of voting for climate action, the senator has been directly involved in very few pieces of pro-climate legislation. Brown has also opposed some legislative efforts by the Democrats, particularly relating to EVs. In an article in E&E News it said, "Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio has been bucking his Democratic colleagues on energy and climate change with increasing frequency as he tries to hold his seat in a tough reelection fight."1007525Sherrod Brown supports but does not advocate for a U.S. fee on carbon. Brown voted for an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt, 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). He voted against an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution). According to his website, "Brown, who is widely considered to be a liberal, is pushing Senate Democrats to require that importers pay a carbon dioxide fee for products made in countries that don't control their greenhouse gases." Despite this, we could not find statements by Brown, publicly advocating a U.S. fee on carbon.7568.75https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-climate-change-is-here-we-must-act-now https://www.eenews.net/articles/a-new-sherrod-brown-democrat-runs-from-climate-agenda/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/brown-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-promoting-carbon-capture-technology https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 https://www.eenews.net/articles/a-new-sherrod-brown-democrat-runs-from-climate-agenda/ Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cantwell, Maria4WashingtonDSenator Cantwell understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a press release responding to a 2017 GAO report which revealed that by 2039, climate change will cost U.S. taxpayers more than $1 trillion dollars, Senator Cantwell stated, "It's only going to accelerate. That's the scary thing...So can we at least sit down and talk about the ways just like on fire, just like on flooding, just like on drought, can we at least sit down at the table and plan strategies for how we can work together to mitigate these impacts? I guarantee you if we don't, this bill is going to continue to rise and the conflicts for us are going to be here."Senator Cantwell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her Senate website it states, "Maria led the passage of legislation to create a modern, efficient national electricity grid, and worked to pass landmark climate legislation." The Senator also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet on climate change, Senator Cantwell wrote, "#Climatechange is not a hypothesis. It is here. It is happening. And now it’s up to us." The Senator has a 94% lifetime score with the LCV, and has co-sponsored pro-climate legislation such as the Clean Economy Act of 2020.7575100Senator Cantwell supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Responding to a report detailing the effects of climate change on the Pacific Northwest, Cantwell said "we must do more in the coming months to further accelerate our transition to clean energy by making additional investments and pricing carbon pollution."10087.5https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cantwell-speaks-on-senate-floor-on-groundbreaking-gao-climate-change-report https://twitter.com/SenatorCantwell/status/872507196692615168 https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/issues/energy http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR2010061704564.html https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/news/press-releases/cantwell-statement-on-devastating-new-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-report https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senate-report-women-burdened-by-dobbs-decision-no-matter-what-state-they-live-inSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casey Jr., Bob3Pennsylvania DSenator Bob Casey Jr. understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his official website, Casey states "The climate crisis not only threatens the health of the environment for future generations, but it is already having a devastating impact on our communities today by negatively affecting our public health, agriculture, economy, and environment. We need to invest in meaningful climate action now, and we can do so while also creating good jobs and providing robust assistance for training and skill development. Senator Casey believes that we can and we must do both."Senator Casey has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his website, Casey states "Pennsylvania’s Environmental Amendment to the state constitution states, “the people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment…”. Senator Casey believes strongly in this constitutional amendment and the responsibilities that these rights place upon him." The Senator has been involved with pro-climate legislation, such as co-sponsoring the Environmental Justice For All Act and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2021. He also boasts a strong lifetime score of 94% with the LCV.10075100Senator Bob Casey supports but does not publicly advocate for a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted for an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt, 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). He voted against an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution). 7587.5https://www.casey.senate.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/member/bob-casey/C001070?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.casey.senate.gov/news/releases/casey-statement-on-supreme-court-overturning-roe https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollutionSupports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cramer, Kevin1North DakotaRSenator Kevin Cramer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he acknowledged that the climate is changing, he refuses to accept the scientific consensus, casting doubt over whether or not it is man-made.Senator Kramer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. While in Congress voted to pass numerous anti-climate bills, and has a 6% lifetime score with the LCV. Cramer has also accepted over half a million dollars in campaign contributions from fossil fuel companies.000Senator Cramer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Then-representative Cramer voted in favor of a 2016 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 89). Rep. Cramer voted in favor of a 2013 amendment by Rep. Scalise that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H. Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). He also signed the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge. 256.25https://www.desmog.com/kevin-cramer/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.cramer.senate.gov/news/press-releases/sen-cramer-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization-scotus-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cruz, Ted2TexasRSenator Ted Cruz disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Senate hearing, Cruz said "According to the satellite data, there has been no significant global warming for the past 18 years. The global warming alarmists don't like these data. They are inconvenient to their narrative. But facts and evidence matters. And I would note that many in the media reflexively take the side of the global warming alarmists."Cruz has a 3% lifetime score with the LCV, indicating a history of voting against climate action. The Senator has also cosponsored legislation such as the Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act and various resolutions condemning EPA regulations.000Senator Cruz makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt. 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). He co-introduced resolution opposing a carbon tax in 2023, saying "A carbon tax would seriously harm hardworking Texans and Americans. Such a tax would discourage domestic manufacturing and energy production, lead to job outsourcing, and hit working-class families particularly hard. It is imperative that Texans continue to have access to affordable energy, and that’s not possible if we implement a carbon tax alongside the radical climate agenda of the Biden administration.”00https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/takeaway/segments/ted-cruzs-ideas-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/member/ted-cruz/C001098?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sens-cruz-cassidy-and-colleagues-introduce-resolution-opposing-a-carbon-tax https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-on-the-dobbs-decision-nothing-short-of-a-massive-victory-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fischer, Deb2NebraskaRSenator Deb Fischer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Lincoln Journal Star, Jessica Clowser, a legislative aide for Senator Fischer stated that the Senator acknowledges that the climate is changing but believes its due to natural cycles. Senator Fischer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. The Senator has repeatedly criticized climate activism and the "climate crusade", and criticizes the "green revolution". Although Fischer cosponsored the Growing Climate Solutions Act of 2020, she otherwise fails to support climate action, as seen in her 8% lifetime score with the LCV, and co-sponsorship of anti-climate legislation such as S.4072 which would withhold funds from the EPA.000Senator Fischer signed the No Climate Tax Pledge by Americans for Prosperity (AFP). The pledge indicates that signers will oppose any legislation relating to climate change that increases government revenue. This would include a fee on carbon. She voted against an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt. 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). She voted for an amendment proposed by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution).00https://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2024/3/fischer-pulls-back-curtain-on-ev-climate-crusade https://www.congress.gov/member/deb-fischer/F000463?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/deb-fischer https://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/local-view-climate-change-has-arrived-in-nebraska/article_106e6038-d5e8-5f26-8808-866ef29c0371.html http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollution http://www.ontheissues.org/Notebook/Note_10-AFP.htm https://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2022/6/a-landmark-pro-life-rulingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gillibrand, Kirsten4New YorkDSenator Kirsten Gillibrand understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her official website, she states "Senator Gillibrand believes we can fight the climate crisis, protect access to clean air and clean water, and create a brighter future for New Yorkers."Senator Gillibrand has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a letter written to the Department of Treasury, she urged "We urge you to develop and implement the bold and long overdue agenda that is necessary to facilitate the transition to a clean energy economy and combat the urgent climate crisis facing us" and pushed for the creation of the Civilian Climate Corps, and has also called for the Creation of a Green New Deal. Gillibrand also boasted a 95% lifetime score with the LCV indicating a strong record of voting for pro-climate legislation.100100100Senator Gillibrand supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator co-sponsored the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act of 2019.10075https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1128/cosponsors https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/news/press/release/gillibrand-statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade/ https://insideclimatenews.org/news/20082019/kirsten-gillibrand-climate-change-global-warming-election-2020-candidate-profile/ https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/priorities/ https://www.gillibrand.senate.gov/news/press/release/gillibrand-calls-on-the-department-of-the-treasury-to-implement-bold-economic-policies-to-combat-the-climate-crisis/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hawley, Josh1MissouriRSenator Josh Hawley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Senator Hawley demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In several public statements he has criticized the Biden administration's prioritization of the climate crisis as a "radical, pro-China climate agenda" and a "fixation". Hawley has also co-sponsored anti-climate legislation, such as several resolutions condemning EPA regulations, and the START Act which would expand oil pipelines.2500Senator Hawley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.congress.gov/member/josh-hawley/H001089?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-slams-biden-admin-prioritizing-its-radical-pro-china-climate-agenda-over-american-workers/ https://missouriindependent.com/2021/07/26/josh-hawley-urges-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-in-mississippi-abortion-case/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Heinrich, Martin2New MexicoDSenator Martin Heinrich understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his Senate website, Heinrich says "Even as climate change poses an existential threat to our land and water, solving it will be one of the greatest opportunities for New Mexico, as we work to restore healthy lands and waters, install and maintain clean energy infrastructure, and build healthier and more resilient communities." In a separate statement, Heinrich referred to the climate crisis as "one of the greatest challenges we will ever face."Senator Heinrich has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Welcoming the creation of the Civilian Climate Corps, Heinrich said "As the first AmeriCorps alum in the Senate, I have been calling to create a Climate Corps for year. There is a lot of work to do to solve climate change and build our clean energy future—young Americans are eager to be the heroes in this story. We need to invest in providing them the training and opportunities they need to pursue emerging career fields at the center of building climate solutions.” The Senator has also been involved with pro-climate legislation such as the Carbon Dioxide Removal Research and Development Act of 2023, and the Climate Change Education Act. His website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 10010075Senator Heinrich publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He was one of the co-introducers of the Save Our Future Act, which sought to create a fee on carbon.10093.75https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/priorities/issues/conservation https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-welcomes-creation-of-american-climate-corps https://www.congress.gov/member/martin-heinrich/H001046?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2085/cosponsors https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-i-will-not-stop-fighting-until-we-federally-protect-womens-reproductive-freedoms-including-restoring-abortion-access-nationallySupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hirono, Mazie2HawaiiDSenator Mazie Hirono understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, the Senator said "The effects of climate change are felt across the world and it's all of our responsibility to protect our planet. I've joined my colleagues in reintroducing the Green New Deal to tackle the climate crisis and I'll continue advocating for our planet this #EarthDay & every day."Senator Hirono has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Senator has introduced pro-climate legislation such as the Women and Climate Change Act of 2022, saying in a press release “I’m proud to introduce this legislation which would include women at all levels, from planning to implementation, and providing them with the platform and support to carry out strategies to combat and respond to our climate crisis. We have an opportunity to create fair, effective, and sustainable solutions to both respond to the climate crisis and empower women through economic development—and I hope my colleagues will join me in getting this legislation across the finish line.” In a press release, Hirono, along with other senators, encouraged the DOJ to open an investigation into big oil companies to determine if they climate change deception campaigns violate federal laws.100100100Senator Hirono has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/maziehirono/status/1649787665510809600 https://www.hirono.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-hirono-introduces-women-and-climate-change-act-of-2022 https://www.hirono.senate.gov/news/press-releases/hirono-colleagues-reintroduce-legislation-to-protect-the-right-of-women-to-cross-state-lines-to-seek-abortion-careSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kaine, Tim2VirginiaDTim Kaine understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "Climate change is an existential threat to Virginia’s economy, our national security, and the future of our Commonwealth [...] He has opposed efforts to open up Virginia’s coastline to offshore drilling and has worked tirelessly to make sure Virginia has clean air and clean water. As an avid outdoorsman, Tim knows Virginia’s great outdoors is a treasure worth preserving for future generations, so he’s laser-focused on protecting Virginia’s environment and finding climate solutions."Senator Kaine has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Senator released an ad against President Trump's climate denial where he states, "Climate change is one of the biggest threats we face, but to Trump, it's just "a hoax." In a speech on the House floor, the Senator stated, "This is a really important issue to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Climate change is not an abstraction, climate change is not a next year or next decade issue, climate change in Virginia is a today issue...The Headquarters of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet is already having to spend millions of dollars to elevate the piers where aircraft carriers come and go due to sea level rise." Kaine has a strong history of voting pro-climate. He understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue10010075Senator Kaine has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Kaine voted against an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt, 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). However, he also voted against an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution).5081.25https://www.kaine.senate.gov/press-releases/video-kaine-statement-on-anniversary-of-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade https://timkaine.com/issues/protecting-our-climate/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://x.com/timkaine/status/785980837242163201 https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4610253/user-clip-tim-kaine-climate-change&start=6345 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollutionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
King, Angus2MaineISenator Angus King understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his Senate website, King says "Every week, there are examples of a changing climate in our state [...] Around the world, climate change is destabilizing nations, driving migration, and posing multiple national security threats. Despite these challenging events, innovation, investment, and hard work in Maine can improve our present and future. In order to achieve a clean energy future, the world will need a massive build out of clean energy resources, energy storage, transmission, and associated projects."Senator King's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the Senator says "Senator King supported the Inflation Reduction Act – which has already started lowering costs, making progress against climate change, and curbing the deficit." He has co-sponsored pro-climate legislation such as the Climate Change Education Act and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2021. Senator King has a generally good, albeit imperfect record of voting for climate action, with a 81% score for 2023 given by the LCV.757575Angus King has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5068.75https://www.king.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/king-statement-on-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade https://www.king.senate.gov/climate https://www.congress.gov/member/angus-king/K000383?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%2C%22sponsorship%22%3A%22cosponsored%22%2C%22congress%22%3A%5B%22117%22%5D%7D https://angusformaine.com/priorities/Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Klobuchar, Amy3MinnesotaDFLSenator Amy Klobuchar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an article on Medium, Klobuchar writes "The climate crisis isn’t happening in 100 years — it’s happening now. 2018 was the fourth-hottest year on record globally and it was another near-record year for U.S. weather and climate disasters. The dire warnings in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Climate Assessment make clear that immediate action is needed."Senator Klobuchar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She has released a comprehensive "Plan to Tackle the Climate Crisis", which includes restoring the Clean Power Plan, strengthening enforcement of the Clean Air Act, and commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement. The Senator was a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. The senator's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 10010075Senator Klobuchar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator writes "We know that carbon pollution has significant costs, but for too long the public has been forced to bear those costs while those responsible for the pollution have paid nothing. Most economists agree that the most efficient way to promote a transition away from fossil fuels is by putting a price on carbon." She promises to work with Congress and the president to develop a price on carbon.10093.75https://insideclimatenews.org/news/06012020/amy-klobuchar-climate-change-global-warming-election-2020-candidate-profile/ https://medium.com/@Amy_Klobuchar/senator-klobuchars-plan-to-tackle-the-climate-crisis-b1133845d2bb https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-roe-v-wade-abortion-senator-amy-klobuchar/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Murphy, Chris2ConnecticutDSenator Chris Murphy understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his official website, Murphy speaks of his drive for environmental stewardship in the Senate "where I am pushing for strong policies to combat climate change, curb pollution, and invest in renewable energy." In a Tweet, the Senator said "My kids don’t understand why I work on anything other than climate change. Why does anything else matter if you don’t fix this, they wonder."Senator Murphy has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He has taken pro-climate action such as co-authoring the Super Pollutants Act and co-sponsoring S.Res.173, a resolution calling on the creation of a Green New Deal. The Green New Deal is a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." The Senator has praised President Biden for the Inflation Reduction Act and rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement, and promises " I am helping lead the fight to enact aggressive policies to combat climate change."100100100Senator Murphy publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator co-sponsored the Save Our Future Act, saying in a press release "Putting a price on localized air pollution as well as greenhouse gases is one of the best ways we can hold polluters accountable for the damage they do to our environment and to the health of our communities. I’m glad to support legislation to provide a market-based solution that would reduce a broad spectrum of harmful emissions, generate revenue to support American workers and local communities, and get us on the path toward a cleaner, healthier future."100100https://www.congress.gov/member/christopher-murphy/M001169?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.murphy.senate.gov/issues/climate-change-and-the-environment https://www.murphy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/murphy-blumenthal-whitehouse-schatz-introduce-save-our-future-act-to-charge-big-polluters-for-emissions-redirect-trillions-to-american-families-and-communities-harmed-by-pollution https://www.murphy.senate.gov/issues/choice-and-womens-healthSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rosen, Jacky1NevadaDSenator Jacky Rosen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Senator Rosen's campaign site it states, "As the threat of climate change looms, she will continue advocating for action that reduces carbon pollution, defends our clean air and water, and promotes clean energy jobs." In a Tweet, she said "The climate crisis has very real impacts in Nevada. I was proud to help secure the largest investment in U.S. history to combat climate change and support clean energy, but we can't stop there. We must keep taking action to protect our planet."Senator Rosen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her website, she states "Jacky has been a leader in the fight to tackle the climate crisis, transition to a clean energy economy, and protect Nevada’s public lands and natural resources" and boasts a 97% lifetime score with the LCV. She has also taken climate action by co-sponsoring legislation such as the Climate Change Education Act and the Clean Economy Act of 2020.100100100Senator Rosen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://www.rosen.senate.gov/2024/01/22/rosen-statement-on-51st-anniversary-of-roe-v-wade/ https://www.congress.gov/member/jacklyn-rosen/R000608?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.rosenfornevada.com/issue/climate-change/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sanders, Bernie3VermontISenator Bernie Sanders understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a speech to the Senate, Sanders said "M. President: As the father of 4 and the grandfather of 7, I very much wish that I did not have to say this. But the most serious challenge facing our country and the entire world today far and away is the existential threat of climate change. That’s not just Bernie Sanders talking. That’s what the scientific community is telling us in a virtually unanimous voice. The latest report from the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is very clear and it is very foreboding. If the United States, China and the rest of the world do not act extremely aggressively in cutting carbon emissions our planet will face enormous and irreversible damage. In fact, the world that we will be leaving our children and future generations will be increasingly unhealthy and uninhabitable."Senator Sanders has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Urging climate action, he said in an op-ed "Either we maintain the status quo and continue to see more heat waves, drought, floods and extreme weather disturbances or we move away from fossil fuels and do our best to make sure that the planet we leave our kids and future generations is healthy and habitable." The Senator has taken climate action, having been a repeated sponsor and advocate for a Green New Deal.100100100Senator Sanders supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. An aggressive carbon tax was a central goal of his 2016 presidential campaign, and introduced the American Clean Energy Investment Act of 2015 which would establish a carbon tax. Of the bill, the Senator said "It is absolutely vital that we do what many economists tell us we must and that is put a price on carbon. It is the simplest and most direct way to make the kind of cuts in carbon pollution that we have got to make if we are going to successfully transition away from fossil fuel to energy efficiency and sustainable energy.”100100https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/climate-change-is-a-threat-to-the-planet-we-must-address-it/ https://berniesanders.com/issues/green-new-deal/ https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-and-ocasio-cortez-reintroduce-green-new-deal-for-public-housing-act/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-introduces-bill-to-cut-carbon-emissions-80-percent/ https://insideclimatenews.org/news/04012020/bernie-sanders-climate-change-global-warming-election-2020-candidate-profile/ https://www.sanders.senate.gov/bernie-buzz/roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scott, Rick1FloridaRSenator Rick Scott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Scott had for a long time denied the existence of anthropogenic climate change. Recent statements on his websites now agree with the scientific consensus that climate change is real; however, inconsistencies in position and a lack of climate action or proposed solutions call into question the sincerity of such statements.Senator Scott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Scott has taken anti-climate action such as co-sponsoring S.4072, which seeks to impede the EPA, and by consistently voting against climate action according to the League of Conservation Voters. The Senator also makes public statements against climate action, such as in a Tweet where he stated "POTUS is throwing the U.S. back into the Paris Agreement just to appease his liberal friends. This deal does nothing to hold real polluters like Communist China accountable & unfairly puts U.S. taxpayers on the hook.”2500Senator Scott makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a Tweet, Scott said of Janet Yellen "she's adding insult to injury with an unjustifiable carbon tax proposal. If this is @POTUS's idea of economic policy, I won't stand for it."06.25https://www.congress.gov/member/rick-scott/S001217?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://floridaphoenix.com/2021/01/28/rick-scott-now-acknowledges-climate-change-but-still-wont-do-anything-about-it/ https://www.rickscott.senate.gov/2022/6/sen-rick-scott-scotus-is-right-to-protect-life-respect-federalism-reverse-roeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Tester, Jon3MontanaDJon Tester understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his official website, Tester states "Jon also knows the climate is changing. He sees it firsthand on his farm, where planting and harvesting seasons are beginning earlier each year [...] Jon believes we need to act to build an energy economy that supports high-paying jobs and addresses the threat of climate change—an energy economy powered by Montana commonsense."Senator Tester supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Although he has spoken of the need to transition to greener energy and combat climate change, he supports an all of the above strategy. An all of the above strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. Despite this, Tester does have a strong history of voting for climate action, with an 89% lifetime score from the LCV.755050Senator Tester opposes a U.S. fee on carbon. He joined Senator Manchin criticizing carbon tax plans, saying "I’m not a big fan of the carbon tax. I just don’t think it works the way it was explained to me."2550https://mobile.x.com/SenatorTester/status/1811155691110797338 https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/577378-manchin-carbon-tax-not-on-the-board-for-biden-spending-plan/ https://www.tester.senate.gov/about/issues/energy/Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
Warren, Elizabeth2MassachusettsDSenator Elizabeth Warren understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Senator's website, she states "The world’s leading experts have long known that climate change is man-made, and we are running out of time [...] This is a crisis. We need bold, aggressive action. We need a Green New Deal -- and we need it now."Senator Elizabeth Warren has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is an original co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, saying "it provides the framework for an ambitious effort to transform our economy and save our planet" and "Elizabeth has woven Green New Deal policies throughout her plans, and that’s why she’ll use all the levers of government to defeat the climate crisis."100100100Senator Elizabeth Warren supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. She voted for an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt, 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). She voted against an amendment proposed by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution). Despite this, we could not find statements by Warren, publicly advocating a fee on carbon.7593.75https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lpMEe08NzY http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollutionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Whitehouse, Sheldon3Rhode IslandDSenator Sheldon Whitehouse understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a speech to the Senate, Whitehouse began saying "As we examine the looming economic dangers of climate change, today we’ll learn about the strain it’s placing on our defense and national security operations. Climate change is a catalyst of conflict, while also threatening our military’s infrastructure and operational readiness—all at significant cost." Whitehouse goes in-depth into how the effects of climate change have national security repercussion and concludes saying "As many national security experts have recognized, climate change is causing environmental damage that affects global stability, our national safety, and our long-term fiscal health. That comes home to roost in the budget. If you don’t believe me, read the Pentagon’s and Intelligence Community’s own reports."Senator Whitehouse has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a speech criticizing how bipartisan climate action has become and criticizing big oil's influence in politics, Whitehouse said "Before Citizens United, there was an active heartbeat of Republican activity on climate change. Since then, the evidence has only become stronger. But after Citizens United uncorked all that big, dark money, and allowed it to cast its bullying shadow of intimidation over our democracy, Republicans—other than those few who parrot the polluter party line that climate change is just a big old hoax— they have all walked back from any major climate legislation [...] As I have said before seventy-four times, and as I say tonight for the seventy-fifth time, it is time for us to wake up." Since 2012 Whitehouse has spoken weekly to the Senate about climate change, notably delivering his 250th speech on the matter in 2019. The Senator backs his pro-climate rhetoric with action. He has sponsored or co-sponsored nearly 200 environment-focused pieces of legislation as Senator, including the Safeguarding America's Future and Environment Act and the Green New Deal.100100100Senator Whitehouse supports and advocates for U.S. fee on carbon. In a panel discussion held as part of Harvard Climate Action Week, the Senator said “If we want a path to climate safety, it’s going to require us to do what is economically and morally right, which is to price carbon pollution.” Whitehouse has repeatedly introduced legislation and amendments aimed at creating a tax on carbon, such as the Clean Competition Act.100100https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/speeches/how-citizens-united-altered-the-climate-debate/ https://www.budget.senate.gov/chairman/newsroom/press/whitehouse-opening-statement-at-hearing-on-climate-change-and-the-costs-to-national-security https://www.congress.gov/member/sheldon-whitehouse/W000802 https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/speeches/time-to-wake-up-a-green-new-deal/ https://www.niskanencenter.org/senator-whitehouse-reintroduced-the-clean-competition-act-a-narrow-based-border-adjusted-carbon-tax/ https://salatainstitute.harvard.edu/senator-sheldon-whitehouse-on-carbon-pricing-theres-no-other-path-to-climate-safety/ https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-statement-on-reported-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wicker, Roger4MississippiRSenator Roger Wicker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He was the only Republican senator to vote no on an amendment, which in its entirety stated "To express the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax."Senator Wicker demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. The Senator has done this by supporting climate deniers. According to the Clarion Ledger he stated, "I agree with the more than 31,000 American scientists who do not believe the science on this matter is settled. Scientific research is advanced by asking questions and allowing for multiple viewpoints. With so much at stake — our economy, our livelihoods, and our environment — we should be tolerant of differences of opinion." Wicker also has a long history of voting against climate action, with a 7% lifetime score according to the League of Conservation Voters.000Senator Wicker makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release Senator Wicker announced his opposition to a fee on carbon stating, “A carbon dioxide tax would negatively impact every single American. The Obama administration’s energy and climate change policies rely on new taxes and regulations that would have damaging effects on the economy of Mississippi and the entire country. A carbon tax would be prohibitively costly to the nation.” He voted against an amendment by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, which would have created an explicit fee for carbon dioxide emissions (S. Amdt. 646 to S. Con. Res. 8, 113th Congress 2013-2014). He voted for an amendment by Senator Roy Blunt that would have prohibited congress from passing a fee on carbon (S. Con. Res. 8, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Resolution).00https://www.wicker.senate.gov/2022/6/wicker-comments-on-supreme-court-decision https://time.com/3677496/climate-change-wicker-inhofe/ https://www.wicker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=8BCF3117-BF43-43A1-9143-0D7AF7548F6B http://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/roger-f-wicker https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/s58 http://scorecard.lcv.org/roll-call-vote/2013-59-pricing-carbon-pollution"Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate

2024 U.S. Senate Challengers

NameStatePartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Blunt Rochester, LisaDelawareDRepresentative Blunt Rochester understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her Climate page, it states “Lisa understands the urgency of the climate crisis we face and believes that everyone deserves access to clean air and water.”100Representative Blunt Rochester publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Representative Blunt Rochester co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aimed to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years. 100100https://lisabluntrochester.com/issue/climate/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/cosponsors https://lisabluntrochester.com/issue/reproductive-freedom/ Supports Roe
Christiansen, KatrinaNorth DakotaDKatrina Christiansen understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an Earth Day tweet, Katrina Christiansen said “I am proud to be running a campaign that is dedicated to protecting our public lands and fighting the climate crisis to protect all North Dakotans.” 75Katrina Christiansen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/KatrinaforND/status/1782404863135236415 https://omny.fm/shows/news-views-with-joel-heitkamp/katrina-christiansen-shares-her-thoughts-on-roe-v Supports Roe
Allred, ColinTexasDRepresentative Allred agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an Op-Ed from May 2024, Allred wrote “Man-made climate change is very real, and we are seeing its impacts across the globe and here at home in Texas.” However, on Colin Allred’s website, it states “We need an all-of-the-above energy strategy that keeps costs low and helps create a more reliable electric grid.”25Representative Allred makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Representative Allred voted for the 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.86).021.25https://colinallred.com/on-the-issues/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/votes/98520 Supports Roe
Alsobrooks, AngelaMarylandDAngela Alsobrooks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it says “Angela knows urgent action is necessary to address the climate crisis and protect the environment. As County Executive, she issued an Executive Order for Prince George's County, setting ambitious targets to reduce the 2005 emission levels by half before 2030 and net zero by 2045. Angela believes the U.S. should adopt a similar timeline.”100Angela Alsobrooks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.angelaalsobrooks.com/priority/climate-change https://www.angelaalsobrooks.com/priority/abortionSupports Roe
Banks, JimIndianaRRepresentative Banks disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2016, before his election to the House, Representative Banks said “I believe that climate change in this country is largely leftist propaganda to change the way Americans live and create more government obstruction and intrusion in our lives."0Representative Banks makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Representative Banks voted for the 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.86).00https://web.archive.org/web/20210429054702/https://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/local-politics/3rd-district-rivals-sound-off-at-forum-15610761 https://banksforsenate.com/issues/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/votes/98520 Opposes Roe
Bashaw, CurtisNew JerseyRCurtis Bashaw does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Curtis Bashaw has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/columnists/charles-stile/2024/06/10/new-jersey-us-senate-race-donald-trump-and-bob-menendez-loom/74006294007/#:~:text=In%20an%20interview%20with%20NorthJersey,the%20personal%20lives%20of%20families. Opposes Roe
Brown, SamNevadaRSam Brown does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he has expressed that “Nevada has}been blessed with an abundance of natural resources, but we’ve also been plagued by politicians pushing extreme left energy agendas, like the Green New Deal, that raise prices and destroy jobs.”25Sam Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://captainsambrown.com/issues/ Opposes Roe
Cao, HungVirginiaRHung Cao disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a livestream fundraising event in 2022, when asked about climate change as an existential threat, he responded “Why do we have a rainbow? It’s because that’s God’s covenant to us, its his promise to us that hell never wipe out the world again. So it's kind of arrogant for us to believe thta we can destroy God’s creation.” He then referred to climate change referred to climate change as a “boogeyman that they're going to scare us about.” 0Hung Cao has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD9bmH8TeAE&t=2284s https://www.hungforva.com/right-to-life/ Opposes Roe
Corey, MatthewConnecticutRMatthew Corey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Matthew Corey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbm-2n-1RkgUnclear Position on Roe
Costello, DavidMaineDDavid Costello understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an opinion piece for the Press Herald, Devid Costello wrote that “to adequately tackle climate change, we need to do more – a lot more than we have done to date. Specifically, we need to employ stronger regulations and incentives to ensure that we come very close to zeroing out our greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050, and we need to draw down significant amounts of carbon from our atmosphere for many, many years thereafter.”100David Costello publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In the same opinion piece for the Press Herald, he wrote “we need to immediately develop and implement an aggressive national, science-based climate action plan. This ambitious and comprehensive plan would include, among other elements: initiatives to progressively price and limit greenhouse-gas emissions.”100100https://www.pressherald.com/2023/08/17/maine-voices-too-hot-to-ignore-considerably-more-action-is-needed-to-fight-climate-change/ https://www.costelloforsenate.com/civil-rights Supports Roe
Curtis, JohnUtahRRepresentative Curtis agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2021, Representative John Curtis founded the Conservative Climate Caucus, which believes that “the climate is changing, and decades of a global industrial era that has brought prosperity to the world has also contributed to that change.” However, the Caucus also supports fossil fuels.50John Curtis makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Representative Curtis voted for the 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.86)042.5https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/john-curtis-utah-republican-wants-make-climate-change-bipartisan-issue#:~:text=Curtis's%20climate%20policies%20center%20on,to%20create%20jobs%20and%20power. https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/votes/98520 https://curtis.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?IssueID=15275 Opposes Roe
Deaton, JohnMassachusettsRJohn Deaton understands the importance of climate change but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "Our climate is changing. For coastal states like ours, the impact of climate change is greater."75John Deaton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://johndeatonforsenate.com/issues/Supports Roe
Domenici, NellaNew MexicoRNella Domenici does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Nella Domenici has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.rdrnews.com/news/local/domenici-comes-to-roswell-talks-politics-immigration-abortion/article_5f54c9ba-2453-11ef-bb05-23344f964285.html Unclear Position on Roe
Elliott, GlennWest VirginiaDGlenn Elliott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Glenn Elliott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75 https://elliottforwv.com/issues/Supports Roe
Gallego, RubenArizonaDRepresentative Gallego understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Environment & Climate Change page of his website, it states “It’s a fact: the climate is changing and we need to act. That’s why Ruben has made environmental issues a top priority.”100Representative Gallego makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Gallego voted for the 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.86). 085https://gallegoforarizona.com/issue/environment-climate-change/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/votes/98520 https://gallegoforarizona.com/issue/protecting-the-right-to-choose/ Supports Roe
Garcia, RaulWashingtonRRaul Garcia does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Raul Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://garciaforwa.com/addressing-the-issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Garvey, SteveCaliforniaRSteve Garvey understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In summarizing an interview with Representative Garvey, KCRA states “[Garvey] believes that climate change is a concern, and would support work toward cleaner energy sources. However, he does not support the governmental timelines for a transition to electric vehicles and restrictions on gas stoves.”50Steve Garvey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.kcra.com/article/steve-garvey-california-united-states-senate/46826148 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQz_A_XnLbY Unclear Position on Roe
Gleich, CarolineUtahDCaroline Gleich understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states “Caroline is dedicated to robust environmental protection and a transition to a clean-energy future. She advocates for sustainable practices, clean energy initiatives, and the implementation of carbon capture technologies to ensure a healthier and more resilient environment for future generations.”100Caroline Gleich has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.carolineforutah.com/issues Supports Roe
Hansen, EricDelawareREric Hansen agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Under the Environment section of his website, it states that “the big problem isn’t the US – it’s China and India. China and India are growing emissions with coal plants faster than we can reduce emissions. That means that no matter what we do, our best efforts will be negated by China and India. The solution is to place tariffs on goods made with dirty energy so that China and India stop relying on cheap and dirty coal. They are ones poisoning the planet."50Eric Hansen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://voteerichansen.com/#Policies https://www.wrde.com/news/eric-hansen-on-abortion/video_ee12b7c4-4e65-5edb-80c6-a36a54ed0837.html Unclear Position on Roe
Hogan, LarryMarylandRLarry Hogan understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In discussing a Marland proposed Climate law, he said “while we share the goal of protecting our environment and combating climate change—and have made historic progress—putting the costs on Marylanders is no solution.”75Larry Hogan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.wmar2news.com/news/local-news/hogan-slams-maryland-senates-proposed-climate-law-calling-it-a-tax-bill https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/politics/larry-hogan-abortion-roe-v-wade.html Supports Roe
Hovde, EricWisconsinREric Hovde does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Eric Hovde has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/feb/22/what-is-wisconsin-us-senate-candidate-eric-hovdes/Opposes Roe
Jim, JusticeWest VirginiaRJim Justice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 delivery from the State Capitol he shared “God will give us time for the smart people of the world to solve the riddle. If there is truly climate change going on, He will give us time.” 25Jim Justice has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://governor.wv.gov/News/press-releases/2022/Pages/Governor-Justice-says-Biden-must-tap-into-West-Virginias-rich-natural-resources-to-make-America-energy-independent-again.aspx https://www.wowktv.com/news/local/gov-justice-applauds-roe-v-wade-decision/ Opposes Roe
Johnson, GloriaTennesseeDGloria Johnson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, she agreed with a criticism of Rep. Dennis Powers, saying that his climate denial is due to poor public education.50Gloria Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.votegloriajohnson.com/meet-gloria/Supports Roe
Kim, AndyNew JerseyDRepresentative Andy Kim understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Energy and Environment page of his website, he writes “I believe climate change is a national security crisis. That’s why I’m proud to have been a part of helping to enact the largest investment in tackling climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in history.”100Representative Kim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. While serving in the house, Representative Kim voted against the 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.86). However, he has not made any public statements in support.5092.5https://kim.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/votes/98520 https://www.andykim.com/issues/reproductive-rights/#:~:text=A%20nationwide%20ban%20on%20abortion,everyone%2C%20everywhere%20in%20this%20countrySupports Roe
Kouzounas, DemiMaineRDemi Kouzounas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Demi Kouzounas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2021-12-03/a-gop-governor-bolstered-maine-abortion-rights-if-roe-is-gutted-those-protections-will-stand-for-now Opposes Roe
Kunce, LucasMissouriDLucas Kunce understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Kunce, a veteran of the Marine Corps, wrote an article for prospect.org where he argues that climate change is a matter of national security. "This should be a bipartisan issue. The threat posed by climate change is not a secret in the defense world. The Pentagon has periodically issued reports on it for years," Kunce said. He adds "In the end, this type of [climate action] leadership shouldn’t even be that risky. I think leaders would find that if you offer the American people two worlds: one with more conflict, higher future defense spending, and an artificially juiced stock market; or one with more security, less military action, cleaner rivers and skies, and more economic opportunity, they would overwhelmingly pick the second. This Marine from Missouri sure would.100Lucas Kunce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://prospect.org/environment/national-security-case-for-decarbonization/ https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/readers-opinion/guest-commentary/article261025972.htmlSupports Roe
Lake, KariArizonaRKari Lake disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Lake said "So don’t tell me that we’re in some sort of a weird heating trend. I don’t believe that for a minute. I’m not going to be afraid of the weather. I don’t believe people will fall for it."0Kari Lake has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2024/07/15/arizona-republicans-skeptical-climate-change-despite-evidence/ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/10/us/politics/kari-lake-abortion-arizona.htmlOpposes Roe
Love Jr., PrestonNebraskaDPreston Love Jr. understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a recent tweet, Love Jr. shared “climate change is no hoax, especially for our farmers. I'm committed to supporting climate-resilient agriculture to help Nebraska farmers adapt to and mitigate the impacts of extreme weather.”75Preston Love Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://x.com/Love4Senate/status/1772280535408058456 https://love4senate.com/reproductive-health/ Supports Roe
Malloy, GeraldVermontRGerald Malloy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. “I know Vermonters are deeply concerned with the climate and reducing emissions and I support that. I will work with industry, and other countries, to achieve objectives and reliable and affordable options.” However, he has also stated that when asked about the climate crisis, he “would explain that I do not believe we are in an existential climate crisis, and discuss doing one’s own research and drawing one’s own conclusions.”25Gerald Malloy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://vermontdailychronicle.com/gerald-malloy-announces-2024-run-for-senate/ https://vermontdailychronicle.com/malloy-it-is-an-exciting-time-to-be-a-republican/ https://www.wamc.org/news/2024-01-16/republican-gerald-malloy-talks-about-entering-the-2024-vermont-u-s-senate-race Opposes Roe
McCormick, DavidPennsylvaniaRDave McCormick does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Dave McCormick’s website states “Dave is a conservationist who believes we don’t have to choose between clean energy and economic development – that’s a false tradeoff. Our leaders must mitigate the risk of climate change through adaptation and energy policies that do not impose significant damage on our society, our economy, and our security. … We need market-driven solutions and an ‘all of the above’ energy agenda, not government spending that drives inflation.”25David McCormick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.davemccormickpa.com/issues/ Opposes Roe
McCray, ValerieIndianaDValerie McCray understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states “We must pursue relentless research and development to find ways to produce cleaner energy and try to reverse the damage to our planet from climate change.”100Valerie McCray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://valeriemccray.org/platform/ Supports Roe
McDermott, BobHawaiiRBob McDermott disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. As a state representative, McDermott said "I think more trees are great, but I think it's misguided and I'll tell you why, they can't control the climate, it's pointless, it's useless - the sun, it's a bright beautiful day, the sun impacts our climate, man has negligible impact."0Bob McDermott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://votemcdermott.com/key-issues/ https://www.kitv.com/news/business/honolulu-leaders-focusing-on-several-issues-in-climate-adaptation-plan/article_5120eede-d785-11ee-b403-37c6a2182387.htmlOpposes Roe
Moreno, BernieOhioRIn a 2021 tweet, Bernie Moreno stated “if the “coastal” elites who cry climate change 24/7 on how to reduce CO2 emissions want to see how it’s done, come to Ohio. We should continue to incentivize fracking and make it much easier for drilling, especially below federal and state lands.”25Bernie Moreno has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/berniemoreno/status/1468942747365265408 https://berniemoreno.com/why-im-running/ Opposes Roe
Morgan, PatriciaRhode IslandRPatricia Morgan disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Criticizing climate action as "fake science", she said "We believe there is climate change but there has been climate change, warming and then cooling, for millions of years. It is a false statement to say that we have warmer temperatures or oceans than at any time in history."0Patricia Morgan makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a Tweet, Morgan said "Carbon tax is just a money grab by elected officials who refuse to cut spending. Democrats do not care about the Little Guys"00https://twitter.com/repmorgan/status/1810321968706752622 https://www.patriciamorgan.com/concerned-rhode-islanders https://twitter.com/repmorgan/status/1351880568867336192Opposes Roe
Morrow, ScottWyomingDScott Morrow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Candidate Q&A, Morrow contrasted himself from his opponent saying "I happen to acknowledge the dire warnings of 97% of all scientists from 197 countries who have proclaimed in one voice that climate change is an existential threat to humanity. We are factually in the midst of the sixth known mass extinction event of our approximately 4.5-billion-year-old planet. Humans are on the list for extinction at the rate we are going."100Scott Morrow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://oilcity.news/community/2024/08/02/candidate-q-and-a-scott-morrow-democrat-for-u-s-senate/Supports Roe
Mucarsel-Powell, DebbieFloridaDDebbie Mucarsel-Powell understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "Unlike Rick Scott who banned the use of the term “climate change” as Governor and dismisses it as “nuisance flooding,” Debbie knows climate change is real and she is ready to take action to address the climate crisis that is impacting Floridians, their lives, and their property."75Debbie Mucarsel-Powell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.debbieforflorida.com/issuesSupports Roe
Osborn, DanNebraskaIDan Osborn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Dan Osborn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://yorknewstimes.com/news/local/government-politics/they-want-us-divided-union-leader-and-u-s-senate-candidate-dan-osborn-visits-york/article_4d291552-d043-11ee-a70f-6be0c0eef43d.html Unclear Position on Roe
Pinkins, TyMississippiDTy Pinkins understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it says “for a long time, science has shown us unequivocally that climate change is man-made, and we are rapidly running out of time to mitigate its causes.”100Ty Pinkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.typinkins.com/environment https://www.typinkins.com/womens-reproductive-freedom Supports Roe
Rogers, MikeMichiganRMike Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Rogers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5028.75https://www.wmur.com/article/new-hampshire-mike-rogers-abortion-china-opioids/43806132#Opposes Roe
Sapraicone, MikeNew YorkRMike Sapraicone does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Sapraicone has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mikesapraiconeforsenate.com/issues/ https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-ny/politics/2024/05/06/republican-u-s--senate-candidate-mike-sapraicone-talks-on-abortion--guns--trump Unclear Position on Roe
Schiff, AdamCaliforniaDRepresentative Adam Schiff understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Climate and Environment page of his website, Representative Schiff states “Adam believes that climate change is the most urgent and existential crisis facing the U.S. and international community today and that, if left unchecked, it will bring about disastrous consequences for our environment, our food and water supply, the global economy, and our national security.”100Representative Adam Schiff publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://schiff.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/congressman-schiff-on-supreme-court-decision-to-strike-down-roe-v-wade#:~:text=June%2024%2C%202022-,Congressman%20Schiff%20on%20Supreme%20Court%20Decision%20to%20Strike%20Down%20Roe,century's%20progress%20and%20legal%20protectionsSupports Roe
Sheehy, TimMontanaRTim Sheehy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, it states “we are blessed here with abundant coal, minerals, timber and grasslands – let’s make sure Montana producers come first. We should be able to responsibly develop those resources here at home to create more high-paying jobs, lower energy costs, and support our communities, all while protecting the environment. This isn’t an either/or choice like the left would have you believe.” However, his company Bridger Aerospace, has taken strong stances in agreement with climate science. 25Tim Sheehy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://timformt.com/on-the-issues/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republican-senate-tim-sheehy-climate-hypocrisy_n_661ea563e4b015646f795ce1 Opposes Roe
Slotkin, ElissaMichiganDElissa Slotkin understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Slotkin said "I think we all believe that we need to take aggressive steps to mitigate the effects of climate change. But I think when you have something like the Green New Deal [...] it makes it less likely that it will pass, not more.”75Elissa Slotkin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5071.25https://x.com/ElissaSlotkin/status/1787835158973845781 https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2019/03/29/green-new-deal-elissa-slotkin-tlaib-ocasio-cortez/3291930002/Supports Roe
White, RoyceMinnesotaRRoyce White disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Referencing greenhouse gas emissions, White said "Part of the climate racket is that livestock is the issue. Livestock is the issue. Slowly, but surely, your animals - and you, as well - will be deemed non-essential.” In a Star Tribune article, Christopher Vondracek states White referred to Washington, D.C., as “the swamp,” claiming that “Amy Klobuchar is at the head of it, all this climate change and the LGBTQ.'”0Royce White has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.startribune.com/klobuchar-white-and-fraser-take-the-stage-at-farmfest/600941610 https://roycewhite.us/in-a-surprise-minnesota-republicans-back-royce-white-to-run-against-amy-klobuchar/mn-gop-senate/ https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-sen-candidate-royce-white-spent-big-on-strip-clubs-limos-luxuryOpposes Roe

2024 U.S. House Incumbents

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadershipLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVotes [Attacking International Climate Collaboration (House Roll Call 27)]Vote [Advancing Climate Action in the COMPETES Act (House Roll Call 18)]Vote [Repealing Assault on Methane Pollution Safeguards (House Roll Call 185)]Vote [Pro-Environment Funding Package (House Roll Call 247)]Vote [Transformative Climate, Jobs, and Justice Investments (House Roll Call 385)]Vote [Investing in Climate-Smart and Pro-Wildlife Infrastructure (House Roll Call 201)]Vote [Inflation Reduction Act (HR 5376)]
Adams, AlmaNorth Carolina12DCongresswoman Alma Adams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "There is no denying that Climate Change and the rise in global temperatures results in extreme ecological changes. As a member of the Congressional Safe Climate Caucus, Congresswoman Adams is pushing for strong and proactive environmental policies that combat climate change, curb pollution, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable development solutions. She believes it’s time to start investing in more renewable energy sources and develop new green technologies. Investing in energy and the environment is effectively investing in the economy."100100Congresswoman Adams has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' The Congresswoman stated, "CLIMATE CHANGE ISN’T NEW. We’ve known the damaging impacts of it for years and we can’t afford to not take action. That’s why I’m proud to support the Energy Innovation & Carbon Dividend Act in order to put a #PriceOnPollution and reduce our carbon emissions by 90% by 2050." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release on a 2017 Executive Order that curtailed America's ability to tackle climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "This Executive Order lets companies off of the hook and shifts environmental cleanup costs onto American taxpayers who are expected to be charged as much as $58 Billion by 2030. The President’s actions roll back critical protections to our air and water supplies and significantly reduce our ability to effectively fight climate change. As long as this administration continues to put big business first, its American families who will pay the greatest price.” Rep. Adams makes climate change a priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100Congresswoman Adams publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://adams.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://adams.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/what-withdrawing-paris-climate-agreement-means https://twitter.com/repadams/status/1220786542182006785 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://adams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/adams-decries-fundamentally-wrong-supreme-court-decision-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Aderholt, RobertAlabama 4RCongressman Robert Aderholt disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2010 op-ed in The Daily Mountain Eagle, the Congressman flouted the science that underpins climate change blaming current warming on natural cycles, writing, "I fall into the second group of people who believe, as do many very credible scientists, that the earth is currently in a natural warming cycle rather than a man-made climate change. Many scientists believe that natural cycles of warming and cooling have existed since the beginning of Earth. If we take the current models of climate prediction and apply those same models to what actually happened in the last thirty years, the models are shown to be very flawed. In addition, what knowledge we do have of a warming period in the Middle Ages cannot be explained by current models which are focused on greenhouse gas reductions." 00In a 2013 press release on the economic climate the Congressman Aderholt stated, “While Obama's Organizing for Action is showing concern about the climate change debate, hardworking Alabamians and I are concerned with our nation’s dismal jobs climate... The biggest denial is that the Obama Administration’s burdensome EPA regulations that have increased the cost of manufacturing and doing business, that Obamacare driving up the cost of healthcare and crippling hiring, and catering to special interest groups like those that are stalling the Keystone Pipeline are not the root cause our nation’s dismal jobs climate.” Congressman Aderholt demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action. 0Congressman Aderholt co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/controversy-about-climate-change https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aderholt-only-climate-we-should-be-talking-about-today-countrys-stalled https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Alabama%22%7D https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-aderholt-statement-leaked-supreme-court-decision-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Aguilar, PeteCalifornia33DCongressman Peter Aguilar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's website, Aguilar states "It is our responsibility to future generations to conserve our resources, protect our environment and do our best to mitigate effects the climate crisis has on our planet. For the past couple of years, we’ve seen unprecedented fire seasons, devastating hurricanes, extreme drought, rising sea levels and more devastate thousands of communities globally. We need to take immediate action, or soon it will be too late. Rep. Aguilar is committed to advancing a climate-forward agenda that promotes opportunity for Inland Empire workers, businesses and entrepreneurs and puts us on a path to win the economic competition of the 21st century."100100Congressman Aguilar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman passed two amendments to lower inland automobile emissions as part of the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), stating, "I was proud to help pass this bill because it will bring real investment to our region and create good-paying jobs in our community. This forward-thinking legislation will help us work our way out of the recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic and will allow us to modernize our crumbling infrastructure, reduce pollution and fight climate change.” Congressman Aguilar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Rep. Aguilar's campaign website, states, "I take the effects of climate change and pollution very seriously and have worked in Congress to reduce our carbon footprint and prioritize the health and safety of our communities." Congressman Aguilar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a January 2022 tweet, the Congressman stated "I had a chance to talk about how the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will help prevent wildfires. We know we must do more to combat climate change and we will — thanks to the @VP’s leadership."100Congressman Aguilar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://aguilar.house.gov/issues/ https://aguilar.house.gov/sites/aguilar.house.gov/files/documents/Protecting%20the%20Environment%20and%20Fighting%20Climate%20Change.pdf https://aguilar.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aguilar-amendments-lower-pollution-and-reduce-traffic-inland-empire-pass https://twitter.com/RepPeteAguilar/status/1484668636488941584 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://aguilar.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-aguilar-statement-on-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Alford, MarkMissouri4RCongressman Alford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.00In a press release, Alford said “Since assuming his post as ‘climate czar’, John Kerry has done nothing but fly his private jets around the world and preach his radical gospel for the climate cult." He has also cosponsored anti-climate bills such as the Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act, and H.R.6813, which would prevent the EPA from creating or enforcing regulations on emissions.0Congressman Burlison opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvyQ_XaMBMc https://alford.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=133 https://www.congress.gov/member/mark-alford/A000379?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepMarkAlford/status/1806423981597282461Opposes Roe
Allen, RickGeorgia12RCongressman Allen disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 election debate, when asked if he believed in man made climate change the Congressman said, "No." 00According to Politically Georgia, "Allen vehemently rejected the idea that warming is an established fact. “The science if definitely NOT settled,” he said in an email. “Limiting debate to one side is not the same as being conclusive… I am not convinced and I am certainly not ready to destroy jobs and whole industry sectors in order to tax industries liberals don’t like and send the money to sectors that they do like.” Rep. Allen opposed the Clean Power Plan, stating in a 2017 post of Rick's Weekly Report, stating "I believe the Clean Power Plan, one of the most drastic environmental regulations in history, did very little to help the environment, but instead, burdened families through reduced income, stifled economic growth and increased electricity costs." Congressman Allen demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Allen makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D56lBsT9WHk https://politics.myajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/politicians-cool-global-warming/r6EaMO72xM6UqCofVLvp3H/ https://allen.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx?ID=QL2FAABJSRT6G https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://twitter.com/reprickallen/status/1217839299292475392Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Amo, GabeRhode Island1DCongressman Amo understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue.75100Congressman Amo has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. A press release read "'As the Ocean State, coastal management is essential to protecting our communities and our way of life from the existential threat of climate change,” said Amo. “That is why I am proud to have joined my colleagues in supporting the Aquidneck Land Trust in their quest to receive nearly $2 million in federal funding. This federal investment will help expand their island-wide approach to resilience and leverage nature-based solutions to fight the climate crisis.'”100 Congressman Amo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://amo.house.gov/press-release/ri-delegation-announces-nearly-2-million-federal-grant-to-accelerate-resiliency-efforts-on-aquidneck-island https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/gabeamo/status/1720225876636246149Supports Roe
Amodei, MarkNevada2RCongressman Mark Amodei does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "I believe Congress should promote policies that protect and preserve our environment for future generations. Responsible stewardship of our environment requires a commitment to sound science and continuous research."250On Congressman Amodei's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "In Nevada, new sources of energy, such as geothermal and solar are showing promise. Geothermal, in particular, brings jobs and growth to Nevada with 20+ plants in operation providing clean, reliable electrical capacity to the grid and significant additional capacity under development." Congressman Amodei does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Amodei opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://amodei.house.gov/environment/ https://amodei.house.gov/energy1/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://amodei.house.gov/news-releases/amodei-statement-scotus-abortion-rulingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Arrington, JodeyTexas19RCongressman Jodey Arrington disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a House Floor speech condemning the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The climate activist agenda, Mr. Chairman, and extreme ideological views... embraces the view that the only means to successfully reducing carbon emissions is to eliminate conventional fuels, which by the way power our nation's economy...This framework is flawed in its assumptions, fraught with political bias, hostile toward our main source of energy, and amounts to a jobs program for ideological bureaucrats." 00On Congressman Arrington's energy page, it states, "West Texas currently accounts for 81% of the onshore production for the entire state of Texas. The oil and gas producers here in District 19 provide a safe and affordable supply of energy to our nation, and thousands of jobs to our people. We need to reduce regulations, cut taxes, and allow these industries to grow and thrive. Like Texas, our country needs more pro-growth, pro-energy policies." Congressman Arrington demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Arrington opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.facebook.com/JodeyArrington/videos/493714594707977/?v=493714594707977 https://arrington.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://arrington.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=761Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Auchincloss, JakeMassachusetts 4DCongressman Jake Auchincloss understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a July 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "At the event co-sponsored by Walmart and Environmental Defense Fund, Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.), said he’s 'not really waiting another decade for Republicans to decide ‘yeah, maybe we should group together climate change with infrastructure.’” “You can get on board or you can not. But we’re going to do it, because it is pertinent and it is necessary,' said the first-term lawmaker..."100100Congressman Jake Auchincloss has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an October 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' when asked "What steps do you believe are the most necessary to deal with global climate change?" Congressman Auchincloss answered "We've got to invest in green R&D, green infrastructure, and green jobs. That means putting a price on carbon. That means asserting muscular federal oversight over protecting our clean water and our clean air provisions..." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a February 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' Congressman Auchincloss stated "Climate change will steal this planet from the next generation. That’s not just a political and environmentally reality... We are talking any federal investment in infrastructure. Not transportation, we are missing an opportunity. Transportation is 40% of what drives climate change in Massachusetts. We put together a progressive plan to reinvent transportation in Massachusetts." The congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Congressman Auchincloss lists "Meet the climate crisis head-on" as a priority, where he states "Jake has a track record of delivering progressive solutions to address climate change. On the city council, he voted with Green Newton priorities 100% of the time."100Congressman Jake Auchincloss publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, to "Meet the climate crisis head-on," he includes "Tax[ing] carbon to curb the pollution that causes climate change." According to a 2021 New Boston Post article, "...in a Zoom event put together by the Foxborough Democratic Town Committee... Auchincloss said that he sees a carbon tax as essential to fighting climate change." In addition, Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/561253-democrats-say-theres-no-time-to-wait-on-including-climate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R22o6H0f4Q https://www.wcvb.com/article/on-the-record-congressional-candidate-jake-auchincloss-discusses-personal-climate-change-issue/31067118 https://www.jakeforma.com/priorities https://newbostonpost.com/2021/07/13/asked-about-the-ideal-tax-code-jake-auchincloss-advocates-for-carbon-tax-higher-death-tax/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Massachusetts%22%7D https://auchincloss.house.gov/media/press-releases/video-auchincloss-we-need-senate-step-and-make-roe-law-land Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Babin, BrianTexas36RCongressman Brian Babin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 Pacific Standard article, Congressman Babin, "...tried to suggest that, because scientists are still researching what caused the Little Ice Age, which extended from the 14th to the mid-19th century, perhaps they are unsure about the causes of climate change now. He also suggested some global warming can be beneficial at times. For people living during the Little Ice Age, he said, 'I would say it would have been more advantageous for the climate to be a little bit warmer.'" 00In a 2017 press release applauding the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Babin stated, "Furthermore, it would uniquely hurt the people of the 36th District of Texas by threatening the many good-paying jobs provided by our area’s petrochemical and refining facilities. While this decision will not sit well with out-of-touch liberal politicians and pro-U.N. globalists, President Trump was elected to put American workers first and turn back such bad deals that undermine U.S. competitiveness and jobs.” Congressman Babin demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Babin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://psmag.com/news/the-house-science-committee-just-held-its-first-helpful-hearing-on-climate-science-in-years https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1314 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=583Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bacon, DonNebraska 2RCongressman Don Bacon agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview for The Reader, Congressman Bacon stated, "Well, I do believe in climate change. But there’s a lot of questions like how much do you put … If we did everything in America that we’re supposed to, does it make a difference or not? So there’s a good debate..."5029On Congressman Bacon's 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "I am proud to be part of the Climate Solutions Caucus to further expand my knowledge on the potential impacts of climate change and find bi-partisan solutions. This was a promise I made to constituents of my district and I keep my promises." From a 2020 press release, "Congressman Don Bacon (NE-R-02) joined Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger (VA-D-07) to announce plans to introduce the Growing Climate Solutions Act in the House. Introduced in the Senate by Senators Mike Braun (R-IN) and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), the bill seeks to help farmers, ranchers and foresters participate in the voluntary carbon market by establishing a Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verifier Certification Program through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)." Congressman Bacon supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Bacon makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2020 interview with The Reader, the Congressman stated, "I don’t like carbon taxes. I don’t think we should be jacking up gas tax or airfares or the utilities when you want to heat your house." When the interviewer questioned the Congressman on his opinion on carbon tax for corporation, he still insisted that carbon taxing hurts the economy, starting, “I am not a fan of carbon tax. I will never be a fan of carbon tax. I think in the end, I’m more into incentivizing behavior versus punishing behavior." Congressman Bacon voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 032.25https://thereader.com/news/the-reader-interview-with-don-bacon https://bacon.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://bacon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=517 https://thereader.com/news/the-reader-interview-with-don-bacon https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bacon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1031Opposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Baird, JimIndiana4RCongressman Jim Baird does not take a position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 article by Science Magazine, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I’ll have to look at their data once I start on the committee. I’m a data man, and we’ll just have to take a look at that.”250Congressman Baird supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In a 2021 Pharos Tribune article, the Congressman states "There is real risk that climate change policy could create many challenges for the agriculture industry. Challenges that create incredible regulatory burden, that decrease efficiency or productivity, that impact that the stability of America’s food supply chain, and that ultimately could cost farmers their business and family legacy." However, Baird has also cosponsored bills such as the Growing Climate Solutions Act, and has worked with groups such as the Citizens Climate Lobby. In a 2021 address to the House Agriculture Committee, Baird spoke of the possibilities for climate change legislation to benefit agriculture.50Rep. Baird makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41). He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 018.75https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/one-indiana-s-new-congressmen-vietnam-veteran-farmer-and-scientist# https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13022019/congress-house-science-committee-climate-change-republicans-green-new-deal-niskanen https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/columnists/2024/05/17/climate-change-should-be-top-priority-to-republicans-wooing-youth-vote/73525878007/ https://mobile.x.com/CCL_Indiana/status/1461699100743766022 https://www.pharostribune.com/opinion/article_7cf849b8-c968-11eb-ad19-f32f4c455aa6.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJjLB7Ip8_M https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/07/these-republicans-cheered-abortion-policy-going-states-they-are-also-sponsoring-federal-ban/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Balderson, TroyOhio12RCongressman Troy Balderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman supported the president's rollbacks of the Clean Power Plan, stating that President Trump's replacement, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, “allows everyone to win." Balderson joined the Conservative Climate Caucus, saying "Together, we will stand up for pragmatic climate solutions that embrace—not stifle—American ingenuity and fight back against job-killing, costly, window dressing from the left." Congressman Balderson does not oppose climate action.0Congressman Balderson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190620/trump-moves-to-gut-obama-climate-policy-and-bolster-coal-industry https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://balderson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2147 https://twitter.com/RepBalderson/status/1540347973506371586Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Balint, BeccaVermont1DCongresswoman Balint understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote, "In Congress, Becca will support a Green New Deal to provide Vermont with the funding we need to create and sustain good-paying green jobs, combat the climate crisis, fight environmental injustice, and transition our state and our country to a clean energy economy."100100Congresswoman Balint has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a LCVAF press release, Balint said “Helping pass Vermont’s Global Warming Solutions Act is some of the most important work I’ve done as a Vermont Senator. The climate crisis is here now and every moment counts if we are going to preserve our environment and ensure a livable world for our children.” 100Congresswoman Balint has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.beccabalint.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lcv.org/bio/becca-balint/Supports Roe
Barr, AndyKentucky6RCongressman Andy Barr disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article from Spectrum News 1, the Congressman was quoted on climate change, stating, "Some say the science is settled, that's not true. There are scientists who dispute the level of warming, the extent to which humans are contributing to that." In an interview with WTVQ, the Congressman expressed his opposition to President Obama's climate change plan, stating, "Coal does contribute to climate change. 'But he says it’s better for the world if we use coal in America.' The administration is trying to destroy the coal industry and the result is more exports to countries like China that have a very poor environmental record." 00In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, the Congressman denied scientific consensus on climate change, stating, "While the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has found a lack of scientific consensus on the causes and consequences of climate change, I am not a climate change denier." The Congressman Barr demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Barr makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2013 press release opposing a fee on carbon the Congressman cited the "human cost," of the war on coal. He also voted in favor and was a co-sponsor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2019/04/16/rep--andy-barr-speaks-on-green-energy-and-the-green-new-deal https://www.wtvq.com/2013/07/02/rep-andy-barr-says-hes-offended-by-presidents-climate-change-plan/ https://barr.house.gov/columns?ID=6D9B3AC5-D9DE-40FF-8381-3DC72FB774C2 https://barr.house.gov/2013/3/barr-fights-carbon-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://barr.house.gov/2022/6/barr-historic-victory-for-life-as-scotus-overturns-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Barragán, Nanette California44DCongresswoman Barragán understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign page, it states that “Nanette understands that climate change is an urgent environmental problem and she intends to act accordingly. She will fight to combat climate change and work to transition us to clean, renewable energy.” 100100Congresswoman Barragán has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a co-chair of the United for Climate And Environmental Justice Congressional Task Force, which aims to reduce the impacts of climate change on minority and low-income communities. In a press release announcing the formation of the Task Force, the Congresswoman stated, “Issues like climate change and pollution disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color, a fact that must be considered in our work as lawmakers." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release opposing the U.S.-Mexico Trade Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "Although there were labor and enforcement improvements made with the USMCA, climate change is a crisis that must be urgently addressed and accounted for in our trade agreements." Rep. Barragán makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Barragan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-testifies-on-the-role-of-climate-change-in-wildfires/ https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-barrag-n-jayapal-announced-united-climate-and-environmental-justice https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-releases-statement-on-house-resolution-5430-the-united-states-mexico-trade-agreement/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://barragan.house.gov/2022/07/15/rep-barragan-votes-to-protect-womens-access-to-abortion-protections-for-reproductive-health-freedom/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bean, AaronFlorida4RCongressman Bean does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Bean demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In an interview, Bean said he wants to expand drilling leases and oil pipelines to reduce prices, and in a Tweet said that "It’s clear this administration is prioritizing their fringe climate agenda and the interests of Wall Street billionaires over the interests of hardworking Americans." In 2024 the Congressman sponsored a resolution expressing disapproval of the EPA's rule relating to “Reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter''.0Congressman Bean opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.news4jax.com/voters-guide/2022/07/28/floridas-4th-congressional-district/ https://x.com/RepAaronBean/status/1637927911528468487 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-joint-resolution/117/text?s=1&r=1Opposes Roe
Beatty, JoyceOhio3DCongresswoman Joyce Beatty understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The consensus view of scientists about the impact that climate change poses to our planet is alarming. Rising temperatures are projected to devastate many of our planet’s precious ecosystems, increase coastal flooding to dangerous levels, disrupt our food systems, and increase extreme weather occurrences. These science-backed facts are why I support taking bold steps to invest in federal programs to address climate change, prevent spending cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), fully enforce the Clean Air Act, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, minimize our reliance on fossil fuels, and promote energy efficiency and conservation. I also support the Paris Climate Agreement and believe the United States should remain a full partner in the international effort to address climate change."100100In a 2017 tweet opposing President Trump's withdrawal from the agreement, she stated, "1. Syria. 2. Nicaragua 3. USA. The ONLY three countries to reject #ParisAccord. Talk about a list you don't want to be on! #ActOnClimate." Rep. Beatty in a press release opposed the Keystone Pipeline for climate reasons, stating, "We should focus on developing domestically produced energy as we transition away from energy sources that cause irreparable climate change and fail to create meaningful American jobs.” Congresswoman Betty's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Beatty has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepBeatty/status/870363347904069634 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-opposes-seriously-flawed-keystone-xl-legislation https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-slams-roe-reversalSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bentz, Cliff Oregon2RCongressman Cliff Bentz agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an editorial from the Bulletin posted on the congressman's website, "Bentz’s concept is more circumspect, realistic and decentralized. He believes climate change is real. He wants innovation, sequestration and adaptation." 500Under 'Environment' on the 'issues' page of his campaign website, Congressman Bentz states "I applaud President Trump’s plan to update the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)." According to a 2021 'S&P Global' article, "Bentz has advocated other climate solutions, including carbon capture and sequestration and the development of solar energy, according to an August 2019 story by The Dalles Chronicle." From a June 2021 article from the 'Pacific Northwest AG Network,' "House Republicans launched the Conservative Climate Caucus. The caucus includes more than 50 representatives, including Oregon’s Cliff Bentz and Washington’s Dan Newhouse." The article says "The goal of the Conservative Climate Caucus is to bring members of the Republican party together to educate each other on climate policies that will make progress on reducing emissions through American innovation and resources." According to a Tweet on his page, "Rep.-elect Cliff Bentz, who led statehouse walkout, backs climate solutions people 'want to do.'" Congressman Cliff Bentz’s supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for effective policies. 50Congressman Cliff Bentz makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2021 'Oregon state senate Republicans who walked out during the state's 2019 legislative session to effectively block Gov. Kate Brown and the Democrat-majority legislature from passing a carbon tax bill."025https://cliffbentz.com/2020/10/editorial-cliff-bentz-for-congress/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/environment/ https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/new-members-of-us-congress-include-climate-defenders-carbon-tax-opponents-61690160 https://www.pnwag.net/2021/06/30/republicans-launch-conservative-climate-caucus/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bera, AmiCalifornia6DCongressman Ami Bera understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Bera's, 'Environment and Agriculture,' page, it states, "We must address the grave threat that climate change poses to our state of California and to future generations. The vast majority of qualified scientists agree that the data on climate change is clear. The evidence shows climate change is making our drought worse and could lead to future droughts. Climate change is expected to result in rising sea levels, which could damage the Sacramento delta and major coastal cities throughout the Bay Area. It could also mean more out-of-control forest fires and more dangerous storms, affecting our country’s agriculture and infrastructure."100100Congressman Ami Bera has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 Congressman Bera co-wrote an op-ed with Congresswoman Kim Schrier (D-WA), stating, "Climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution, to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Facebook post, he wrote, "Climate change is a grave (and real) threat. We have an obligation to future generations to do whatever we can to address this crisis." Rep. Bera makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the '100% Clean Economy Act of 2019' (H.R.5221), legislation that "establishes requirements to... (achieve) a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Rep. Ami Bera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Bera voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH) 7593.75https://bera.house.gov/environment#climatechange https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://www.facebook.com/RepAmiBera/posts/2512714255408323 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?r=3&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bera.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-bera-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bergman, JackMichigan1RCongressman Jack Bergman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Bergman does not oppose climate action. When joining the Bipartisan Climate Caucus in 2017 Congressman Bergman was quoted by Climate Citizens Lobby stating, "Michigan’s First District is home to some of our nation’s most cherished natural resources and I’m proud to join my colleagues to examine ways to promote and protect these resources. Michiganders understand that our Great Lakes and natural resources are worth protecting—for our environment, for our economy, for our kids and grandkids, and for the future of the Great Lakes region.” 25Congressman Bergman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://citizensclimatelobby.org/rep-jack-bergman-congressman-climate-conscious-youth/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepJackBergman/status/1540347859626856450 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Beyer, DonVirginia8DCongressman Don Beyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's climate change and the environment page, he states, "Stopping the harmful consequences of global climate change is the existential crisis of our generation. We cannot continue pumping pollutants into our air at no economic cost. Fourteen of the fifteen hottest years on record have been in this century. Global temperature changes are causing prolonged droughts, extreme weather events, and rising sea levels."100100Congressman Beyer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congressman stated, "The president’s recent decision to pull out of the Paris agreement, the international climate agreement by which each nation voluntarily committs to addressing climate change in their own country, is an intentional choice to bury his head in the sand. We can’t ignore reality, and we don’t have the luxury of just sitting this one out." Rep. Beyer also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on infrastructure, the Congressman stated, “I’m proud to support this framework because I believe it is the roadmap we need to put people to work strengthening and modernizing our communities in a way that respects the environment and addresses the climate crisis. Congressman Beyer makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is the Democrat Coalition Climate Change Task Force Co-Chair. 100Congressman Beyer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman supports the Healthy Climate and Family Security Act, which would, "cap the emissions of greenhouse gases through a requirement to purchase carbon permits, to distribute the proceeds of such purchases to eligible individuals, and for other purposes. 7593.75https://beyer.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15199 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4651 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4722 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1210 https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Healthy%20Climate%20and%20Family%20Security%20Act.pdf https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5628Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bice, Stephanie Oklahoma5RCongresswoman Stephanie Bice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, the congresswoman states "...I believe that Congress should enact a national strategy that ensures abundant, affordable energy for consumers, and creates more American jobs, all while reducing emissions. According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, Bice stated, "Certainly, we should be mindful of the impact of oil and gas on our climate."250According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, "...[Congresswoman Bice] says climate change is a problem that should be addressed by encouraging the private sector to produce innovative clean energy technologies." "'We need to be looking at all forms of energy,' she added, noting Oklahoma’s leading status in generating power from wind and, to a lesser extent, solar." However, in a May 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Bice writes "I am proud to join @RepArrington and 50+ of my colleagues in an effort to stand up for our oil and gas industry. It's important that we keep our energy workers employed and stand up for the families, farmers, and small businesses who rely on affordable energy." Congresswoman Stephanie Bice does not oppose climate action.25Congresswoman Bice opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://bice.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/candidates-race-to-win-oil-industry-support-in-key-oklahoma-house-race https://twitter.com/repbice/status/1392977991337226243 https://bice.house.gov/media/press-releases/bice-applauds-reversal-roe-vs-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Biggs, AndyArizona5RCongressman Andy Biggs disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 candidate survey by the Arizona Republic, the Congressman stated, “I do not believe climate change is occurring... I do not think that humans have a significant impact on climate. The federal government should stop regulating and stomping on our economy and freedoms in the name of a discredited theory.” 00According to the Arizona Republic, when asked about climate change by a constituent Congressman Biggs stated, "There are credible scientists who say climate change exists; we aren’t sure why... There are credible scientists who say it doesn’t.” During a 2017 Congressional hearing on the social cost of carbon, the Congressman also stated, "The previous administration disregarded scientific integrity by overestimating climate change resulting from greenhouse gas emissions. In order to push an expensive regulatory agenda, the administration inflated the SCC to justify costly regulations in response to the allegedly terrible damage CO2 emissions will cause in the future." Congressman Biggs demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Briggs makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2017 article by The Guardian, when addressing a price on carbon pollution Congressman Biggs stated, "It is simply not right for Americans to be bearing the brunt of costs when the majority of benefits will be conferred away from home." Congressman Biggs voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/house-science-panel-adds-climate-denying-members/ https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2017/04/12/andy-biggs-town-hall-arizona/100124436/ https://biggs.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-biggs-opening-statement-hearing-examining-social-cost-carbon https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/mar/01/republican-hearing-calls-for-a-lower-carbon-pollution-price-it-should-be-much-higher https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=103896&c=AZ05AB https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bilirakis, Gus M.Florida12RCongressman Bilirakis agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, "Congressman Bilirakis believes that climate change is real and has been active in Congressional hearings focused on reducing carbon emissions, boosting renewable energy options, and modernizing the nation’s power generation. The Congressman wants clean air, clean water, and environmental protection..."500Congressman Bilirakis lacks leadership by advocating against the Paris Agreement. According to Politifact, the Congressman stated in an email that, "A study by the National Economics Research Association showed that the (Paris climate) deal could cost 2.7 million lost jobs in the U.S. by 2025 should our country adhere to the commitments made by the Obama Administration." Politifact deemed the study referred to as unreliable, stating, "The study is unreliable, using an extreme model that does not consider the possible benefits of carbon regulation and rules out investment, flexibility or technology that would lead to more jobs." According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, " Congressman Bilirakis firmly supports an “all of the above” energy strategy that includes increasing domestic production, providing incentives for the development of renewable resources, and promoting conservation. " Congressman Bilirakis demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bilirakis makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).012.5https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/jun/21/gus-bilirakis/gus-bilirakis-cites-flawed-study-defend-us-wit/ https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bilirakis.house.gov/media/press-releases/bilirakis-applauds-historic-scotus-decision-uphold-sanctity-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bishop Jr., Sanford D.Georgia2DCongressman Bishop understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2024 Tweet, Bishop said "Climate change is not a distant threat — it's happening now and it demands action. We need to implement policies that protect our planet and future generations."75100Congressman Bishop supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. According to a 2017 WMGT 41 article the Congressman was quoted on his disappointment over President Trump pulling out of the Paris Agreement, stating, “I think it’s very unfortunate. I’m very disappointed that the President does not see the need for people to work together across the globe to protect the earth on which we live.” On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "I have long supported the development and exploration of domestic energy sources which will revitalize our economy, create millions of new jobs, lower energy bills, and strengthen our national security. I am a strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline, increased exploration of energy sources on federal lands and offshore, renewable energy research, and promoting rural electric cooperatives and nuclear energy."50Congressman Bishop publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5068.75https://twitter.com/Bishop4Congress/status/1806365415683027050 https://www.41nbc.com/2017/06/01/congressman-bishop-disappointed-president-trumps-withdraw-paris-climate-agreement/ https://bishop.house.gov/legislative-work/fiscal-responsibility/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://bishop.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-bishop-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-toSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bonamici, SuzanneOregon1DCongresswoman Suzanne Bonamici understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' it states, "In Northwest Oregon, we are facing the challenges of our inaction on climate change, whether it be more acidic oceans, rising sea levels, raging wildfires, changing agricultural conditions, and extreme weather events. Climate change and pollution also disproportionately affect our most vulnerable, and we must do more to protect the public of health of our communities. It is past time for Congress and the country to take action and address the growing threat of climate change and protect our environment. The United States has the ability and the obligation to lead the world’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels, and transition to 100% clean energy. I will continue to work with my colleagues to implement adaptation and mitigation strategies as we fight to take meaningful action on climate change."100100Congresswoman Bonamici has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 Congressional hearing, the Congresswoman questioned Energy Secretary Rick Perry about the Department’s inaction on climate change and efforts to withhold federal funding for clean energy research and development, stating, "Climate change is an existential threat, and it requires the full attention of the federal government.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As a member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman helped release the committee's climate action plan, stating in a press release, "Our committee was charged with crafting a bold, science-based, comprehensive climate action plan to address the climate crisis and reach net-zero emissions no later than mid-century and net-negative thereafter." We included a focus on the needs of frontline communities, opportunities to accelerate our transition to a 100 percent clean energy economy, and ways to create good-paying jobs." Rep. Bonamici makes climate change a priority issue as well. She is also a cosponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Bonamici has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee. on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://bonamici.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-challenges-energy-secretary-perry-climate-change-clean-energy https://bonamici.house.gov/ClimateActionPlan https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-condemns-scotus-abortion-decision https://bonamici.house.gov/press-release/congresswoman-bonamici-statement-42nd-anniversary-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bost, MikeIllinois12RCongressman Mike Bost disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with St. Louis Public Radio, when the Congressman was asked if he believed in man made climate change, he stated, "I don’t. I don’t know that I do; no... Some scientists do; some scientists don’t."00On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it advocates for the continued development of fossil fuel resources stating, "In addition to new sources of oil and natural gas, the United States also possesses significant quantities of coal, enough to last us for over a hundred years. Southern Illinois contains significant coal deposits. In recent years, new technologies have been developed that make it possible to more efficiently produce energy from this coal with far fewer emissions of pollutants." Congressman Bost demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bost makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). Congressman Bost also co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/illinois-12th-district-contenders-highlight-differences#stream/0 https://bost.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bost.house.gov/2022/5/bost-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-opinion-on-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Boyle, BrendanPennsylvania2DCongressman Brendan Boyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "With record-shattering temperatures and billions of dollars going toward natural disaster relief, the consequences of climate change are clearer than ever. But this is not a problem the United States can solve alone. Our atmosphere is everyone’s atmosphere, and only through international cooperation and compliance with the Paris Climate Agreement can we begin to tackle this monumental threat." 100100Congressman Boyle has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman included an amendment in the Fiscal Year 2020 Energy and Water Appropriations Act, which would prohibit the Trump administration from rejecting any grant application for using the term “global warming” or the term “climate change” in the application. In a press release on the amendment, the Congressman stated, “At a time when climate change and global warming pose an unparalleled threat to our national security and the safety of the planet, we must fight back against the Trump Administration’s codification of climate change denial." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman discussed the reality of climate change at a 2019 town hall stating, "Climate change is not a hoax. It is a reality. This is a problem that is happening right now.” Rep. Boyle makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100Congressman Boyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-amendment-included-landmark-climate-change-legislation-passed https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-passes-boyle-amendment-counteract-trump-administration-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Brecheen, JoshOklahoma2RCongressman Brecheen disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 00 Congressman Brecheen demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has frequently criticized climate action and climate activists, such as in a Tweet where he said "Gas prices just reached a 4-month high, as President Biden continues to side with radical climate alarmists instead of hard-working families. We must END Biden’s war on American energy!" Brecheen has cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as the Stop Climate Hysteria in Diplomacy Act (H.R.6289) and the Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act (H.R.3256).0Congressman Brecheen opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.okenergytoday.com/2024/07/climate-deniers-in-congress-include-oklahomans/ https://www.congress.gov/member/josh-brecheen/B001317?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://joshbrecheen.com/issues/#tab-1948Opposes Roe
Brown, ShontelOhio11DShontel Brown understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2022 tweet, she asserted, "there is no doubt that climate change is real. Acting as if it isn’t, is dangerous and will only harm us. Taking care of our environment is essential for our future because it affects everything we do." Additionally, she's committed to pushing the country toward a future with "net-zero emissions by 2050 and a carbon-free power sector by 2035."100100Congresswoman Shontel Brown has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She makes climate change a top priority issue and has climate action on her 'Priorities' page on her website, where she wrote, "I support the principles laid out in the Green New Deal and I am committed to aggressive action on climate change." The congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. She's posted many tweets calling for climate action and provided amicus briefs defending the EPA's authority earlier this year.100Shontel Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://twitter.com/RepShontelBrown/status/1554482793547272196 https://shontelbrown.com/priorities/ https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-joins-190-congressional-democrats-in-amicus-brief-defending-epas-clean-air-act-authority https://shontelbrown.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-brown-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/APro ClimateN/APro Climate
Brownley, JuliaCalifornia26DCongresswoman Julia Brownley understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her official 'Environment' page, Congresswoman Brownley states, "We must take meaningful steps to fight climate change, which threatens Ventura County’s economic productivity, public health, and the environment. As a member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, I support strategic investments in clean, renewable, and sustainable energy to counterbalance the effects of climate change on our economy and in our communities." 100100Congresswoman Brownley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Although he has at times been vocal about protecting the environment, on her 'Energy,' page, it states, "I support an all-of-the-above approach to solving our energy needs. While our nation is overly dependent on fossil fuels, we need to look at new technologies that support the development and expansion of clean, renewable, alternative energy resources, like wind, biomass, and solar. Reducing our reliance on foreign oil will have multiple benefits for our national security, our environment, and will help to create and sustain good jobs in new high-tech sectors." An 'all of the above' strategy also encompasses expanding domestic production of fossil fuels/oil. This is not environmentally sustainable, nor is it productive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congresswoman Brownley supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. In a 2019 town hall, Brownley suggested that carbon fees were on the table but did not take a strong position one way or the other. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7575https://juliabrownley.house.gov/issues/environment/ https://juliabrownley.house.gov/brownley-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-on-west-virginia-v-environmental-protection-agency/ https://juliabrownley.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://www.vcstar.com/story/opinion/editorials/2019/11/18/carbon-tax-table/4207913002/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://juliabrownley.house.gov/brownley-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Buchanan, VernFlorida16RCongressman Vern Buchanan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250He advocated on behalf of the Paris Agreement. In a 2019 tweet, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Buchanan stated, "Moments ago I voted for legislation to keep the United States part of the international Paris Climate Accord. Global warming is a serious threat - especially to a state like #Florida with two coastlines vulnerable to rising waters. #Sayfie." Congressman Buchanan does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Buchanan opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://buchanan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/buchanan-urges-trump-reconsider-climate-accord https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/VernBuchanan/status/1540364317161308160?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Budzinski, NikkiIllinois13DCongresswoman Budzinski understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. "I’m committed to addressing long standing environmental health and safety problems in the Metro East while also pushing Congress to do more to combat global climate change. I also believe that our transition to a clean energy economy can be an opportunity to create good-paying, 21st century union jobs in places like Central and Southern Illinois."75100Congresswoman Budzinski's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In Congress, she has become a member of the Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition and pledges to dedicate money from the Inflation Reduction Act to combatting climate change and environmental issues in her district.75Congresswoman Budzinski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://nikkiforcongress.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Burchett, TimTennessee2RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 Tweet, the Congressman, referencing a snow storm, wrote, "Al Gore needs to scrape my dadgum windshield."00In a press release, Burchett discussed putting forward an amendment to a bill to withold funds from a Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, saying "This office doesn’t do anything except send John Kerry on private jets to fly around the world and push woke Green New Deal agendas." Congressman Burchett demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Burchett opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/timburchett/status/949267790049042432?lang=en https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://burchett.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-burchett-discusses-roe-v-wade-overturn-susan-b-anthony-pro-life-americaOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Burlison, EricMissouri7RCongressman Burlinson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and driven by human activity. In a Tweet, Burlison said "The Globalist Climate Change Left can eat crickets, but Missourians will stick with steak!"00Congressman Burlison demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a debate, Burlison said "The Green New Deal or the idea that we’re going to power the next century off of rainbows and unicorns isn’t going to work. We have got to stop hindering ourselves and and start exploring every resource that is in America that includes all of our gas. All of our oil reserves also allow for real exploration." Burlison has also supported anti-climate bills such as the No American Climate Corps Act, and H.R.6813, which would prevent the EPA from creating or enforcing regulations on emissions.0Congressman Burlison opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://twitter.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1729621833215868934 https://www.ozarksfirst.com/your-local-election-hq/august-2022-primary-election/missouri-7th-district-gop-debate-highlights/ https://www.congress.gov/member/eric-burlison/B001316?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1805253203895759074Opposes Roe
Calvert, KenCalifornia41RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but according to 'Vice,' he "[v]oted in support of the Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011 (H.R. 910), which relied on climate change denial to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions—additionally excluding carbon dioxide from the definition of "air pollutant"—as a means to prevent further global warming and harm to human health."250In a press release on the Green New Deal the Congressman stated, "Socialism disguised as radical environmentalism is still socialism. As Democrats admit, the Green New Deal seeks a ‘massive transformation’ of America... It would end air travel, force every homeowner to retrofit or tear down their home, and make small businesses plow any revenues into upgrading their stores. It even would kick us out of our cars, unless of course, you could afford an electric vehicle." Congressman Calvert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Calvert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87). In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "The only conceivable way to fund the Democrat’s Green New Deal government-state is through tax increases on all Americans, including the middle-class. Green New Deal supporters acknowledge it will likely require a carbon tax and that even if they took the revenues of every billionaire and business in the country, it would not be sufficient to fund the plan [...] If Speaker Pelosi brings the Green New Deal to the House floor, I will proudly vote against this socialist fever dream."06.25https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7yekv/climate-deniers-congress-california https://calvert.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-green-new-deal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-rulingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cammack, Kat Florida3RCongresswoman Kat Cammack does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On her campaign website, Congresswoman Kat Cammack states "I strongly support an 'all of the above' energy policy. Everything from the development of oil, liquid natural gas, clean coal, and other fossil fuels as well as alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, hydro-power, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass must be on the table." However, Congresswoman Cammack expressed in a 2021 tweet that "Re-entering the Paris Climate Accords undermines our economic growth and competitiveness with strict requirements, giving the upper hand to the #CCP who get off with just a warning." Congresswoman Kat Cammack demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Cammack opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.katforcongress.com/policy https://mobile.twitter.com/repkatcammack/status/1352073882405113859?lang=ar-x-fm https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/RepKatCammack/status/1352716243120377857Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Caraveo, YadiraColorado8DCongresswoman Caraveo understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Caraveo said "My thoughts are with everyone being evacuated in Superior right now, and for everyone affected by these fires. This weather is not normal — & a reminder that action to combat climate change cannot wait. Please stay safe."75100Congresswoman Caraveo's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a press release, Caraveo said "The Suncor shutdown demonstrated to Coloradans how climate change can have a direct impact on both their pocketbook and physical health. That is why we need to make sure our energy infrastructure, no matter the fuel, is resilient to extreme weather events caused by climate change."75Congresswoman Caraveo has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://caraveo.house.gov/issues https://twitter.com/YadiraCaraveo/status/1476662093726298113 https://caraveo.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-caraveo-stands-co-consumers-squeezed-high-gas-prices-after https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Carbajal, SaludCalifornia24DCongressman Salud Carbajal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Having raised my children on the Central Coast, I understand the importance that environmental preservation and energy efficiency has for our community. The Central Coast is already experiencing major climate change impacts like wildfires and drought. We can save lives, property, and money when we work to proactively mitigate these increasingly destructive events. I believe we cannot afford inaction on the most significant challenge of our time."100100Congressman Carbajal has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2018 the Congressman introduced the, Climate Change is Real Act (H.R.5552) which would have required EPA to reinstate the information about climate change that was removed from, or redacted on, the EPA's website during the period beginning on January 20, 2017." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act (H.R. 3541), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real and we cannot wait another minute to tackle the problem from every angle. My Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act will help communities across the nation, especially ones like our Central Coast, that are vulnerable to climate disasters and need more help on the front lines of this crisis." Rep Carbajal makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "On Tuesday, the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes two of Congressman Carbajal’s bills: H.R. 2470, the Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act and H.R. 2199, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act.The Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act, establishes a competitive funding program at the Environmental Protection Agency for the development of innovative water-related infrastructure projects built with the threats of climate change in mind.In addition, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act designates four new wilderness areas in the Carrizo Plain National Monument and expands nine existing wilderness areas in Los Padres National Forest. The wilderness designation is the highest form of protection the government can give to a public land and would prohibit any commercial development on the land, including oil and gas drilling."100Congressman Carbajal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Carbajal is also a co-sponsor of the 'MARKET CHOICE Act' (H.R.4520), legislation that intends to "(impose) a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses." He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://carbajal.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15122 https://carbajal.house.gov/district/climate-change-is-real-act.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5552?s=1&r=3 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=683 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1190Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carey, MikeOhio15RMike Carey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Mike Carey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as evidenced on his campaign website where he states, "We must invest in new fossil fuel technologies as well as renewables because we need more electricity to run a 21st century economy, not less." Additionally, it says on his website, "Mike is fighting for American energy independence by co-sponsoring bills such as the Powering America Through Domestic Energy Act and the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act."0Congressman Carey opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.careyforcongress.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Carson, AndréIndiana7DThe Congressman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with Fox 59, condemning President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I am deeply disappointed... It's disappointing because we have seen rising tides, globally... And next to China, America has the highest emission rates. So for us not to be an active player along with our global partners in addressing this issue is deeply disappointing." Climate change is not listed under the 'Issues' section of his website. Even on his 'Energy' page, there is no mention of the issue.75100Congressman Carson in a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "America has a moral obligation to lead on the global effort to stop #ClimateChange, which is harming our environment, our economy and public health in Indiana, across America and around the world -- particularly in low-income communities bearing the brunt of its negative effects. That's why it's imperative we pass H.R. 9, which helps create a clean energy economy that provides good-paying jobs, cleaner air for our children and a safer climate for future generations. I'll proudly vote for it when it comes to the House floor this week. #ClimateActionNow." Despite this, the Congressman supports an all of the above approach to energy, stating "Tackling our nation’s energy crisis will require a broad and comprehensive strategy that includes pursuing all forms of energy including wind, solar, nuclear, biofuels and coal."75Congressman Carson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congressman co-sponsored the 2017 version of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4209), which would impose an excise tax on the carbon dioxide content of coal, petroleum, and petroleum products, but did not co-sponsor the 2019 version of the bill. 10087.5http://fox59.com/2017/06/04/in-focus-carson-on-climate-change-comey-hearing-next-week/ https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanAndreCarson/posts/america-has-a-moral-obligation-to-lead-on-the-global-effort-to-stop-climatechang/2395588163793613/ https://carson.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22John+Larson%22%5D%7D https://carson.house.gov/issues/womens-issuesSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carter, BuddyGeorgia1RCongressman Buddy Carter understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2019 interview with Savannah Now on the Congressman's appointment to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congressman said that he recognized humans contributed to climate change stating, "Yes I do... I do recognize that industrial activity is contributing to climate change... Regardless if it is mostly [caused by humans] or not, it has to be addressed." The Congressman also responded in the affirmative when asked if he thought it was a climate crisis, stating, "I believed there is [a climate crisis]." 750In a 2019 press release announcing his appointment to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is real and the need to protect our environment is real. We must find solutions to address this problem. I wanted to join this special committee because as the representative of the entire coast of Georgia, I know firsthand the need to protect our environment and do all that we can to prepare for severe weather. Unfortunately, many proposals coming out of Congress right now are big government solutions that are job-killing, too expensive, not actually effective and even completely unfeasible. I'm a member of this committee because I want to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to create solutions to address climate change that are realistic, market-based and will actually have an impact on climate change. We should also be focusing on proposals that will create American jobs instead of killing them. I'm ready to get to work." In a 2019 CSPAN interview on climate change the Congressman stated, "I subscribe to an all of the above energy strategy... There is no question we will have to use fossil fuels until we can get to the point where we are totally reliable and we can rely on renewables, but we are not at that point... The fossil fuel sector has done a great job of cleaning it up. It is not nearly as bad as it used to be." Congressman Carter does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Carter opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 2531.25https://www.savannahnow.com/news/20190304/georgia-congressman-buddy-carter-all-in-on-addressing-climate-change https://buddycarter.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3844 https://www.c-span.org/video/?461834-4/washington-journal-rep-buddy-carter-r-ga-discusses-trump-administration-climate-amp-carbon https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://buddycarter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14891Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Carter, JohnTexas31RCongressman John Carter disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed titled, "The Return of the Warmers," he states, "They were thoroughly discredited just last year in the international "Climategate" scandal. The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and their pals from the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in Great Britain were caught red-handed, through their own email communications, to have intentionally falsified the scientific data on which they claim that human activity is a leading cause of global warming. Further, they were found to have hidden their own research results that showed world temperature not rising, but actually falling over the past several years. The truth they tried to conceal from the world is that global temperature fluctuations are a normal earth cycle. We may or may not even be in a warming cycle. Even if we are, scientific evidence does not conclude that activity by man plays any significant role. The reason for the lies is because the goal of these people is not to protect the environment, it is to implement a socialistic one-world government that has dictatorial control over every human activity, led by tyrannical liberal elites."00On Congressman Carter's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe in an 'all of the above' energy strategy...while maximizing our use of domestic fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) that will allow us to plan for our future needs while providing enough energy for today. While doing this we must also unlock new oil supplies. As US oil prices decrease, I will continue to fight against per-barrel or at-pump taxes that hit Texans in their wallets. These proposals negatively affect successful free markets and continue a trend that promotes the flawed notion that the federal government knows how to spend your money better than you." Congressman Carter demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Carter voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://carter.house.gov/opeds/the-return-of-the-warmers/ https://carter.house.gov/energy/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://carter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carter, TroyLouisiana2DTroy Carter understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. There is no mention of climate change anywhere on his campaign website. However, he "embraced Biden’s priorities on addressing climate change and pledged not to accept money from oil and gas interests."75100Congressman Carter does not oppose climate action. He has voted for many significant pieces of climate legislation, but does not display leadership by pushing for more climate action. Additionally, although he pledged to not take any money from oil and gas special interest groups, he "accepted $19,150 from oil and gas interests despite a campaign pledge to shun the industry's money, a national environmental nonprofit says."25Congressman Carter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://troycarter4congress.com/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_47d6257a-8e6c-11eb-8bfe-bbef118f6a3b.html https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_f6dea29e-a209-11eb-aacc-374672a77988.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9FoyhN56kwSupports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cartwright, MatthewPennsylvania8DCongressman Matt Cartwright understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Congressman's website's 'Energy and Environment' page states, "He believes in utilizing domestic resources in an environmentally responsible manner, finding newer, better uses for older forms of energy production, and investing in sustainable clean energy technologies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions." On his website, Congressman Cartwright also states, “Climate change is going to fundamentally alter our lives in the coming decades, and scientists agree that it is one of the biggest threats this country faces. It is a real risk, but also an opportunity to create jobs and plan for the future."100100In 2019, the Congressman introduced Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act (H.R. 1243), which would develop a plan to identify and support the nation’s most vulnerable communities, while enhancing long-term research into the effects of climate change on the health of everyday Americans. In 2017 the Congressman also helped introduce the Safeguarding America’s Future and Environment (SAFE) Act (H.R. 2478), which would establish an integrated national approach to ongoing and expected effects of extreme weather and climate change. Despite this the Congressman does not mention climate change on his, 'Energy and Environment,' page and calls for an, "all-of-the-above” approach to investing in American energy." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 75Congressman Cartwright publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10093.75https://cartwright.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://cartwright.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=391678 https://cartwright.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cartwright-and-sen-markey-introduce-bill-to-prepare-for-health-0 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1243 https://cartwright.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cartwright-whitehouse-introduce-bill-to-protect-natural-resources-from https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://cartwright.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=392133Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casar, GregTexas35DCongressman Casar understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. Casar's official campaign website, it states, "Our planet is burning, flooding, and freezing all at the same time. Fighting the climate crisis must be a top priority for every country in the world. We can create good paying-union jobs while we become the global leader in renewable energy." 100100Congressman Casar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's website, he states "I’m a proud co-sponsor of the Green New Deal and similar legislation to create good union jobs in clean energy and protect communities harmed by pollution and natural disasters. Our country can and must take care of everyone along the way — from children to seniors to fossil fuel workers." In August 2023, the Congressman participated in a thirst strike on the steps of Capitol during a heat wave in order to protest workers' rights violations and pressure for climate action.100Congressman Casar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Casar voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.casarforcongress.com/issues https://casar.house.gov/issues/climate https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/08/greg-casar-joe-biden-climate-emergency-progressives https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Case, EdHawaii1DCongressman Ed Case understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Protecting our environment is one of my top priorities. As Hawai`i and the rest of the planet face the impacts of climate change, I believe we must take the full range of action to protect our natural heritage and ensure it will survive and prosper for generations to come."100100According to Court House News, during a Congressional hearing on the Green New Deal, Congressman Case discussed the transition from coal to renewables stating, "If the majority of Congress enacts policies that are purposefully designed to move us toward renewable energy at the expense of coal, and there is a tremendous consequence to those businesses and communities, the question is, how do we best transition them.” Congressman Case's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Case has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://case.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14893 https://www.courthousenews.com/green-new-deal-drives-a-wedge-at-house-energy-hearing/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://case.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=909Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casten, SeanIllinois6DCongressman Sean Casten understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "A former CEO of a clean energy company, Representative Casten has worked throughout his career to reduce greenhouse gas emissions profitably. In Congress, he is continuing this mission. The cost of inaction is enormous, but Representative Casten recognizes that addressing climate change is an opportunity to invest in the energy infrastructure of tomorrow, making our businesses more productive and our economy more competitive globally. "100100Congressman Casten has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release co-sponsoring the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the greatest existential threat to our species. It is also an unequivocal economic opportunity." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 article in the Northwest Herald, the Congressman stated, "The reason I’m in this job is because I am deeply concerned about climate change and the fact that that was a priority in my prior professional career, doesn’t mean it stops being a priority once I got into this line of work.” Congressman Casten makes climate change a top priority issue. Rep. Casten, along with Congressman Mike Doyle, announced the 'Industrial Efficiency Incentive Act,' legislation that will not only "reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial sector and maximize the energy efficiency of industrial facilities in the United States, but it will also make these facilities more financially viable and lower their energy costs."100The Congressman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 tweet, on market mechanisms for reducing carbon emissions, the Congressman stated, "True, but important to note that an INCENTIVE [cap and trade] to reduce carbon is not the same as a PENALTY [carbon fee] to emit it. The incentive is much more important than the penalty and they are decidedly not equivalent, no matter how many academic economists may tell you otherwise." However, Rep. Casten voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://casten.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://casten.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-casten-discusses-his-work-combat-climate-change-state-issues https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/following-passage-hr-9-casten-delivers-floor-speech-demanding-continued-climate https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/representatives-casten-and-doyle-introduce-legislation-make-us-industry https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4230 https://twitter.com/SeanCasten/status/1090291212106559491 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/casten-responds-draft-scotus-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wade-headlines-445pm-ctSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castor, KathyFlorida14DCongresswoman Kathy Castor understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 article published by the Guardian, regarding climate change, Congresswoman Castor states, 'We just don’t have any more time to waste,” the Florida congresswoman said in an interview with the Guardian ahead of crucial UN climate talks in Scotland. “We have got to act now or else we’re condemning our children and future generations to a really horrendous time.'”100100Congresswoman Castor has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Speaking as a Floridian who boarded up and fled my home with my family as Hurricane Irma spun its destructive winds and storm surge towards my hometown a year and a half ago, I understand we must act with urgency on the climate crisis.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, she released the "Solving the Climate Crisis” plan, stating in a 2020 WMNF article, "We are releasing a transformative roadmap for solving the climate crisis. We have a plan for building the 100% clean energy economy. And we are going to do it in an equitable and inclusive way. Our task is urgent. The last five years are the hottest on record. And it’s getting hotter." Rep. Castor makes climate change a top priority issue. During 2019 Hispanic Heritage Month, the Congresswoman rallied with the Sierra Club, Green Latinos, and Mom's Clean Task Force, stating, "Combating climate change means enacting solutions that work for all of us. Those who are most impacted by our rapidly changing climate are our frontline communities who can’t afford flood insurance, families who can’t pay higher electric bills or those who don’t have places to turn when disaster strikes." 100Congresswoman Castor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7593.75https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/21/kathy-castor-interview-climate-crisis-democrats https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398936 https://www.wmnf.org/kathy-castor-announces-solving-the-climate-crisis-plan/ https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403085 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403900Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castro, JoaquinTexas20DCongressman Joaquin Castro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release celebrating Earth Day, the Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said, "As we mark this Earth Day, I am hopeful of a better future for our children. While the Trump Administration has abdicated our global leadership on climate issues and rolled back critical environmental protections, local leaders and everyday Americans are doing their part to fight climate change and protect our land and water. Hispanic families and communities of color – who are disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate change – are working to combat environmental injustice and ensure their children can live healthy lives away from pollution...The time to act is now." In a 2021 'Twitter' post, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the defining crisis of our time — and its disruptive impacts are displacing people worldwide.”100100Congressman Castro’s website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. In an Earth Day Press Release, Congressman Castro said "The time to act is now. We must invest in an Infrastructure of Opportunity for our children to succeed. That includes healthy and safe communities, clean air and water, and a sustainable environment for them to thrive in. Congress must work to ensure the best possible future for our children. I hope all Americans will do their part today and recommit to changing their everyday actions to ensure a clean Earth for future generations." This pro-climate rhetoric is supported by a strong history of taking pro-climate action according to the LCV.75Congressman Castro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chc-chairman-castro-statement-on-earth-day https://twitter.com/joaquincastrotx/status/1385294050534694916?lang=bg https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chc-chairman-castro-statement-on-earth-day https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/joaquin-castro https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-from-congressman-castro-on-the-supreme-courts-abortion-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organizationSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Chavez-DeRemer, LoriOregon5RCongresswoman Chavez-DeRemer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking to The Oregonian's editorial board, she said “The climate has been changing for thousands and thousands of years. We can’t predict when the climate’s going to change."00Congresswoman Chavez-DeRemer supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Speaking of joining the Conservative Climate Caucus, she said "It’s our duty to protect it. Addressing climate change should not be a partisan issue. I’m excited to work with my colleagues on climate-friendly policies that protect our environment without overregulating or restricting energy production."50Congresswoman Chavez-DeRemer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://chavez-deremer.house.gov/media/press-releases/chavez-deremer-joins-conservative-climate-caucus https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2022/10/lori-chavez-deremer-jamie-mcleod-skinner-looking-to-win-over-moderates-in-competitive-5th-congressional-district-race.html https://twitter.com/LChavezDeRemer/status/1521554747546689536Opposes Roe
Cherfilus-McCormick, SheilaFlorida20DCongresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, the Congresswoman said "Florida is ground zero for the climate crisis, just as we saw with historic flooding in April." 1000Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On August 1, 2022, Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick received Vice-President Kamala Harris in Miami along with other local Floridian representatives, and called for "prioritizing the well-being of people and communities most exposed to climate harm and least able to cope with it." She makes prominent public statements on the issue.In a 2020 Q&A with the South Florida Sun Sentinel, voiced her strong support for the Green New Deal, and described her home state of Florida as "America's ground zero for climate change" due to its unique risk to rising sea levels. The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In voting for government funding legislation (H.R. 2471), the congresswoman emphasized the importance of combating the "existential threat of climate change through a renewed focus on environmental enforcement, pioneering funding for environmental justice, and historic investments in clean energy and climate science". 100Congresswoman Cherfilus-McCormick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).5083.3333https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.miamitimesonline.com/news/local/veep-harris-visits-miami/article_88b960e4-130d-11ed-b7b0-5bd51bed8cc1.html https://cherfilus-mccormick.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sheila-cherfilus-mccormick-votes-pass-omnibus-appropriations https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-questionnaire-sheila-mccormick-20200622-f23fbeyofvcjhkdx4t2rceaauu-story.htmlSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Chu, Judy California28DCongresswoman Judy Chu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her energy and environment page, she states, "Our economy is inextricably intertwined with our long-term energy and conservation strategies. By investing in renewable energy and protecting our natural wonders, we can address climate change while modernizing our economy. I am committed to taking aggressive action to reverse the effects of climate change. That is why I am committed to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, promoting policies that keep our air and water clean, supporting a marketplace where green energy technologies and jobs can thrive, protecting our environment through conservation, and connecting communities to the outdoors."100100Congresswoman Chu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the 'Climate Action Now Act' (H.R. 9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on climate change. In a 2019 press release introducing the Climate Resiliency Service Corps Act of 2019 (H.R. 5176) to establish a new AmeriCorps program to promote community adaptation, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery from the effects of climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is a national threat, affecting every region of the country. And it is one that demands immediate action." Rep. Chu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a press release, "Today, Representatives Judy Chu (CA-27) and Jimmy Panetta (CA-20) introduced the National Climate Service Corps and Careers Network Act of 2021 to create a National Climate Service Corps within AmeriCorps. The corps would allow Americans to serve their communities through public service projects focused on community adaptation, mitigation, and resiliency."100Congresswoman Chu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman/woman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://chu.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-bill-would-establish-americorps-program-address-climate-change https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-judy-chu-introduces-legislation-create-national-climate-service https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-s-statement-her-arrest-following-protests-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cicilline, DavidRhode Island1DCongressman David Cicilline understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "David is fighting to address climate change, and the undeniable science that tells us carbon pollution is threatening the health of our environment and the public. David knows that to protect Rhode Island’s air, water, and other natural resources today and years into the future, we need to end our reliance on the fossil fuels that pollute and degrade our ecosystem."100100Congressman Cicilline has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release endorsing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "This is a 10-year plan that we can achieve if we come together to rise to this challenge and finally address the threat of climate change.” Rep. Cicilline also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "We can’t afford to ignore it – especially in Rhode Island. If climate change continues, it will devastate our fishing and tourism industries, which support nearly 90,000 Rhode Island jobs and more than $7 billion in economic activity for our state each year.” Congressman Cicilline makes climate change a top priority issue. According to The Brown Daily Herald, in 2018 the Congressman joined Senator Sheldon Whitehouse in visiting the Climate Development Lab at the Urban Environmental Lab, in an attempt to elevate the work the lab was conducting. 100Congressman Cicilline publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 press release reintroducing The American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act (H.R. 4926), Rep. Cicilline stated, "It is time for polluters to pay their fair share. We cannot simply continue to ignore the overwhelming science that climate change is happening and presents a serious threat to our national security, our economy and the health and well-being of millions of Americans. The federal government should not be in the business of subsidizing carbon pollution, and I applaud Senator Whitehouse and Senator Schatz for their leadership on this important legislation.” The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.cicilline.com/energy-and-environment https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/cicilline-statement-introduction-green-new-deal https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/cicilline-statement-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.browndailyherald.com/2018/12/04/whitehouse-cicilline-meet-climate-lab/ https://cicilline.house.gov/press-release/whitehouse-schatz-blumenauer-cicilline-introduce-updated-american-opportunity-carbon https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hI9_flveMgSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ciscomani, JuanArizona6RCongressman Ciscomani does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he said "Keeping Arizona and our world protected, especially our air and water, are important [...] We should be able to responsibly care for our environment and our beautiful state while simultaneously supporting the economic growth of our booming economy." However, Ciscomani fails to take a position on climate change.250Congressman Ciscomani demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has a poor record with the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a history of voting against climate action. Ciscomani has cosponsored bills such as the Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act, which would remove incentives for petroleum and natural gas systems to reduce emissions.0Congressman Ciscomani opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/07/09/arizona-6th-congressional-district-election-candidates/74130198007/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/juan-ciscomani https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1141/cosponsors?s=8&r=4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://juanciscomani.com/prioritiesOpposes Roe
Clark, KatherineMassachusetts 5DCongresswoman Katherine Clark understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change' page, it states, "There’s no question that the climate crisis is the existential threat of our time. The devastating realities of climate change have been felt across the globe, wreaking their harshest impacts on our most vulnerable communities. As the Representative of a coastal community, I have seen firsthand how a changing climate directly threatens Massachusetts. And as a mother of three, I recognize that we are running out of time to do right by future generations. This moment demands an unprecedented, all-hands-on-deck response."100100Congresswoman Clark has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a member of the Safe Climate Caucus. Rep. Clark also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Facebook post, the Congresswoman states, "#Climatechange is a challenge fit for America: seemingly impossible but solvable with ingenuity and determination. We can transform our country and economy with a Green New Deal. Let's get to work! #ChangeTheDebate." Congresswoman Clark along with Senator Ed Markey hosted a town hall on climate change and the Green New Deal. The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue.100The Congresswoman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://katherineclark.house.gov/environment https://safeclimatecaucus-lowenthal.house.gov/members https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2582504311764920 https://framinghamsource.com/index.php/2019/08/09/congresswoman-clark-sen-markey-hosting-town-hall-on-climate-change-and-green-new-deal-in-framingham/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CToday%20stands%20among%20the%20darkest,will%20not%20stand%20for%20it. Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clarke, Yvette D.New York9DCongresswoman Yvette Clarke understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. As Vice Chair of the Energy and Commerce committee, she has introduced various bills to help "tackle the progression of the climate crisis," as stated on her website. During a press conference announcing her efforts to reintroduce climate legislation at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Rep. Clarke said, "climate change is a crisis, [O]ur duty in Congress is to take bold action to tackle climate-warming emissions and protect the American public from future climate impacts." 100100Congresswoman Clarke has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is the sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021, legislation that "requires the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy." Rep. Clarke also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis action plan, which highlighted several of the Congresswoman's bills, she stated, "I am proud to see my colleagues in the House come together to take meaningful action on the critical issue of climate change and environmental protection. My bills that have been highlighted in the Climate Crisis Action have the potential to be invaluable tools in ensuring our environment is preserved for future generations.” Congresswoman Clarke makes climate change a top priority issue. She is the sponsor of the FEMA Climate Change Preparedness Act of 2019, a bill that would require "the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to revise its 2018-2022 Strategic Plan to ensure that the plan explicitly mentions climate change and addresses the implications of climate change."100Congresswoman Clarke publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://clarke.house.gov/clarke-introduces-legislation-to-combat-the-impacts-of-climate-change/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394?s=1&r=4 https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4823?s=1&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cleaver, EmanuelMissouri5DCongressman Emanual Cleaver understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Cleaver's energy page it states, "As early as 1859, British scientist John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide (CO2) can trap heat. Since Charles Keeling began measuring atmospheric CO2 in the late 1950s, scientists have accumulated a wealth of evidence documenting the increase of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, the rise of global average temperature and the influence of human activities on the Earth’s climate."100100Congressman Cleaver has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 article from the Martin City Telegraph, detailing an "an online meeting of the South Kansas City Alliance on Sept. 13," it stated, "The energy-themed meeting began with a pre-recorded talk by U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II, who announced he would be working in the next 90 days with the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority to launch an ambitious program to provide free rides on electric buses in three 21st century corridors. The corridors (which are yet to be determined) would provide charging stations for electric vehicles. “It will be no emissions and no admissions,” he quipped. 'This will be a major part of what I’m doing in the next session of Congress as a response to climate change.'" The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet regarding the climate impact on black communities, he stated, "It’s no secret that #ClimateChange affects communities of color the hardest. That’s why @TheBlackCaucus is working hard to ensure these communities are protected from the consequences that will come with a warming climate." Rep. Cleaver makes climate change a top priority issue. As chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy, the Congressman held a hearing on how Climate Change is already impacting America’s economy and national security, as well as the extraordinary costs that are expected to arise as the planet’s climate continues to warm.100Congressman Cleaver publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://cleaver.house.gov/issues/energy https://martincitytelegraph.com/2021/09/27/rep-cleaver-addresses-climate-change-at-the-local-level/ https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1181264877190631424 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleaver-holds-subcommittee-hearing-to-shed-light-on-economic-costs https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleavers-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cline, BenVirginia6RCongressman Ben Cline disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 News Leader article, "Cline also referenced the world stage when discussing climate change, a topic that constituents brought up several times. He agreed that humans contribute to climate change but disputed with the crowd how much was due to manmade reasons."00In a 2019 Weekly Newsletter posted on Congressman Cline's website, he wrote about energy independence, stating, "In my remarks against this legislation on the House Floor, I spoke about my visit earlier this spring to the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, where I was able to see firsthand the great strides that have been made in energy exploration, technology, and innovation. The amazing developments in ensuring that energy resources can be explored and extracted safely, with minimal impact to our environment, demonstrated to me that similar efforts can be achieved back home in the waters off the coast of Virginia. These new developments would ensure that our environmentally sensitive areas can be protected for future generations while we lower energy costs for residents and businesses across the Commonwealth." Congressman Cline demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Cline makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 Roll Call article, "Riggleman and Cline both said they support free-market innovations to combat climate change and incentives to spur those innovations, but opposes taxes on carbon." Congressman Cline was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.newsleader.com/story/news/2020/01/07/rep-ben-cline-discusses-questions-and-concerns-during-staunton-town-hall/2833759001/ https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=193654&c=VA06BC https://www.rollcall.com/2019/10/09/virginia-gop-representatives-town-hall-heavy-on-policy-light-on-impeachment/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repbencline/status/1540374854582652929Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cloud, MichaelTexas27RCongressman Michael Cloud does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Cloud demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In an interview with Right Voices, Cloud said "It’s crazy because a lot of the supposed stated initiatives of the Left, especially with Green New Deal-type policies, are having a reversed effect than the goals that they’re meant to have." He later questioned the value of national climate legislation, saying "If there is a climate emergency, it’s not a national one–it’s not like the environment stops at our borders— it’s a global one so we’ve got to look at a larger perspective on these sorts of things. The answer is really taking our responsibly-made goods and products and having them take up more of the world’s market."0Congressman Cloud opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cloud.house.gov/posts/congressman-cloud-statement-on-scotus-repeal-of-roe-v-wade https://c3newsmag.com/congressman-michael-cloud-explains-role-of-american-innovation-in-driving-environmental-progress/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Clyburn, James E.South Carolina6DCongressman James Clyburn understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 Tweet, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is real and its evidence is all around us. The Paris Agreement was an important first step toward holding countries accountable and we cannot allow this president to remove us from it. #ClimateActionNow #HR9." 100100According to the League of Conservation Voters, Congressman Clyburn has a strong record of voting in favor of climate action. Congressman Clyburn supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Clyburn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7581.25https://twitter.com/WhipClyburn/status/1124007260013965314 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/james-e-clyburn https://www.majoritywhip.gov/media-center/press-releases/majority-whip-clyburn-statement-supreme-court-overturning-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clyde, AndrewGeorgia9RCongressman Andrew Clyde disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from the 'Associated Press' detailing a debate, the congressman stated "I will hold court with those scientists who don’t believe in man-made climate change. You know, we have four seasons of the year, the climate changes every year, four times.”00When asked about climate action in Congress in a questionnaire from the Atlanta Journal-Consitutution in 2020, Congressman Andrew Clyde stated that "It is not the federal government’s responsibility to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, or any aspect of our environment for that matter. The (Environmental Protection Agency) is an unconstitutional agency and should be dissolved. Climate change is fake news." Congressman Clyde demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Clyde makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He cosponsored and voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://apnews.com/article/business-georgia-climate-change-elections-athens-bfe5820602da1f78a17f4d5d18d9d02f https://www.ajc.com/issues-house-9-republican-runoff/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPK8v1v9FOEOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cohen, SteveTennessee9DCongressman Steve Cohen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'environment,' page, it states, "In February 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading international network of scientists, for the first time concluded that global warming is "unequivocal" and that human activity is the main driver of it, causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950... Recently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a report that expounds upon the IPCC findings and claims that climate change is undeniable and is the reason why the past decade is the warmest in the history of record-keeping."100100Congressman Cohen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an op-ed written in December of 2019, the Congressman wrote, "I am alarmed by the increasing threat that climate change and other industrially created damage pose to the environment and recognize that bold actions must be taken to reverse the causes, as well as address the consequences." Rep. Cohen also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "President Trump’s ill-advised attempt to withdraw from the Accord is irresponsible and this bill makes it clear that a majority in this Congress intends to prioritize the needs of the future by addressing climate change." Congressman Cohen makes climate change a top priority issue. During the 16th Annual Environmental Justice Conference, the Congressman expressed his support for the Green New Deal, stating, "The Green New Deal is something that should be passed into law to ensure the safety of the future generations that inhabit the earth, but there are members of the Republican Party that fail to see that."100Congressman Cohen publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Cohen co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://cohen.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/22/opinion/letters/climate-plastics.html https://cohen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-cohen-votes-climate-action-now http://www.dailyhelmsman.com/news/congressman-cohen-sponsors-new-green-deal-at-environmental-justice-conference/article_433f761e-eaea-11e9-931d-a3cae32e478d.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://cohen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-cohen-condemns-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cole, TomOklahoma4RCongressman Tom Cole agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, the Congressman states, "While I believe climate change is real and needs to be addressed, it should be done in such a way that is collaborative with Congress and results in internationally equitable terms."500Congressman Cole supported President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Paris, on the other hand, was negotiated by President Obama in a way that was clearly in the best interest of China, India, and Europe. His agreement forced the United States to make sharper reductions in our greenhouse emissions than our European allies, it committed the United States to picking up far more than our fair share of the expenses associated with compliance, and it allowed China and India to actually increase their emissions until 2030." In addition, Rep. Cole opposed funding for the study of climate change by the Central Intelligence Agency, stating in a press release that, "I believe that common sense solutions that promote clean air and water are very important. But I do not believe that our nation's intelligence dollars should be redirected from gathering information that has kept our country safe from another attack to studying climate change." Congressman Cole demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Cole makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a 2009 article, Rep. Cole stated his opposition to a carbon price: "In these uncertain times, policies like cap and trade are exactly the wrong way to proceed. Raising taxes and energy costs and putting Americans out of work are not the answer to our economic challenges."012.5https://cole.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cole-statement-on-US-reentering-paris-climate-agreement https://cole.house.gov/media-center/weekly-columns/after-paris-climate-accord-america-will-continue-lead https://cole.house.gov/press-release/cole-opposes-cuts-critical-intelligence-funding https://cole.house.gov/cap-and-trade-costly-experiment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://okcfox.com/news/local/roe-wade-supreme-court-overturned-dobbs-mississippi-oklahoma-reaction-abortion-reproductive-rights-pro-life-choice-samuel-alito-mullin-mccall-tom-cole-great-treat?fbclid=IwAR374VdYU-ix2bkL0ttDcg38b0nnHEm417SSzjZRKztPjdznWziNo6v0vWQOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Collins, MikeGeorgia10RCongressman Collins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Collins said "The only “climate change” that caused this invasion was in the Oval Office."00In a 2023 press release, Collins expressed his opposition to EPA regulations on truck emissions, referring to it as "unnecessary, burdensome, and exactly the wrong policy." Congressman Collins demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In 2024 Collins introduced the anti-climate bill H.J.Res.151, disapproving of another EPA pro-climate action.0Congressman Collins opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://twitter.com/RepMikeCollins/status/1742657176844542124 https://twitter.com/RepMikeCollins/status/1672627705446117378 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-joint-resolution/151?s=10&r=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepCollinsPress/status/1661110323779084307Opposes Roe
Comer, James Kentucky1RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2015 WFPL article, Congressman Comer stated on climate change, “I do not believe in global warming. I’m the one person whose business and livelihood depends on Mother Nature, so I understand weather patterns... We’ve had a very severe winter this year with 12-inch snows, so there is no global warming.”00In a 2017 article by WKMS, the Congressman was quoted supporting the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating, “I support President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris Accord. It’s something that was holding America back. The deal was not a good one for the United States, and with this move, President Trump continues to look out for working Kentuckians in coal country.” In a 2020 interview found on Facebook, when asked if climate change is the greatest threat to mankind, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely not. I don't know any serious credible scientific organization that makes such claims. It is not even our most severe environmental problem... I don't think there is any evidence that climate change is our most serious environmental problem." Congressman Comer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Comer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://wfpl.org/a-look-at-kentucky-gubernatorial-candidate-comers-climate-change-remarks-and-agriculture/ http://wkms.org/post/congressman-comer-speaks-paris-climate-accord-decision https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanComer/videos/571690400194562/?v=571690400194562 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/james-comerOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Connolly, Gerald E. Virginia11DCongressman Gerry Connolly understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to Congressman Connolly's campaign website, "Climate change is one of the most pressing issues our society faces, endangering not just every individual here in Virginia and across our nation, but the future of humanity and our entire planet. As a founder and co-Chairman of the House Green Dogs, the largest environmental caucus in Congress, Congressman Connolly has consistently advocated for a 21st century, clean energy future. He helped successfully pass the largest government investments in clean energy, and was a proud supporter of the Paris Climate Agreement and Clean Power Plan. Congressman Connolly has continuously opposed Republican efforts to weaken the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act. For his efforts, Gerry has consistently been endorsed by the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters, two of the largest pro-environment advocacy organizations in the country."100100Congressman Gerry Connolly makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the Congressman's website, Connolly states, “With a new Administration, we can finally turn the page on President Trump’s climate denialism, and restore our standing in the global community as a leader in reducing climate change. President-elect Biden has pledged to rejoin and strengthen the Paris Climate agreement on the first day of his presidency. As co-chair of the House Green Dogs, I am committed to ensuring Congress is a partner with the Biden administration in providing visionary leadership and historic investment in addressing climate change and its public health impacts.” Congressman Gerry Connolly has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action.100Congressman Connolly has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://gerryconnolly.com/issues/environment/ https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4161 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4560Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Correa, LouCalifornia46DCongressman Correa understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. While his website has an "Environment" section, it does not mention climate change. In a 2019 Tweet, Correa said "Climate change is real. As the greatest economy in the world, we need to lead by example and show that strong climate rules do not mean weak economies." 75100Congressman Correa has demonstrated leadership on climate change by voting in favor of legislation that promotes climate action and making some public statements, such as in a Tweet where he lauded the climate investments of the Build Back Better Bill. Despite this, the Congressman does not mention climate change on his Congressional or campaign sites. Congressman Correa supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congressman Correa publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10081.25https://correa.house.gov/about/issues https://twitter.com/RepLouCorrea/status/1191475359922958336 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepLouCorrea/status/1465722062534852610 https://correa.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-correa-statement-on-supreme-courts-draft-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Costa, JimCalifornia21DCongressman Jim Costa understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 Weekly Newsletter, the Congressman stated, "The wildfires raging in Australia remind us all too well of the threat we face in California as we deal with drought and horrific fires among the many growing impacts of climate change. We can do more to improve air quality, transportation and water, all affected by climate change."100100According to a press release on his website in 2021, "Congressman Jim Costa (AC-16) and the Problem Solvers Caucus endorsed the Growing Climate Solutions Act, which aims to remove barriers for farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners to participate in the voluntary carbon credit marketplace. As producers look to reduce their environmental footprint, they often look to the carbon credit marketplace to offset their emissions." Congressman Costa website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Costa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://costa.house.gov/news/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletter-01062020 https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-problem-solvers-caucus-endorse-growing-climate-solutions-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Courtney, JoeConnecticut 2DCongressman Joe Courtney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The United States is the second largest carbon emitter in the world, and the Paris Climate Accord proved that our nation, and the global community as a whole, has recognized that a zero-emissions, clean energy economy is the only path forward for a sustainable, sound future. In Connecticut, we’ve taken this to heart: over half of all electric power generation jobs are in the solar sector—more than natural gas or any other fuel. These jobs are not only going to dominate our economy in the future – they are already a major part of our economy today. Turning our back on the Paris Climate Accord leaves our nation without a seat at the table as the world determines climate and clean energy policies, raises troubling questions about whether our nation stands by its commitments, and undermines states like Connecticut that have longstanding commitments to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.”100100In a 2017 tweet, Congressman Joe Courtney referred to a video melting arctic ice since 1979, writing, "Check out how much Arctic ice has melted since 1979. Climate change is NOT an #AlternativeFact. #DefendScience." The Congressman is also a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. Congressman Joe Courtney's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congressman Courtney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-backing-out-paris-climate-accord-puts-country-wrong-side https://twitter.com/RepJoeCourtney/status/824648100337774593 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Connecticut%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Craig, AngieMinnesota 2DCongresswoman Craig understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, the opening statement says, "There’s no denying it – climate change is happening and we have to address it now. In Minnesota, we’ve already seen milder winters, heat waves, droughts, and floods. Climate change is a threat to our environment and the health and safety of all Americans."100100Congresswoman Craig has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced the Resilience Revolving Loan Fund Act of 2019 (H.R. 3779), which according to the Congresswoman would make loans available for projects that minimize the risk of wildfire, earthquake, flood, storm surge. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release on the bill she stated, "As the impact of climate change gets closer and closer to home, we need to make sure our communities have the resources they need to be resilient in the face of increasing natural disasters.” She makes climate change a top priority issue. Regarding the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' she said, ""This bill is going to really motivate young voters across the nation,' said Democratic U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, who's in a tough re-election battle in the swing Second Congressional District. 'We've delivered on the single biggest bill to address climate change in the history of our country.'" It is the first issue mentioned on her 'Environment' page on her website.100In a 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Craig wrote, "As extreme weather events continue to intensify in the U.S. & abroad, we must take action to address climate change. That’s why I support legislation backed by @citizensclimate to put a price on carbon & return 100% of the revenue to American families." The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman was not in Congress for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.angiecraig.com/issues/ https://craig.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-angie-craig-rodney-davis-introduce-bipartisan-disaster-prevention-bill https://twitter.com/RepAngieCraig/status/1421628570137464834 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://craig.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-angie-craig-helps-pass-house-bills-protect-and-strengthen https://www.startribune.com/divide-over-historic-climate-bill-animates-closely-watched-minnesota-congressional-campaigns/600199911/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Crane, EliArizona2RRepresentative Crane disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Crane said "It does feel like things are getting warmer. It does feel like things are getting drier, but that could be because I'm getting older [...] Climate change could play a role in that but think the earth goes through cycles."00In 2023, Representative Crane signed onto a letter encouraging the EPA to reconsider air quality standards for Arizona. Rep. Crane has cosponsored bills such as the No American Climate Corps Act (H.R.6215) and Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act (H.R.3256). Representative Crane demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Crane opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/062524_smith_cd2_debate/jack-smith-makes-case-gop-primary-challenge-us-rep-eli-crane/ https://lesko.house.gov/2023/7/lesko-leads-delegation-letter-to-epa-about-change-to-air-quality-standards https://www.congress.gov/member/elijah-crane/C001132?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://eliforarizona.com/eli-crane-statement-on-roe-v-wade/Opposes Roe
Crawford, RickArkansas1RCongressman Rick Crawford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2024 press release, the Congressman stated “Earth Day is a nice concept, but in practice it typically turns into an annual bashing of humans as spoiling the planet, with bigger government, higher taxes, and less freedom for Americans being the alleged solutions." According to a 2013 article in Talk Business & Politics the Congressman stated, "There's not sound science to support some of the initiatives that the President, I think, is committed to [...] supported by scientific data, but more supported by political agendas."00Congressman Crawford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2017 interview with KUAF Morning Edition the Congressman when asked about the Paris Agreement stated, "President Obama did not have the authority to commit the United States to the Paris Accord... If this is a non-binding agreement what's the point of being apart of it...Other nations want us to do everything to fix the environment and don't want to participate at the same level that we do." In January 2021, the Congressman states in a tweet that "I’ve always supported an “all-the-above” energy approach because we have to ensure availability of energy and it’s affordability. This first action of cancelling #KeystoneXL will start to reduce available sources of energy, and with it, affordable energy..." Crawford furthermore has a poor voting history with climate action legislation, receiving a lifetime score of 4% from the LCV.0Congressman Crawford opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://crawford.house.gov/posts/rep-crawfords-earth-day-statement https://talkbusiness.net/2013/01/cong-crawford-wants-permanent-spending-controls/ https://crawford.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=350654 http://kuaf.com/post/crawford-talks-comey-hearings-cuba-climate-change#stream/0 http://congress.freedomworks.org/legislators/rick-a-crawford https://twitter.com/reprickcrawford/status/1355180400235130884 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/rick-crawford https://crawford.house.gov/posts/rep-crawford-responds-to-scotus-overturning-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crenshaw, DanTexas2RCongressman Crenshaw disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to 'CAP,' the congressman stated, in regards to climate change, that, “There is an interesting political tactic often employed by the Left, and it follows a predictable pattern. First, identify a problem most of us can agree on. Second, elevate the problem to a crisis. Third, propose an extreme solution to said crisis that inevitably results in a massive transfer of power to government authorities. Fourth, watch as conservatives take the bait and vociferously reject the extreme solutions proposed. Fifth and finally, accuse those same conservatives of being too heartless or too stupid to solve the original problem on which we all thought we agreed. This is the pattern we have seen play out with respect to climate change.”00In a 2019 video posted to You Tube, Congressman Crenshaw went on the offensive against the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating, "Today we voted on the climate action now act which prevents the president from withdrawing from the Paris agreement...The targets it sets are unrealistic and unworkable as the agreement calls for the u.s. to cut emissions by 28 percent from our 2005 levels. Well what would a 28 percent decrease in emissions by 2025 actually look like. The short answer, it would drastically alter the energy sources we depend on every single day, it would cut jobs, closed factories, dramatically increase utility costs, decrease economic production, and ruin our ability to create new green energy solutions like carbon capture technology." Congressman Crenshaw demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Crenshaw makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. When discussing a carbon tax and dividend in a 2018 Q&A on his campaign website, Rep. Crenshaw stated, "I am always going to be reluctant to put undue economic burdens on our people." The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://www.americanprogress.org/article/look-rhetorical-evolutions-congress-former-climate-deniers/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9jQ4ZF1SQ4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/6308464613112#sp=show-clipsOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crockett, JasmineTexas30DCongresswoman Crockett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, the Congresswoman said "Climate change is real, and we need to invest for the future we know is coming. We can’t afford any more losing bets." Her website states "We face an existential crisis, but we can also be a part of the solution."100100Congresswoman Crockett has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman's website states "Congresswoman Crockett is determined to lead the charge in electrification, and adoption of renewable fuels. A just transition is possible, and money and energy can and will be saved in the process. We know that communities of color are hardest hit by the adverse effects of climate change, and Crockett is working to ensure that green initiatives are put in place for the betterment of TX-30." The Congresswoman has also cosponsored pro-climate legislation such as the Climate Resilience Workforce Act and H.Con.Res.37, expressing the sense of a climate emergency.100Congresswoman Crockett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://twitter.com/RepJasmine/status/1657398825466617856 ]https://crockett.house.gov/issues/energy-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/member/jasmine-crockett/C001130?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Crow, JasonColorado6DCongressman Jason Crow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is a severe threat to the planet, people, and our nation. Congress must act to reduce carbon pollution and other emissions to protect against further impacts of climate change, but it must also work to help communities adapt to an already changing climate. It is essential that Congress act to address climate change because, as we have seen, presidential action alone may be undone quickly under a future administration." 100100Congressman Crow has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 the Congressman hosted a forum on the impact of climate change on public health, stating in a press release, "Community conversations like this are vital to finding solutions to the threats that climate change poses. It’s time for Congress to lead on climate change and pass legislation that will protect our communities and children.” Congressman Crow also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing a provision to the National Defense Authorization Act, which would require large military installations to include assessments of climate change and mitigation efforts in their master plans, the Congressman stated, "Our military has seen firsthand the impact of climate change on national security and the first step of countering any threat is to create a baseline understanding of what we’re up against. My provision will ensure we understand the threat so we can improve our military's resiliency to global warming and the dangerous impacts of extreme weather.” Rep. Crow makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is affecting extreme weather events, public health, and our national security. It’s time for America to be a global leader and work to address climate change and reduce our carbon footprint. We need #ClimateActionNow."100Congressman Crow publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://jasoncrowforcongress.com/environment-and-energy-policy-for-americas-future/ https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-crow-hosts-forum-impact-climate-change-public-health https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-jason-crow-secures-provision-ndaa-address-national-security-threats-posed https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.facebook.com/RepJasonCrow/photos/a.2006826719432464/2704174986364297/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-crow-votes-codify-access-reproductive-healthcare-0Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cuellar, HenryTexas28DCongressman Henry Cuellar agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a press release supporting the Natural Gas (LEADING) Act of 2019 (H.R. 3828), the Congressman stated, "We need an economically sensible solution to reducing greenhouse emissions and fighting climate change in the United States. Carbon capture has been shown to be the best way to properly mitigate the effects of climate change, create more reliable, affordable energy, and increase economic growth." Vote Climate U.S. PAC supports several forms of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), not including carbon capture and sequestration, because we believe that method perpetuates the fossil fuel economy. It is not clear what form of CDR the Congressman is referring to here. 50100Congressman Cuellar's website's 'Energy and Environment' page does not mention climate change. Instead it says, "The 28th Congressional District of Texas, is both the 6th largest oil producing and 4th largest natural gas producing district in the state. It includes a large portion of the Eagle Ford Shale reserves; one of the most productive natural gas fields in the country. In order to support this production, last year, Congressmen Cuellar helped secure $13 million in federal funding towards the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Improvement Project (CIP). CIP is a USACE project to expand the Port’s ship channels, allowing vessels to navigate the channel safely, meeting surging global demand for U.S. produced oil and natural gas. The Port of Corpus Christi is the largest export port of U.S. produced crude oil and is a major export hub for U.S. energy products." Congressman Cuellar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements supporting the fossil fuel industry. 0Congressman Cuellar voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2543.75https://cuellar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404563 https://cuellar.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3998 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.npr.org/2022/07/10/1110723295/texas-rep-henry-cuellar-is-one-democrat-who-opposes-abortion-rightsOpposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
D'Esposito, AnthonyNew York4RCongressman D’Esposito does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Congressman D’Esposito does not directly address the climate or climate change on the Issues page of his website.250Congressman D’Esposito does not oppose climate action. Congressman D’Esposito’s campaign website states his belief that “we need an all of the above strategy.” An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congressman D’Esposito opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman D’Esposito voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://despositoforcongress.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://theisland360.com/community-news/gillen-desposito-spar-over-his-abortion-ban-stance-after-ivf-ruling/Opposes Roe
Davids, ShariceKansas3DCongresswoman Sharice Davids understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I agree with the overwhelming majority of scientists who recognize that climate change is real, and that we must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. According to the Weather Channel, the Kansas City-area is the fifth most vulnerable U.S. city to the dangers of climate change. We need innovative solutions to combat this crisis, grow our economy, and leave behind a healthier world for our children."100100Congressman Davids co-sponsored the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating, "Protecting our environment and natural resources is necessary for both our planet and our economy." in a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "We aren't coastal or desert, but climate change & extreme weather is our reality in #KS03. It does not have to be the reality for future generations. Joining my colleagues to urge investment in clean energy, so we can leave a planet AND an economy that works for our grandkids." Congresswoman Sharice David's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Davids has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://davids.house.gov/issues/energy https://davids.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-davids-statement-passage-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/RepDavids/status/1442923638211055616 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://davids.house.gov/media/in-the-news/here-s-what-kansas-city-area-elected-officials-say-about-potential-overturn-roe-vSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Davidson, WarrenOhio8RCongressman Warren Davidson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 town hall reported on by the Journal-News, the Congressman was quoted on climate change, stating, "And while I’m not indifferent to climate change, I’m not saying it’s a total falsity and I’m not saying it’s a certainty."00In a 2019 tweet mocking the severity of climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Manmade climate change is real. Humans are destroying America’s political climate. Mob rule is no way to defend the republic. #DefendFreedom." Congressman Davidson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Davidson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.journal-news.com/news/davidson-isis-more-threat-than-climate-change/gSD89FAxoXGtDUu20ThJAK/ https://twitter.com/WarrenDavidson/status/1176666085963313153 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://davidson.house.gov/pro-life-and-family-issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Davis, Danny K.Illinois7DCongressman Danny Davis understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's proposed rules that would exacerbate climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change resulting from the burning carbon-based fuels for energy poses an urgent and critical threat to public health and welfare. Emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel powered electric utility generators account for nearly 40 percent of the United States’ carbon pollution." In a press release in support of the Build Back Better Act, Congressman Davis said, "The Build Back Better Act represents a transformative investment in children, families, workers, businesses, and the planet that will improve health and well-being, advance economic and environmental justice, meaningfully address climate change, and grow our economy while asking the wealthiest and most secure to pay their fair share...Further, it ensures the largest effort to combat climate change in American history."100100Congressman Davis has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2020 the Congressman joined a brief in support of youth for protection from human-caused climate change. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release opposing the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The science is clear and definitive. Ignoring or defying the science is a crime on the scale of starting a nuclear war. 195 nations came together after more that ten years of negotiations to change course and avoid a human made global disaster." Rep. Davis makes climate change a priority issue as well. In a 2020 Chicago Tribune interview, the Congressman stated "Climate change is real, the science is unequivocal despite the protestations of some who ignore the overwhelming scientific consensus and the on-the-ground reality we are experiencing world wide."100Congressman Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://davis.house.gov/statements/davis-statement-on-trump-administration-proposed-rules-which-would-harm-the-environment-and-public-health/ https://davis.house.gov/statements/davis-joins-brief-in-support-of-youth-for-protection-from-human-caused-climate-change/ https://davis.house.gov/statements/statement-on-president-trumps-intent-to-withdraw-the-united-states-from-the-paris-climate-agreement/ https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/editorials/ct-who-is-danny-davis-7th-congressional-district-candidate-20200328-gvipgdobb5h2teafqq2tblbpcy-story.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://news.wttw.com/2022/05/03/congress-members-weigh-possible-roe-v-wade-reversalSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Davis, DonNorth Carolina1DCongressman Davis understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Davis says "Air and water pollution and the impacts of the climate crisis often disproportionately impact our poorest families, working-class communities, and communities of color, who are more likely to live in areas where air and water pollution exceed national standards. Don will fight for eastern North Carolina's right to live in safe and healthy communities."7575Congressman Davis supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5062.5https://votedondavis.com/priorities/Supports Roe
De La Cruz, MonicaTexas15RCongresswoman De La Cruz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman De La Cruz demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has promised to "Reject radical socialist Green New Deal policies" and in a Tweet said "Socialist Radicals like AOC and Vin-Cent Gonzalez want to move to ONLY renewable energy! This WILL eliminate THOUSANDS of OIL FIELD JOBS in our district!! Say NO to unemployment and radical thinking!!"0Congresswoman De La Cruz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2516.6667https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/188292/monica-de-la-cruzOpposes Roe
Dean, MadeleinePennsylvania4DCongresswoman Madeleine Dean understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website's environment page, it states, "[She] supports legislation to boost America’s investments in renewable energy, fund green infrastructure, and reengage in global agreements to combat climate change." In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congresswoman stated, "Action on climate change is long overdue. The longer we wait, the more irreversible damage is done to our planet."75100The Congresswoman supports the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating in a press release, “When everyone from the Pope to the Pentagon warns us that we are in peril, it is time to act. The climate crisis is the existential threat of our time, and it is essential that we deliver thoughtful and innovative action to protect public health, advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology, and defend our national security.” Congresswoman Dean's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Dean publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10087.5https://dean.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repdean/status/1301322556272717824?lang=en https://dean.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-madeleine-dean-votes-pass-climate-action-now-act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://dean.house.gov/2022/6/congresswoman-dean-s-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeGette, DianaColorado1DCongresswoman Diana DeGette understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Combatting the Climate Crisis,' page, it states, "Rep. DeGette believes the ongoing climate crisis is the single greatest threat facing our planet. In Congress, DeGette is leading the charge to cut our nation’s carbon emissions, curb methane waste and pollution, and create the nation’s first-ever federal clean energy standard."100100Congresswoman DeGette has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release outlining a plan to get America to net-zero emissions by 2050, the Congresswoman stated, "If we are going to avoid the worst effects of our climate crisis, the U.S. has to take drastic steps now to cut our carbon emissions. By creating a national clean-energy standard that all U.S. power companies will have to adhere to, we will be able to spur the innovation and deployment of the new technologies we’ll need to solve this crisis.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release introducing the Clean Energy Innovation and Deployment Act (H.R. 7516), the Congresswoman stated, "To truly solve this climate crisis, we need to start driving the innovation and deployment of new clean-energy technologies today,” DeGette said. “This legislation will not only do that, but it will also help bring down the cost of these technologies so other countries can quickly follow suit.” Rep. DeGette makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 press release on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis highlighting the Congresswoman's proposed legislation as necessary to combatting climate change, she stated, "If we are going to be serious about solving this crisis, we must take steps now to lower our emissions, increase our use of renewable energies and protect more of our public lands." 100Congresswoman DeGette publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://degette.house.gov/issues/climate-crisis https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/degette-us-should-be-leader-in-combatting-climate-crisis https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/degette-introduces-legislation-to-cut-carbon-emissions-from-us https://degette.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/new-house-committee-report-cites-several-degette-bills-as-important-to https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/ec-announces-hearing-on-impact-of-overturning-roe-v-wade-on-july-19 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeLauro, Rosa L.Connecticut3DCongresswoman DeLauro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "The facts are clear, and there should be no debate: climate change is real. It is an urgent problem. And our country must address it. The Paris Agreement set out an ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the United States should not withdraw from it. Left unchecked, climate change will continue to have disastrous effects on our environment, our public health, our food safety, our economy, and our national security. We cannot allow climate-deniers to set the legislative agenda any longer. The time to act is now.” In a 2024 Tweet, DeLauro said "I will continue to fight to protect our nation's environment, fight climate change, & always put people over polluters. #EarthDay."100100In a Tweet, DeLauro criticized a bill cutting funding to the EPA saying "When it comes to caring for the environment – ensuring our air is safe to breathe, our water is safe to drink, and we are resilient in a changing climate – House Republican's Environment and Interior bill takes the side of the most egregious polluters and climate-deniers." Congresswoman DeLauro's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman DeLauro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).5081.25https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-block-trump-withdrawing-us-paris-climate-agreement https://x.com/rosadelauro/status/1782471283663380737 https://delauro.house.gov/issues/energy https://x.com/rosadelauro/status/1720473259219554409 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-defend-reproductive-freedomSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DelBene, SuzanWashington1DCongresswomen Suzan DelBene understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, our children, and the future of our planet and we need to address it now. Congress must do more to combat this growing and urgent existential threat. We need to continue making new investments in a green America." Congresswoman DelBene continues on, stating, "Protecting our natural resources is not only good for our environment but good for our economy as well. Here in the Northwest, sea levels are rising, our oceans are becoming more acidic and we are seeing an increase in insect outbreaks and tree diseases. This endangers our local economy – potentially costing us thousands of jobs – and threatens a way of life that is uniquely Northwest. In order to protect our environment, we must address the challenge that climate change poses without delay. Without a doubt, climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, and our children – not to mention the future of our planet – and we need to address it now. Congress can and must do more to combat this growing and urgent threat."100100Congresswoman DelBene expresses her belief in the importance of climate action, stating on her campaign website, "I believe that climate change is one of the most serious threats we face, and that we need to take the necessary steps to build a new economy based on clean and renewable energy sources and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil." In a 2017 press release the Congresswoman supported staying in the Paris Agreement, stating, "If President Trump withdraws from the Paris Climate Accord, it would endanger our children’s health, their futures and the planet. This reckless decision would also harm the reputation of our country, jeopardizing our role as a global leader on combating climate change." The Congresswoman also sent a tweet in 2019 on climate change, stating, "Climate change is real and without action its consequences will greatly alter our way of life." Congresswoman DelBene's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman DelBene has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://delbene.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14888 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1205 https://www.delbeneforcongress.com/issues/environment/ https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1107 https://twitter.com/RepDelBene/status/1173705968443674624 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3160Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Deluzio, ChrisPennsylvania17DCongressman Deluzio understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman states "...to meet our climate goals to reduce carbon emissions, we need to invest in the clean energy sources of the future, protecting and creating union jobs in places like western Pennsylvania...And to get to the future where the world is free of greenhouse gas emissions – which we must do for the sake of humanity...fight for tougher environmental standards around natural gas (like methane emissions controls)... but we need natural gas in our electrical grid to provide reliable baseload power while we build out capacity for non-fossil fuel sources..."75100Congressman Deluzio's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a press release, Deluzio announced federal funds for climate resiliency, saying "Every Pennsylvanian should have clean air and water, period. That's why I am proud this federal grant will fund the infrastructure projects and environmental clean-ups we need to better protect the health of Western Pennsylvanians." The Congressman has a 97% lifetime score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of voting for pro-climate legislation.75 Congressman Deluzio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://chrisforpa.com/core-values/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/chris-deluzio https://deluzio.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-deluzio-announces-new-federal-funds-improve-public-health-climateSupports Roe
DeSaulnier, MarkCalifornia10DCongressman Mark DeSaulnier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his 'Energy and the Environment' page, he writes, "Congressman DeSaulnier recognizes climate change for the existential threat that it is and, beginning with his time as a member of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), he has been a proud champion of policies that promote sustainability, protect the environment, and mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. He is a firm believer that the challenges of climate change also present enormous opportunity and strong, forward-looking energy and environmental policy will be a key driver of growth, innovation, and competitiveness. While fueling economic growth, rigorous environmental protections will protect the health of all Californians."100100Congressman DeSaulnier has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 press release, the Congressman introduced the 'Jobs for a Carbon Free Transportation System Act' (H.R. 5896), "landmark legislation to help transition our economy off fossil fuels to cleaner, renewable energy while simultaneously supporting workers, communities, and state and local governments." Congressman DeSaulnier also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2019 Lamorinda Weekly article, the Congressman hosted a climate change town hall, where he stated, "The costs of not responding to climate change must be approached from an economic standpoint. We must not weaken our goals to slow down climate change, but aspire to save the planet for future generations." Rep. DeSaulnier makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. The Green New Deal is a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congressman DeSaulnier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 version of the DeSaulnier's Digest, regarding the anti-carbon tax resolution in the U.S. House, the Congressman stated, “A carbon tax has the potential to be an important tool for fighting climate change, and the Republican resolution is counterproductive." The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://desaulnier.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-introduces-landmark-legislation-support-workers https://www.lamorindaweekly.com/archive/issue1314/DeSaulnier-discusses-climate-change-and-environment-at-Town-Hall.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/desaulnier-digest/update-mark-s-trip-us-mexico-border https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-host-virtual-town-hall-fight-protectSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DesJarlais, ScottTennessee4RCongressman Scott DesJarlais does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman DesJarlais demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congressman's website's 'Energy and Infrastructure section, DesJarlais states, "In Congress, I have voted to permit new pipeline construction, authorize international gas exports, and protect dependable energy, such as coal and nuclear, so important to Tennessee. Supplying our allies with American-made energy helps cement alliances." In a press release with other House Republicans, DesJarlais said "Domestic energy, manufacturing jobs, economic growth and optimism are finally returning because of tax cuts and lighter regulation. We cannot allow an extreme, far-left agenda to destroy the progress this country is making.”0Congressman DesJarlais opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://desjarlais.house.gov/issues/energy-infrastructure https://desjarlais.house.gov/2019/5/rep-scott-desjarlais-fights-socialist-agenda-in-congress https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Diaz-Balart, MarioFlorida26RCongressman Mario Diaz-Balart disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 E&E article, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It's more of a religion... on both sides of the issue. I don't play that game. My issue is, 'All right, what is the problem that you're trying to solve?' and 'Does it solve it?'"00Congressman Diaz-Balart was an advocate of the Keystone XL pipeline, stating, "The House has once again acted on a bipartisan basis to pass legislation to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will create thousands of jobs, move the United States closer to energy independence and strengthen our national security. This project will contribute billions of dollars to communities across the nation and bolster our economy." In a 2023 press conference, Diaz-Balart said that "there simply is no justification for spending billions more on a failing, inflated, and economically harmful climate change agenda led by clueless bureaucrats at the United Nations.” Congressman Diaz-Balart demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Diaz-Balart opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060054524 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-votes-to-approve-keystone-pipeline https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-statement-scotus-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Dingell, DebbieMichigan6DCongresswoman Dingell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her 'Environment & Climate Change' page, the Congresswoman said "For decades, the science and our understanding of climate change has been growing, but it is clear, it is an urgent, existential threat we all face. Sea levels are rising, temperatures are warming, and extreme weather is intensifying and becoming more frequent. The time to act on climate change is now and strong US leadership on the world’s stage is needed."100100Congresswoman Dingell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The time is now – not tomorrow, not next year – to address climate change. The Paris Agreement takes real steps to slow down our changing climate and ensures the United States stays a leader in addressing one of our most critical global threats,” Rep. Dingell also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 speech on the House floor, the Congresswoman stated, "Weather events are getting more severe. Hurricanes and wildfires cause more damage each year, and extreme cold and heat waves more common. Climate change is changing the world around us causing mass displacement and global health crises caused by continuing sea-level rise and increasing annual temperatures." Rep. Dingell makes climate change a top priority issue. In December 2019, the Congresswoman introduced The National Climate Bank Act of 2019, which would publicly finance and stimulate private investment in clean, renewable energy and emissions reduction projects. 100Congresswoman Dingell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://debbiedingell.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=16223 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1708 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1985 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2024 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/05/14/congresswomen-dingell-stabenow-speak-abortion-rally-university-michigan/9751811002/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Doggett, LloydTexas37DCongressman Lloyd Doggett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's protecting our planet page, he states, "We cannot continue ignoring the critical challenges facing Texas, our country, and our planet caused by climate change, that's why I am a sponsor of the Green New Deal and H.R.9, the Climate Change Now Act. Encouraging the expansion of renewable energy is vital for protecting our world, strengthening our national security, and boosting our economy." 100100Congressman Doggett has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, '“Let's embrace the simple truth that preserving the earth is worth it. America should lead on creating new green jobs, but Trump clogs the corridors of power with fossil fuel industry cheerleaders. Now is the time for alternative energy, not alternative facts.” Rep. Doggett also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in Newsweek, the Congressman wrote about climate change messaging, stating, "While American families absolutely have the capacity to be magnanimous and mindful about humanitarian crises around the world (many of which are increasingly caused by climate change) and climate chaos that will impact future generations, compelling and alarming reports can only do so much to equip them to take on this challenge. Climate messaging should not just alarm the reader; it should also equip them to combat climate change personally, and to demand change from major polluters and lawmakers. Congressman Doggett makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019 the Congressman introduced the Green Transportation Act (H.R. 3822), which would aim to reduce pollution and mitigate climate change.100Congressman Doggett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://doggett.house.gov/issues/protecting-the-planet https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/newsweek-way-were-talking-about-climate-change-all-wrong-heres-how-we-win https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/unbearable-cost-inaction-rep-doggett-urges-passage-climate-action-now https://doggett.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/paving-way-green-local-leadership-doggett-introduces-green https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3822/all-info https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://doggett.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-cruel-decision-demanding-accountability-every-elected-officialSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Donalds, ByronFlorida19RCongressman Byron Donalds disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. An article covering a 2020 debate states "Donalds said he believes the science on climate change is 'not settled,' particularly as it relates to humanity's role in causing it." 00In a 2020 interview with Cheddar News, Congressman Donalds says "... let's re-embrace nuclear power. It is cheap. Uh, when it comes to fossil fuels, it is clean." He later states that nuclear power is "renewable power that everybody can rely on..." On his campaign website, Congressman Donalds states "I support environmental research and studies that not only preserves our waters, but also leads to sensible solutions, that do not burden taxpayers." Congressman Byron Donalds does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Donalds makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 06.25https://www.news-press.com/story/news/2020/09/29/byron-donalds-and-cindy-banyai-debate-covid-19-climate-change-education-and-taxes/3559961001/ https://cheddar.com/media/rep-elect-byron-donalds-r-fl-on-his-plans-for-congress https://www.byrondonalds.com/water_quality https://donalds.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=703 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Duarte, JohnCalifornia13RCongressman Duarte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Duarte does not oppose climate action.Talking to the Sacramento Bee, he said "I support environmental policy that puts working families first — not big political donors." However, on his website Duarte voices support for an all of the above strategy. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congressman Duarte opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284821206.html#storylink=cpy https://duarte.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14893 https://www.axios.com/2024/04/08/trump-abortion-house-republicans-swing-districts https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Dunn, NealFlorida2RCongressman Neal Dunn disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2016 Panama City News Herald article Congressman Neal was quoted stating, "I am sure human activity plays some role, but I don’t think the science is clear on how much is man-made and how much is natural. What I do know is that the United States should not follow the path of the global warming alarmists like the Obama administration who wants us to unilaterally handicap... industry with over-burdensome EPA regulations. That will only further empower China, who is actually the largest polluter in the world.”014In a 2017 press release supporting the American withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The Paris agreement breaks faith with the Americans we were elected to represent. The pact demanded that America meet stricter emissions standards than it did for China, Russia or India. It also compelled American taxpayers to fork over billions of dollars to other countries in a wealth redistribution scheme. With rising energy prices, American workers would be forced to compete against foreign countries with one hand tied behind their backs, and it would cost our economy $2.5 trillion and 400,000 jobs by 2035. President Trump is right to walk away from a bad deal and put America first.” Congressman Dunn demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Dunn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 259.75http://www.newsherald.com/news/20160416/local-political-figures-cautious-about-sea-level-rise https://dunn.house.gov/issues https://dunn.house.gov/2017/6/dr-dunn-s-statement-paris-climate-accord https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.nealdunn.com/issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
Edwards, ChuckNorth Carolina11RCongressman Edwards disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. “My grandmother always said, ‘You can’t change the weather.’”00Congressman Edwards demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. The Congressman has sponsored and cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as H.R.5210 - MOTOR Act. Edwards also has a 6% lifetime score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of opposing climate action.0Congressman Edwards opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.citizen-times.com/story/opinion/2024/01/07/opinion-chuck-edwards-denies-climate-change-ignores-science/72084554007/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5210?s=4&r=2https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/ChuckEdwards4NC/status/1540395476385730560Opposes Roe
Ellzey, JakeTexas6RCongressman Jake Ellzey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Jake Ellzey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Ellzey has continuously voted against bills that promote climate action.0Congressman Ellzey opposes or vote against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jake-ellzey https://www.ellzeyfortexas.com/issues https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/147592/jake-ellzey/2/abortion https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Emmer, TomMinnesota6RCongressman Emmer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "Another [voter] asked Emmer whether the GOP would acknowledge climate change and do something about it. 'Why don't we agree we should leave this place in as good a condition as we found it,'" Emmer said, and mentioned proposals to clean plastic from waterways and plant a trillion trees."250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Emmer stated, "While other nations like China and India are increasing emissions, the United States has shouldered the burden of increased energy costs and the loss of American jobs by their participation in this agreement. America, and especially my home state of Minnesota has been leading the way to reduce emissions... I applaud President Trump and his Administration for officially withdrawing, and for responsibly advancing America's interests." According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "When asked about supporting renewable energy, Emmer said 'all energy sources are important,'" and we should use any that make economic sense." Congressman Emmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Emmer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Emmer co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.sctimes.com/story/news/2020/02/21/military-trump-and-climate-change-put-rep-tom-emmer-foley-town-hall/4799098002/ https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2022/10/05/voter-guide-see-6th-district-candidates-stances-on-guns-abortion-more Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Escobar, VeronicaTexas16DCongresswoman Veronica Escobar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a January 2020 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change is an urgent global crisis that demands a strong and swift response. As Congress continues to push for ambitious climate action, we must also ensure we harness foreign policy to combat this threat and protect our planet for future generations."100100Congresswoman Escobar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's website, she states, "I was proud to sponsor the Department of Defense Climate Resiliency and Readiness Act to ensure that one of the largest producers of greenhouse gasses prioritizes necessary developments in renewable technologies, builds on the success of NetZero pilots, and makes judicious use of taxpayer dollars. I also introduced the Targeting Environmental and Climate Recklessness Act (TECRA), to modernize the use of sanctions - a key foreign policy tool - to meet one of our most pressing global challenges: climate change." Congresswoman Escobar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is the consequence of climate change—and our shameful unwillingness to make the sacrifices and changes necessary to slow it down. Too late to stop it, but never too late to act to try to slow it down some. Oh, what tragedy our children have inherited." Rep. Escobar makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 press release, "Congresswoman Escobar successfully added two amendments to the NDAA that will make our military more adept at mitigating climate change." 100Congresswoman Escobar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Escobar co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://twitter.com/RepEscobar/status/1217942440264585216 https://escobar.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2759 https://twitter.com/vgescobar/status/939644562368118784 https://escobar.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-veronica-escobar-applauds-passage-ndaa-securing-wins-el-paso https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://escobar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=952Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Espaillat, AdrianoNew York13DCongressman Adriano Espaillat understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. At the United Nations Climate Change conference, he stated, "We can no longer ignore the climate crisis and I commend President Biden's leadership during this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference following the backtracking by the previous administration to remove the United States from the Paris Agreement...I look forward to working with climate justice champions to ensure international commitments to combat the impact of global warming, and I remain committed to ensuring the effects of the climate crisis on poor, developing populations and people of color across the world remain at the forefront of our policy discussions with international leaders in attendance during this year’s conference"100100Congressman Espaillat has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.R.3764 (Ocean-Based Climate Solutions Act of 2021), legislation that would establish "a variety of requirements to reduce carbon emissions and protect oceans, coastal habitats, marine mammals, and fish populations from climate change and other threats." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Green Climate Fund Authorization Act of 2019, the Congressman stated, "It remains critical that we continue our efforts to promote a bold and swift transition to a clean energy economy and work beyond our borders to mitigate and adapt to climate change as we bring forth solutions to combat it." Rep. Espaillat makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In July of 2020, the Congressman "secured no less than $500 million for international climate financing through the Green Climate Fund," money which will be used for "the creation of programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate the impacts of climate change on some of the most vulnerable global communities, and adapt to a changing climate."100Congressman Espaillat has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-attends-united-nations-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3764?r=5&s=1 https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-introduces-green-climate-fund-authorization https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-adriano-espaillat-reestablishes-us-global-climate-leadership-house https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://espaillat.house.gov/media/press-releases/representative-adriano-espaillat-votes-defend-reproductive-health-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Estes, RonKansas4RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release on the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Both the Paris Agreement and Green New Deal would cost our country trillions of dollars and impact millions of American jobs... The Green New Deal is projected to cost $93 trillion." Congressman Estes demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Estes opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1867 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3534Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Evans, DwightPennsylvania3DCongressman Dwight Evans understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Scientific research proves climate change is real and its consequences are serious and evident. Sea level rise, droughts and rising temperatures across the nation show the serious impact of climate change. Climate change is directly related to our national security, economic prosperity and food supply. It is time to take our energy policy down a new path that reduces carbon pollution and promotes a sustainable, greener tomorrow for future generations."100100Congressman Dwight Evans has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman opposed President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, "I will continue to act on climate because our future generations depend on it and we have a lot to lose if not. In fact, 59% of Americans believe in climate change and know protecting our earth is crucial. Nevertheless, President Trump’s action to withdraw the US from the Paris Climate Agreement, does not mean that my colleagues and I will advocate less for what is in the best interest of the Philadelphians, Pennsylvanians and the American people." On his website's 'Environment' page, Congressman Evans states, "Scientific research proves climate change is real and its consequences are serious and evident. Sea level rise, droughts and rising temperatures across the nation show the serious impact of climate change. Climate change is directly related to our national security, economic prosperity and food supply. It is time to take our energy policy down a new path that reduces carbon pollution and promotes a sustainable, greener tomorrow for future generations." The Congressman also supported the Better Future Act (OFF Act) (H.R. 3671) in 2018, which would eliminate tax giveaways to the fossil fuel industry. Congressman Evans makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congressman Evans publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://evans.house.gov/issues/environment https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/i-do-not-support-us-withdrawal-paris-climate-agreement https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-evans-announces-support-fossil-fuels-better-future-act https://evans.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://evans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/evans-senate-must-pass-women-s-health-protection-actSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ezell, MikeMississippi4RCongressman Ezell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Ezell demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Ezell advocates for increased domestic fuel production and supports cutting oil industry regulations. 0Congressman Ezell opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.mikeezell.ms/issues/protect-our-unborn-children https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/277/mike-ezell/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Fallon, PatTexas4RCongressman Pat Fallon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In an April 2021 tweet posted in 2021, Congressman Fallon wrote "@AOC claims fossil fuel infrastructure and "climate-denying politicians" in Texas caused the 2021 power crisis. But according to @DallasFed, electricity generation started to fail when AOC's beloved wind turbines froze. Stop lying about Texas @AOC." In another April 2021 tweet, the congressman wrote "Democrats across the country say their definition of "infrastructure" includes: -Universal Pre-K -Climate Action -Climate Justice -Eradicating Right to Work Environments -Caregiving -Affordable Housing -Police Accountability -Paid Leave THIS AIN’T INFRASTRUCTURE!" Congressman Pat Fallon demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fallon opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepPatFallon/status/1385345746954825732 https://twitter.com/reppatfallon/status/1385029338496741381 https://fallon.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-fallon-issues-statement-supreme-court-decision https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Feenstra, Randy Iowa4RCongressman Randy Feenstra does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a 2021 'Iowa Torch' article, Congressman Feenstra stated that "As a member of [the Energy, Climate, and Conservation] task force, I will continue fighting for Iowa biofuel producers.." The congressman "also coordinated members of the Iowa delegation in sending a letter to the president, urging him to uphold his previous promise to “promote and advance” ethanol and biofuels." Congressman Randy Feenstra demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Feenstra opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.feenstraforcongress.com https://iowatorch.com/2021/07/01/feenstra-to-serve-on-energy-climate-and-conservation-task-force/ https://feenstra.house.gov/media/press-releases/feenstra-issues-statement-roe-v-wade-0 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Finstad, BradMinnesota1RCongressman Brad Finstad does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change in an interview with a local newspaper, he addressed agricultural problems without mentioning climate change a single time.2533Congressman Finstad does not oppose climate action. Congressman Finstad supports an all of the above climate strategy plan. In an opinion piece, he wrote, "We need an “all of the above” strategy for energy solutions. I’m proud to say as a family farmer from New Ulm the agricultural community has been on the forefront of this effort through ethanol and biofuels production."25Congressman Finstad opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2527https://www.dglobe.com/news/local/district-1-congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-everything-from-roe-v-wade-to-immigration-and-climate-change https://www.postbulletin.com/opinion/letters/brad-finstad-we-need-to-address-the-energy-crisis https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Fischbach, Michelle Minnesota7RCongresswoman Michelle Fischbach does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a February 2021 press release, "Fischbach, a member of the House Agriculture Committee, plans to voice support for ethanol and soy diesel during discussions about climate change, she said. “Those are sources we’re already using; we have to make sure that we don’t neglect those in favor of solar and wind,” Fischbach said." In an April 2021 press release, "Fischbach said she hopes to hear more from farmers and work on issues directly important to them, as opposed to broader issues like climate change." Later in the press release, Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach stated 'If we are going to do these things with climate change and make these changes, I don’t want to see us doing things like the California emissions standards,'” Fischbach said. Other measures like biofuels need to be supported as part of the solution, she said." Congresswoman Fischbach demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Fischbach opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=059891B1-66CD-4C7B-88A2-4BD412AF71F8 https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=AD38A3C7-D61C-4614-9B4D-1AAFD6717141 https://fischbach.house.gov/2022/6/rep-fischbach-reacts-to-supreme-court-decision-on-dobbs-v-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzgerald, Scott Wisconsin5RCongressman Scott Fitzgerald does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the 'Milwaukee Journal Sentinel' in 2019, "Asked if climate change was a significant global threat, Fitzgerald said the issue 'deserves a lot more scrutiny.' 'I know that certainly the scientific community has said there are indicators, definitely something going on. But at this point, I don't know if we can draw any hard conclusions on the issue,' he said."250In 2021, Congressman Fitzgerald voted in favor of the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act, "a bill to authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline. Congressman Scott Fitzgerald demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fitzgerald opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/17/longtime-state-senate-leader-scott-fitzgerald-announces-bid-congress/2346564001/ https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1299297 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepFitzgerald/status/1131739311941009408 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzpatrick, BrianPennsylvania1RCongressman Brian Fitzpatrick understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to the Congressman's website, he states, "Climate change and the irresponsible management of our resources put a strain on the health of our communities—and our children...That is why I have been fighting hard for these priorities during my time in Congress." It continues, "Congress can and must do more to combat climate change and rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. We don’t need to choose between clean energy and economic growth, or between combating climate change and creating jobs. We can and should do both." 7543Congressman Fitzpatrick has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed written in 2020 on bipartisan action on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is already costing our economy through increased flooding, more severe storms, and devastating droughts. Delaware and Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional district are about 40 miles apart, but they both border the Delaware River and are home to communities, including Levittown and Wilmington, that are at significant risk of damaging floods in the near future." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 speech on the House floor on climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is critical in order to preserve public health the reality is climate change is real and humans are a contributing factor Congress must take serious and reasonable steps to combat it." Rep. Fitzpatrick makes climate change a top priority issue as well. The Congressman condemned the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Every nation will be affected by climate change, which is why nearly every country agreed to work to reduce carbon emissions in the Paris Climate Accords. The people in my district remain committed to pursuing bipartisan solutions to address climate change and protect our environment which is why I voted yes on HR 9."100Congressman Fitzpatrick publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congressman introduced the Modernizing America with Rebuilding to Kickstart the Economy of the Twenty-first Century with a Historic Infrastructure-Centered Expansion (MARKET) Act (H.R. 4520), which imposes a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses.10079.5https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/2021/5/reps-fitzpatrick-carbajal-re-introduce-market-choice-act https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/op-ed-it-s-time-bipartisan-support-combating-climate-change-and-rebuilding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaBKEfRURRU https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/fitzpatrick-statement-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/news/local/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-abortion-pennsylvania-bucks-county-congressman-brian-fitzpatrick-ashley-ehasz/65363272007/Opposes RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fleischmann, ChuckTennessee3RCongressman Chuck Fleischmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Fleischmann's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States possesses immense oil and natural gas reserves that are completely unused. Increasing our energy independence can and should be done in a responsible manner that will not unnecessarily drive up energy costs or jeopardize economic growth." Congressman Fleischmann demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fleischmann opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://fleischmann.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://fleischmann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-fleischmann-statement-on-us-supreme-court-s-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organizationOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Flood, MikeNebraska1RRepresentative Mike Flood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Mike Flood demonstrates a lack of leadership with the lack of public statements, advocacy and vetoing of pro climate bills. On his website, he touts his achievements in paving "the way for state approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, helping secure America's energy future and defeating the left-wing, environmentalist radicals who fought to stop it in the Legislature."0Congressman Flood opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://mikefloodfornebraska.com/about/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti Climate
Fong, VinceCalifornia20RRepresentative Fong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Fong demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Fong, along with Rep. David Valadao, signed a letter to Governor Newsom asking he rethink his plan to phase out oil extraction in California by 2045. He also has a history of voting against climate action, with an 8% 2023 score by the California Environment Voters.0Representative Fong has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5025https://www.bakersfield.com/news/valadao-fong-sign-letter-calling-on-newsom-to-back-off-oil-industry/article_5c8b027e-4a25-11ef-90ce-13cd01f27488.html https://envirovoters.org/scorecard/representative/vince-fong/ https://www.kget.com/news/local-news/local-lawmakers-and-leaders-respond-to-roe-v-wade-decision/Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Foster, BillIllinois11DCongressman Foster understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We know that climate change is real and largely man-made. While some politicians claim it’s a hoax, most experts believe we will begin to see very significant economic, political, and social consequences from climate change if we do not act now. I support sound economic policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect our environment for the next generation."100100Congressman Foster has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Naperville Community Television, in 2019 the Congressman hosted a climate change forum, where he was quoted stating, "The time for action is now. That we’ve spent decades debating this, we’ve been spending decades lowering the scientific uncertainty to the point where it’s absolutely clear that it’s passed time to take action.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman states, "We must aggressively combat climate change, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and promote cleaner and more economical sources of energy. In the near term we must do what we can, within the bounds of what is economically sensible and technically feasible, to begin making progress in these efforts. In the longer term, we must develop new energy technologies that have the best chance of succeeding in the market place." Rep. Foster makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release regarding the U.S. decision to re-join the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I applaud President Biden acting on Day One to rejoin the historic Paris Climate Agreement. This sends a clear message to the world that American leadership is back. We will not abdicate our responsibility to help protect the planet for future generations, and we will employ our nation’s scientific infrastructure to tackle the challenge of climate change.”"100Congressman Foster has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://foster.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://foster.house.gov/media/in-the-news/representatives-host-climate-change-forum https://billfoster.com/issue/energy-that-is-safe-secure-and-affordable/ https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Foushee, ValerieNorth Carolina4DCongresswoman Foushee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Foushee said "The climate crisis is one of the most pressing issues of our lifetime—and it disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable among us." On her campaign website, it said "Valerie believes that we must do more to protect our planet for our children and the generations to come. She supports increased environmental regulations and funding for the EPA and increased investments into green transit. She knows that we must reduce our dependence on coal and oil and prioritize more sustainable alternatives like solar and wind energy."100100Congresswoman Foushee has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website she voices support for creating a Green New Deal, which she also called for in cosponsoring H.Res.319. In a Tweet, Foushee said "Modernizing the federal procurement process to consider climate-related risks is long overdue. At yesterday’s @HouseScience Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee Hearing, I discussed the importance of greenhouse gas emissions transparency for federal contractors."100Congresswoman Foushee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://valeriefoushee.com/issues https://twitter.com/ValerieFoushee/status/1649129531746181121 https://www.congress.gov/member/valerie-foushee/F000477?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://twitter.com/ValerieFoushee/status/1704940802361655563 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Foxx, VirginiaNorth Carolina5RCongresswoman Virginia Foxx disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Foxx criticized climate activists who “think that we, human beings, have more impact on the climate and the world than God does.”00IRep. Foxx was a supporter of the Keystone Pipeline, and spoke out against the Paris Climate Accord. In a 2019 interview, she said "The Paris climate accord doesn’t do anything to move us in the right direction globally." According to the League of Conservation Voters, Foxx has a dismal lifetime climate score, extremely rarely making a pro-environment vote. Congresswoman Foxx demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Foxx opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.huffpost.com/entry/climate-change-facts-myths_n_846255 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398625 https://www.mtairynews.com/news/73652/foxx-defends-climate-vote-at-outdoor-event https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=400077 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/virginia-foxxOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Frankel, LoisFlorida22DCongresswoman Lois Frankel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website it states, "Climate change is the most immediate and pressing challenge globally, nationally, and locally right here in South Florida. We are already seeing the consequences with stronger hurricanes, higher temperatures, more frequent flooding, and beach erosion."100100As a member of the Energy & Water Appropriations subcommittee, the Congresswoman fought for $250 million in funding for Everglades Restoration, stating in a 2019 press release, "This bill will also increase the funding for renewable and energy efficiency programs critical to fighting climate change and reducing our carbon emissions as we strive to make our nation carbon neutral by 2050." In a 2019 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "If we don’t do something about #climatechange, extreme weather will have an impact on every Floridian. On our public health, our agriculture, our unique environment & wildlife." Rep. Frankel makes climate change a top priority issue as well. Her website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Frankel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=574 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3145 https://twitter.com/reploisfrankel/status/1100863141250883585?lang=bg https://loisfrankelforcongress.com/environment/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3456Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Franklin, ScottFlorida18RCongressman Scott Franklin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from 'The Ledger' states that "Franklin said the climate seems to be changing, but he said he isn’t convinced human activity is the driving factor."00In the 2020 Candidate Questionnaire from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, Congressman Scott Franklin wrote "I believe American innovation and entrepreneurship will help us solve the environmental and climate challenges we face. I am concerned about investing taxpayer dollars in specific businesses or research initiatives tied to renewable energy. The U.S. government should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. We must let the free market determine what solutions are effective, efficient and affordable." Congressman Scott Franklin does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Franklin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.theledger.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2020/10/18/election-2020-franklin-cohn-battle-long-red-district-15/3670575001/ https://www.flaccb.org/documents/2020/10/franklin_scott.pdf https://franklin.house.gov/issues/agriculture https://franklin.house.gov/media/press-releases/franklin-defends-lives-unborn-votes-no-abortion-demand-until-birth-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Frost, MaxwellFlorida10DCongressman Frost understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman said "The greatest challenge facing our country and the world is the climate crisis. The effects of climate disasters are compounded by already existing inequalities of class and race. Frankly, the continuity of the species depends on whether or not we transition from a carbon-dependent economy to one which is powered by green technologies and green jobs. If there is a future, it is a green future. We cannot hesitate and we cannot let big-oil, big-business, and the 1% decide our fates for us."100100The Congressman lists on his websites actions that need to be taken to tackle climate change, such as passing a Green New Deal and establishing a civilian climate corps. Frost has also taken climate action such as cosponsoring H.Con.Res.37 which expresses the sense of Congress that there is a climate emergency, and H.Res.319 calling on the creation of a Green New Deal.100Congressman Frost has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. (EXAMPLES). He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.frostforcongress.com/issues#environmentaljustice https://www.congress.gov/member/maxwell-frost/F000476?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://frost.house.gov/know-your-reproductive-rights https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Fry, RusselSouth Carolina7RCongressman Fry does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Fry opposes climate action. On his website, he voices support for an "all of the above" energy strategy. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congressman Fry opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://russellfrysc.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RussellFrySC/status/1540342304795463682Opposes Roe
Fulcher, RussIdaho1RCongressman Russ Fulcher disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to The Spokesman-Review, during a 2018 debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated that he believes, "in the cycle that’s happened since the beginning of time.” 00During a 2019 speech on the House Floor about the Green New Deal, Congressman Fulcher stated, "Over the next ten years it would eliminate the use of fossil fuels and nuclear power. This mean our gasoline-powered vehicles and instruments would be useless and there would be no air travel... The architects fail to explain how they would rebuild the economy they would decimate." Congressman Fulcher demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Rep. Fulcher makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/oct/29/medicaid-immigration-climate-top-idaho-1st-distric/ https://twitter.com/RepRussFulcher/status/1100463418614652930 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://fulcher.house.gov/2020/1/rep-fulcher-op-ed-after-47-years-it-s-time-congress-recognize-victims-of-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Gaetz, MattFlorida1RCongressman Matt Gaetz agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 In a Pensacola News Journal article the Congressman was reported to have stated after joining the bipartisan climate solutions caucus that, "I don't think there's a scientific debate left to be had on if it is happening. I also think history is going to judge very harshly climate change deniers, and I don't want to be one of them."5014In a 2019 press release promoting his climate change plan, titled the Green Real Deal, Congressman Gaetz stated, "While some in our government espouse that climate change isn’t happening, our military puts politics to the side. These leaders carry the trust of the American people on their shoulders. We call on them to lead this country’s most precious resource — our people — into battle. They do not have the luxury of an academic debate about climate change; they do not have time to argue with a thermometer. So, when these same people state that climate change is real and already impacting our military, we should all listen." In a 2019 interview on Fox Business, he described the Green New Deal as a "Green Nightmare." Congressman Gaetz supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Gaetz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2534.75https://www.pnj.com/story/money/business/2017/11/24/after-pushing-bill-abolish-epa-rep-matt-gaetz-joins-climate-solutions-caucus/893141001/ https://gaetz.house.gov/media/in-the-news/matt-gaetz-addressing-climate-change-through-green-real-deal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vcFMlpLZu0&feature=emb_logo https://gaetz.house.gov/media/in-the-news/meet-matt-gaetz-controversial-gop-congressman-leading-effort-release-fbi-memo https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2022/07/23/florida-congressman-matt-gaetz-makes-controversial-abortion-comments/10136955002/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Garamendi, JohnCalifornia8DCongressman Garamendi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release for Earth Day, he stated, “There is no Planet B. On this Earth Day, I am recommitting myself to doing everything in my power to protect our air, water, and ecosystems for this generation and those to come. 2020 was tied for the hottest year on record, and recent climate reports paint a grim picture for the future of our planet if we don’t act now,” Garamendi said. “Mother nature is crying out for help, and we must all heed her warning and answer the call before the climate crisis permanently upends our lives and our world. As a public servant, I have and will continue to spend my career fighting to address the existential threat of climate change" 100100Congressman John Garamendi has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "America must take the climate crisis seriously. Congressman Garamendi is a passionate advocate for investments in clean energy, building weatherization, public transit, and biking amenities, because these are the key ways we can lower our carbon footprint." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech on the House floor, he stated, “Global warming is real. Take a look at California. We are in the midst of the fourth year of a very severe drought. You can debate whether this drought is or is not the result of climate change, but you cannot debate the fact that CO2 in our atmosphere is approaching 400 parts per million – highest it’s ever been in over 800,000 years. You cannot debate the fact that it’s a heck of a lot warmer in California in the last decade than it’s ever been in recorded time. You cannot debate the fact the snow level in California is rapidly rising up the Sierra Nevada and the Siskiyou Mountains leaving us with an ever smaller snow reservoir." Congressman Garamendi makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release announcing his support and vote for the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' he stated, "This historic legislation provides over $369 billion—the single largest investment ever—to tackle the climate crisis. With the clean energy programs funded in this bill, we will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030. This critically important funding will make the air we breathe and the water we drink cleaner and spur a once-in-a-generation investment in research and technology to mitigate the risks posed by climate change" 100Congressman Garamendi publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Garamendi voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-garamendi-s-statement-earth-day https://garamendi.house.gov/legislative-work/issues/environment https://garamendi.house.gov/press-release/garamendi-calls-congress-address-climate-change https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-applauds-inflation-reduction-act-s-introduction-us-senate-deliver https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-s-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garbarino, AndrewNew York2RCongressman Andrew Garbarino agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote, "I believe we can address our changing climate while also protecting the economic prosperity of the United States."500Congressman Garbarino does not oppose climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as indicated in a June 2022 tweet: "As Long Islanders continue to pay the price for Biden’s Energy Crisis, I recently traveled to Houston, TX to learn more about domestic oil and gas production and see firsthand the potential of America's energy sector. We can and must produce the energy we need here at home."25Congressman Garbarino opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525https://garbarino.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repgarbarino/status/1532067132032229377 https://dccc.org/vulnerable-rep-andrew-garbarino-is-complicit-in-continued-threat-to-abortion-rights/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Garcia, ChuyIllinois4DCongressman Chuy Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "This generation faces an unprecedented and urgent climate crisis that threatens our economy, our national security, and our planet. As a nation and member of the global community, we must aggressively confront human-caused climate change. To do so, policy makers must promote a transition to sustainable technologies in the 21st century.100100Congressman Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release calling for infrastructure policies to address climate change, Rep. Garcia stated, "The fact is, climate change is causing more extreme weather events and will put more strain on our crumbling infrastructure." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 speech endorsing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "The greatest challenge to our generation combating and reversing the effects of global climate change." Congressman Garcia makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 speech on the EPA, he stated, "It is important to acknowledge the growing crisis of climate change in our times. Yet President Trump wants to severely cut funding for the atmospheric reduction programs."100Congressman Garcia publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He was not in Congress to vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://chuygarcia.house.gov/issues/environment https://chuygarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-jes-s-chuy-garc-calls-federal-infrastructure-policies-address https://chuygarcia.house.gov/media/videos/pledging-support-green-new-deal-chicago https://www.facebook.com/RepChuyGarcia/videos/410631513059484/?v=410631513059484 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepChuyGarcia/status/1540346068969324544Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garcia, MikeCalifornia27RCongressman Mike Garcia agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a September 2021 Simi Valley town hall, Representative Garcia stated that "I do believe the climate has changed in the last 120 years as a result of the industrial revolution."500Congressman Mike Garcia demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a December 2019, Representative Garcia tweeted that "'it’s climate change' excuse is a typical politician fabrication to cover her [Christy Smith] poor leadership on policy". In response to a question on the spread of wildfires during his September 2021 Simi Valley town hall, Congressman Garcia remarked that “God forbid if anyone tells you that this is a product of climate change", and attributed the increasing spread of wildfires to poor forest management. In an August 8 tweet, Rep. Garcia said that the Inflation Reduction Act (H.R. 5376) and American Rescue Plan (H.R. 1319) do not "make any sense, and calling these bills anything other than what they are (dumb) is wrong".0Congressman Garcia opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Garcia voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2518.75https://theproclaimerscv.com/2021/09/02/the-vaccines-work-ok-garcia-talks-afghanistan-biden-climate-change-and-more-at-simi-valley-town-hall/ https://twitter.com/ElectMikeGarcia/status/1205657952062824449 https://theproclaimerscv.com/2021/09/02/the-vaccines-work-ok-garcia-talks-afghanistan-biden-climate-change-and-more-at-simi-valley-town-hall/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-10-20/2022-california-midterm-election-garcia-smith-abortion-economy-environment https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-08-29/california-congressional-republicans-recalibrate-abortion-stanceOpposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Garcia, RobertCalifornia42DCongressman Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. His Congressional website states, "He knows that climate change is an existential threat to the safety and wellbeing of the entire global community—and that we must push to reduce our emissions and dependence on fossil fuels."100100Congressman Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He introduced the Clean Shipping Act of 2023 (H.R.4024) which would "set a path to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from all ocean shipping companies that do business with the United States." The Congressman also cosponsored H.Res.319, calling on the federal government to create a Green New Deal. 100Congressman Garcia has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.congress.gov/member/robert-garcia/G000598?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://robertgarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-robert-garcia-introduces-clean-shipping-act-address-port-pollution https://robertgarcia.house.gov/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Garcia, SylviaTexas29DCongresswoman Sylvia Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, Congresswoman Garcia states, “To mark the start of hurricane season, I introduced the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. We know that climate change isn’t just warming the Earth, but also changing weather patterns around the globe. While we must prepare for worse hurricanes in the future, we also need to be planning on how to reduce greenhouse gases that drive climate change and ultimately greater storm intensity,”100100Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Congresswoman Garcia's website, "Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia (TX-29) issued the following statement to mark the first day of the Atlantic hurricane season and the introduction of the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. This bill requires the Administration to produce a report to Congress every 5 years on how the United States plans to combat the increasing hurricane activity due to climate change. These reports will lay out a strategic plan on how the nation can address the causes of climate change and weather intensification. The legislation also prohibits the use of nuclear weapons for weather modification." Congresswoman Garcia makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congresswoman Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sylvia-garcia-issues-statement-start-hurricane-season-introduces https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-garcias-statement-roe-v-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gimenez, Carlos Florida28RCongressman Carlos Gimenez understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Speaking about climate change in 2017 during his 'State of the County' address , the congressman said "It's not a theory. It's a fact. We live it every day." In a 2021 'Orlando Sentinel' article, Congressman Gimenez wrote "Now more than ever, it is incumbent upon all of us to invest instead in clean energy and resiliency solutions to deal with the impacts we have created and prevent the worse ones coming down the pipeline."750On his website, Congressman Gimenez states "I support an all-of-the-above approach to domestic energy production with a focus on research, and deployment of new, clean energy technologies that ensures all Americans have access to affordable and reliable energy sources." Despite claiming to understand climate change as a threat, Gimenez has consistently acted to block or spoken against climate action, including voting against numerous bipartisan climate bills. Congressman Gimenez demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gimenez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525https://www.governing.com/archive/tns-miami-climate-change-gimenez.html https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-carlos-gimenez-hurricane-insurance-invading-sea-20210528-fi4mw4bfnrbldcwmnnqes3lbay-story.html https://gimenez.house.gov/2024/3/rep-carlos-gimenez-issues-statement-on-further-consolidated-appropriations-act-2024 https://twitter.com/TheLeadCNN/status/1469426355720839170 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://gimenez.house.gov/2022/6/gimenez-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie Washington3DCongresswoman Gluesenkamp understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. The Congresswoman's website states that "Marie believes that climate change is real and is man-made. She also believes that increasingly severe weather events caused by climate change disproportionately affect the working class. Marie has also championed tax-rebates for energy efficiency upgrades for working class families, like weather skirting for mobile homes.7575Congresswoman Gluesenkamp Perez's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Gluesenkamp Perez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2562.5https://marieforcongress.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Golden, JaredMaine2DCongressman Jared Golden understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is the greatest environmental challenge of our time. Jared believes it presents a unique and pressing threat to homes, jobs, and entire industries across our state, as well as our national security."10071.42Congressman Golden co-sponsored the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating in a press release, "We have to protect Maine’s environment – and the thousands of jobs that depend on it – from climate change. If our forests, water, or climate go bad, it would destroy our forest products, fishing, and farming industries. The United States must honor the commitments it made in the Paris Agreement." Congressman Golden's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Golden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5074.105https://golden.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://golden.house.gov/media/press-releases/golden-votes-keep-us-paris-agreement-protect-maine-s-environment-0 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://golden.house.gov/media/press-releases/golden-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-vs-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Goldman, DanNew York10DCongressman Goldman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Goldman said "Climate change is an urgent, existential threat that must be addressed immediately and comprehensively. There is no time for half-measures; we must transition to renewable energy as quickly as possible."100100Congressman Goldman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his website, it states "Dan supports the principles and goals of a Green New Deal to transition to clean energy, which will also create millions of good-paying union jobs. However, the government cannot do this alone. Dan will work to incentivize private companies to invest in renewable energy and encourage community and public power production. We must promote public-private partnerships to address climate change at the necessary pace to save our planet." He has also demonstrated leadership by co-sponsoring legislation such as H.Res.319 calling on the federal government to create a Green New Deal.100Congressman Goldman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.dangoldmanforny.com/climate-change-green-new-deal https://www.congress.gov/member/daniel-goldman/G000599?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://goldman.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-dan-goldmans-statement-two-year-anniversary-supreme-courtsOpposes Roe
Gomez, JimmyCalifornia34DCongressman Jimmy Gomez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his House website, Gomez says "We’ve reached a turning point with regards to the environment. Not only must we protect our public lands and tackle this climate crisis, we need to ensure access to the beautiful environment that surrounds us [...] Our nation is facing a climate emergency, which is why I support the Green New Deal -- a jobs and justice-centered plan to decarbonize the U.S. economy within ten years and focuses on creating the maximum amount of prosperity for working people and marginalized communities in the process."100100Congressman Gomez has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Gomez introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, “The Climate Solutions Act of 2019 will shift our country away from the inaction and cowardice that have come to define this administration’s approach to environmental justice and towards an aggressive strategy that supports strong renewable energy standards, forcefully targets greenhouse gasses, and establishes a bold national energy efficiency standard." Congressman Gomez also makes notable public statements supporting climate action, such as in a Tweet where he touted the benefits of the Inflation Reduction Act.100Congressman Gomez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Gomez voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).7593.75https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=493 https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=438 https://www.facebook.com/RepJimmyGomez/photos/a.172532199956354/363344207541818/?type=1&theater https://twitter.com/RepJimmyGomez/status/1588340493871894528 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/JimmyGomezCA/status/1540417701960630272Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gonzales, TonyTexas23RCongressman Tony Gonzales disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a December 2019 meet and greet in Pearsall, Texas, the congressman stated 'A lot of times the narrative is, minorities and young people are for this climate change stuff. Well, guss what, I’m young, I’m a minority, and I am completely against that.’”00On his website, Congressman Gonzales states "Texas is our country’s lead producer of oil and natural gas. It’s important that we are free from regulations in order to tap into our state’s full energy potential." In a 2023 Tweet, Gonzales said "When outside groups put an extreme climate proposal on the El Paso ballot, I knew I had to do something to save thousands of jobs & small businesses. It’s been an honor to lead the charge against Prop K & ask y’all to vote NO!" Congressman Tony Gonzales demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Gonzales opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/200826-Tony-Gonzales-Research-Book-ONLINE-.pdf https://gonzales.house.gov/issues/energy https://dccc.org/tony-gonzales-supports-extreme-near-total-abortion-ban-bounties-on-doctors-family-members/ https://twitter.com/TonyGonzales4TX/status/1654167102515814400 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gonzalez, VicenteTexas34DCongressman Vicente Gonzalez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25100On Congressman Gonzalez's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congressman Gonzalez supports an all-the-above approach to energy and understands the importance of American energy not only to power our cars and homes, but also as a national security issue and a job creator. The 15th District is home to the Eagle Ford Shale, one of the largest oil production areas in the state, creating more than 3.8 million jobs and generating $473 billion in gross domestic product. The Congressman has seen firsthand the effects of a thriving oil and gas industry." Congressman Gonzalez does not oppose climate action, instead supporting an 'all-of-the-above' energy plan, which does not go far enough to completely eliminate the use of fossil fuels. 25Congressman Gonzalez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2543.75https://gonzalez.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/166483/vicente-gonzalezSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gooden, LanceTexas5RCongressman Gooden disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When responding to a 2017 voter survey guide by The Dallas Morning News, the Congressman stated, "Climate science is imprecise and so are the consequences of any legislative action we take to address the issue. We can never be so arrogant to believe we can predict with certainty the impacts that will follow specific regulations about emissions, not only for the environment but also for our economy." In a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' the congressman stated, "Climate change is not the reason for the boarder crisis. Joe Biden is."00In a 2019 editorial on climate solutions, Congressman Gooden says, "I offer another solution – one that utilizes the creative power of the American economy. By sponsoring developments in carbon capture, natural gas extraction and nuclear power, Republicans have found a way to allow the genius of American innovation to solve the problems we face. We can’t regulate our way out of this mess as the Obama administration attempted. The future of clean energy and reducing emissions lies in new technologies like small-scale, advanced nuclear power plants and solid-state batteries. The only way to access those solutions is for the American economy to be unleashed." Congressman Gooden demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Gooden opposes or vote against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5012.5https://voterguide.dallasnews.com/2018-general/candidates/469/ https://twitter.com/lancegooden/status/1383929296767504385 https://gooden.house.gov/media/editorials/republican-solutions-climate-crisis https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=101216&c=TX05LGOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gosar, Paul A.Arizona9RCongressman Paul Gosar disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Tweet, Gosar said in a Tweet "On some bills I vote no, not because of the infrastructure, but because Pelosi and the radical left includes crap like climate change and other nonsense." In another Tweet, Gosar said "The left is afflicted with group hysteria about Covid, the “insurrection”, Ashli Babbitt, the multi-millennia climate fluctuations and a host of other issues."00Congressman Gosar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Gosar regularly votes against climate action, and is given a lifetime score of 4% by the LCV. In 2017, Gosar called on the United States to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, saying "This liberal pipedream abdicates our sovereignty in favor of a global redistribution of wealth."0Congressman Gosar makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Gosar stated, "Democrat socialists made clear today that they want to use climate change as a means to abolish capitalism and implement massive taxation, expropriation and government control." In a 2014 op-ed for the Arizona Republic on President Obama's Clean Power Plan, he stated, "Knowing he can’t lawfully enact a carbon-dioxide tax plan, Obama is unlawfully directing his EPA to impose strict limits on carbon emissions from existing coal and gas-fired facilities." Congressman Gosar was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://twitter.com/repgosar/status/1578477023235694592 https://twitter.com/DrPaulGosar/status/1410031441421881351 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/paul-gosar https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1480 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2241Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gottheimer, JoshNew Jersey5DCongressman Gottheimer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement regarding President Biden's executive order to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, he stated, "Withdrawing the United States from the historic Paris Agreement on climate change was a mistake, an abdication of American leadership on the world stage, and a setback for the united effort needed to keep our air and water clean. We must prioritize addressing the threat of climate change and work to mitigate the harm to our environment, our economy, and our communities. When it comes to clean air and water and a healthy environment, we cannot afford to look the other way."100100In a press release discussing his advocacy for new climate protections, Rep. Gottheimer stated, "We are in the middle of a major climate crisis. It’s not something we can just ignore and hope will get better. When you talk about fighting climate change, at first it seems like an insurmountable task. But then you dig into it, and you realize we can take immediate steps now that will have both an immediate and long term impact on our lives-on our health, on our economy, on our planet. The cost of inaction on climate change is incalculable." He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congressman Gottheimer's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Gottheimer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2329 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2352 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2771 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=8 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Graves, SamMissouri6RCongressman Sam Graves disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a September 2019 tweet, the Congressman wrote, "Cattle farmers have enough difficulties to deal with without politicians promising to tax away their profits. It’s time for the ‘cattle are a driving force behind climate change’ myth to die."00In an op-ed written in the Washington Times, regarding the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "The Green New Deal isn’t about the environment at all. It’s about making America a socialist country.” Congressman Graves demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Graves makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://twitter.com/repsamgraves/status/1177253308475617280 https://republicans-transportation.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404401 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://graves.house.gov/media-center/e-newsletters/my-pro-life-priorityOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Green, AlTexas9DCongressman Al Green understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2022 Tweet regarding the Inflation Reduction Act he said, "I won’t allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good bill the Senate just passed, the IRA, which will cut inflation, fight climate change, cap healthcare expenses, & reduce the deficit. Although the perfect is beyond our reach, the good is in our grasp. I’ll vote for the good."75100Congressman Green supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congressman Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5068.75https://twitter.com/RepAlGreen/status/1556385433822674946 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTRDruHv7eE https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Green, MarkTennessee7RCongressman Mark Green disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' Congressman Green stated, "If climate change is an 'existential threat,' according to Joe Biden, what does he consider Americans trapped under Taliban rule in Afghanistan?"00In an interview on Fox News, while discussing a climate change plan put forward by then Presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke, Congressman Green stated, "I think he recognizes that there are a lot of democrats who recognize that the Green New Deal is absurd so he's trying to meet them halfway with an idea that gets us to carbon neutrality... But even his plan, it's crazy, I mean 5 trillion dollars." Congressman Green demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Green opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/RepMarkGreen/status/1435662151931342852 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlBZEjZHsUQ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://markgreen.house.gov/2019/1/dr-mark-green-announces-support-for-pro-life-bills-ahead-of-46th-anniversary-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Greene, Marjorie Taylor Georgia14RCongresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a town hall in March 2021, the congresswoman claimed “Maybe perhaps we live on a ball that rotates around the sun, that flies through the universe, and maybe our climate just changes.” In an article in 'Gizmodo' she states, "The Earth is more green than it was years and years ago, and that’s because of the Earth warming, it’s because of carbon, because plants do need carbon. Their whole argument is not even scientific."00During a town hall in March 2021, the congresswoman inquired, "How much taxes and how much money did the people back in the Ice Age spend to warm up the earth?” Congresswoman Greene demonstrates a lack of leadership with dangerous public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a tweet posted in May 2021, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed "The Earth’s climate has always changed, and there is NO amount of taxes or government that can change it." 00https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mtg-aoc-climate-town-hall-b1823660.html https://gizmodo.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-says-climate-change-is-healthy-f-1849066151 https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1396810561548083202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1396810561548083202%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F https://www.salon.com/2022/06/24/marjorie-taylor-greene-calls-overturning-of-roe-v-wade-a-blessing/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Griffith, MorganVirginia9RAccording to the Briston Herald Courrier, Congressman Griffith stated, "The climate is changing. Any plan of action must reflect the reality that most countries in the world will continue to use fossil fuels. Our goal as a worldwide leader and energy exporter should be to develop cleaner, more efficient ways to utilize the wealth of energy resources our country possesses." In an op-ed to the 'Roanoke Times,' posted on his website, the Congressman says, "The America of the Green New Deal is no leader. That plan expects us to dismantle our economy and fundamentally alter our lifestyle to cut carbon emissions." On his 'Energy and Environment' page he says, "We need to increase current coal production..." 00According to Congressman Morgan Griffith's website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Griffith states, "I support coal use and production. Coal is a vital component of the American economy, with a third of the nation’s electricity being generated from it. We need to increase current coal production and eliminate overly burdensome regulations that hurt the industry with little to no environmental gains. I also support research into technologies to burn coal more efficiently." The page is also headed with a large image displaying a piece of coal. Congressman Griffith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Griffith makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.heraldcourier.com/news/local/rep-morgan-griffith-named-to-committee-on-climate-change/article_53d4b3a6-3c1a-11e9-a117-c3c4bf8b360c.html https://morgangriffith.house.gov/spotlight/ https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398741 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=44643 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=402684Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Grijalva, RaulArizona7DCongressman Grijalva understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Grijalva's, 'Combatting Global Climate Change,' page it states, "According to the Environmental Protection Agency, global average temperatures have risen by 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 100 years. Without a proactive national strategy to reduce emissions from greenhouse gases and contain other man-made drivers of climate change, temperatures will continue to rise. Some members of Congress deny the challenges presented by climate change and prefer to ignore the overwhelming scientific data available on the issue. Rep. Grijalva continues to believe in the need for comprehensive energy legislation that meets the nation’s energy needs, creates green jobs and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. He understands the importance of investing in clean energy and preventing the potentially catastrophic effects global warming could have on our farms, coasts, and oceans."100100Congressman Grijalva has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2024 press release, Grijalva spoke at length about the threats that climate change poses to Arizonans, and the steps Arizonan democrats are taking to combat it. He encouraged the passage of new climate bills and calls on Republican members of congress to take climate action. On his, "Carbon Dioxide & Climate Policy," page, it states, "Climate disruptions will cause the spread of invasive species, threaten native species, endanger watersheds, cause habitat loss, and increase the intensity and length of the fire season on our public lands. It is difficult to imagine Glacier National Park without glaciers or Joshua Tree National Park without trees. Yet the evidence is clear that we may be facing just that kind of future." Rep. Grijalva makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, saying in a press release, “What I heard yesterday is what I’ve been hearing for years: this economy needs to be cleaner and more sustainable if we want a livable future. The Green New Deal is the right framework for the work we need to do, in Congress and across the nation, to reduce our fossil fuel use, create green jobs, and protect our country and our planet for the long term.” 100Congressman Grijalva publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 as the Progressive Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Grijalva helped create a competing budget proposal to that of the then-Republican majority called the "Peoples Budget." The proposal looked to implement a carbon fee of $25 per ton emitted. Congressman Grijalva voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://grijalva.house.gov/combating-global-climate-change/ https://grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/chair-grijalva-releases-natural-resources-climate-action-report-highlights-top-accomplishments-of-2019/ https://naturalresources.house.gov/media/press-releases/chair-grijalva-champions-bold-climate-action-supports-green-new-deal-resolution https://www.vox.com/2015/3/24/8284171/progressive-caucus-peoples-budget https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqo2aY2Nlrk https://grijalva.house.gov/rep-grijalva-statement-on-executive-order-to-help-safeguard-abortion-access-and-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Grothman, GlennWisconsin6RCongressman Glenn Grothman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 interview with Right Wing Watch, the Congressman stated, "This is this environmental stuff, this is the idea that is driven by this global warming thing. Global warming is not man-made and there is barely any global warming at all. There's been no global warming for the last twelve or thirteen years. I see a shortage of Republicans stepping up to the plate and saying, 'look, this global warming stuff is not going on.' It's ridiculous for the United States, of all the countries in the world, to be putting extra regulations on our business while the Chinese, the Indians, whatever are building new factories all the time. And our factories are stuck saying, 'you can't do this, you can't do this,' because you've got to reign in this global warming which doesn't exist anyway."00In a 2017 op-ed supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman wrote, "The Paris climate agreement was a bad deal for all Americans, but would have hit Wisconsin’s Sixth District particularly hard... At best, the climate agreement was a wealth redistribution program that imposed hefty costs on American families, and focused far more on handouts to other countries than actually protecting the environment." During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman fielded a question on climate change, responding, "In general, I'm old enough to remember the 1970s when they talked about global cooling." Congressman Grothman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Grothman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEDiN_CNTCs https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=332 https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/local/2017/04/30/grothman-town-hall-draws-angry-raucous-crowd/101066122/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3034Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guest, MichaelMississippi3RCongressman Michael Guest does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a March 2022 tweet, the Congressman wrote "America can run on AMERICAN energy," attaching a picture of an oil rig and the words 'Unleash American Energy Independence." In a press release, the Congressman criticized the Democrats' focus on addressing climate change. Congressman Guest demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Guest opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepMichaelGuest/status/1504558980319924225 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/guest-criticizes-democrats-focus-climate-change-over-border-security https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/guest-speaks-pro-life-rally-following-opening-statements-supreme-court-hearingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guthrie, S. BrettKentucky 2RCongressman Brett Guthrie agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "Climate change is a real and serious threat, but I do not believe that radical solutions proposed in the Democrats’ “Green New Deal” are the solution. The Green New Deal is projected to cost up to $93 trillion over ten years, at an estimated cost of over $60,000 per year per household. I believe that we need innovative and market-based solutions to combat climate change."500Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership by voicing his support for the Keystone Pipeline and advocating against President Obama's climate change plan. According to WFPL, the Congressman stated, “As President Obama prepares to roll out an agenda on climate change, I hope he will also address our nation’s energy needs... While claiming to support an all-of-the-above energy program, President Obama has yet to approve the Keystone XL pipeline and the EPA continues its attempt to regulate the coal industry out of business.” According to Impact2020, "A spokeswoman for Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Bowling Green, said he shared concerns about climate change, but that he’s 'mindful of the costs associated with over-regulation that hurt our economy.'" Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Guthrie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 012.5https://guthrie.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=71998 https://guthrie.house.gov/latest-news/guthrie-new-epa-rules-could-cripple-kentuckys-economy/ https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/policy/environment/climate/article222424225.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://guthrie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=387748Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hageman, Harriet Wyoming1RCongresswoman Hageman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. "For the Biden administration and many Democrats in Congress, there is no higher authority than the climate change god."250Congresswoman Hageman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, Hageman said "With the cost of energy weighing on Americans, a GOP-led House panel considered a bill Tuesday that takes aim at the Biden administration’s green energy agenda, blaming it for rising energy costs."0Congresswoman Hageman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-news/hageman-says-bidens-radical-climate-agenda-reason-americans-cant-access https://x.com/HagemanforWY/status/1540342014604038144Opposes Roe
Harder, JoshCalifornia9DCongressman Josh Harder understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states "Josh believes climate change is an existential threat to our way of life. Catastrophic wildfires. Historic droughts. Polluted air and water. That’s why Josh introduced the FARM Act, a landmark climate change bill that supports Valley farmers in the fight against climate change. The bill is one of the only bills in Congress backed by both the leading environmental and agricultural groups." 100100In a 2019 press release advocating for the needs of farmers on the front line of climate change, the Congressman stated, "Farmers are on the front lines of the climate crisis, but they’re often treated like a part of the problem rather than a part of the solution.” The Congressman introduced the Future of Agricultural Resiliency and Modernization (FARM) Act which would help farmers across the country to more effectively fight climate change. In a 2022 tweet, Congressman Josh Harder stated "There's no more time to speculate — climate change is impacting our health, our farms, our jobs, our food, and our economy. We have to take real action now." Congressman Harder website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Harder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://harderforcongress.com/issues/ https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-urges-climate-change-committee-include-farmers-needs-environmental https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-introduces-farm-act-support-agriculture-efforts-fight-climate-change https://twitter.com/JoshHarder/status/1480584689672929296 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-votes-to-pass-of-pair-of-bills-ensuring-women-s-access-to-health-careSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Harris, AndyMaryland1RCongressman Andy Harris disagrees with statured scientists that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Baltimore Sun article, when asked if he was concerned about a U.N. climate report, the Congressman, responded stating, "there are many different projections for the pace of climate change” and "differing analysis for the degree of causality assigned to types of emissions.” 00In a 2017 press release on the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Harris stated, "Under the Paris Accord, the United States would pay trillions of dollars in economic costs and lose millions of jobs, while China is permitted to increase its emissions through 2030. President Obama made a bad deal, and President Trump can do better. Any new international climate agreement should be ratified by the U.S. Senate, as outlined in the Constitution.” Congressman Harris demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Harris opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-md-rodricks-column-1021-story.html https://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/paris-accord-bad-deal-american-people https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.wmdt.com/2022/06/lawmakers-react-to-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harshbarger, Diana Tennessee1RCongresswoman Diana Harshbarger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a 2020 interview with the 'Bristol Herald Courier,' "Harshbarger said she believes America is doing a lot to address climate change with efforts like emissions reduction. She said China and India are the countries that need to do more. “It’s other countries that need to step up and do their part in order to diminish the climate change from happening,” Harshbarger said. Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger does not oppose climate action.25Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://heraldcourier.com/elections/candidates-discuss-their-stances-on-issues/article_09b55219-806f-550b-a5e7-51b823b581cf.html https://www.votediana.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hayes, JahanaConnecticut5DCongresswoman Jahana Hayes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Hayes says "Climate change is both an environmental issue and a civil rights, economic, and public health issue. Stopping and reversing climate change, protecting public lands and waters, reducing air pollution, transitioning to green energy supplies, and investing in sustainable agriculture is a top priority of mine as your representative."100100Congresswoman Hayes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, I understand that climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. If we do not adhere to the promises we made as a nation in the Paris Climate Agreement, our children and grandchildren will pay the price." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis's recommending the Clean School Bus Act, a bill the Congresswoman introduced, she stated, "“Climate change has been threatening the lives of our children and the health of our environment for decades. COVID-19, which directly threatens our respiratory health, has made it crystal clear that we need to address air pollution caused by our school bus fleet immediately.” Rep. Hayes makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated "The negative effects of climate change are happening in real time all over the country. We must take real action now." 100Congresswoman Hayes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://jahanahayes.com/issues/environment/ https://hayes.house.gov/media/blog-posts/hayes-cosponsored-and-voted-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://hayes.house.gov/media/press-releases/hayes-clean-school-bus-legislation-recommended-address-climate-change-select https://twitter.com/repjahanahayes/status/1306257430242885637?lang=en https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021369 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021385 https://hayes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2E188817-CEF9-46FE-A423-1A580933045E Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hern, KevinOklahoma1RCongressman Kevin Hern disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 'Business Insider' article says, "The New York Times characterized Hern in a January 2019 reports as 'the aerospace engineer elected in Oklahoma, [who] has questioned whether human activity is the primary cause of climate change.'" In a 2019 House Budget Committee hearing on the Costs of Climate Change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change must be addressed without sacrificing our country's economic and fiscal wellbeing through destructive policies like the Green New Deal."00The Congressman stated in a 2019 interview with Newsmax that climate advocates, "don't truly understand the impact of fossil fuels." According to a 2019 Oklahoma Energy Today article, the Congressman opposed the Green New Deal, stating, "It’s simple, the Green New Deal is bad for Oklahoma and bad for America." Congressman Hern demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Representative Hern makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 article by Americans for Tax Reform, the Congressman was applauded for offering, "an amendment to an upcoming spending package that would block any funds in the bill from being used towards implementing a carbon tax." The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7lgfPBfWUI&feature=youtu.be https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/green-new-deal-kevin-hern-nancy-pelosi-house/2019/07/01/id/922890/ https://www.businessinsider.com/climate-change-and-republicans-congress-global-warming-2019-2#oklahoma-28 http://www.okenergytoday.com/2019/06/congressman-hern-tells-house-democrats-their-green-new-deal-would-be-devastating-to-oklahoma/ https://www.atr.org/atr-applauds-rep-kevin-hern-amendment-prohibiting-carbon-tax?page=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://hern.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=650Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Higgins, ClayLouisiana3RCongressman Higgins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 interview with PBS News Hour, the Congressman Higgins stated, "I certainly do not disagree with the fact that climate change happens, but I do think it is reasonable to question very carefully the science that has used models, which has sometimes come under fire for having been sort of fraudulently manipulated in order to produce a result... Climate change has existed for well before human history. So the question is not whether or not our climate changes across the planet, nor is it really a question that the human race does have some sort of impact upon climate change..." 00The Congressman ignored the true causes of coastal erosion. On his campaign page, instead of correctly blaming sea level rise and oil spills, he claimed that coastal erosion was caused by decreased sediment, stating, "Throughout history, the Louisiana marshland was replenished by river sediments – land-building deposits derived from the Mississippi River overflowing its banks. But in the early 1900s, a decision was made to levee the river as we know it today. So for the last 80 or 90 years, south Louisiana has been lacking that natural re-building process." In a 2022 Press Release, Higgins criticized climate action, the Green New Deal, and activist Raya Salter saying "Her opening statement was delivered with seething vitriolic hate. She was trembling, unhinged with Green New Deal madness [...] Congressman Higgins made her look inept, because that’s what happens when Democrats are faced with hard truth." Congressman Higgins demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0The Congressman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview on PBS News Hour the Congressman stated, "When we talk about spending the people's treasure, and the very concept that we can fix climate change with some sort of a tax, is something that I certainly take very seriously with regards to having an intelligent debate about." Congressman Higgins voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). He did not sign the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge.00https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/watch-louisiana-rep-clay-higgins-skepticism-human-caused-climate-change http://captainhiggins.com/issues/ https://clayhiggins.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clayhiggins.house.gov/2022/09/18/higgins-battles-radical-climate-activism-congressional-oversight-hearing/ https://clayhiggins.house.gov/media/press-releases/higgins-supreme-court-ruling-major-victory-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Hill, FrenchArkansas2RCongressman French Hill agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release opposing the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real, but the proposals put forward by Democrats, like the Green New Deal, are fiction. The reality is, America is already a global leader in pursuing cleaner production of energy and reducing carbon emissions–to the tune of approximately 10% over the past decade. Addressing climate change should include investing in longer battery life technologies, lowering barriers for solar cell innovation, and pursuing cleaner more cost-effective methods to use nuclear energy. I believe that we need to continue pursuing an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy that leads to a cleaner, less carbon dependent future without forcing Arkansas families to bear the burden of the flawed Paris Climate Accord."500Congressman Hill spoke against the World Bank's climate mission saying it should not focus on combatting climate change, and instead only on reducing poverty and an all-of-the-above energy strategy. Hill has also criticized climate action attempted by Democratic members of Congress, calling it "fiction." Congressman Hill demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Hill opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://hill.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5690 https://www.devex.com/news/us-rep-french-hill-calls-for-a-rethink-of-world-bank-s-climate-mission-107164 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.thv11.com/article/news/politics/rep-french-hill-climate-change-is-real-green-new-deal-is-fiction/91-3facb77e-16f9-411a-94ff-96524eecd730 https://katv.com/news/local/arkansas-lawmakers-praise-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-united-states-governor-asa-hutchinson-senator-tom-cotton-john-boozman-lieutenant-tim-griffin-attorney-general-leslie-rutledge-representative-french-hill-bruce-westerman-rick-crawfordOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Himes, JimConnecticut4DCongressman Jim Himes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and environment,' page it states, "Climate change is here, and it’s affecting more Americans every day. The increasingly severe storms associated with climate change, like Hurricane Ida and Superstorm Sandy, are damaging Connecticut’s coastal communities, causing severe flooding, closing roads, and downing power lines. The price of inaction will be far greater than if we made meaningful and drastic changes to our energy and environmental policies." 100100 In a 2021 press release from Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, regarding an "offshore wind proposal awarded $500,000," the Congressman stated 'Catastrophic and deadly weather events will only continue to worsen unless we face the climate crisis head on,” Congressman Jim Himes said. “Connecticut stands ready to do its part by shifting to wind and other renewable energy sources.'" Himes has made other press releases supporting the passage of climate action bills, such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Congressman Hime's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Himes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10093.75https://himes.house.gov/energy-and-environment-depth https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2021/12-2021/Governor-Lamont-Announces-Connecticut-Offshore-Wind-Proposal-Awarded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://himes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2A07B459-DB29-4D09-9572-6FF1F3D2F85FSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hinson, AshleyIowa2RAshley Hinson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote, "We need to find other solutions to address climate change without putting farmers and producers out of business. In Congress, I will work across the aisle and find ways to combat climate change that won’t destroy our economy."750Ashley Hinson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2020 tweet, she spread misinformation about the Green New Deal Bill, where she gave the bill an unrealistic price tag and made other false claims including that the bill, if passed, would put all Iowan farmers out of business. 0Congresswoman Hinson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She has supported other policies like carbon capture and sequestration but voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525https://ashleyhinson.com/statement-from-ashley-hinson-regarding-the-zero-emissions-vehicles-act-of-2020/ https://www.thegazette.com/campaigns-elections/fact-checker-hinsons-green-new-deal-tweet-speaks-to-base-not-facts/ https://hinson.house.gov/media/press-releases/hinson-statement-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Holmes Norton, EleanorDistrict of Columbia1DCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release on the increasing frequency on natural disasters, Congresswoman Norton stated, "Climate change has exposed to country to the increasingly numerous and severe natural disasters that are occurring in areas never previously recorded. We have a moral and civic obligation to be upfront with the American people about federal, state, and local unpreparedness for new and unanticipated disasters. Both the funding and thinking in Congress is locked somewhere in the 20th century, failing to take into account what climate science already shows is occurring on an annual basis.”1000Congresswoman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release advocated for the INVEST in America Act, which was included in the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2) and would reauthorize funding for DC public transit. In the press release, she stated, "The use of technology in transportation and the bill’s many climate change innovations make this a break from prior bills to become the nation’s first 21st century transportation and infrastructure bill. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2017 press release, the Congresswoman during an Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management Subcommittee hearing on disaster mitigation and recovery called climate change “the elephant in the room.” Rep. Holmes makes climate change a top priority issue. From a July 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Chair of the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, released her House floor remarks on the INVEST in America Act, the surface transportation infrastructure bill, which Norton held write and which the House passed today." The Congresswoman stated "However, today's bill, for example, for the first time tackles climate change in recognition that transportation leads as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. The need to reduce burning fossil fuels is a priority in this bill to move us more quickly to zero emissions."100Congresswoman Norton Holmes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. ”The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.The Congresswoman also co-sponsored the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years.100100NOTE: THIS CANDIDATES DID NOT VOTE ON ANY OF THE VOTES ABOVE, SO THE VOTE SCORE DOES NOT FACTOR INTO HER CLIMATE CALCULATION. HER VOTE SCORE IS IMPUTED BASED ON THE AVERAGE OF HER POSITION, LEADERSHIP AND FEE ON CARBON SCORES. https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-presses-importance-of-pre-disaster-funding-at-committee-hearing https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-ensured-the-new-surface-transportation-reauthorization-bill-the https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-applauds-house-passage-of-surface-transportation-infrastructure https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-introduces-bill-address-climate-crisis-head-and-invest-nation-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://norton.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norton-condemns-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-says-dc-woman-areSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Horsford, StevenNevada4DCongressman Steve Horsford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the House's Climate Crisis Action plan, he stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis that threatens our children’s futures, and the futures of our children’s children. As a member of the House Natural Resources Committee, I’m working to push Congress to take up the bold action that’s needed to address the ever-growing threat of climate change and ameliorate the effects of human emissions and pollution."100100Congressman Horsford has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.Res.755, a bill that expresses "support for the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow and reaffirm(s) the United States commitment to international cooperation (in) combating climate change." Congressman Horsford also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the need for climate action via Build Back Better and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal, he stated, "The historic drought at Lake Mead is a shocking example of the threat climate change poses to the West...I’m grateful to Vice President Harris for coming to Nevada to see our water crisis firsthand, and I look forward to working with the White House to pass the urgent climate investments in the Build Back Better Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal. Together, these bills will create jobs, invest in Nevada’s clean energy economy, and protect our environment for generations to come.” Congressman Horsford makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Horsford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-crisis-action-plan-highlights-congressman-steven-horsford-s-geo https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/755?s=1&r=2 https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-horsford-joins-vice-president-harris-push-climate-action-through https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=6&r=10 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Houchin, ErinIndiana9RCongresswoman Houchin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Houchin demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She cosponsored H.J.Res.117 which opposes EPA regulations, and in a press release criticized President Biden's "climate-obsessed agenda."0Congresswoman Houchin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://houchin.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-erin-houchin-introduces-resolution-stop-fdic-climate-rule https://www.congress.gov/member/erin-houchin/H001093?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/149614/erin-houchin https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Houlahan, ChrissyPennsylvania6DCongresswoman Chrissy Houlahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to her website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Congresswoman Chrissy states, "As an engineer and a scientist, I understand the grave threat that climate change poses to America and the world at large. Let’s be clear: climate change is real, and human behavior is making it worse. The adverse effects will impact not only the natural environment but also our national security and our economic vitality. I am committed to fighting for binding legislation with actionable measures to mitigate these negative impacts and stop climate change in its tracks."100100Congresswoman Houlahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release supporting The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is happening. And we are causing it. Inaction on this threat harms our economy, national security, and health. I refuse to stand by and do nothing. This is a fight for our country, for our children, and for humanity." Rep. Houlahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Congresswoman Houlahan penned a 2019 op-ed for the Daily Loca, where she wrote, "Let us be frank: Climate change is happening. The effects will be disastrous. And it’s caused by human activity. But this recognition cannot be reserved to one day a year. We need to be acting every day from here on out to combat climate change and reverse the negative impacts it has had on our world and will continue to have if we don’t take aggressive action quickly." Rep. Houlahan makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congresswoman proposed an amendment to The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) which, "encourages the United States to go above and beyond the requirements outlined in the Paris Agreement and aggressively employ diplomacy to work with our partners around the world to take swift and decisive action to combat climate change."100Congresswoman Houlahan publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman co-sponsored the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019 (H.R. 4051), which imposes a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fossil fuels and fluorinated gases that emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Rep. Houlahan voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1335 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1120 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1152 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1115 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2792Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hoyer, StenyMaryland5DCongressman Steny Hoyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2023 article he wrote for Medium, Hoyer said "As we observe Earth Day, the environmental challenges in Eagle Harbor ought to remind us that while the climate crisis poses an existential threat to us all, its effects are often most acute and immediate for historically underserved communities."100100In a press release advocating for the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Congressman Hoyer stated, "Our bill would restore America’s standing in the global fight against climate change and address the threats to public health and our economy posed by rising sea levels, wildfires, and a greater frequency of deadly storms." In a September 2019 Tweet, the Congressman, responding to an IPCC Ocean's report, wrote, "The major climate report by the @IPCC_CH only further illustrates what is at stake if we do not #ActOnClimate. Our oceans, coastal communities, and marine ecosystems are suffering from the dangerous heat of climate change." Congressman Hoyer's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Hoyer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 7587.5https://hoyer.house.gov/content/hoyer-statement-epas-decision-roll-back-clean-power-plan https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/hoyer-statement-house-democrats-introduction-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/LeaderHoyer/status/1176931695347601409 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/hoyer-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hoyle, ValOregon4DCongresswoman Hoyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "Climate change and environmental degradation isn’t a future threat: it is an immediate emergency that we are experiencing today in the form of wildfires, extreme heat, drought, contaminated water, and more. In the legislature, Val helped expand Oregon’s Clean Fuels program to reduce carbon emissions, worked to move Oregon off of coal power, and increased renewable energy standards for utilities. In Congress, she will work to reestablish the United States as a global leader in addressing climate change, fight for clean air and water, and protect Oregon’s natural treasures. Val’s plan to tackle the climate crisis includes: Moving America to a 100% Clean Electricity standard. Fighting for a just transition to a renewable energy future that provides good jobs for Oregonians and protects families from high energy costs. Halting new fossil fuel leasing on our federal public lands. Pushing for the federal investments necessary to make Oregon a leader in renewable energy generation."100100Congresswoman Hoyle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, the Congresswoman said "Tackling the climate crisis requires bold investments that put our communities first. $197 million from the Inflation Reduction Act is headed to Oregon to help us reach our carbon emissions targets, bringing us a step closer to cleaner air and a healthier climate." Hoyle has also cosponsored climate legislation such as H.Con.Res.37, expressing the sense that there is a climate emergency, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congresswoman Hoyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://hoyle.house.gov/media/press-releases/hoyle-statement-on-the-dobbs-decision-anniversary https://www.congress.gov/member/val-hoyle/H001094?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.lorichavezderemer.com/issues https://x.com/RepValHoyle/status/1815774346473877914Supports Roe
Hudson, RichardNorth Carolina9RRichard Hudson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. A 2021 statement from his website states "The science is clear — humans are contributing to it, and time is running out to address it."750Richard Hudson does not oppose climate action. In 2021, he joined the Conservative Climate Caucus. However, he's advocated for production of "more of America's own energy resources, including wind, solar, clean coal, hydropower, biofuels, nuclear energy, as well as oil and natural gas."25Congressman Hudson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://hudson.house.gov/media/in-the-news/column-count-on-rep-hudson-to-deliver-climate-solutions https://www.fayobserver.com/story/opinion/2021/07/25/letter-hudson-showing-leadership-environment/8059383002/ https://hudson.house.gov/press-releases/hudson-releases-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Huffman, JaredCalifornia2DCongressman Huffman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Action,Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Addressing climate change is the greatest imperative of our time. The stakes are enormous for our environment, our economy, and our planet. Confronting climate change will require major investments in infrastructure, new technologies, well-paying jobs, and energy independence. Pursuing these projects will not only make progress on climate change- they will also make our country stronger, healthier, and more prosperous. As a climate leader and an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal resolution, these priorities are front and center in all my work for California’s Second District."100100Congressman Huffman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release introducing Resources for Workforce Investments, not Drilling Act (ReWIND Act) he stated, "The Trump administration has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted to act in the country’s -- or the planet’s -- best interests. Any large allocation of money invites misuse, and Congress must take the necessary precautions to ensure that Trump doesn’t use taxpayer money to provide handouts to the fossil fuel industry.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Rep. Huffman stated, "It’s time to draw a line against the Trump administration’s attempts to take us backward, worsen the climate crisis, and make the United States an international laughing stock." Congressman Huffman makes climate change a top priority issue. In an op-ed co-written with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the Congressman writes, "Denial is no longer an option; mockery of the Green New Deal is not a constructive answer. It is time for serious action." 100Congressman Huffman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 the Congressman introduced the Gas Replacement Act, which according to his site would, "Replace the chronically-underperforming federal gas tax with a life-cycle assessment-based carbon tax on gasoline and diesel fuels that will accurately reflect the carbon emissions of the fuel." The Congressman co-sponsored the Climate Action (H.R. 4209) which would place a tax on carbon pollution to raise money for infrastructure projects. Congressman Huffman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://huffman.house.gov/policy-issues/climate-action-energy-and-environment https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rewind-act-prohibits-bailout-of-fossil-fuel-industry-with-cares-act-funds-during-public-health-crisis https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-huffman-votes-to-pass-hr-9-new-legislation-to-keep-the-us-in-the-paris-climate-agreement https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/green-new-deal-vote-shows-republicans-would-rather-mock-climate-ncna987486 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://patch.com/california/sanrafael/marin-congressman-jared-huffman-blasts-roe-rulingSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Huizenga, BillMichigan4RCongressman Bill Huizenga disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in 'Vice," he is referred to as a "climate denier," and quoted there saying, "I do not believe that further congressional action is needed to address climate change...Today's global warming doomsayers simply lack the scientific evidence to support their claims. A host of leaders in the scientific community have recognized that the argument for drastic anthropogenic global warming is no longer based on science, but is being driven by irrational fanaticism."00In a 2022 press release, the Congressman stated "The SEC is engaging in these rulemakings to advance the Biden Administration’s environmental agenda. The intellectual foundation for these rulemakings leaves little doubt that the purpose of these rulemakings is not truly an attempt to provide financially material information to investors for all companies; the real intent is to fight climate change. Congress, however, has not passed any securities-related law that would allow for that to be a legitimate aim of Commission rulemaking. If and until that happens, the Commission must act consistently within its historical bounds, or rulemakings like these should and likely will be thrown out in federal court." Congressman Huizenga demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Huizenga makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7bxvj/michigans-climate-change-deniers https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://huizenga.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=401479 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hunt, WesleyTexas38RCandidate Wesley Hunt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Hunt demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has regularly spoken in favor of oil and gas production, saying on his campaign website "The reality is that our country would look like something out of the Flintstones if Biden eliminated oil and gas...This energy crisis was self-inflicted and there will be no resolution until Biden and his radical allies step away from their fantasy of zero carbon emissions by the next decade." In a press release, Hunt criticized his Democratic opponents saying "They advocated for policies that will cause severe economic damage to our community, including spending trillions in taxpayer funding to implement the Green New Deal. We cannot afford to let these dangerous proposals become reality."0Congressman Hunt opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/236/wesley-hunt/ https://wesleyfortexas.com/an-open-letter-to-joe-biden-the-war-on-american-energy-is-killing-the-middle-class/ https://web.archive.org/web/20201105082744/https:/wesleyfortexas.com/houstondebate/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Issa, DarrellCalifornia48RCongressman Darrell Issa disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' Congressman Issa stated, "It got a lot warmer before we were ever burning, uh, extracted, uh, net extracted carbon. And we don’t know what man’s impact is. We don’t know how to affect it." He later said “Climate change is occurring if humans all died today.”00In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' Congressman Darrell Issa said "We need to promote an all-of-the-above approach to clean energy, including clean natural gas..." An 'all-of-the-above' energy approach does not eliminate the use of fossil fuels, an essential step to combating climate change. Congressman Issa demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Darrell Issa makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' when asked if he supported a carbon tax, the congressman stated "Uh, the answer is no. Uh, I think the carbon tax is too simplistic." He voted for a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2020-09-25/2020-election-q-a-with-darrell-issa-candidate-in-the-50th-congressional-district https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2020-01-12/meet-darrell-issa-candidate-for-the-50th-congressional-district https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://issa.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-issa-issues-statement-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-decisionOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Ivey, GlennMaryland4DCongressman Ivey understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. He states in his campaign website that "Our country and the world are now in the midst of a crisis. Increased severe weather events are only one indication of the effects of the changing climate caused by the use of fossil fuels [...] Fundamental changes are required, and it will take a multi-pronged approach that will involve everyone. That is why I support the concept of the Green New Deal; we have no time to spare, and our future depends on its success." Furthermore, on his house.gov website, he states that "We urgently need to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions in order to avoid some of the worst consequences of climate change."100100Congressman Ivey has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action as a top priority issue. He has co-sponsored house resolutions such as H.Con.Res.56, which "expresses the sense of Congress that climate change caused by human activities constitutes a climate emergency, which demands the President use existing authorities and emergency powers to mitigate and prepare for the consequences of the emergency." Furthermore, his campaign manager stated that "Glenn Ivey knows that climate change is the most pressing crisis facing humankind, and he knows it will be necessary to call for and mandate difficult sacrifices." 100Congressman Ivey has no known position on a carbon fee. 5087.5https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_Ivey https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/37?s=1&r=6 https://ivey.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.eenews.net/articles/donna-edwards-leans-on-climate-record-in-tough-house-bid/ https://twitter.com/RepGlennIvey/status/1749448076962513312Supports Roe
Jackson, JonathanIllinois1DCongressman Jackson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He recognizes that climate change is real, and on his House website acknowledges the importance of addressing climate change.75100The congressman has a high score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of voting for climate action. Congressman Jackson's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/294/jonathan-jackson/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jonathan-jackson https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/jonathan-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Jackson, Ronny Texas13RCongressman Ronny Jackson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an April 2020 tweet, Congressman Jackson wrote "Under the guise of the pseudo-threat called 'climate change,' Democrats want to destroy American industry, and put millions of Americans on unemployment."00On his campaign website, Congressman Jackson writes "While the radical left pushes bad energy policies...which would decimate our ability to produce vital resources—I will always support legislation that protects the energy industry, and its impact on our local economy. Maintaining America’s energy independence and Texas’s position as the nation’s leading oil and gas producer is an important priority to me, and I will be an active voice in standing up to the Biden Administration’s war on energy." Congressman Ronny Jackson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Jackson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1252354737074130953?s=20 https://jackson.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://jackson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=427 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jacobs, SaraCalifornia51DCongresswoman Sara Jacobs understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Jacobs states, "Climate change is one of the biggest threats faced by humanity, and we need to do far more to stop it." Jacobs recognizes the "the value and urgency of the Paris Climate Agreement and will push to re-enter it."100100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Jacobs states that "Congress must also maintain, establish, and fully enforce environmental regulations that protect our ecosystems, natural resources, and public health." In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' the congresswoman stated that "As the climate crisis worsens, it is my sincere hope that more Republicans will rejoin the efforts to address climate change with the urgency it deserves, and I will gladly work with them to that end." In a tweet posted in 2020, Congresswoman Jacobs said "Climate change is one of the biggest threats we face, but Washington has failed to act & our young people will be forced to live with the consequences. We need to send a new generation of leaders to Congress who will address climate change with the urgency it requires." The Congresswoman's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 100Congresswoman Sara Jacobs publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://sarajacobsforca.com/environment https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=184 https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2020-09-24/sara-jacobs-53rd-congressional-district https://twitter.com/sarajacobsca/status/1252974148093194241 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=565Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
James, JohnMichigan10RCongressman James disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and driven by human activity. He has said that the jury is "still out" on climate change and referred to global warming as a natural phenomenon.00Congressman James voiced support for withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord during the Trump administration, and voiced opposition to the EPA's regulations. He also has a poor record with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of voting against climate action. Congressman James demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman James opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.facebook.com/macombcountyrepublicanparty/videos/1804298853208789/ https://www.congress.gov/member/john-james/J000307?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.notus.org/michigan/john-james-abortion-republicansOpposes Roe
Jayapal, PramilaWashington7DCongresswoman Pramila Jayapal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Pramila is standing up to climate change deniers in Congress and fighting for immediate action on climate change — pushing to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. and around the world. She is a proud co-sponsor of the "100 by '50" Act, which lays out a road map to achieve 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, including a just transition for workers in the fossil fuel industry. Pramila understands the dire consequences any further delay will have on our environment, public health, and local fishing and tourism industries."100100Congresswoman Jayapal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman brought a climate scientist as her guest to the 2019 State of the Union, stating in a press release, "Climate change is creating refugees, claiming lives and costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The Trump administration continues to push our planet down a path of destruction. Instead of tackling the problem head-on, President Trump is burying his head in the sand and handing out favors to his friends in the coal industry.” Congresswoman Jayapal also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 Twitter post, the Congresswoman stated, Boldly taking on climate change isn’t something we can compromise on — the fate of our communities and our planet is at stake." Rep. Jayapal makes climate change a top priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Jayapal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 E&E News article, the Congresswoman claimed the progressive movement had been, "a little bit all over the place," on carbon taxes and that, "No one wants to take it off the table... And at the same time, we want to recognize that there are some challenges inherent to each of these methods." The Congresswoman was also a supporter of Washington Initiative 1631, a 2018 ballot initiative in Washington state, which would have implemented a fee on carbon. Congresswoman Jayapal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.pramilaforcongress.com/energy-and-the-environment https://twitter.com/RepJayapal/status/908796614654935040 https://twitter.com/pramilajayapal/status/1304965786273021953 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060118143 https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2018/09/19/32586929/washington-states-carbon-fee-will-make-history-unless-big-oil-can-stop-it https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jayapal.house.gov/2022/06/24/jayapal-chair-of-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jeffries, HakeemNew York8DCongressman Jeffries understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement of support for President Biden’s Build Back Better Framework, he stated, “We will confront the climate crisis with the fierce urgency of now by making the largest federal investment ever in combating climate change. “100100Congressman Jeffries is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act, legislation that would require the President “to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change.” In a Tweet, Jeffries said "House Dems will continue to confront the climate crisis with the fierce urgency of now. And do everything in our power to save the planet from catastrophe." The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 100Congressman Jeffries has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://www.dems.gov/newsroom/press-releases/chairman-jeffries-statement-of-support-for-president-bidens-build-back-better-framework https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=10&s=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jeffries.house.gov/2022/06/24/rep-jeffries-statement-on-the-extreme-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson Jr., Henry C.Georgia4DCongressman Johnson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We cannot achieve or maintain a high standard of living if our environment is severely degraded or damaged. The window of opportunity to secure our natural environment against existential threats produced by human activity is rapidly closing. Humans are in large part responsible for climate change, a potentially devastating threat to our security and health that must immediately be addressed."100100Congressman Johnson has demonstrated leadership on climate change through advocating for climate action. In a 2018 press release being recognized for his 100% environmental voting record by Environment Georgia, the Congressman stated, "Protection of our imperiled planet is the central challenge of our time. Climate change is real and threatens our health, the environment, national security and our economy, and I’m committed to working with anyone on Capitol Hill, the White House and the Fourth District to invest in clean-energy technologies and jobs.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 meeting with Climate Climate Lobby volunteers, the Congressman stated, "Every American and indeed every person on this planet is affected by this public health crisis, but yet, in these times of isolation, self-reflection, and fervent politicking, it is all the more important that we take a step back and acknowledge the effect we are having on our planet." Rep. Johnson makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In a 2022 press release, "Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) criticized Shell for a 2020 company statement, saying that its operating plans, outlooks, budgets and pricing assumptions “do not reflect” its emission reduction targets. 'How can we take Shell’s climate mitigation goals seriously when they do not even consider these goals in their current budgets, outlooks and prices?” he asked.'" 100Congressman Johnson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://hankjohnson.house.gov/issues/environment https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-johnson-recognized-100-environmental-voting-record https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=280636796428603 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/democrats-go-after-big-oil-climate-pledges-calling-them-insufficient https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Georgia%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/e-newsletters/roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson, DustySouth Dakota1RCongressman Dusty Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with Bill Zortman of KELO, the Congressman stated, "We are reducing our carbon footprint more quickly than the European Union. And the last few years, they've been increasing their carbon footprint. We're not doing that through a piece of paper that doesn't hold China and India accountable until 2030. So yes, let's make sure we take care of the environment. I don't think, the accords or the right vehicle." 250In a 2019 radio interview with SDPB, when asked about the Paris Agreement, Congressman Johnson stated, "It seems interesting that they’re putting pressure on us for compliance when they’re so far out of compliance. And, of course, the Paris Accord exempts China and India from any mandates until 2030. If this is really an existential threat to human kind, it seems like it should be all hands on deck, not letting China and India out of the bag. And it seems like the European Union—if they believed it was an existential threat—they’d be meeting their goals under the Paris Accord.” Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Johnson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://kelo.com/news/articles/2019/may/01/dusty-johnson-updates-bill-zortman-on-the-border-and-carbon-emissions/ https://listen.sdpb.org/post/rep-johnson-disagrees-climate-action-now-act-ahead-vote https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://dustyjohnson.house.gov/media/press-releases/johnson-issues-statement-scotus-roe-v-wade-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Johnson, MikeLouisiana4RCongressman Mike Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 USA Today posted a video of the Congressman, stating, "I am not a big proponent of climate change data because I have seen data on the other side... The climate is changing. But the question is, is the climate changing because of natural cycles in the atmosphere... or is it changing because we drive SUVs."00Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership by supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In a 2017 op-ed in the Shreveport Times, the Congressman wrote, "President Donald Trump did us all a service this month by removing our country from the lopsided Paris climate agreement... Fourth, and very importantly, the Paris agreement accomplished almost nothing in exchange for all those extraordinary costs. Even the most optimistic studies projected that if all its conditions were met, the agreement would reduce global temperatures by only 0.2 degree Celsius. That’s a far cry from 'saving the planet.'" Congressman Johnson is a supporter of oil and gas exploration, stating in a press release, that, "The Trump administration’s decision to allow enhanced exploration, leasing and development within the Outer Continental Shelf, previously closed to such activities, prioritizes home-grown energy production and puts the United States one step closer to achieving energy dominance." Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Johnson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2017/05/31/u.s.-rep.-mike-johnson-and-climate-change/102355868/ https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/2017/06/08/rep-johnson-paris-climate-deal-bad-u-s/381772001/ https://mikejohnson.house.gov/media/press-releases/johnson-statement-trump-administration-s-proposed-oil-and-gas-leasing-program https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://mikejohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1155Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jordan, JimOhio4RCongressman Jim Jordan disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article by 'MIC,' "Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who has taken a cool $200,000 from fossil fuel firms, said 'God bless Chevron' for their plans to increase oil production rather than shrink their carbon emissions."00Congressman Jordan supported the president's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, "The Paris accord is a treaty that should have had a vote in the Senate. President Trump did the right thing by withdrawing us from an agreement that was not properly ratified. The Paris treaty would hurt American companies and American workers by depressing economic output, keep companies from creating jobs and drive millions more out of the country." He has also opposed the Green New Deal, stating, "The Green New Deal is not new, but it is devastating.” Congressman Jordan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Jordan makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). In 2008, Rep. Jordan was the first to sign Americans for Prosperity No Climate Tax Pledge. He has also said that "[He] will oppose any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue."00https://www.mic.com/impact/house-oversight-committee-shell-exxon-executives-hearing https://jordan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=4563 https://jordan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398131 https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-jim-jordan-climate-deniers-climate-change-20190409-fca3h7mj65g7xmjz264fo45qvi-story.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86-ThC1_iQ0Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, DavidOhio14RCongressman David Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 2528 Congressman Joyce joined the Conservative Climate Caucus, saying "I’m proud to be among those launching the Conservative Climate Caucus today. Republicans need to have a voice in creating practical solutions to address climate change." On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States must take an 'all of the above' approach that utilizes all available energy sources, including coal, oil, natural gas, and wind. This will help keep energy costs low for consumers. During my time in Congress, I have supported efforts which promote and prioritize the domestic production of energy sources and feel strongly that we must reduce our dependence on foreign energy." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Joyce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525.75https://joyce.house.gov/energy/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://joyce.house.gov/posts/joyce-issues-statement-on-scotus-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, JohnPennsylvania13RCongressman Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release touting Natural Gas, the Congressman stated, "Congress must support an ‘all of the above’ strategy to ensure Americans’ access to affordable and efficient energy. A leader in our nation’s natural gas production, Pennsylvania’s natural gas reserves have tripled between 2011 and 2017 thanks to the development of the Marcellus Shale. Not only has the development of natural gas in Pennsylvania expanded economic opportunities, but it also is driving declining carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. power sector. As a physician, I believe it is critical that we utilize clean-burning natural gas as a key component of our energy economy.”250In a 2019 press release advocating against the Paris Agreement, Congressman Joyce stated, "“When President Obama signed the Paris Agreement, he clearly did not understand the harm it would do to the manufacturers of south central Pennsylvania. The workers of the 13th District overwhelmingly elected President Trump to remove them from bad deals that hurt their businesses and eliminate their jobs, and I do not support reentering this lopsided pact that is unfair to my constituents.” Congressman Joyce demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Joyce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-clean-natural-gas-key-component-america-s-energy-economy https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-votes-shield-13th-district-workers-unfair-climate-deal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kamlager-Dove, SydneyCalifornia37DCongresswoman Kamlager-Dove understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release, she said "I was proud to commemorate Earth Day by introducing this resolution highlighting the need to take immediate action to address the climate crisis for the sake of our children and young people. Children and youth have the greatest stake in and will be the greatest beneficiaries of global progress toward combating climate change. At the same time, it is the younger generations that will suffer the most from a failure of the international community to act urgently on climate adaptation and mitigation."100100Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, she said "What can you do TODAY to end carbon in our atmosphere (bike vs. drive)? When planning purchases (electric vs. gas stove)? I rise up with Sierra Club in an all-out attack on climate catastrophe. Make your plan. Do your part. Let’s save our planet, y’all." Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has cosponsored climate legislation calling on the creation of a Green New Deal (H.Res.319).100Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.congress.gov/member/sydney-kamlager-dove/K000400?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://twitter.com/sydneykamlager/status/1354186826576093185 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://kamlager-dove.house.gov/media/press-releases/kamlager-dove-titus-introduce-resolution-threat-climate-change-poses-children https://kamlager-dove.house.gov/media/press-releases/kamlager-dove-statement-anniversary-landmark-roe-v-wade-rulingSupports Roe
Kaptur, MarcyOhio9DCongresswoman Marcy Kaptur understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's climate change Executive Orders, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is not an abstract issue for many Ohioans. Its impacts can be felt all along the shoreline of Lake Erie where warmer water can exacerbate problems such as harmful algal blooms. The effects of climate change are far and wide and impact our land, our water and our air – let the science be our guide, Mr. President.” 100100Congresswoman Kaptur has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Families in Northern Ohio know the climate crisis is real and poses an existential threat to our future. Tackling climate change to protect public health, the air we breathe, and the water we drink must be among our highest priorities." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, the Congresswoman hosted a 2019 hearing on climate change, stating, "Climate change is the global issue of our time and a challenge to our ability to sustain life on Earth. Our responsibility in Congress is to support efforts that meet that challenge head on." Congresswoman Kaptur makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019, she hosted a roundtable on Dept. of Energy's role in fighting climate change. In her opening statement she stated, "We are here to discuss the topic of climate change – a global issue that challenges our ability to sustain life on earth. Our job in Congress is to frame the magnitude of this challenge and provide a practical pathway forward that is regionally sensitive."100Congresswoman Kaptur has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7593.75https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-statement-trump-executive-orders-climate-change https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-votes-keep-us-paris-climate-accord https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1060433344348518 https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-hosts-hearing-department-energy-s-role-addressing-climate-change https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/politics/ohio-leaders-react-supreme-court-draft-ruling-roe-v-wade-abortion-marcy-kaptur-sherrod-brown-tim-ryan/95-6b340037-7ed5-4ae1-a442-f7de77059788Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kean Jr., ThomasNew Jersey7RCongressman Kean Jr. understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an article he wrote for northjersey.com, Kean said "Climate change is real and both political parties in Washington D.C. need to step up and be more earnest in their approaches [...] Republican elected officials need to acknowledge that our children’s futures are at stake, climate change is real, and global industrial activity is a contributing factor."750Congressman Kean Jr. does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Kean Jr. opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2020/09/03/tom-kean-jr-climate-change-demands-bipartisan-combat/5702903002/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on Roe
Keating, BillMassachusetts 9DCongressman Bill Keating understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. During his opening statement of an April 2019 hearing on the threats of climate change to national security, the Congressman stated, "What does our warming globe actually look like? Intensifying food and water insecurity; population flows related to migration, displacement, and planned relocation; the inability of fragile states to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate change; increased need for disaster relief and humanitarian assistance; great power competition resulting from the diminishment of arctic sea ice; and heightened conflict with and among states. These are problems that would generally demand the full focus of American foreign policy. You’d think that getting at the root cause of such an alarming list of issues would be a major priority."100100Congressman Keating’s 'Environment' page states, "Bill has long been a champion for environmental conservation. In the face of a changing climate, he believes is critical to invest in both conservation and coastal restoration initiatives." He was also quoted in The Hill, stating, "Our generation has failed to adequately address the climate crisis.” Congressman Keating’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Keating has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2019/4/keating-opening-statement-at-climate-change-hearing https://keating.house.gov/policy-work/issues/environment https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/461977-climate-activist-greta-thunberg-implores-lawmakers-to-listen-to-the https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/bill-keating Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kelly, MikePennsylvania16RCongressman Mike Kelly disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2013 press release responding to a speech President Obama gave on climate change, the Congressman stated, “In spite of serious, ongoing crises in trouble spots around the world, President Obama recently flew abroad to name climate change, of all things, the ‘global threat of our time.’ Despite the thousands of jobs that the Keystone XL pipeline is guaranteed to create and the vast public support it enjoys, the president refuses to approve it. Despite the hundreds of thousands of jobs derived from our nation’s coal industry – including more than 40,000 jobs in Pennsylvania – and the affordable energy it provides our communities, the White House’s climate advisor has shockingly declared that ‘a war on coal is exactly what’s needed.'" 00In a 2017 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "Today’s announcement is great news for the American people. It is a victory for our economy, our sovereignty, and our Constitution. The Paris Agreement – which should have been considered a treaty from the very beginning – was written with Americans and their elected representatives as an afterthought. It would result in unfair domestic harm for American workers, taxpayers, consumers, manufacturers, and energy producers. We would shoulder most of the cost and gain no measurable reward. There’s a reason President Obama never submitted this accord to the Senate for proper approval: it would have been rejected as a very bad deal for America, and rightly so." Congressman Kelly demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Kelly makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-responds-president-obama%E2%80%99s-climate-change-speech https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-applauds-president-trump%E2%80%99s-announcement-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kelly, RobinIllinois2DCongresswoman Robin Kelly understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her 'Energy and Environment' page, it states, "We are experiencing a climate crisis. Changing weather and natural disasters have created challenges for Illinoisans throughout the state. Addressing climate change and moving toward clean, sustainable energy sources is one of the most pressing issues facing our country." Some of her key objectives are "achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, prioritizing energy infrastructure that encourages sustainable, clean energy that supports the goal of net-zero emissions... (and) lowering energy costs for consumers through investments in biofuels, solar, and wind energy sources." 100100In a 2020 press release on air pollution and climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "In the ensuing decades, the focus has shifted to global warming, and fossil fuels have largely been reframed as a climate problem. And that makes sense, given the enormous implications of climate change for long-term human well-being. But there’s an irony involved: The air pollution case against fossil fuels is still the best case! In fact, even as attention has shifted to climate change, the air pollution case has grown stronger and stronger, as the science on air pollution has advanced by leaps and bounds. Researchers are now much more able to pinpoint air pollution’s direct and indirect effects, and the news has been uniformly bad." The Congresswoman does not mention climate change on her issues page. Congresswoman Kelly’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Kelly publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10093.75https://robinkelly.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://robinkelly.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/air-pollution-is-much-worse-than-we-thought https://robinkelly.house.gov/issues https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://robinkelly.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-kelly-expresses-outrage-scotus-overturns-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kelly, TrentMississippi1RCongressman Trent does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Trent's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I support an all-of-the above energy strategy. Americans deserve access to reliable and affordable energy, and the federal government does not need to be in the business of picking winners and losers. Technological advances in extracting oil and natural gas from shale, specifically a technique known as fracking, has increased our GDP, reduced prices for consumers, expanded investment in the energy sector, created jobs, and is the leading contributing factor for improvements in the economy." Congressman Trent does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Trent makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).012.5https://trentkelly.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14933 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://trentkelly.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5512Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kennedy, TimNew York26DCongressman Kennedy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his former campaign website, he said "New Yorkers are already experiencing climate change. Statewide, there are 159,337 clean energy workers who continue to advance sustainability methods and promote clean production. Let’s BUILD BACK America’s workforce to reflect a green future today."750Congressman Kennedy does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Kennedy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5050https://kennedyforuscongress.com/issues/ https://www.timkennedyforsenate.com/build-back-nySupports Roe
Khanna, RoCalifornia17DCongressman Ro Khanna understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate,' page, Khanna states we must have "the sources of energy to bring back manufacturing while having a moonshot in renewable energy and energy efficiency to create jobs, lower costs, end our dependence on petrostate authoritarians, and tackle the climate crisis [...] It is our responsibility to leave the planet healthy and safe for our children and future generations. This requires preserving open spaces, developing sustainable communities, achieving energy efficiency and water conservation, and investing in alternative energy sources. I will fight for protective measures against the harmful effects of climate change and hold local polluters accountable."100100Congressman Khanna has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed on California's climate progress in the Sacramento Bee, the Congressman wrote, "We have been pushing for our state to lead in the fight against runaway climate change for years now, and together we’ve achieved a lot. We’re on our way to running on 100 percent clean energy by 2045 – one of the most ambitious targets in the nation. California is showing concrete results in achieving the vision of a Green New Deal while fostering economic growth. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest budget commits California to becoming “carbon-neutral” by 2045." Rep. Khanna makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 San Jose Spotlight article, The Congressman in a 2021 tweet stated, "The UN’s climate change report confirms we've already warmed the globe and must act immediately to prevent it from worsening. Global warming is causing heat waves, stronger storms, flooding, and droughts. The stakes are clear for the infrastructure bill. No climate no deal.” 100Congressman Khanna supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. According to Science Magazine Rep. Khanna has stated his support for a carbon fee stating, "I’m obviously in favor of a carbon tax.” Congressman Khanna voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://khanna.house.gov/issues/environment-climate https://khanna.house.gov/media/editorials/climate-crisis-needs-courage-change-here-s-what-gov-newsom-needs-do https://twitter.com/RepRoKhanna/status/1424842631083925508 http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/special-series-new-congress-meet-ro-khanna-representing-heart-silicon-valley https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://khanna.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-khanna-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kiggans, Jen Virginia2VACongresswoman Kiggans does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Kiggans does not oppose climate action. Kiggans is the co-chair of the Conservative Climate Caucus, which seeks to address climate change from a conservative position. However, on her website, Kiggans advocates for an all of the above approach to energy. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congresswoman Kiggans opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.13newsnow.com/article/news/politics/elaine-luria-jen-kiggans-react-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade/291-8cf4eb42-5903-4c1d-8db0-f268152b2af9 https://kiggans.house.gov/resources/energyOpposes Roe
Kiley, KevinCalifornia3RCongressman Kiley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he recognized that climate change plays a roll in California's wildfires, he fails to recognize the role of humans and fossil fuel emissions in driving it.250Congressman Kiley supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Kiley said to the Sacramento Bee "I joined the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus to work in a bipartisan way to preserve both our environment and economic opportunity and to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate. I have also actively supported investments in clean energy."50Congressman Kiley opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2525https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284816431.html#storylink=cpy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-19/republican-recall-hopefuls-seek-to-differentiate-themselves-in-san-francisco-debateOpposes Roe
Kim, Young California40RCongresswoman Young Kim agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Tweet, Young said "We all know that the climate is changing, and that it’s time to seek innovative and clean energy solutions to lower emissions."5014Congresswoman Young Kim is a co-sponsor of the Trillion Trees Act (H.R 2639), which will "conserve, restore and grow 1 trillion trees worldwide globally to grow our forest resiliency and reduce emissions." Congresswoman Kim expressed in a tweet posted in February 2021 that "We can address climate change, grow our economy and ensure reliable, affordable energy for consumers. I’m looking forward to promoting free-market climate solutions on @housesciencegop." Congresswoman Kim supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Young opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Young voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2534.75https://twitter.com/RepYoungKim/status/1515356790950703110 https://youngkim.house.gov/issues/wildfires https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2639/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22trillion+trees%22%5D%7D https://twitter.com/repyoungkim/status/1359224144496328714 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://youngkim.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-young-kim-fights-protect-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Krishnamoorthi, Raja Illinois8DCongressman Raja Krishnamoorthi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his 'Protecting Our Environment & Growing The Green Economy' page, he states, "We have a solemn obligation to protect our environment and to take a sustainable approach to managing our natural resources. As the former president of a solar technology company, I know firsthand that the preservation of our air, water, and wildlife for future generations is not only a moral imperative, but also an economic necessity. I’m dedicated to a comprehensive approach to protecting our environment and supporting our economy at every level." In a 2018 press release calling on FEMA to incorporate climate change into its flood maps, the Congressman stated, “We can no longer afford to ignore climate change’s role in magnifying the damage of storms and their staggering cost to taxpayers as we plan for future disasters. Experts have noted that the flood waters of Hurricane Florence could be half a foot higher due to rising sea levels caused by climate change while other research points to its capacity to amplify the power of the storms themselves...it’s imperative that FEMA accepts the scientific consensus on climate change and incorporates its impact into projecting the potential damage of future storms."100100Congressman Krishnamoorthi has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. From a 2021 press release, "Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi hailed Thursday’s passage of the Investing in a New Vision for the Environment and Surface Transportation (INVEST) in America Act, a five-year plan to invest $715 billion into infrastructure to create jobs and fortify U.S. transportation systems. "I’m proud that the House was able to pass the INVEST in America Act to keep the U.S. competitive on the global stage for infrastructure and to positively contribute to the environment,” Congressman Krishnamoorthi said. 'The climate change, environmental equity, and water policy aspects of the INVEST in America Act are crucial to safeguarding our natural resources and economic future. I’m proud that my amendments to support environmentally friendly materials and study sewage system sustainability were included in this landmark legislation which will rebuild and reimagine our country’s infrastructure for the next generation.'” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change isn't just a problem for one political party, or one country. It's a problem facing every country, every human, now and for generations to come. We need to take action NOW." Rep. Krishnamoorthi makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 'Climate Action Now Act' (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congressman Krishnamoorthi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/issues/environment https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-krishnamoorthi-we-can-no-longer-afford-ignore-climate-change-s-role https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-raja-krishnamoorthi-applauds-passage-invest-america-act-including https://twitter.com/RajaForCongress/status/1458732580023508996 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors?r=3&s=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://krishnamoorthi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-krishnamoorthi-denounces-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kustoff, DavidTennessee8RCongressman David Kustoff does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On Congressman Kuster's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "H.R. 2910, the Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act: This legislation increases transparency and accountability and promotes better coordination among agencies involved when reviewing interstate natural gas pipelines," as well as, "H.R. 2883, the Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act: This bill establishes a predictable and transparent process to permit the construction of cross-border pipelines and electric facilities." Congressman Kuster demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Kustoff opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://kustoff.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://kustoff.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-kustoff-issues-statement-supreme-court-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaHood, DarinIllinois16RCongressman LaHood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman was asked his stance on climate change, in which he answered, "I agree, the climate is changing. I believe that humans play a role in that, there's no doubt about that. The question is, at what level do they play a role? Is it 51% is it 35% what is that?"250In a 2016 Facebook Post the Congressman wrote, "What happened in Paris won't stay in Paris. How did President Obama circumvent Congress during the climate change conference?" In a hearing in the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Rep. Lahood made the following statement on the social cost of carbon. "Last year I was pleased to cosponsor H.R. 5668, Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulation Act. Or THERA. This legislation is aimed at prohibiting the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency from considering the Social Cost of Carbon as part of any cost benefit analysis unless specifically authorized by law. If passed the DOE and EPA would no longer rely on manipulated and fabricated economic benefits to justify or support new job-killing environmental regulations. The Social Cost of Carbon is nothing but a political tool lacking scientific integrity and transparency conceived and utilized by an administration pushing a green agenda to the detriment of the American taxpayers. Perhaps a better measurement of the Social Cost of Carbon is not the net damages that result from a 1-metric ton increase in carbon dioxide emissions in a given year but the damage inflicted on domestic industries by the environmental regulations justified by this flawed calculation." Congressman Lahood demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Lahood opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://www.week.com/story/35194619/darin-lahood-in-town-for-first-town-hall https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1568524306804354 https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/HHRG-115-SY18-WState-LaHood-20170228_0.pdf https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://lahood.house.gov/2022/6/lahood-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaLota, NickNew York1RCongressman LaLota does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his House website he said "We need to work in a serious and bipartisan manner to tackle pollution and mitigate mankind’s negative effect on our environment. However, he fails to acknowledge the role of emissions on climate change.250Congressman LaLota demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Although he is a member of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, he has voiced support for the expansion of oil drilling and pipelines, and opposes the Green New Deal. Furthermore, LaLota has a low score with the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a record of voting against climate action legislation.0Congressman LaLota opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/267/nicholas-j-lalota/ https://lalota.house.gov/media/press-releases/climatesolutions https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220809180750/https:/www.nicklalota.com/protecting-life https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
LaMalfa, DougCalifornia1RCongressman LaMalfa disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a committee meeting, LaMalfa dismissed Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg's statement that climate change is real dismissing it as the changing seasons. According to a 2018 article by The Guardian, the Congressman was quoted stating that he, "didn't buy" human-made climate change.014Congressman LaMalfa co-sponsored H.R.6813 "To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule related to revisions to the air emissions reporting requirements, and for other purposes" and cosponsored H.R.8773 "Revoking Engine and Vehicle Requirements Act of 2022." Congressman LaMalfa demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Lamalfa makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman referred to a carbon fee as a, “job-killing scheme,” in a 2016 brief sponsored by the Center for American Progress. He also voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 03.5https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/northern-california-congressmans-climate-quip-18380653.php https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/31/california-wildfire-climate-change-carr-fire https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/28144132/CarbonPriceFiscal-brief.pdf https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8773?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22lamalfa%22%7D&s=6&r=1 https://lamalfa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/lamalfa-reacts-to-supreme-court-s-repeal-of-roe https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6813?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22lamalfa%22%7D&s=5&r=2 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Landsman, GregOhio1DCongressman Landsman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he said "We must take action to address the threat of climate change and pass down a sustainable, safe world to our children."75100Congressman Landsman supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. On his website, Landsman said "In Congress, Greg is fighting to protect access to clean air and water and hold polluters accountable. He is also working to return federal investments, made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment Act, that support renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental restoration in Southwest Ohio."50Congressman Landsman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5068.75https://www.landsmanforcongress.com/the-issues-1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Langworthy, NickNew York23RCongressman Langworthy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Langworthy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Langworthy has expressed support for removing restrictions on fracking, restarting the Keystone Pipeline, and increasing fossil fuels production. He also has a low record with the LCV indicating a history of voting against climate action.0Congressman Langworthy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/259/nicholas-a-langworthy/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/nick-langworthy https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/23rd-congressional-candidates-differ-on-overturn-of-roe-v-wade/article_f32ca65c-7cd2-5fee-b832-5bf55a14156a.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Larsen, RickWashington2DCongressman Rick Larsen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Scientific evidence leaves no doubt that the global climate is changing as a result of greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activity. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading organization in assessing climate change, has found that greenhouse gas emissions have risen to unprecedented levels. I am committed to protecting Washington state’s environment and mitigating the devastating effects of climate change." 100100Congressman Larsen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Congress must take concrete steps to address the threats of climate change. Since the beginning of the 116th Congress, Democrats in the House of Representatives have made addressing climate change a priority." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman also introduced National Evaluation of Aviation and Aerospace Solutions to Climate Change Act (H.R. 5977), stating in a press release, "Climate change threatens life on Earth, and addressing this threat is one of my top priorities in Congress... This bill will help catalog those efforts, identify barriers to the adoption of mitigation efforts and serve as a roadmap for the steps the aviation and aerospace sector must take to achieve a 100 percent clean economy by 2050.” Rep. Larsen makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman voted to direct the United States Coast Guard to submit a report on the vulnerabilities of Coast Guard installations and requirements from climate change over the next 20 years, stating in a 2019 press release, "Congress must take concrete steps to protect U.S. Coast Guard installations at risk due to the effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, flooding, drought and wildfires.”100Congressman Larsen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://larsen.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14892 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1513 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2345 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1500 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2672Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Larson, John B.Connecticut1DCongressman John Larson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Larson's, 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "The scientific evidence is clear: climate change poses an existential threat. This crisis cannot wait. Rep. Larson and Congress are enacting legislation now to ensure we have healthy and safe planet."100100Congressman Larson has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 House Ways and Means Committee hearing, the Congressman on The Economic and Health Consequences of Climate Change the Congressman stated, "The science is clear, we are in a midst of a climate crisis and must act now. Climate change is real, it is caused by human activity, and without action, the consequences for the planet will be dire." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2022 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change isn't going anywhere. We need to act NOW. That's why I support multiple bills to address this dire need...” Rep. Larsen also makes climate change a top priority issue as well. On his campaign website, the Congressman states "Climate change is here now. In Connecticut and around the world, we are already seeing its effects on our air quality, wildlife, the severity of natural disasters, and more. We can’t wait any longer to cut our emissions and create new green energy jobs while we’re doing it. John knows this. That’s why he hasn’t waited for gridlock to clear in Washington to take bold action and get results. As a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee, John has spearheaded numerous clean energy tax credits, which have sparked a boom in solar, wind, and other zero emission technologies."100Congressman Larson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman introduced the American Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which aims to put a tax on carbon pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 52% in ten years. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://larson.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-calls-action-climate-change https://twitter.com/johnlarsonct/status/1489406721042923522 https://larsonforcongress.org/issues/climate-change/ https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-larson-introduces-carbon-tax-legislation https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-introduces-bill-address-climate-crisis-head-and-invest-nation-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://larson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/larson-statement-supreme-court-ruling-end-reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Latta, Robert E.Ohio5RCongressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a statement made to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy and Research Hearing on Climate Change Legislation, he stated, "It is time for Congress to take a strong look at climate change legislation and the effects it will have on our economy, especially how hard it will affect the Midwestern states that rely heavily on agriculture, manufacturing, and small businesses." 250Congressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on climate change. According to a a 2015 press release, Congressman Latta stated, "Despite the lofty rhetoric we heard at this afternoon’s press conference, these new rules are more about this President looking to build a legacy than build a better future. The rules, released under the guise of ‘Climate Change prevention’, will directly impact hardworking families all across Ohio with job losses, and increased energy costs – dramatic increases in some cases." Congressman Latta demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Latta makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2012 press release opposing a fee on carbon, the Congressman stated, "During a time when many families and local manufacturers are already facing financial hardships, we cannot impose a tax increase that will result in higher energy prices.” Congressman Latta was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://latta.house.gov/blog/?postid=157726 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398046 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=315306 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lattaforcongress.com/ (Listed on main page)Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaTurner, JakeKansas2RCongressman Jake LaTurner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Jake LaTurner demonstrates a lack of leadership with no public statements, advocacy or votes for climate action.25Congressman Jake LaTurner opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://www.ksn.com/news/your-local-election-hq/candidates/jake-laturner-republican-for-u-s-house-kansas-district-2/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://laturner.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-laturner-issues-statement-scotus-overturning-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lawler, MikeNew York17RCongressman Lawler disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Lawler said "Considering NYS was once a glacier, it's clear we've had climate change for a very long time, not just in the last 20 years."1000Congressman Lawler demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Lawler has accepted money from the oil and gas industry, such as from PACS for Exxon and Chevron. Lawler is also a cosponsor of the Energy Choice Act, which would prevent the transition away from fossil fuels.0Congressman Lawler opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://www.foodandwateraction.org/democracy/mike-lawler-climate-environment/ https://x.com/ny17org/status/1681757303534411777 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/2022/10/06/mike-lawler-ny-17-these-are-my-positions-on-abortion/69524466007/Opposes Roe
Lee, LaurelFlorida15RCongresswoman Lee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, avoiding answering the question when asked in a debate.250Congresswoman Lee does not oppose climate action. In a debate, the Congresswoman voiced support for sustainable growth and rebuilding, as well as protecting existing green spaces. However, she has also called for "reviving" the Keystone pipeline while opposing expanding drilling off the coast of Florida. 25Congresswoman Lee opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://floridapolitics.com/archives/565536-alan-cohn-laurel-lee-spar-on-abortion-immigration-as-accusations-fly/ https://www.theledger.com/story/news/politics/elections/congressional/2022/10/24/democrat-alan-cohn-faces-republican-laurel-lee-congressional-district-15-seat/10561153002/ https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/300/laurel-lee/#_edn40 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Lee, SummerPennsylvania12DCongresswoman Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the Congresswoman writes "In Congress I will fight for a Green New Deal to transition to a 100% clean and renewable energy economy. This includes ending fracking, which poses a disproportionate threat to communities like ours. The Green New Deal centers frontline and marginalized communities facing the brunt of environmental racism - communities with poisoned water, high rates of asthma, etc - communities like ours." In a 2022 interview with Teen Vogue, Congresswoman Lee states "There is no future in fossil fuels, not for our planet and not for any industry. No matter how much planet-destroying drilling and fracking you do, those fossil fuels will run out. We can either be leaders in the movement toward 100% renewable energy, pass a Green New Deal, and create millions of green union jobs and infrastructure investment here — or we can be left behind again."100100Congresswoman Lee has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release, she said "I’m so proud to deliver over $44M in funding to cut methane emissions in my district. In regions like Western Pennsylvania, where the legacy of oil and gas extraction is deeply felt, this investment is not just about reducing emissions; it’s about justice and health for our communities [...] unchecked methane emissions contribute to climate change and pose serious health risks, especially in marginalized areas. This is a big step towards correcting historical neglect and ensuring a cleaner, healthier future for all.” The Congresswoman has cosponsored pro climate legislation such as the Climate Resilience Workforce Act.100Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://summerforpa.com/issues/ https://www.teenvogue.com/story/summer-lee-congress-pennsylvania-interview https://summerlee.house.gov/posts/congresswoman-summer-lee-announces-over-44m-in-funding-to-cut-methane-emissions-from-wells-and-support-environmental-restoration-of-well-sites https://www.congress.gov/member/summer-lee/L000602?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Lee, SusieNevada3DCongresswoman Susie Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 virtual town hall, Rep. Lee discussed the need for urgent climate action, saying, "As federal leaders, we owe it to our communities to act with urgency to deliver on climate action that meets this moment at the scale that science and justice demand. I am proud to work alongside the Nevada Conservation League and environmental advocates to help secure a better climate future."100100On Congresswoman Lee's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "I will be a leader in Congress when it comes to energy independence and combating climate change." The Congresswoman is a cosponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congresswoman Lee’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://nevadaconservationleague.org/icymi-congresswoman-susie-lee-joins-environmental-advocates-to-discuss-federal-climate-action/ https://susieleeforcongress.com/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Leger Fernandez, Teresa New Mexico3DCongresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'NM Political Report,' the Congresswoman Leger Fernandez states, "Some of the science and data that I’ve read places very dire consequences if we don’t address climate change. If you read the book by William duBuys, 'A Great Aridness,' he summarizes a lot of that research, where they discuss that New Mexico may face a future of being like the Sonoran desert. The desertification of New Mexico is very scary, which is why I believe that addressing climate change and doing this transition is an urgent need." In a tweet posted in October 2021, Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez writes "We need bold climate action now."100100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a tweet posted in September 2021, Congresswoman Leger Fernandez writes "The climate crisis is already here. It's past time to act. It's time to pass a clean energy standard. #BuildBackBetter." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an endorsement interview with 'Yucca Action,' Congresswoman Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez states "We must seriously and intentionally listen to climate scientists and address climate change. In Congress, I will advocate for bold action to meet or exceed carbon reductions of 50% of 2005 levels by 2030." Congresswoman Legar Fernandez makes climate change a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "And we know that climate change is an existential crisis. We must reduce carbon pollution, rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, and invest in renewable energy resources like wind and solar, as well as clean energy tax incentives."100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandezhas no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2020/10/07/candidate-qa-teresa-leger-fernandez-on-environmental-issues/ https://twitter.com/RepTeresaLF/status/1450141247549710341?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet https://twitter.com/TeresaForNM/status/1441118934678192131 https://www.yuccaaction.org/teresa https://www.teresaforall.com/sustainability https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Letlow, JuliaLouisiana5RJulia Letlow does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Julia Letlow demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has sent multiple tweets criticizing the Biden Administration's supposed attacks on the oil and gas industries, arguing that they are essential to American energy production, like this one: "Our people don't have to be paying outrageous gas prices at the pump. Louisiana has both the abundant natural resources and a skilled workforce ready to return to work. We just need this Administration to end their unreasonable war on domestic energy production."0Congresswoman Letlow opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/repjulialetlow/status/1501320460679757830 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepJuliaLetlow/status/1404931024690331653 https://twitter.com/repjulialetlow/status/1501320460679757830 https://www.era-leader.com/local-content-top-stories/congresswoman-letlow-issues-statement-supreme-court-abortion-decision-0#sthash.lCKr7J6t.dpbs https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Levin, MikeCalifornia49DCongressman Mike Levin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Congressman's, 'Climate Change & Natural Resources,' page, it states, "Rep. Levin knows that the climate crisis is the defining issue of our time. With California experiencing worsening droughts, heat waves, and rising sea levels, Rep. Levin believes we must take aggressive action now to limit the worst effects on our planet and preserve our natural resources for future generations. Rep. Levin is proud to serve on the House Natural Resources Committee and the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis. He knows that we can grow our economy, create new jobs in America, and combat the climate crisis at the same time, and he has introduced a number of bills to achieve those goals."100100Congressman Mike Levin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed published in The Hill on pressing the Interior Secretary on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is a defining issue of our time, and if we don’t take bold action to address this crisis, our children and grandchildren will suffer the worst consequences." Congressman Levin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Q&A with the San Diego Union Tribune, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "I think that the fossil fuel industry had an opportunity to invest in technology and innovation and to change their business model but instead they decided to invest in politicians. And that’s what they’ve done. And I’ve got colleagues, I don’t want to name them but smart, Republican colleagues who their own districts are facing climate change today." Rep. Levin makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, "U.S. Representative Mike Levin (CA-49) led a letter signed by 133 House Members calling on President Biden to ensure infrastructure legislation includes robust investments to combat the climate crisis."100The Congressman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Levin is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://levin.house.gov/issues/climate-change-natural-resources-0 https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/in-the-news/hill-rep-mike-levin-op-ed-congress-must-press-interior-secretary-act-climate https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2019-08-21/interview-with-rep-mike-levin https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-leads-letter-with-133-house-members-calling-for-strong-climate-action-in-infrastructure-package https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-statement-on-draft-supreme-court-decision-on-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lieu, TedCalifornia36DCongressman Lieu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Lieu's House website, he says "it's clear to me that to solve climate change, we need America to do what California has done, and then for America to get other countries to do what California has done." In a press release, Lieu said "Climate Change is the greatest existential threat to humanity. We must act now and act fast to protect our planet and future generations from the impacts of climate change. Across the world, we’ve seen more and more extreme weather events, including the recent wildfire on Maui and the floods in Libya, which have resulted in thousands of deaths. At home in my congressional district, my constituents have seen wildfires, landslides, and other natural disasters that have destroyed homes and livelihoods. Unless we take extreme action now, it will only get worse."100100Congressman Lieu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Lieu introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, "There is no threat greater to our nation’s security than climate change. Failing to protect our planet will endanger the lives of millions, hurt our economy and jeopardize our children’s future. The wildfires in my district were worsened by drought conditions and are a sliver of what is in store if we fail to act." Rep. Lieu also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in the Brentwood Residents Association Newsletter, the Congressman wrote, "When it comes to our future, there is no greater threat than climate change. I believe that strong federal action is necessary to protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the world our children will inherit. Having a clean environment should not be a partisan issue." Congressman Lieu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a March 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "Speaking at The Hill’s “The Loss of Nature: A Global Threat” event, Lieu said climate change has prompted an upheaval in biodiversity, with policies needed at the state, federal and international to address the problem. “Climate change is an existential threat, not just to California or America, but to the entire world. And the way that we solve this is we get the rest of America to do what California did and the rest of the world to do what America hopefully will do soon," Lieu told The Hill’s Steve Clemons.“The good news is a number of countries are taking climate change seriously. I think they can all do more, but we’ve shifted in just a decade or so from a bunch of people denying that climate change even is happening to now people who are acknowledging it and that’s a very good first step,” said Lieu, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee."100Congressman Lieu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a press release condemning a resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise, which opposed a carbon fee, he stated, "A majority of the American people and even ExxonMobil support a carbon fee. I call on my House Republican colleagues to stop the shenanigans and work across the aisle to help solve our climate crisis.” He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://lieu.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-reintroduces-bold-climate-change-bill-0 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/544881-ted-lieu-raises-alarm-biodiversity-climate-change https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-lieu-statement-opposing-house-vote-condemning-carbon-tax https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lofgren, ZoeCalifornia18DCongresswoman Lofgren understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Climate change is the most serious environmental issue facing our nation and our planet. Today we see the negative impacts of climate change as heat-trapping emissions increase global temperatures, melt once permanent ice caps and glaciers, and raise our sea levels leading to greater threats from erratic weather. The pace of climate change threatens habitats and food production as well as public health."100100Congresswoman Lofgren has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced The Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act of 2019 (H.R. 4041), which according to her press release would, spur investment in clean energy projects, create jobs, and help communities fight the climate crisis. In her press release, the Congresswoman stated, "We all benefit as Americans when we invest in the future of our country. I am pleased to reintroduce the Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act for the fourth time, as momentum builds in California and across the country for aggressive action on climate change.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "Our oil dependency also undermines our national security and worsens the threat of climate change. That's why Zoe has supported efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase efficiency standards for cars, trucks, and buildings. By increasing efficiency, we can reduce overall consumption and slow emissions that lead to climate change." Rep. Lofgren makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Lofgren has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).7593.75https://lofgren.house.gov/energy-environment-issues/environment.htm https://lofgren.house.gov/media/press-releases/clean-energy-victory-bonds https://lofgren.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepZoeLofgren/status/1525176800447451136Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Loudermilk, BarryGeorgia11RCongressman Barry Loudermilk disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 press release advocating for sound science to be used in the Environmental Protection Agency, the Congressman stated, "For several years, the EPA and other government bureaucracies have been pushing out environmental regulations based on new scientific ‘discoveries’ relating to climate change. However, the data on which these ‘discoveries’ are based have not been made available to the general scientific community for review or fact-checking. This has brought into question the overall motives of the EPA and other agencies who are demanding more environmental regulations. All regulatory decisions should be based on factual scientific information that is open and available for public viewing. Americans deserve common sense reform, and this bill is a positive step to bring honesty and sound science to the EPA.”00Congressman Loudermilk shows a lack of leadership by tweeting in support of the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump is making the right decision withdrawing from the #ParisAgreement on climate change, and I fully support his decision." Along with fellow House Republicans, Rep. Loudermilk submitted an amicus briefing to the Supreme Court opposing the Clean Power Plan. In a press release, he stated, "The EPA’s regulations on new and existing power plants would be devastating to our economy if they are implemented. In my home state of Georgia alone, electricity prices would be expected to increase by 12 percent; and, with the average American household already spending $15,000 a year on hidden regulatory taxes, the Clean Power Plan is simply unworkable." Congressman Loudermilk demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Loudermilk makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release advocating against a federal carbon fee, the Congressman stated, "The last thing that the federal government needs to do is to add more tax burdens on hardworking Americans. The President’s plan to tax carbon is yet another attempt to grow the government and cut private sector jobs. While environmental issues are important, the solution is not to make gas and electricity more expensive for consumers. Instead, we need to further encourage businesses to explore alternative energy options, so we can protect the environment and allow Americans to keep their hard-earned money in their pockets.” The Congressman also co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1052 https://twitter.com/reploudermilk/status/870378067528744965 https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=547 https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=778 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://loudermilk.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4028Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lucas, FrankOklahoma3RCongressman Frank Lucas agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2021 article in the 'Tulsa World News,' Congressman Lucas states, "Fossil fuel use isn’t incompatible with emissions reductions," Lucas wrote. "We don’t have to repeat Europe’s mistake and choose between reliable, affordable energy and clean energy. My Republican colleagues and I acknowledge that climate change is real, but the way we succeed isn’t by weaponizing financial regulators and shunning the energy companies that are essential to meet our energy needs. If we do that, we are cutting off the industry that is making essential investments in the new technologies necessary to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks."500In a press release criticizing the Paris Accords, Congressman Lucas stated, "It will be fascinating to see how the EPA responds to this concept of sending U.S.employees out to enforce agreements that the Senate has not yet approved.” According to a 2019 E&E News article, the Congressman who is the ranking member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather. According to a spokeswoman, "As a rancher who represents a large community of agricultural producers, Ranking Member Lucas wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather... He's interested in how we can help communities increase preparedness for weather events and help businesses benefit from better short-term weather prediction." Congressman Lucas demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Lucas makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 interview with Axios, when asked about climate change regulations the Congressman stated, "A lot of folks I work with advocate carbon taxes, rules and regulations — all sorts of ways to compel consumers to do things that are at least in the short- and medium-term not in their best economic interest. ... I just fundamentally believe that’s not the direction that will ultimately get to where we and the world wants to go.” Congressman Lucas voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).012.5https://tulsaworld.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/d-c-digest-lucas-challenges-limitations-placed-on-energy-companies-to-combat-climate-change/article_1f2580da-4325-11ec-844f-4b38ce9fd8e9.html https://lucas.house.gov/press-release/lucas-questions-epa%E2%80%99s-role-international-climate-agreement https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060120401 https://www.axios.com/republican-bill-double-science-funding-climate-change-b734c787-257a-49c3-87bb-0f9ff762d906.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/oklahoma-lawmakers-react-to-roe-v-wade-overturnOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Luna, Anna PaulinaFlorida13RCongresswoman Luna does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Luna demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congresswoman's website, she says "Anna believes the American people have the right to use American oil from American soil. She will continue to lead the charge in Congress for American energy independence by restoring oil and gas leases, reinstating the Keystone XL pipeline, and fighting the Left’s radical Green New Deal regulations." In 2024 the Congresswoman cosponsored a bill which would repeal recent emission regulations put on cars sold in D.C.0Congresswoman Luna opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/VoteAPL/status/1540342614897172483?s=20&t=HEfstmdHcGD3ehrzU5k33w https://luna.house.gov/energy-independence https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7526/text?s=9&r=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Luttrell, MorganTexas8RCongressman Luttrell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Luttrell demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, Luttrell said "Joe Biden and the radical left's plans will decimate the domestic energy industry and put hundreds of thousands of Texans out of work. We must defend American energy!" 0Congressman Luttrell opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).The congressman has also repeatedly voted in favor of disapproving of EPA rules and regulations intended to improve the climate.2512.5https://twitter.com/MLuttrellTX/status/1402424554765553665 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/member/morgan-luttrell/L000603?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=113604004287327&id=100813268899734&set=a.101197502194644Opposes Roe
Lynch, Stephen F.Massachusetts 8DCongressman Stephen Lynch understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The seminal Fourth National Climate Assessment, recently released by the federal U.S. Global Change Research Program, only reinforced the current and potential impact of climate change on U.S. national security. According to the report, produced by thirteen federal agencies: “[c]limate change and extremes increase the risk to national security through direct impacts on U.S. military infrastructure and by affecting factors, including food and water availability, that can exacerbate conflict outside U.S. borders.” Moreover, climate change is already affecting our defense readiness by “damaging roads, runways, and waterfront infrastructure.” 100100Congressman Lynch has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Change National Security Strategy Act of 2019 (H.R. 1201), which, "calls on the Federal Government to step up and lead the fight against the greatest global threat facing the earth," according to a press release announcing an earlier version of the bill. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump risks irreparably damaging America’s future generations by abandoning the Paris Climate Agreement." Rep. Lynch makes climate change a top priority issue. In a December 2018 Tweet, the Congressman announced his support for a Green New Deal, writing, "I am happy to support the Resolution for a Standing Committee on a #GreenNewDeal."100Congressman Lynch publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Lynch is a co-sponsor of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which would implement a fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://lynch.house.gov/issue/energy-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1201/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.+1238%22%5D%7D https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-introduces-climate-change-national-security-strategy-act https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-statement-response-president-trump-abandoning-paris-climate-agreement https://twitter.com/RepStephenLynch/status/1075516895875489792?fbclid=IwAR0i6nDCNyuGZ31xgJ-c1FIPppbsXdWH9oSeBsBHX5NWqOhKeDK0IS8qzgk https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/repstephenlynch/status/1521574188968034309?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mace, NancySouth Carolina1RNancy Mace disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, she declared "I'm kind of mixed on this. I'm not a scientist. To me, it's not clear cut." She later argued "You can't say one or the other when there's data on both sides of the issue."014Nancy Mace’s does not oppose climate action, but is not a strong advocate for effective policies. She helped establish the Conservative Climate Caucus, and has called for efforts to increase renewable energy production.25Congresswoman Mayce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2516https://twitter.com/joecunninghamsc/status/1301692362314387456?lang=en https://mace.house.gov/media/newsletters/06252021-our-environment-everything https://mace.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-mace-khanna-introduce-bill-ban-russian-oil-imports https://mace.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mace-releases-statement-re-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-leak https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Magaziner, SethRhode Island2DCongressman Magaziner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states, "too many Rhode Islanders are making difficult choices between paying for gas and groceries, while billion-dollar energy companies are making record profits and climate change remains an immediate threat to our way of life."100100Congressman Magaziner has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his campaign website, it promises "In Congress, Seth will continue his work to lower the cost of energy by suspending the federal gas tax, holding billionaire oil companies accountable for price gouging and investing in affordable clean energy." In a press release, Magaziner announced funding for a coastal storm risk management project, saying "“Sea level rise, coastal erosion and more frequent flooding threaten Rhode Island and our way of life, and we need to invest in long-lasting solutions that will protect homes, schools, businesses and critical infrastructure from the effects of climate change."100Congressman Magaziner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://magaziner.house.gov/ https://sethmagaziner.com/issue/protecting-the-environment-and-combating-climate-change/ https://magaziner.house.gov/media/press-releases/magaziner-clinches-wins-climate-resiliency-efforts-rhode-island https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Malliotakis, NicoleNew York11RNicole Malliotakis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Nicole Malliotakis does not oppose climate action. In a statement, she said "In Congress, I will continue to fight for commonsense solutions that protect our environment while empowering America’s energy industries to reach their full potential in producing clean, inexpensive energy for our nation’s consumers."25Congresswoman Malliotakis opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://nicolemalliotakis.com/congresswoman-nicole-malliotakis-endorsed-by-citizens-for-responsible-energy-solution/ https://www.silive.com/politics/2022/05/malliotakis-dodges-roe-v-wade-discussion-this-is-a-decision-for-the-courts-not-politicians.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Maloy, CelesteUtah2RCeleste Maloy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Maloy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has co-sponsored several resolutions condemning pro-climate regulations created by the EPA, Fish & Wildlife Services, and National Marine Fisheries Service.0Representative Maloy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.celesteforutah.com/issues https://www.congress.gov/member/celeste-maloy/M001228?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Celeste+Maloy%22%2C%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DOpposes Roe
Mann, Tracey Kansas1RCongressman Tracey Mann disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'High Plains Public Radio,' Congressman Mann said "scientific data shows that the 'climate is changing' and 'scientific data that says it’s not.'" Mann does not believe that climate action needs to be taken. “I hear stories about smog and various things, the climate and how it was decades ago, and is getting much better,” Man stated.”00In a 2021 Kansas Reflector article detailing a policy hearing, Congressman Mann stated, “We need to highlight climate solutions that are produced by agriculture...” Congressman Tracey Mann does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Tracey Mann makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Mann co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.hppr.org/hppr-news/2020-07-06/a-look-at-the-sizable-pool-of-candidates-hoping-to-represent-kansas-big-1st https://kansasreflector.com/2021/02/27/u-s-house-agriculture-panel-to-key-in-on-climate-change-and-farming/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Kansas%22%7D https://mann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mann-reacts-us-supreme-court-ruling-dobbs-v-jacksonOpposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Massie, ThomasKentucky4RCongressman Thomas Massie disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in the Washington Times, Congressman Massie, was quoted saying, “I would challenge him [President Obama] to show us the linkage — the undeniable linkage — between droughts and the change of weather, and some kind of human activity.”00Congressman Massie demonstrates a lack of leadership by supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In a press release, the Congressman stated, "There is no way to meet the level of CO2 emissions that President Obama signed up for in the Paris Climate Accord without drastically raising the price of energy on every consumer in the United States and hurting our economy. Pulling out of this agreement was the smart thing to do and I applaud President Trump on his decision." In an article in The Liberty Conservative, the Congressman was quoted making this statement on climate change. "I took a trip once to one of the inland glaciers in the Canadian Rockies, and there were stakes in the ground showing how much it had receded since the 1800s. And it was obvious to me that it had been melting since preindustrial times… Most of the public is still debating whether the earth is heating up. But I think the real question is by how much? I’m still looking for an answer I can hold onto… I think the jury is still out on the contribution of our activities to the change in the earth’s climate." Congressman Massie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Massie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2013/jan/22/rep-massie-mit-grad-questions-obamas-global-warmin/ https://massie.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/congressman-massies-statement-on-president-trumps-decision-to-pull-out-of https://www.thelibertyconservative.com/rep-thomas-massie-considered-science-advisor-president-trump/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://massie.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=112043Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mast, BrianFlorida21RCongressman Brian Mast understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting the Environment,' page, it states, "Our community has felt the social and economic consequences of environmental disaster firsthand [...] As research tools have become more robust, scientists have developed a more comprehensive understanding of our planet’s changing climate. Their research has made clear that we must do more to protect our Earth and air quality. That’s why I’m proud to be a member of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus. The Caucus is an important tool to educate members on economically-viable options to reduce climate risk and protect our nation’s economy, security, infrastructure and environment. Together, we can find a path forward to protect our planet for future generations."7514In a 2017 article in The Atlantic, Congressman Mast was quoted stating, "It’s important that we take climate change very, very seriously because the threats that are posed by that are very serious. I’m just not a person that believes we should be turning a blind eye to it." According to a 2017 Florida Politics article, the Congressman advocated for climate change innovation, stating, "Treasure Coast residents know all too well about the crippling impact on both the quality-of-life and economy when environmental disaster strikes. We must act now to find economically-viable solutions to address the risk of climate change.” Congressman Mast's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Mast opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2547.25https://mast.house.gov/environment?page=14 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/house-republicans-climate-change-global-warming-trump/518430/ http://floridapolitics.com/archives/234006-brian-mast-carlos-curbelo-call-american-innovation-climate-change https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mast.house.gov/2022/6/victory-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Matsui, DorisCalifornia7DCongresswoman Doris Matsui understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's environment page, it states, "Enacting policies that assist in our ongoing efforts to reverse the effects of a changing climate, while protecting our air, water, lands, oceans, and wildlife remains a priority of the Congresswoman’s."75100Congressman Matsui has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release advocating for the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2) which addresses provisions related to federal-aid highway and transit, the Congresswoman stated, "The Moving Forward Act provides a roadmap that will prioritize resiliency, combat climate change, and create economic opportunities across the Sacramento region.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet the Congresswoman wrote, "As climate change worsens, today’s @UN #ClimateAction Summit marks a turning point in our efforts to reverse climate change and build a healthier planet for years to come. We must support the Paris Agreement and create actionable solutions to combat this global climate crisis." Rep. Matsui makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the congresswoman stated "Proud to support the #BuildBackBetter Act, which combats #ClimateChange by: ·funding a Clean Electricity Performance Program that will help meet climate goals ·supporting equitable EV infrastructure & clean transportation ·investing 40% of the funds in underserved communities"100Rep. Matusi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Matsui voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 7587.5https://matsui.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897 https://twitter.com/DorisMatsui/status/1176243885359751171 https://matsui.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1971 https://twitter.com/dorismatsui/status/1437929160031281159 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://matsui.house.gov/media/press-releases/matsui-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McBath, LucyGeorgia6DCongresswoman Lucy McBath understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congresswoman McBath believes we must address climate change while securing a sustainable energy future. The Congresswoman supports increased investment in sustainable energy and increasing subsidies for homeowners who utilize solar or other forms of renewable energy."100100In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change poses a real threat not only to our planet, but to our nation’s economy. We must remain in the Paris Climate Agreement, and we need a concrete plan to meet our environmental goals. Today, I was proud to vote YES for H.R. 9 to take #ClimateActionNow." Congresswoman McBath's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman McBath publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Shevoted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10093.75https://mcbath.house.gov/energy-environment https://www.facebook.com/replucymcbath/videos/climate-change-poses-a-real-threat-not-only-to-our-planet-but-to-our-nations-eco/430887874374864/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mcbath.house.gov/press-releases?ID=3CAF7930-0A63-4390-AF41-3CAAD9173885Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McCaul, Michael T.Texas10R Congressman Michael McCaul agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article in 'Politico, McCaul said climate change "is real. The question 'is how to deal with it.'"500On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it states that he is in support of offshore oil drilling, opening up new oil refineries, and clean coal. Congressman McCaul demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman McCaul opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/21/mccaul-texas-power-grid-winter-weather-470576 https://mccaul.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
McClain, LisaMichigan9RLisa McClain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Lisa McClain demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In August 2022, she tweeted "Less than 1% of people named climate change as the most important issue facing America. Why then is it the 100% focus of the Democrats agenda?" In a 2024 Tweet, McClain criticized President Biden for hurting the economy and listening to caving to "radical climate activists." She has not advocated for any form of climate action.0Congresswoman McClain opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepLisaMcClain/status/1555603791642238977 https://twitter.com/RepLisaMcClain/status/1761080730912965071 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mcclain.house.gov/2022/1/congresswoman-lisa-mcclain-speaks-house-floor-49th-anniversary-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McClellan, JenniferVirginia4DRepresentative McClellan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it says "Jenn recognizes that climate change is an environmental issue, an economic issue, a health issue and a racial justice issue that we must take action to address [...] Jenn knows we are at a critical point in the fight against climate change."100100Representative McClellan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She has sponsored or co-sponsored several pro-climate pieces of legislation such as H.Res.1375 and the A. Donald McEachin Environmental Justice For All Act (H.R. 1705), and has publicly advocated the importance of taking action.100Jennifer McClellan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jennifermcclellan.com/issues/ https://www.eesi.org/podcasts/view/7.4-representative-jennifer-mcclellan-talks-climate-resilience-and-environmental-justice-in-the-commonwealth https://www.congress.gov/member/jennifer-mcclellan/M001227?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Jennifer+McClellan%22%2C%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DSupports Roe
McClintock, TomCalifornia5RCongressman Tom McClintock disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune, titled, 'Tom McClintock column: On climate change — the sky is not falling (opinion),' the Congressman wrote, "And despite what we are told, there is a vigorous debate within the scientific community over how much human activity influences climate compared with vastly more powerful natural forces that have driven climate change for 4.5 billion years. As Chicken Little belatedly discovered, there is a big difference between an acorn and the sky." McClintock repeats this sentiment in speaking to The Valley Citizen saying "The Earth’s climate is constantly changing and has been since the planet formed over four billion years ago [...] I firmly believe that the United States should not hamstring its economy in an attempt to combat climate change."00According to The Sacramento Bee, In a 2018 Congressional debate, Congressman McClintock, when asked about climate change, stated, "The planet’s been warming on and off since the last Ice Age... The climate has been changing for 4.5 billion years. The extent to which human activity has a role to play is being hotly debated right now.” He added that “there’s a lot we still don’t know about the feedback mechanisms within or climates.” Congressman McClintock demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman McClintock makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.tahoedailytribune.com/news/opinion/tom-mcclintock-column-the-sky-is-not-falling-opinion/ https://thevalleycitizen.com/congressman-tom-mcclintocks-deadly-denial-of-global-warming/ https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article218767065.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/tom-mcclintockOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McCollum, BettyMinnesota4DCongresswoman Betty McCollum understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Today, our planet is in peril because of climate change, which is already affecting Minnesotans and Americans. As the Chair of the Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I am a strong supporter of action on climate change and strongly oppose efforts to undermine our international commitments and turn the United States into an environmental rogue nation."100100Congresswoman McCollum has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While attending the United Nations Foundation Climate Change (UNFCC) Conference of Parties (COP) 25 in Madrid, the Congresswoman stated, "So, we’re here to say that we're still in it. We're still working in Congress to reduce emissions, to build green infrastructure. And as you know, our Twin Cities are doing everything they can do to combat climate change, as well as many other cities.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 House floor debate on congressional spending, Rep. McCollum stated, "I believe we have a moral obligation to future generations to leave this planet better than we found it. Limiting pollution from power plants is part of an overall strategy to protect us from the worst impacts of climate change. We owe it to the next generation.” Congresswoman McCollum makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 Star Tribune article, the Congresswoman was quoted, saying 'Confronting the consequences of climate change on the environment, biodiversity, and human health is the most significant scientific and policy challenge of this generation.'"100Congresswoman McCollum has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://mccollum.house.gov/issues/environment-energy https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/12/02/minnesota-rep-mccollum-at-madrid-climate-meeting-were-still-in-it https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democrats-weave-climate-messages-into-spending-bills https://www.startribune.com/new-u-climate-center-is-a-win-for-region/600104278/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mccollum.house.gov/media/press-releases/mccollum-statement-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McCormick, RichGeorgia7RCongressman McCormick disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. McCormick said “How much money would you be willing to spend for that? And how much impact is it really going to have? I’m not denying there’s global warming or global cooling. I’m just saying, how much money are we going to spend on something that really isn’t affecting that process?” However, he goes on to imply humans are driving global cooling and that climate change is merely part of a millennia long process. In a Tweet McCormick said "scientists also failed to answer how humans are producing climate change which I guess shouldn’t surprise us after all."00In a Tweet, McCormick voiced opposition to climate action saying "Newsflash for all of the climate change alarmists out there. No amount of money or time will ever be able to fix the carbon dioxide and methane emissions problem you claim is causing our earth to heat. Start trusting the science and recognize that the earth is just going through its natural cycle right now."0Congressman McCormick opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.eenews.net/articles/quiz-show-gop-deploys-new-climate-messaging-tactic/ https://twitter.com/RepMcCormick/status/1710313335009202661 https://twitter.com/RepMcCormick/status/1786869393193873542 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.richmccormick.us/dr-rich-mccormick-applauds-supreme-courts-draft-majority-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes Roe
McEachin, DonaldVirginia4DCongressman Donald McEachin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, McEachin states, "Research continues to confirm what residents of communities in Virginia and across the United States already know –– climate change is a public health threat multiplier and communities on the frontlines of our climate crisis suffer disproportionately from the health impacts of our warming planet. It is imperative that we develop a long-term strategy to address the threats posed by climate changes to public health. Our discussion draft moves our country one step closer to meeting these challenges by advancing federal research, building capacity and increasing planning in order to protect public health and our public health systems.”10086Congressman McEachin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now act, the Congressman stated, “An overwhelming majority of Americans believe that we should take strong action to protect our environment, and I am very proud to support legislation that does just that. I cannot stress enough how important it is that the Senate pass this legislation for the well-being of our children and all future generations.” Rep. McEachin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release responding to the IPCC Oceans Report, the Congressman stated, "If we fail to deviate from our current path, the consequences for our planet will be calamitous and irreversible. That is why I am committed to leading our transition to a clean energy economy and will be introducing the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019." Congressman McEachin makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 op-ed written in The Virginian Pilot, the Congressman wrote, "THE TIME TO act on climate is now. Over the last year, we have suffered devastation from record-breaking hurricanes, wildfires and other extreme natural disasters — all while scientists continue to warn us that we must take bold, decisive action to address the urgent threat of climate change." 100Congressman McEachin introduced The Pollution Transparency Act (H.R. 3981) in 2017 that would have worked, "to ensure that federal agencies calculate a per-unit, dollar-value cost of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions, and make those figures a part of cost-benefit analyses of proposed policy actions." Congressman McEachin voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 10096.5https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-bennet-announce-discussion-draft-bolster-efforts-address-long-term https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-applauds-house-passage-climate-action-now-act https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-statement-ipcc-oceans-report https://www.pilotonline.com/opinion/columns/article_8ea8bbca-25af-11e9-9fe5-cfe2df2baed7.html https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mceachin-introduces-bicameral-pollution-transparency-act https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McGarvey, MorganKentucky3DCongressman McGarvey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, McGarvey said "I am running to address the existential threat of climate change so that future generations have a livable planet and aren’t constantly dealing with natural disasters like last December’s tornadoes that devastated entire communities in Western Kentucky or regular extreme flooding in Eastern Kentucky. We must act now."1000 Congressman McGarvey has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's campaign website, he expresses support for climate action such as investment into EV infrastructure, federal clean energy standards, and dramatically expanding renewable energy buildout. He has co-sponsored legislation such as H.Res.319 calling for the creation of a Green New Deal, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congressman McGarvey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5083.3333https://www.morganmcgarvey.com/issues/climate-change https://www.morganmcgarvey.com/issues/reproductive-rights#:~:text=I%20will%20be%20a%20vote,state%20legislatures%20across%20the%20country. https://www.congress.gov/member/morgan-mcgarvey/M001220?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
McGovern, JamesMassachusetts 2DCongressman James McGovern understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Our climate is changing. Our children's future depends on investing in clean, sustainable energy sources -- and taking bold steps to address the damage we have already done to our fragile planet. I will continue to fight for big, bold solutions to the climate crisis that will usher in a healthier, more equitable, and more resilient economy for everyone."100100Congressman McGovern has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In September 2019, the Congressman gave a speech at a climate strike in front of the Capitol Building. Rep. McGovern also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a March 2019 interview with the Daily Hampshire Gazette, the Congressman was quoted stating, "The amount of young people that are engaged on this issue is amazing to me. Middle, high school kids, and college students — they are so articulate, and they are so motivated. I think climate change is this generation’s Vietnam.” The Congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the Boston Globe, while discussing his support for the Green New Deal, Congressman McGovern stated, "We need to listen to the scientists more than the corporate executives who run fossil fuel companies, and more than these people who peddle conspiracy theories. The bottom line is that what is at stake is the future of our planet.”100Congressman McGovern publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://mcgovern.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=120518 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2gObn_ZJyo https://www.gazettenet.com/McGovern-discusses-Trump-budget-leadership-of-rules-committee-24220831 https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/11/03/markey-and-mcgovern-talk-climate-change-raucous-worcester-forum/dcePDc55MupgqkjSYaZ1rO/story.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a40410841/supreme-court-roe-v-wade-jim-mcgovern/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meeks, Gregory W.New York5DCongressman Gregory Meeks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's Health Issues webpage, "Climate change and other environmental issues pose an enormous threat to global public health. Extreme weather, crop destruction, changes to ecosystems, and the mere presence of air and water pollutants are all serious threats to people’s well-being across the globe. We must fight climate change and protect the environment like our lives depend on it, because they very much do."100100Congressman Meeks has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of 'Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal' (H.Res.332) bill, legislation that "calls for the creation of a Green New Deal." The Green New Deal aims to invest in fighting climate change and reducing GHG emissions while also creating new jobs in the American economy. Rep. Meeks also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an Op-ed for The Hill, he states, "While the people who have historically inhabited the Western Hemisphere...are among the most vulnerable to the climate crisis, they are also the key to its survival. It is the responsibility of those in power — including myself as chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee — to make systemic change that empowers those at the forefront of climate change to be at the core of its solution." Congressman Meeks makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Meeks publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://meeks.house.gov/issues/health https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/583934-those-on-the-front-lines-of-climate-change-should-be/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?r=8&s=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://meeks.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-meeks-statement-scotus-decision-strip-away-right-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Menendez Jr., Robert New Jersey8DOn Congressman Menendez's website it states, "Climate change is here and has had severe impacts on our area, hurting underrepresented, marginalized groups the most. I think every day about the world we are leaving to the next generation." Congressman Menendez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue.100100On his website, Menendez says "I fought to secure millions in environmental justice grants for the residents of our District. I am also a cosponsor of the COAST Anti-Drilling Act and the Clean Water Act to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and establish standards of protection for wetlands, streams, and other water bodies" and pledges to fight to climate justice. The Congressman has also received a score of 100% from the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a record of voting pro-climate.100Congressman Menendez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Casar voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.robmenendez.com/issues/climate-change/ https://menendez.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-menendez-receives-100-rating-league-conservation-voters-national https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://menendez.house.gov/issues/womens-health-and-reproductive-rightsSupports Roe
Meng, GraceNew York6DCongresswoman Meng understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Recent disasters such as Hurricane Sandy have highlighted how vulnerable our coastline is to climate change. The only response to this crisis is to proactively reduce carbon emissions and invest in programs that promote energy efficiency. I support an energy plan that has a balanced approach, helps consumers now, boosts production of energy from alternative sources, draws from a diverse energy supply, stresses conservation, and protects the environment. Addressing America’s reliance on fossil fuels by investing in renewable-energy sources is essential for protecting our environment and ensuring our nation’s energy security."100100Congresswoman Meng has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. As part of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman included an amendment that stresses the critical link between climate change and food security. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 article by Queens County Politics, the Congresswoman was quoted the importance of climate change education, stating, "The magnitude of climate change will continue to grow and challenge how we live. That is why it is imperative that we bring the issue into our schools.” Meng makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Meng publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://meng.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://meng.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/meng-measure-stressing-link-between-climate-change-and-food-security https://www.queenscountypolitics.com/2019/09/20/climate-change-education-necessary-congresswoman-grace-meng/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepGraceMeng/status/1498484051077959688Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meuser, Dan Pennsylvania9RCongressman Dan Meuser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 speech on the House floor condemning the Paris Agreement, Congressman Meuser stated, "We need to harness American talent not squander them with bogus plans like the Green New Deal or ineffective climate plans. We need access to affordable, reliable, clean energy sources including natural gas, nuclear, oil, and clean coal." Congressman Meuser demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Meuser makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).06.25https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4795923/user-clip-congressman-dan-meuser-speaking-forcing-us-2015-paris-agreement-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/pennsylvania/read-pa-s-elected-leaders-react-to-scotus-abortion-ruling/article_efffa90c-f3cd-11ec-83a0-ab0b70132776.html (Unclear on Roe but considers himself Pro-Life)Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mfume, Kweisi Maryland7DCongressman Kweisi Mfume understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' Congressman Mfume stated "On a forward-looking basis, America must take bold steps to avert the catastrophic effects of climate change. These steps include incentivizing personal choices, motivating corporations to make better choices (either by the carrot, the stick or both), helping to lead the way towards an increasingly green economy, and reestablishing our role as a global leader on climate issues. Establishing benchmarks and regularly measuring our progress in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion, for example, should be a way of life across the globe." 100100According to a 2020 'Fox News' article, "During his short term, Mfume said he voted to combat the impacts of climate change..." In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' the congressman said, "As an initial matter, the federal government must reaffirm its commitment to enforcing existing environmental laws. This work includes ensuring existing laws are not weakened by regulations or administrative interpretations." On his campaign website, Congressman Mfume lists "Work to protect the environment and combat climate change" as a 'priority' on his website. Congressman Kweisi Mfume's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Kweisi Mfume has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/elections/voter-guide/bs-voter-guide-d07-kweisi-mfume-20200106-maqinkka4jhwravcdr5frzyfmi-story.html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kweisi-mfume-maryland-congressman-kim-klacik-baltimore https://mfumeforcongress.com https://mfume.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-kweisi-mfume-statement-on-the-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Miller, CarolWest Virginia1RCongresswoman Carol Miller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On the Congresswoman's campaign website she describes herself as, "Pro Coal," and one her priorities as, "Protecting Coal and Gas." The Congresswoman was also quoted in a 2019 E&E News article calling coal, "clean." Congresswoman Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Miller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release in March 2019 about her selection to the House Select Committee on Climate Crisis, she said, "I hope that my colleagues will join me in prioritizing innovation, not taxation or over-regulation, in our energy industry to maximize efficiency, cut costs, protect and create jobs in West Virginia, and care for our earth for generations to come.” The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).06.25https://www.electcarolmiller.com/ https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060122761 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-s-statement-selection-house-select-committee-climate https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Miller, MaryIllinois15RCongresswoman Mary Miller disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, saying "The farmers in my district recognize climate change as summer, winter, spring, and fall” and frequently criticizing climate change as a scam.250Congresswoman Mary Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2021 interview with the 'Chicago Tribune,' the congresswoman states she "will fight to protect rural residents by opposing radical ideas like the Green New Deal and other extreme environmental legislation." 0Congresswoman Miller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She cosponsored voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 06.25https://www.marymillerforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/patriot_savvy/status/1707156686845165582 https://twitter.com/RepMaryMiller/status/1758162361637130345 https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/editorials/ct-who-is-mary-miller-15th-congressional-district-candidate-20200228-qdc257smdbevdfxvpt5sfepcg4-story.html https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/1107710215/roe-overturned-mary-miller-historic-victory-for-white-life https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/A
Miller, MaxOhio7RCongressman Miller disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate said "Democrats pushing "climate emergency" hysteria won't rest until gas is $10 a gallon. This won't work for families, rural areas, or farmers. Biden's policies aren't just hurting Ohio’s economy—they’re weakening America."00 Congressman Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as H.J.Res.136, which disapproves of EPA regulations. Miller also has a 0% lifetime score with the LCV, indicating a history of anti-climate action.0Congressman Miller opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1552051657948762112 https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1540415272179630080 https://www.congress.gov/member/max-miller/M001222?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/max-miller https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Miller-Meeks, MariannetteIowa1RCongresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks states that "scientists almost universally warn that climate change is poised to cause disastrous effects across the globe, largely caused by the burning of fossil fuels like gasoline and coal."500Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. . In an October 2020 interview with the Iowa Capital Dispatch, the congresswoman agreed with Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords while simultaneously arguing that "incentives for farmers could be a key tool in fighting climate change". Congresswoman Miller-Meeks advocates for a market-focused approach to climate action, saying that "we know that the market works, we know that economic freedom and innovation go hand in hand and that when we’re talking about emissions, and talking about a cleaner, healthier planet".According to her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supported Biden's move to allow the sale of E15 during the summer in 2022, saying that it "makes sense for agriculture-heavy states like Iowa".50Congresswoman Miller-Meeks opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2531.25https://millermeeks.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-mariannette-miller-meeks-highlights-conservation-efforts-young-americans https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2020/10/27/2nd-district-candidates-debate-climate-change-environmental-regulations/ https://c3newsmag.com/mariannette-miller-meeks-iowa-climate-solutions/ https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2022/09/26/miller-meeks-bohannan-trade-barbs-over-abortion-in-1st-district-debate/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mills, CoryFlorida7RCongressman Mills does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he said climate change has "existed with or without Americans", he used that as a reason to oppose climate action.250Congressman Mills demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Mills has advocated for increased domestic fossil fuel production, and in a Tweet said that "The Green World Order plan is a DISASTER." 0Congressman Mills opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/303/cory-mills/ https://twitter.com/CoryMillsFL/status/1550583458610794496 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Molinaro, MarcNew York19RCongressman Molinaro does not take a clear or consistent position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a press release, Molinaro said "Our climate is changing, and a lost focus on resource preservation, physical infrastructure investment, and conservation-based solutions is leaving us more vulnerable than ever." However, speaking to FOX News about wildfires, Molinaro said "AOC can save her lecturing for the floor of the House [...] There is little question that Canada obviously needs to focus on forest management, but this isn’t the moment to start lecturing people about the science of climate change."250Congressman Molinaro supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. along with Representative Crockett (D-TX), Congressman Molinaro introduced the EMIT LESS Act which seeks to lower agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. In an op ed, Molinaro said we should move towards sustainable energy, adding "But we must do so by finding a balance between respecting our environment and respecting taxpayers.50Congressman Molinaro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5031.25https://newrepublic.com/post/173398/gop-rep-molinaro-too-soon-talk-climate-change-amid-wildfire https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2024/07/josh-riley-highlights-marc-molinaros-controversial-abortion-vote-new-ad/397796/ https://molinaro.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3228 https://molinaro.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1605Opposes Roe
Moolenaar, JohnMichigan2RCongressman John Moolenaar disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily News, during a 2017 town hall, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "When we breathe, we emit our own carbon dioxide.” 00During a 2017 town hall when receiving questions on regulatory rollbacks of the Environmental Protection Agency, Congressman Moolenaar stated, "I believe in sound science, in good science. I believe the federal government has an important role in funding good science. I also have seen how, sometimes, agencies like the EPA get off track in their mission and pursue... I believe science, science moves forward... when people challenge a theory." Congressman Moolenaar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Moolenaar opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://thedailynews.cc/articles/congressman-moolenaar-hosts-raucous-listening-session-at-cmu/ https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/05/climate-concerns-raised-at-many-town-halls/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.themorningsun.com/2022/06/24/moolenaar-praises-end-of-roe-others-blast-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mooney, AlexWest Virginia2RCongressman Alex Mooney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 Vice News article, "Mooney said the debate about man-made climate change belongs in the 'climate change community' but that debate is not resolved."00According to Congressman Mooney's campaign website's 'Energy and Environment,' page, "Congressman Mooney is also working to ensure that federal tax dollars do not go towards funding international projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions." According to the Charleston Gazette-Mail the Congressman supported the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Congressman Mooney demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Mooney makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wn3jax/west-virginias-climate-change-deniers https://mooney.house.gov/issues/energy-and-mining https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/wv-leaders-praise-withdrawal-from-climate-deal/article_0eab3dc9-cc75-54b5-9b9c-7fb843fb6ede.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://mooney.house.gov/issues/family-values/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, BarryAlabama1RCongressman Barry Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In August 2020, Congressman Barry Moore claimed the Green New Deal to be ''job killing" in response to Biden's speech delivered on the final day of the Democratic National Convention. Congressman Moore demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Barry Moore opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5018.75https://barrymooreforcongress.com/index.php/2020/08/21/barry-moore-the-democrats-have-had-their-turn-next-week-its-ours-i-cant-wait/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Moore, Blake Utah1RCongressman Blake Moore understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "First Congressional District Republican Rep. Blake Moore, who represents Summit County in Congress, says the Republican Party cannot sit on the sidelines of the climate change debate and stressed the need for the GOP to 'change that narrative' as the United States explores ways to lower carbon emissions."7514According to a 2021 article from 'C3 News Magazine,' "Moore has indeed offered unique and principled conservative perspectives, including... engaging in issues of climate and the environment by joining the Conservative Climate Caucus this summer." According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "Moore said in his first few months in Congress he has joined the Natural Resources Committee as well as the bipartisan wildfire caucus and others dedicated to addressing climate change from several angles." In the article, the congressman also stated, "If we want to make progress on climate issues we have to focus on our shared goals and start our discussions from a point of mutual understanding.” “Beginning with where we disagree dooms conversations.” Congressman Blake Moore supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Moore opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2541https://www.parkrecord.com/news/rep-blake-moore-calls-for-gop-to-change-the-narrative-around-climate-change/ https://c3newsmag.com/utahs-blake-moore-joins-c3-solutions-on-right-voices-series/ https://blakemoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-blake-moores-statement-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, GwenWisconsin4DCongresswoman Moore understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 House floor speech on climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "If we give up the fight against climate change, we are giving up the fight for our future, and the future of our children. But I'm a fighter, so I took to the House floor to demand action from the Administration on climate change."100100Congresswoman Moore has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman cited climate change as her reason for supporting the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act (H.R. 729), stating in a 2019 press release, "I am proud to support the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act, which ensure coastal communities have the resources to properly respond to the effects of climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 speech published to her campaign website, Moore states, “Climate change is an issue we must address now through meaningful policies. This important report details sweeping actions and legislation our country needs, including legislation that I have introduced. Rather than running away from the challenges posed by combatting climate change, as this Administration has done, this report reaffirms that the federal government must lead both domestically and internationally to achieve meaningful change." Rep. Moore makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Congressman Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=386515005606738 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4412 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4600 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5042Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moran, NathanielTexas1RCongressman Moran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Moran demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has taken anti-climate action such as cosponsoring several attempts to remove natural gas taxes, and voting for an amendment on H.R.377 which would prevent the bill's funds from being used for climate change executive orders.0Congressman Moran opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.congress.gov/member/nathaniel-moran/M001224?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://moran.house.gov/voterecord/?Page=37 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.instagram.com/repnatemoran/p/C8m5XyZJ2AK/Opposes Roe
Morelle, JosephNew York25DCongressman Joseph Morelle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Envrionment,' page, it states, "There is no debate here: climate change is real and it’s wreaking havoc all over the globe. Each day our country fails to act on climate change, we threaten the future of our children and grandchildren and the long-term vitality of our planet. I have always stood up to protect our environment by supporting measures that reduce our carbon emissions, protect our critical natural resources, and ensure our planet’s well-being for future generations."100100Congressman Morelle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman is a supporter of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Climate change is, without a doubt, the most pressing threat not only to the future of our nation, but our entire planet.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing his sponsorship of the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Res. 52), which calls for a comprehensive, large-scale approach to address climate change, the Congressman stated, "The science is clear: climate change is real, it is already occurring, and it is a global emergency. We must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. That’s why I’m declaring a climate emergency and strongly supporting the Climate Emergency Resolution to demand immediate and comprehensive action." Rep. Morelle makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the 100% Clean Economy Act, which sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy by 2050. In a press release on the bill the Congressman stated, "The effects of climate change pose an existential threat to our environment as we know it – we need bold, unprecedented action to combat this crisis and protect our planet for future generations.”100Representative Morelle publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://morelle.house.gov/issues/protecting-our-environment-0 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-joe-morelle-takes-action-address-climate-change-crisis-protect https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-action-fight-back-against-climate-change-and-protect https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-bold-action-address-climate-crisis-and-achieve-clean https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-congressman-joe-morelle-response-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moskowitz, JaredFlorida23DCongressman Moskowitz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Moskowitz states "We’re living through a climate crisis that threatens our way of life, and we must act quickly to mitigate the effects of climate change. Investing in environmental protection isn’t just a long-term plan towards clean air, clean water, and sustainability, it’s also a way to reinvigorate the economy and create jobs in our community."100100Representative Moskowitz's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Moskowitz's website says "Jared was a consistent advocate for environmental causes as a State Representative, and he has continued fighting for bold policies in Congress to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, convert to clean energy sources, protect the Everglades, and make our community more resilient against environmental threats." He also has a strong score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-climate voting record; however, in 2024 he voted anti-climate on H.Con.Res.86).75Congressman Moskowitz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2575https://jaredforflorida.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jared-moskowitzSupports Roe
Moulton, SethMassachusetts 6DCongressman Seth Moulton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "No community is immune to the dangers of climate change, and the urgency to combat the threat gets greater by the day [...] When it comes to the environment, action matters, and it’s only going to cost our economy more the longer we wait. The U.S. should lead the way in sustainability, resiliency, and innovation, setting an example for the rest of the world. We owe it to our children and our grandchildren to get this right."100100Congressman Moulton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a November 2019 Tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a threat to our national security. The U.S. shouldn't just re-join the Paris accord—we need to be leading on this issue, at every level of government and in the private sector and academia." Congressman Moulton also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 interview with the Milken Institute, the Congressman stated, "We need to start providing some leadership [on climate change] here at home in America that means reducing our carbon footprint but also actually leading in green technology." Rep. Moulton makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 press release, the Congressman announced his support for the Green New Deal, stating, "No issue is more important today for our children and our grandchildren than addressing climate change. And if we do so successfully, our nation will be stronger, our economy will be stronger, our communities will be more resilient, and the futures of our children and grandchildren will be much brighter.”100Congressman Moulton publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://moulton.house.gov/issues/confronting-climate-crisis https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1191785965116968960 https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1125521075121610754?lang=en https://moulton.house.gov/news-stories/press-releases/moulton-announces-support-of-green-new-deal/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://moulton.house.gov/press-releases/moulton-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-opinion-on-overturning-roe-vs-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moylan, JamesGuam1RDelegate Moylan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Delegate Moylan does not oppose climate action.25Delegate Moylan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.3333https://moylan.house.gov/ https://www.facebook.com/kanditnews/videos/breaking-news-moylan-changes-position-on-abortion/1963589564113209/?_rdrSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Mrvan, FrankIndiana1DCongressman Frank Mrvan agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his 2022 campaign website, Congressman Mrvan emphasized that "it is past time that the federal government recognizes the value of science and the challenges of pollution and climate change".50100Congressman Mrvan supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In August 2021, Congressman Mrvan went on a birding trip with Audobon Great Lakes and learned about "climate solutions to protect Indiana's birds and people". In addition, the congressman's campaign website calls for innovation and alternative energies that are necessary to meet" the challenge of climate change".50Congressman Mrvan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://mrvanforcongress.com/issues/#protecting-our-environment https://gl.audubon.org/news/congressman-frank-j-mrvan-goes-birding-audubon-great-lakes https://mrvan.house.gov/media/press-releases/mrvan-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mullin, KevinCalifornia15DCongressman Mullin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he states "The increase in extreme weather events across the nation and in the San Francisco Bay Area over the past few years is no coincidence. Dependence on fossil fuels and other non-renewable forms of energy is causing an increasingly volatile climate crisis."100100Congressman Mullin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his website, it said Mullin "was the architect of a $3.7 billion climate resiliency budget trailer bill focused on addressing the consequences of extreme heat, sea level rise and other climate impacts. In Congress as a member of the Natural Resources Committee, Kevin is committed to keeping offshore drilling away from California’s beautiful coastline, improving air quality, and protecting our nation’s open space and wildlands."100Congressman Mullin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://kevinmullin.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.kevinmullinforcongress.com/prochoiceSupports Roe
Murphy, GregNorth Carolina3RGreg Murphy disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Fox News interview, he stated “I was thrilled to buy gas for $4.32 last night. Biden and his administration, the progressive left are chasing this dream that if we all go to renewables, world climate change will stop happening. Let's just be real about this. Climate change has happened on this Earth for billions of years.”00Greg Murphy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Murphy has consistently voted against bills that promote climate action.0Congressman Murphy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://cnsnews.com/article/washington/melanie-arter/rep-greg-murphy-climate-change-has-happened-earth-billions-years https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/greg-murphy https://murphy4congress.com/issues/pro-life/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Nadler, JerroldNew York12DRepresentative Nadler understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 op-ed for The Villager, he states, "Climate change is real and threatens all of us, regardless of nationality, political party, or economic status. Extreme climate change has already arrived in the United States and impacts every congressional district across our country." The Congressman acknowledges and applauds the advocacy of young activists such as Greta Thunberg and additionally says, that while "their advocacy is critical and admirable...our children and grandchildren should not need to skip school and stage mass protests to stop climate change," thus calling for governments to be more strongly involved. 100100Congressman Nadler has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that would prohibit "federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil." Rep. Nadler also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Capitol Hill climate change speech the Congressman stated, "We talk about a climate crisis and indeed it is a climate crisis. The people have no idea how great a crisis it is or how pressing it is... I have a 13-month-old granddaughter and I look at her, I get terrified because I don't know if human life will survive 50 years." Congressman Nadler makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021 (H.R.2394), legislation that would require "the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy."100Congressman Nadler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://www.jerrynadler.com/news-clips/op-ed-listen-kids-climate-change-must-be-addressed https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857?r=10&s=1 https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4817970/user-clip-nadler-climate-speech https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394?s=1&r=4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jerrynadler.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Neal, RichardMassachusetts 1DCongressman Richard Neal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate Change,' page, it states, "One of his top priorities as Chairman of the Ways & Means Committee is making the environment we share cleaner and safer, while also promoting renewable energy that creates thousands of jobs in the process. That’s why he held the first Ways & Means hearing on climate change in over a decade. It's why he cosponsored the Climate Action Now Act, which would enter the US back into Paris Climate accords, and set hard limits on carbon emissions."100100Congressman Richard Neal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In May 2019 as the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Neal hosted the first hearing on climate change in 12 years for that committee. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Neal stated, "The administration that consistently denies the existence of climate change has now abandoned an international effort to preserve and protect our environment." Congressman Neal makes climate change a top priority issue. "As Chairman, Richie is also a champion of the GREEN Act, which would be Congress’s largest tax investment ever in combating climate change and promoting clean energy. The act extends current renewable energy tax incentives, and creates new models to increase the use of green energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions." 100Congressman Neal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a speech on the House floor in opposition to a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con Res 119), the Congressman stated, "Listen. If you want to debate a carbon tax, let’s hold some hearings. Let’s find out what it would mean for the economy, for Big Oil, for families in Springfield. Let’s find out what impact it would have on fossil fuel emissions and on economic growth. Let’s think strategically about how it would affect our geopolitics. If you want to have this debate, let’s have this debate." Congressman Neal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).100100https://www.nealforcongress.com/environment-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/neal-opening-statement-hearing-economic-and-health-consequences-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congressman-richard-e-neal-president-trumps-decision-withdraw https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/rep-richard-neal-opening-floor-statement-h-con-res-119 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://waysandmeans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chairman-neal-statement-supreme-court-s-rollback-roe-v-wade Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Neguse, JoeColorado2DCongressman Joe Neguse understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "Joe firmly believes climate change is an existential threat, and one that must be addressed with bold action [...] Joe believes in building a brighter future for the next generation, by safeguarding our planet, tackling climate change and investing in a clean energy economy."100100Congressman Neguse has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Readiness Act of 2020 (H.R. 6119), which would require the Department of Defense to submit to Congress a report outlining the threats both domestic and abroad of climate change to United States national security. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Thirty by Thirty Resolution to Save Nature (H.RES. 835), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time, one that cannot be ignored or idled on, but one that must be met with bold and pragmatic solutions that protect our future and our planet.” Rep. Neguse makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 Colorado Politics article, "U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse of Lafayette is taking credit for landing more than $50 billion in stimulus money for the proposed 21st Century Climate Conservation Corps. The first $10 billion would go to hire thousands of young people and veterans starting out at $15 an hour, followed by $40 billion for local resilience and wildfire preparedness projects and other work to cut emissions, administered by the Department of Interior and the U.S. Forest Service."100Congressman Neguse publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a 2018 interview with the League of Women Voters, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe we should have stronger federal emissions standards, a federal carbon tax, and an end to the massive subsidies currently provided in our tax code to oil and gas companies who contribute so greatly to climate change." The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://joeforcolorado.com/on-the-issues/ https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/neguse-spanberger-introduce-legislation-to-address-the-national-security-threat-of-climate-change https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-neguse-sets-national-goal-of-conserving-30-of-us-lands-and-ocean-by-2030 https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/neguse-secures-50-billion-for-proposed-climate-conservation-corps/article_08403cee-11ba-11ec-adc1-6b5e265d1994.html https://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/2018_Endorsements_Joe_Neguse.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-rep-neguse-responds-to-supreme-court-decision-overruling-roe-v-wade_Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Nehls, Troy Texas22RCongressman Troy Nehls does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a February 2021 Click 2 Houston article, “These policies are dangerous and they’re reckless,” said U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls (R-District 22). The Republican leaders are referring to Biden’s executive order aimed at tackling climate change. The order temporarily suspends new oil and gas permits on federal lands and waters. The order also cancels the Keystone XL Pipeline permit." On his campaign website, Congressman Nehls states "Some in Congress are pushing for a complete ban on fossil fuels. This would be a travesty not only to Texas' economy but the entire country." Congressman Troy Nehls demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Troy Nehls has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Nehsl did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5018.75https://www.click2houston.com/news/politics/2021/02/03/texas-republicans-call-bidens-energy-policy-reckless-but-energy-experts-outlook-isnt-as-bleak/ https://www.nehlsforcongress.com https://sbaprolife.org/representative/troy-nehls https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Newhouse, DanWashington4RCongressman Dan Newhouse disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Alliance to Save Energy the Congressman made the following statement on climate change: "Congress should have an honest and respectful debate about this issue. Those of us who are wary of the negative economic impact to America caused by schemes like Cap and Trade have been branded ‘climate deniers,’ which only hardens people's positions on both sides. Of the global warming proposals I've seen, the proposed benefits have been vague and hard to quantify, while the negative economic impact in the form of higher energy costs has been severe, especially when countries like China aren't bound to the same agreements and limits.”00The Congressman supports the continued development of fossil fuels, stating on the energy page of his website, "We must continue to increase the development of domestic energy sources to ensure greater economic security for Washington State and the U.S. In order to maintain access to affordable energy for Central Washington’s residents, it is essential that the U.S. continue to develop a safe, domestic, all-of-the-above energy strategy." Congressman Newhouse demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Newhouse makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He was the original sponsor of H.Res.1001 — 115th Congress (2017-2018), "Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy." He voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00http://www.ase.org/sites/ase.org/files/resources/Media%20browser/new_members_in_house_114th_final.pdf https://newhouse.house.gov/sponsored-legislation https://newhouse.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://newhouse.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/newhouse-defends-life-pivotal-supreme-court-caseOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Norcross, DonaldNew Jersey1DCongressman Norcross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Environment' page, it states, "We have a responsibility to future generations to leave behind an earth and environment that is clean and sustainable. This responsibility also presents opportunities to create jobs and grow our economy by inventing, manufacturing and installing clean energy technology and other sustainable solutions here in America. Environmentally sustainable policies and investments in renewable energy will reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil, and help address climate change."100100Congressman Norcross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In January of 2021, he announced over $233,000 in funding to Rutgers University to research the effects of climate change on ecological diversity. In the News Release, he stated, "Climate change is a serious threat to our communities, with devastating consequences both globally and here in South Jersey...The work being done at Rutgers–Camden is critical to deepening our understanding of how changing temperatures are affecting ecological systems around the world. This funding will advance the vital research being conducted right here to ensure a safe and healthy environment for generations to come.” Rep. Norcross also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In February 2021, in a 2021 News Release regarding that day's vote on Build Back Better, he stated, "Climate change isn’t coming, it’s already here...Last week, tornadoes and flooding caused by Ida devastated portions of New Jersey, underscoring why we must respond to the climate crisis. Today’s vote sends a clear message: to build back better, America needs historic levels of investment in climate monitoring; we need to fund institutions and universities that are on the cutting-edge of climate research; and we need a climate-ready workforce. Climate change and job creation go hand in hand, and by investing in our climate response we are laying the foundation for economic growth and generating good-paying jobs. I am proud to vote for these vital investments in America’s future to ensure our nation is prepared as climate change brings increasingly extreme weather events to our shores." Congressman Norcross makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congressman Norcross has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman did not vote in a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://norcross.house.gov/issues/environment https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-announces-more-233k-rutgers-university-camden-climate-change https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-votes-advance-science-space-and-technology-committee-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors?r=6&s=3 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Norman, RalphSouth Carolina5RCongressman Norman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but 'Inside Climate News' reports, "The House of Representatives on Wednesday voted to cut funding from key climate protection rules and rejected an attempt to save regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency from being closed...Offered by Rep. Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina, the amendment's cuts would have come close to the 31 percent reduction sought by President Donald Trump." 00In a 2018 Tweet, Congressman Norman announced, "Today, I introduced a bill that would eliminate the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI) within the US Agency for International Development (USAID)." Norman made a blog post on his website, warning that "Few people understand the ~massive~ environmental damage we face if Biden and far-left Democrats get their way on fossil fuels." Congressman Norman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Norman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).00https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13092017/house-budget-vote-climate-change-enforcement-epa-methane-trump-social-cost-carbon https://twitter.com/RepRalphNorman/status/996794987005272064 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://norman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1373Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Nunn, ZacharyIowa3RCongressman Nunn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Nunn does not oppose climate action. According to a June 2023 press release on Congressman Mike Gallagher's website, "Reps. Mike Gallagher (R-WI), Jared Huffman (D-CA), and Zach Nunn (R-IA) today introduced the Naturally Offsetting Emissions by Managing and Implementing Tillage Strategies (NO EMITS) Act, a bill that would create incentives for producers to transition their farms to soil health cropping systems. These systems increase farm productivity and reduce net carbon emissions by optimizing the ability to sequester carbon use." However, Nunn also has a very poor record of voting against climate action, and Vote Climate does not consider carbon sequestration to be an effective method of combating climate change.25Congressman Nunn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://zachnunn.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/447?s=3&r=38 https://gallagher.house.gov/media/press-releases/gallagher-huffman-nunn-introduce-bipartisan-bill-incentivize-use-soil-health https://budzinski.house.gov/posts/budzinski-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-to-support-biofuels-biomanufacturing-innovation https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/86/cosponsors?s=1&r=12Opposes Roe
Obernolte, JayCalifornia23RCongressman Jay Obernolte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Speaking in regards to natural resources as an issue, Congressman Jay Obernolte states that "We need common-sense policies that will support our communities, protect our environment, and help our economy to grow." Congressman Obernolte does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Obernolte opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Obernolte voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2518.75https://obernolte.house.gov/issues/natural-resources https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.vvdailypress.com/story/news/2022/06/24/abortion-roe-v-wade-overturn-high-desert-victorville-california/7726230001/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ocasio-Cortez, AlexandriaNew York14DCongresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's official website, she states, "We must treat Climate Change like a serious, existential threat to our planet." When speaking about the large-scale changes that would have to be implemented by the Green New Deal, legislation that would implement economic reforms to cut carbon emissions while boosting the economy, she said that ""Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us."100100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's, 'Green New Deal,' page, she introduced and sponsored the Green New Deal Resolution (H.R. 109), "to recognize the scale of the climate crisis and provide a roadmap to evaluate policies that can protect our planet and uplift our communities. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech introducing the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Con. Res 52) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change represents not only our greatest threat but one of our greatest opportunities. Working to solve the climate crisis will create tens of millions of union jobs, empower communities, and improve the quality of life for people across the globe.” The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 AP article, when discussing the Green New Deal, the Congresswoman said there is, "no middle ground” when it comes to climate change. 100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to an article in Politico, "Even some progressives who support a carbon tax, such as Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), are promoting it as just one possible element of a sweeping 'Green New Deal' that includes pouring huge amounts of money into renewable energy." An article in 'The World,' said, "The Post's Editorial Board recently laid out its own argument for a Green New Deal that, unlike the AOC-Markey plan, includes carbon pricing and stops short of broader progressive goals. Stephen Stromberg of the Post, who authored the editorial, expressed some surprise that the Green New Deal did not include carbon pricing, noting that in 2009, Sen. Markey co-sponsored a carbon-pricing bill that, at the time, was considered 'the premier global warming/climate change legislation' of the Obama era.'” Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/climate https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/691997301/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-releases-green-new-deal-outline https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/gnd/resolution https://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-blumenauer-and-ocasio-cortez-announce-introduction-of-climate-emergency-resolution https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/52 https://apnews.com/4359d6588f9740aca1ab24a9745f2c9d https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/carbon-tax-climate-change-environmentalists-1052210 https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-04-11/green-new-deal-doesnt-include-carbon-pricing-some-say-thats-big-mistake https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ogles, AndyTennessee5RCongressman Ogles disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking to Congress, Ogles said "Ogles: We may have had a hot summer but I just went trick or treating with my kids and the low that evening was 29 degrees so temperatures change. Temperatures have been changing for a millennia."00Congressman ogles demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, he said “After years of abuse by the Biden Administration in the name of ‘climate change,’ the United States must prioritize the American energy industry over woke politicking [...] Our country needs to produce more energy, not less, but Democrats designed their extreme climate agenda to restrict oil and natural gas production.” He has also cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as the Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act, and H.R.6813, preventing the EPA from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing rules regarding air emissions.0Congressman Ogles opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-lawmaker-inane-climate-denying-125450229.html https://ogles.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ogles-leads-republicans-unleash-american-energy https://www.congress.gov/member/andrew-ogles/O000175?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://apnews.com/article/abortion-2022-midterm-elections-social-media-campaigns-7069366a86f36ab7f49d5abd42f79a97Opposes Roe
Omar, IlhanMinnesota5DCongresswoman Ilhan Omar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Justice' page, it states, "We are in a climate crisis. With increased natural disasters and a warming planet--we need large scale action to combat climate change and ensure everyone has access to clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment. In Congress, my top environmental priority is addressing climate change and helping our country reduce its carbon footprint by transitioning away from a reliance on fossil fuels and moving towards a 100% clean energy economy."100100Congresswoman Omar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a House floor speech supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The United States is responsible for nearly a third of excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today and thus bears more responsibility for the climate crisis than any other country." Rep. Omar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2021 Yahoo News article, Congresswoman Omar attended a hearing by the House Oversight and Reform Committee, where "Omar ended her remarks by saying, 'We’re at a tipping point developing fossil fuels now; given the escalation of the climate crisis and its harm to black and brown communities, it is unconscionable. Given each of your roles in these attacks on humanity, you all should resign. Thank you, and I yield back.'” Congresswoman Omar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the introduction of the Zero Waste Act (H.R. 4050), the Congresswoman stated, "Today, we need elected leaders to champion solutions that match the scope of the challenges we face. Addressing the waste crisis is critical to preventing further damage to our climate—it’s integral to racial justice and a clean, equitable future.”100Congresswoman Omar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://omar.house.gov/issues/environmental-justice https://twitter.com/ilhan/status/1123979802250182659?lang=en https://www.yahoo.com/video/congresswoman-omar-blasts-oil-execs-151623183.html https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-introduced-zero-waste-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Owens, Burgess Utah4RCongressman Burgess Owens does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a 2021 'Deseret News' article, "...Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, led more than 50 of his Republican colleagues, including...Burgess Owens...in the newly formed Conservative Climate Caucus. The Conservative Climate Caucus is another step toward meaningful Republican action on climate change." During a 2020 general election debate, when asked about policies to address climate change, Congressman Owens stated, "I would suggest a warp time speed commission." The congressman later states "We can pull together free market and let them take the lead..." Congressman Burgess Owens does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Owens opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2021/6/25/22547236/guest-opinion-a-step-toward-meaningful-republican-action-on-climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FKsAjtKsb8 https://burgess4utah.com/issues/life/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Pallone Jr., FrankNew Jersey6DCongressman Frank Pallone understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 new conference addressing the 'CLEAN Future Act,' legislation that aims for 100% clean electricity by 2035 he stated, "I really believe that the time for slow, marginal change has gone...You can’t just watch from the sidelines as the climate crisis wreaks havoc on Americans’ health and home. The cost of inaction is staggering — it already is."100100Congressman Pallone has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is the sponsor of the CLEAN Future Act (H.R.1512), legislation that "establishes an interim goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 as well as a national goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050," and specifies that "Each federal agency must develop a plan to achieve the goals." Rep. Pallone also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release discussing the CLEAN future act and it's role in combating climate change, he stated, "Record wildfires, flooding, heat waves and drought have spelled out a dire reality: the climate crisis is here. New Jersey is on the frontline of this crisis, and we can no longer afford to address climate change along the margins. The CLEAN Future Act provides the kind of serious federal leadership this moment requires...This plan represents our commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas pollution. For the sake of the American people, the long-term sustainability of our economy, and public health, we must act boldly, and that is exactly what we intend to do.” Congressman Pallone makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Rep. Pallone has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). However, when discussing the CLEAN Future Act (of which he is a sponsor), the Congressman made it clear that his bill did not call for a carbon tax as it was futile. He stated, "We don’t have a carbon tax…I think it’s time to try something new. The votes are just not there for a price on carbon.” 5087.5https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1512 https://pallone.house.gov/media/press-releases/pallone-details-plan-combat-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=8 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Palmer, GaryAlabama6RCongressman Gary Palmer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a committee hearing, Palmer said “There’s a number of examples that indicates that the science is not completely settled, although I think that the consensus is that the climate is changing, I’m not sure the consensus is that it’s all anthropomorphic— I’m certain the consensus is that it’s not all anthropomorphic.”00During a 2019 Congressional hearing on carbon emissions, Congressman Palmer stated, "Apparently some folks take as the gospel truth whatever these esteemed scientists project and for instance, in his book Farewell to Ice Peter Wadhams, a professor of ocean physics at Cambridge University predicted that the polar ice in the Arctic would be gone by mid decade. Not only is the ice still there but at points between 2012-2016 it actually increased by about 50 percent. I went from 2.2 million square miles to 3.3 million square miles, so my point is, I guess my question is, do each of you believe that the science on climate is settled?" Congressman Palmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gary Palmer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an April 2021 blog post on Republican Leaders, Representative Palmer states "...the truth behind the carbon tax – it is bad policy that increases costs, mainly on the poorest among us, and will not achieve the global goals its proponents claim it will."00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fOn6j36d8 https://www.climateofdenial.org/track-climate-change-denial/rep-gary-palmer-r-al-6th-district/ https://www.republicanleader.gov/rep-gary-palmer-the-cost-of-a-carbon-tax/ https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/local/alabama-legislators-respond-leaked-scotus-draft-opinion-roe-v-wade/525-add771b1-3b09-445c-9190-73bb9c21a700Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Panetta, JimmyCalifornia19DCongressman Panetta understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We must remain committed to protecting our environment for future generations by confronting and attempting to reverse the effects of climate change to support the health of our community, country, and planet. As your Member of Congress, I am working to deliver thoughtful and innovative action on climate change to protect public health, and clean air and clean water; advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology; defend our national security; and to pass on a healthy and sustainable future for our children."100100Congressman Panetta has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "United States leadership was crucial in the widespread adoption of the Paris Climate Agreement. Withdrawing our nation from the agreement undermines U.S. global leadership on combating climate change and threatens the future of our planet." Congressman Panetta makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing The Climate Action Rebate Act (H.R. 4051), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a severe and serious threat to our coastal communities, agricultural economies, public health, and national security. It’s beyond time for our government to do its part to respond to this crisis by reducing carbon emissions and promoting a financially feasible transition to a clean energy economy.” Rep. Panetta makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes Congressman Jimmy Panetta’s (CA-20) legislation, the Green Bus Tax Credit Act... By tackling climate change through the tax code and incentivizing the adoption of clean energy technologies, these bills will help meet the report’s ambitious but attainable climate goals."100Congressman Panetta publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Panetta, along with Senators Coons and Feinstein, introduced 'The Climate Action Rebate Act' (H.R. 4051) which would put a price on carbon and use the revenue to fund infrastructure and other government programs. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://panetta.house.gov/issues/environment https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-amendment-congressman-panetta-climate-action-now-act https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-panetta-sens-coons-and-feinstein-introduce-bill-price-carbon-pollution https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-secures-bold-legislation-first-ever-house-climate-crisis https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepJimmyPanetta/status/1540362490458112001?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pannill Fletcher, LizzieTexas7DCongresswoman Lizzie Fletcher agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the Congresswoman states, "We know that domestic production of oil and natural gas is critical to our national security, our economy, and our energy future. And we know that renewable energy is an increasingly important part of the energy mix. We also know that climate change represents a real and growing threat. We know we are already experiencing its effects."50100In a 2019 Congresswoman Fletcher co-wrote an op-ed with Congressman Adam Graves (R-LA), they came out in support of offshore drilling, stating, "Opponents of offshore drilling cite the need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in their calls for a ban on exploration of the OCS. As members of Congress representing districts along the Gulf of Mexico that have been ravaged by storms made worse by a changing climate, we understand all too well the need to address climate change and reduce GHG emissions. In 2016, the Obama administration Bureau of Ocean Energy Management found when analyzing lifecycle GHG emissions that 'in the absence of new OCS leasing,' emissions could actually increase from reliance on foreign sources of oil and gas. In 2018, oil and natural gas supplied 67 percent of the energy Americans used. In other words, our concern is that these bills will result in greater GHG emissions and further threaten the environment due to the risks associated with the transportation of fuels." Congresswoman Fletcher supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Fletcher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2068 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2187 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3951Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pappas, ChrisNew Hampshire1DCongressman Chris Pappas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We should all work to leave our environment better than we found it by promoting clean energy, supporting environmental protection, and directly confronting the existential threat of climate change [...] I believe it is critical that Congress develop and pass thoughtful, innovative solutions to the climate crisis before it’s too late to mitigate the worst effects of the catastrophic changes that are already upon us. We must act now to put our state and our nation on a pathway to a more sustainable future."100100In a 2019 press release announcing his support for the Climate Action Now Act, he stated, "Climate change is an existential threat not only to our environment but also our economy, our national security, and our way of life...With rising sea levels and worsening storms, New Hampshire communities are already facing the very serious impacts of climate change and it is imperative we take action. The U.S. plays an outsized role in global emissions and it is critical that we reaffirm our international commitment to combat climate change. I will continue to fight for policies that support a robust clean energy economy and a more sustainable future.” However, his previous support for climate action does not mirror his current actions and view. According to a 2022 NH Journal article, "After years of calling climate change is “an existential threat” and voting to raise taxes on oil and gas companies, Pappas now says he supports increased fossil fuel production and an “all of the above” — oil, gas, and nuclear — energy policy." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. Congressman Chris Pappas does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Pappas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. During a 2019 interview with New Hampshire Public Radio, when asked about his support of a carbon tax, the Congressman stated, "We had a forum last night on CNN. But I think we do need a more robust debate around climate issues, including a proposal like a carbon tax. It's not an idea that I've signed on to at this point in time." Rep. Pappas voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5068.75https://pappas.house.gov/issues/energy https://pappas.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-pappas-co-sponsors-climate-action-now-act-stepping-us-commitment https://nhjournal.com/pappas-signed-no-fossil-fuel-money-pledge-took-money-from-nord-stream-lobbyist/ https://www.nhpr.org/post/conversation-1st-district-congressman-chris-pappas#stream/0 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pascrell Jr., BillNew Jersey9DCongressman Bill Pascrell Jr. understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "He believes that we must protect our finite natural resources from polluting industries and use every tool available to combat climate change. Bill frequently reminds his skeptical colleagues across the aisle that the impacts of climate change are undeniable because they are already here."100100Congressman Pascrell Jr. has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release re-introducing the Renewable Chemicals Act, a bill whose main goal is to phase out the use of fossil fuels he stated, "For our children and grandchildren, America must lead the world in the fight against climate change,...Our bipartisan legislation today will help boost our production of renewable chemicals and clean energy and decrease our dependence on the fossil fuel industry." Rep. Pascrell Jr. also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release discussing the 2021 IPCC report, the Congressman stated, "this report has shaken me to my core. It makes clear that we cannot afford to wait any longer. Our planet is burning. We need bold action to combat climate change now. I joined over 180 House Democrats urging clean energy provisions in our infrastructure investment because every agenda item must prioritize our environment. For too long Congress has legislated without a keen eye on the climate crisis. I say: No more. An investment in America’s infrastructure will hold no weight unless we preserve the planet for our children and grandchildren. I’ll continue to push for bold climate provisions in every single piece of legislation I work on because future generations are counting on us. No more delays.” Congressman Pascrell Jr. makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Rep. Pascrell Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://pascrell.house.gov/issues/energy-and-the-environment/ https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/pascrell-fitzpatrick-reintroduce-green-bill-help-phase-fossil-fuels/ https://pascrell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4843 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=7 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pelosi, NancyCalifornia11DCongresswoman and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Speaker Pelosi's energy and environment page, it states, "The climate crisis is the existential threat of our time – and our future depends on taking action now. As the climate crisis accelerates, we face what the United Nations calls Code Red for Humanity: with extreme weather devastating communities around the world and here at home, while disproportionately impacting our most vulnerable communities. Californians are acutely aware of the climate crisis' impacts, as we continue to experience life-threatening wildfires, severe droughts and record-high temperatures." 100100Speaker Pelosi has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. At the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference, Pelosi said global warming “is a threat multiplier, amplifying and accelerating existing inequities in our economies and societies." In a 2020 speech unveiling the, "Solving the Climate Crisis," action plan, the Congresswoman stated, "Democrats know that the climate crisis is the essential crisis of our time, threatening public health, jobs and the economy, national security and values. Our plan honors our obligation to address the climate crisis and embraces our opportunity to solve that crisis as we build a new, clean energy economy that creates millions of good-paying jobs with strong labor protections. And it champions, and so many here you’ll hear from, environmental justice, tackling systemic racism by reducing pollution and empowering leaders from communities who are disproportionately affected, both from COVID-19 and the climate crisis, which are related."100Congresswoman Pelosi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://pelosi.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.pbs.org/newshour/live-update/climate-summit-updates-biden-joins-world-leaders-in-glasgow/pelosi-america-is-back-to-curb-climate-change https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/63020-0 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/62422-1Supports RoePro ClimateN/AN/AN/APro ClimateN/APro Climate
Peltola, MaryAlaska1DMary Peltola understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with a local Alaskan newspaper, she asserted, "climate change is one of the most pressing crises facing our planet — and communities across Alaska are already experiencing its devastating impacts."10058Mary Peltola does not oppose climate action. She supports an all of the above solution, as evidenced in an interview where she stated, "I am pro-resource development. At the same time, I recognize that we've got to make sure that our ecosystems are healthy and balanced." Furthermore, POLITICO reported that Pelolta "has also taken stances on investing in renewable energy while continuing dependence on oil and gas."25Mary Pelolta has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5077.6667https://www.ktoo.org/2022/08/12/just-answers-where-the-u-s-house-special-election-candidates-stand-on-climate-change-in-alaska/ https://www.hcn.org/articles/north-politics-a-q-a-with-mary-peltola-alaskas-new-house-rep https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/09-14-2022/new-face-on-natural-resources/ https://twitter.com/marypeltola/status/1540485004706230272?lang=en https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Perry, ScottPennsylvania10RCongressman Scott Perry disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Penn-Live Patriot News article, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "The climate's changing, without a doubt. I think we contribute to it. I don't know exactly how, and that becomes the rub." The article also stated that the Congressman believed reports that "suggest global surface temperature data often used to corroborate climate change over time has been 'adjusted' to make the planet appear cooler in the past." The Congressman was quoted again, stating, "It opens up an opportunity for skepticism... and I think it's right because what we're talking about is the things we do impact peoples' lives. And we want to proceed based on the facts; not based on suppositions or the facts we hope that we have."00In 2016, Congressman Perry introduced the Energy Sovereignty Act (H.R. 4544), which looked to block the Clean Power Plan. The Congressman stated that, "’[Hydropower] only one part of the solution – but it’s much better than this attempt to delegate nearly unlimited power over the energy sector to the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats at the EPA. Such expansive authority of the EPA would be economically devastating and could threaten the reliability and viability of our Nation’s energy sector." The Congressman sought to cut climate change reporting from the 2018 defense budget according to the York Daily Record, stating that, "My goal with this amendment is to prioritize our limited defense resources on efforts that pose an immediate and direct threat to our national security. A litany of other federal agencies deal with environmental issues." Congressman Perry demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Perry makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41) and voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://www.pennlive.com/politics/2018/10/where_they_stand_a_look_at_the.html https://perry.house.gov/issues/energy.htm https://perry.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398234 https://www.ydr.com/story/news/2017/07/12/funding-behind-perrys-amendment-cut-climate-change-reporting-defense-budget/472158001/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2022/10/where-do-our-local-representatives-really-stand-on-the-abortion-pennlive-letters.htmlOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Peters, ScottCalifornia50DCongressman Peters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, "Energy and Environment," page, it states, "I am dedicated to combating climate change and fostering renewable energy. Unfortunately, San Diego is facing some of the consequences of climate change--from droughts, to wildfires, and floods from rising sea levels. Therefore, we must not only work to curb climate change but prepare for the effects it has on our region and nation as well. San Diego is home to many innovative green energy and cleantech companies that are important to our environment and economy. I will work in Congress to make sure these companies, as well as the premier research institutions in our region, get the support they need. We owe it to the next generation to ensure they, too, get a chance to enjoy our great outdoors."100100Congressman Peters has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman published a "Climate Playbook" on his website, stating, "The threat posed by climate change and the cost of inaction are undeniable. Climate change and its effects include: less habitable coastal regions due to rising sea levels, entire cities underwater from floods, homes and centers of commerce destroyed, devastating weather events that worsen every year, and water and food scarcity. Policymakers in the United States must confront this existential crisis head on, and time is of the essence." Congressman Peters also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the Super Polluters Act (H.R. 4113), which would aim to slow climate change by regulating black carbon, hydrofluorocarbons, the Congressman stated, "As oceans warm, sea levels rise, and droughts sear our world, we must find immediate ways to slow and reverse climate change or face these dire consequences of inaction." Rep. Peters makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release highlighting his contributions to the House Climate Crisis Action Plan, stated, "The climate crisis requires urgent, comprehensive action. We cannot wait to get to where we need to be without major policy change,” said Rep. Peters. “The Select Committee report published today provides Congress with a pragmatic and substantive agenda that we must act on swiftly, including the bipartisan bills I introduced last year, to protect our environment and public health.” 100Congressman Peters publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://scottpeters.house.gov/energy-environment https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reps-peters-gaetz-introduce-bill-to-slow-climate-change-reduce-super https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-bills-highlighted-in-new-house-climate-crisis-action-plan https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-releases-statement-following-scotus-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Petterson, BrittanyColorado7DCongresswoman Pettersen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Her campaign website stated "Brittany knows that climate change is one of the greatest threats we face and is committed to championing legislation to help communities deal with the current impacts of the climate crisis and ensure we mitigate its worst effects." 100100Congresswoman Pettersen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She said to the League of Conservation Voters "We must enact bold legislation to mitigate the current impacts of climate change and protect against the worst consequences. I look forward to working to protect our environment, public lands, water, and our future, for my son Davis, and all Coloradans." In a 2024 press release, Pettersen announced 11 million dollars for Colorado projects to cut emissions and transition to a green economy, saying "This funding, made possible by the Biden Administration, is a significant investment into our community and will help Colorado stay at the forefront of sustainability and innovation fueled through clean energy."100Congresswoman Pettersen has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://brittanypettersen.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lcv.org/bio/brittany-pettersen/ https://pettersen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=558Supports Roe
Pfluger, August Texas11RCongressman August Pfluger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, regarding energy independence, the congressman writes "I’m proud to support the hard-working oil and gas producers that keep our Texas economy strong. In Washington, I’ll fight back against the oil-hating liberals and work to secure total energy independence for our country."250According to a February 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11) is proud to announce the introduction of his second piece of original legislation, H. Res. 125, which protects the oil and gas industry from executive overreach by recognizing that any policy-making action taken to address climate change should be undertaken by the legislative branch, not through unilateral executive action—which the Biden administration continues to abuse." From a January 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman Pfluger issued a statement: “The Paris Climate Agreement does nothing to save or clean up the planet. With no mechanism to hold China and India—the two largest global polluters—accountable, this agreement merely shackles the United States with job-killing regulations that cost trillions of dollars and imperil our national security." Congressman August Pfluger demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman August Pfluger makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.augustpfluger.com/#issues https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-schumer-its-jobs-emergency https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-moves-block-biden-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Texas%22%7D https://pfluger.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=524Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Pingree, ChellieMaine1DCongresswoman Chellie Pingree understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her house website, Pingree says "Climate change is real, caused by human activity, and an urgent threat to our way of life. For too long, scientific warnings were ignored and now we’re at a crisis point. To avoid a major, irreversible catastrophe, we must take bold action to become carbon neutral by 2050."100100Congresswoman Pingree has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, she stated, "I’m proud that after years of inaction, Congress has turned the page on climate denial. As we face our post-coronavirus economic reality, Congress’ work to put our climate at the forefront is more important than ever." Rep. Pingree makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "Climate change isn’t like Santa Claus. It is real whether you believe in it or not." 100Congresswoman Pingreepublicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://pingree.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14914 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3428 https://twitter.com/chelliepingree/status/1316527704817180674 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4215Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Plaskett, StaceyVirgin Islands1DDelegate Plaskett understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her Congressional website, it states "Plaskett is also committed to protecting environmental safeguard policies and firmly supports legislation aimed at mitigating the effects of climate change."750Delegate Plaskett supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. She has a 61% lifetime score with the LCV and has sponsored a pro-climate bill.50Delegate Plaskett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5058.3333https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/stacey-plaskett https://www.congress.gov/member/stacey-plaskett/P000610?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Stacey+Plaskett%22%2C%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://plaskett.house.gov/issues/ https://plaskett.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4110Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Pocan, MarkWisconsin2DCongressman Pocan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to Pocan's campaign website, the Congressman states, "At a time when we face high energy and gas prices and see the effects of global climate change in our daily lives, I believe that making the country more energy efficient will not only reduce our carbon footprint, but also will position the U.S. to thrive in a twenty-first century economy. As a member of the Safe Climate Caucus, I am committed to preserving our environment through investments in clean energy capabilities. I subscribe to the notion that if we make investments in the short term, we can ultimately make our energy use more efficient in the long term."100100Congressman Pocan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a video from the Safe Climate Caucus, the Congressman stated, "There's no question that increasing levels of CO2 are bad for the planet bad for our country that rising sea levels could have devastating impacts across the globe and that we need to do something about climate change." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a reality. Period. Pulling the U.S. out of the #ParisAgreement is not only a blatant refusal to participate in a necessary global fight against climate change, but it threatens ALL life across the world. @realDonaldTrump, you're a failure." Rep. Pocan makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congressman Pocan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://pocan.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ6-qMNpoI0 https://twitter.com/repmarkpocan/status/1191466230600912900 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pocan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/pocan-on-scotus-decision-overturning-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pressley, AyannaMassachusetts 7DCongresswoman Ayanna Pressley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Speaking on the Road to the Green New Deal tour, the Congresswoman stated, "The impacts of climate change are intersectional on our public health, on our human migration, on national security. And so we come here tonight to advance bold, innovative and, yes, unapologetic, aspirational policy.”100100Congresswoman Ayanna Presley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On Congresswoman Pressley's campaign site's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "Climate change presents a number of serious threats to public health, including longer heat waves, more frequent extreme weather, and decreased air quality." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2022 press release, "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)...issued a joint statement on reported delays by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in issuing new disclosure rules regarding climate change risk: 'The climate crisis is here, and it is already having a significant impact on our communities and our economy. We cannot wait for our country’s largest corporations to decide whether they take climate change seriously when extreme floods, heat waves and storms are already devastating our neighborhoods. Just as we must use every tool to prevent climate catastrophe, we must act with strength and urgency to protect our financial system from climate risk. We are alarmed that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate-change disclosure rule has been delayed. We urge the Commission to act swiftly and issue a strong rule that holistically accounts for a company’s climate contributions and addresses the urgent need to act on climate-related financial risk.'” Congresswoman Pressley makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, along with Congressman Mondaire Jones (NY-17) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-13), introduced the Fossil Free Finance Act, legislation to require the Federal Reserve (Fed) to mandate large banks and other Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) align their financing of greenhouse gas emissions with science-based emissions targets. The Fossil Free Finance Act requires the Fed to acknowledge the existential threat climate change poses to the core tenants of its monetary policy and supervisory mandates and act to mitigate the financial stability threats of climate risk."100Congresswoman Pressley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://dailyfreepress.com/blog/2019/04/23/ayanna-pressley-ed-markey-speak-about-green-new-deal-in-dorchester/ https://ayannapressley.com/issues/equity-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR26MJ2CtbTUUivdVWD4keVMWZB1UYqsf6u9pj10f0umX6TmrK6wsPhu-MM https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-reps-pressley-garc-bowman-bush-ocasio-cortez-and-tlaib-regarding https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/pressley-jones-tlaib-unveil-bill-require-federal-reserve-mandate-big-banks https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pressley.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-pressley-s-statement-draft-supreme-court-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Quigley, MikeIllinois5DCongressman Mike Quigley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'The Ticking Clock of Climate Change,' page, it states, "An investment in our environment is an investment in our future. Climate change is an urgent threat to everyone on the planet, threatening lives and livelihoods by jeopardizing clean air, clean water, and healthy and diverse ecosystems. We can’t afford to sit back and continue to do nothing. As President Obama said, 'We’re the first generation to feel the impact of climate change, and the last generation that can do something about it.'"100100Congressman Quigley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his 'Energy/Environment' page, it states, "We live in a time of unprecedented threat to our environment. From pollution to habitat degradation to the global crisis of man-made climate change, the evidence all around us is clear that we must act to protect our planet and everything living on it...I believe that climate change represents an existential threat to the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans and billions around the world and that Congress must act with the urgency and ambition that climate science demands. For these reasons, I was an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a bold and aspirational proposal to transition our economy away from reliance on fossil fuels." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. He is a co-sponsor of the America's Clean Future Fund Act (H.R.2451), legislation that "establishes requirements and incentives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and assist industries, communities, and workers transition to a low-carbon economy, including by establishing (1) the Climate Change Finance Corporation (C2FC); (2) the America's Clean Future Fund; and (3) a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fuels by covered entities." Rep. Quigley makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, during a floor speech about reentering the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated "President Biden’s commitment, necessary as it was, will not itself reduce America’s emissions enough to meet our 2015 promise to the world or stem the climate crisis. For that, Congress must act urgently. We must reject the bad faith talking points about a false dichotomy between environmental stewardship and economic growth and openly embrace the idea that a sustainable economy is dependent upon a sustainable environment."100Congressman Quigley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://quigley.house.gov/newsroom/the-ticking-clock-of-climate-change#:~:text=Representative%20Mike%20Quigley%20speaking%20on,on%20climate%20change%20is%20now.&text=Climate%20change%20is%20an%20urgent,and%20healthy%20and%20diverse%20ecosystems. https://quigley.house.gov/issues/energyenvironment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2451?s=1&r=10 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-delivers-floor-speech-calling-urgent-congressional-action https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-statement-supreme-court-decision-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ramirez, DeliaIllinois3DCongresswoman Ramirez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. "Delia understands that we are at a crisis point to act on climate change and that we need swift and decisive action to prevent a climate catastrophe. She knows that being on the right side of this issue requires that our values be clear and uncompromised, which is why she has refused to take campaign contributions from the fossil fuel industry and private energy companies. Delia is clear that future generations are depending on our leaders today to take bold and principled stances to end our reliance on fossil fuels, make a full transition to clean energy, and transform our economy to be greener and cleaner."100100While in Congress, the Representative has cosponsored legislation such as the Environmental Justice for All Act and the Green New Deal for Health Act. In a Tweet, Ramirez said "The fossil fuel industry is making us sick, and the Republican Polluters Over People Act would literally kill us. We have a climate catastrophe that is hitting Black and Brown communities hardest. H.R. 1 is a blank check for polluters that must be stopped."100Congresswoman Ramirez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.deliaforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/repdeliaramirez/status/1641485296045895696 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Raskin, JamieMaryland8DCongressman Jamie Raskin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a testimony in the Senate Budget Committee, Raskin criticized Big Oil for avoiding climate accountability. Raskin said 'In the 1960s, the science of global warming was well understood by Big Oil. Instead of telling the world about the perils of global warming and working to change their business model, the companies suppressed relevant scientific findings for decades and came to challenge and contradict urgent calls by scientists to take climate change seriously as a global threat. As the experts told us, this pattern of lying and evasion set the country back decades in our ability to seriously address and manage climate change."100100Congressman Raskin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman co-wrote an editorial for the Baltimore Sun, which stated, "With no time left to debate the delusional dogmas of climate denialism, we must develop policies to break quickly and permanently from the carbon economy and invest in renewable energy and a far more resilient national infrastructure." Rep. Raskin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a September 2019 press release urging President Trump to prioritize climate change in the renegotiated NAFTA deal, the Congressman stated, "The Paris Agreement represents the type of global cooperation that our trade deals should aspire to, and has the support of 185 countries, including our NAFTA trading partners. This is the most basic lens through which we should negotiate all trade deals.” Congressman Raskin makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (H.Res 109). 100Congressman Raskin publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign sites, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Jamie will champion a sweeping carbon tax along with market-based solutions to stimulate renewable energy development and steadily and dramatically reduce carbon fuel consumption." Congressman Raskin voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://www.budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/honjamieraskintestimonysenatebudgetcommittee.pdf http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-1010-political-climate-change-20171009-story.html https://raskin.house.gov/media/press-releases/raskin-urges-president-trump-prioritize-climate-renegotiated-nafta https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jamie-raskin-rachel-maddow-roe-v-wade-full-on-handmaids-tale_n_62709e42e4b01131b1261271Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Reschenthaler, GuyPennsylvania14RCongressman Guy Reschenthaler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congressman stated, "The reason the global temp is rising is due to China’s disregard for the environment and emissions standards."250In a 2019 press release supporting the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Reschenthaler stated, “This was an unfair deal that put our country at a disadvantage by giving a free pass to the world’s worst polluters while forcing unrealistic demands on our national economy. As our nation reaches its energy dominance and continues to reduce emissions through innovation, House Democrats want us to put our economic growth, jobs, and security at risk by forcing President Trump to implement the Paris Agreement.” According to his website, the Congressman states, "As a member of the House Energy Action Team, I am on the front lines fighting against radical proposals that would kill our coal, oil, and natural gas industries and the family-sustaining jobs in southwestern Pennsylvania that go with them." Congressman Reschenthaler demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Reschenthaler opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/greschenthaler/status/1281664989305151490 https://reschenthaler.house.gov/media/press-releases/reschenthaler-opposes-legislation-cripple-us-energy-sector https://reschenthaler.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rogers, HaroldKentucky5RCongressman Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership by advocating against the Clean Power Plan. He support an amendment to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2015 (H.R. 4923) which would have prohibited federal agencies from using funds to do climate action. The Congressman does not mention climate change on his, 'Environment,' or, 'Energy,' pages. Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://wfpl.org/where-do-kentuckys-congressmen-stand-climate-change-hard-tell/ https://halrogers.house.gov/environment https://halrogers.house.gov/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://halrogers.house.gov/press-releases?ID=BF6A6E32-08FA-47F4-9C5E-0061D1ED2F83Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rogers, MikeAlabama3RCongressman Mike Rogers disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In response to the 2014 U.S. National Climate Assessment which reported that heatwaves and more intense storms would be exacerbated by global warming, the Congressman was quoted in a press release found on Rep. Roby's page, which stated that, "President Obama and his Administration will stop at nothing to push his radical environmental policies onto our economy. This report is another chapter of the EPA's War on Coal, and lays the groundwork for yet another regulatory end run around Congress. These policies, if not stopped, will cost American families in higher electricity rates and hurt good paying jobs." 00According to the Alabama Political Reporter in June 2021, "Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers, R-Alabama, and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-California, wrote an op-ed Tuesday in Defense News" where they state that "... 'the administration redirects nearly $650 million in critically needed military modernization and procurement funding to climate change and to monitor the social media accounts of our servicemembers,” Rogers and Calvert wrote. "These initiatives have nothing to do with ensuring we have a lethal force ready to “fight tonight”. When we dedicate scarce defense funding to global climate change, biofuels initiatives, and social engineering experiments with military personnel you can almost hear the cheers and laughter of our adversaries.'” Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to Oanow.com, during a 2019 town hall, when asked if he supported carbon fee legislation the Congressman said he would not. He also voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://roby.house.gov/roby-news/al-representatives-voice-opinions-new-climate-assessment https://www.alreporter.com/2021/06/25/rogers-says-the-budget-should-be-focused-more-on-china-less-on-climate-issues/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://oanow.com/news/local/congressman-constituents-talk-issues-at-town-hall/article_2833d50c-4aba-11e9-afd5-b71b2f531bb4.amp.html https://mikerogers.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1918Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/A
Rose, JohnTennessee6RCongressman John Rose disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a June 2019 article in the Crossville Chronicle, when asked about global warming, the Congressman stated, "Global warming is currently a hypothesis. Climate change is real. It happens, but to what degree does mankind have an impact? The scientific community have to be careful. We live in a complex world and there are lots of causes. Any one may have an effect. The tilt of earth’s axis could have an effect. I try to keep an open mind.”00According to the League of Conservation Voters, Congressman Rose has a dismal history of voting against climate action. In a Tweet, Rose said "President Biden opened another front in his ongoing war against American energy by halting LNG export terminals based on the so-called "climate crisis." Congressman Rose demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rose has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He did not vote in a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5012.5https://www.crossville-chronicle.com/news/glade_sun/congressman-rose-visits-fairfield-glade-pleasant-hill/article_01e5e4f4-92c1-11e9-8660-e76b170ceeab.html https://twitter.com/RepJohnRose/status/1752496920969564169 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://johnrose.house.gov/media/press-releases/rose-urges-supreme-court-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ross, Deborah North Carolina2DCongresswoman Deborah Ross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most imminent threats facing our country, and we must take immediate action to address it. I have been a champion on environmental and climate issues, voting repeatedly to protect our land and water for future generations. As a state legislator, I voted to support clean energy, oppose fracking, and address climate change in North Carolina. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources. These measures will reduce our need to use fossil fuels for energy."100100Congresswoman Deborah Ross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 questionnaire from 'Indy Week,' when asked about policies she supports to address climate change, Congresswoman Ross answered "I have been a longtime champion of environmental issues in North Carolina and will continue to be a champion as a member of Congress...I have promoted renewable energy investments in North Carolina and will continue to do so. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy, and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet posted in July 2021, Congresswoman Ross wrote "Wildfires on the West Coast are spreading smoke all the way to Raleigh. We have to put aside partisan politics and address climate change NOW. We can't wait to act." Congresswoman Deborah Ross makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the 'League of Conservation Voters,' "She understands the urgent need to fight the climate crisis, invest in our clean energy future, and protect the country’s natural beauty. In Congress, Ross will continue this leadership by working to advance the clean energy economy, diversify transportation, and make addressing climate change a top priority."100Congresswoman Deborah Ross publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the 'Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act' (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://deborahross.com/priorities/ https://indyweek.com/news/elections/candidate-questionnaire-deborah-k-ross-u-s-congress/ https://twitter.com/repdeborahross/status/1418250555563065347 https://www.lcv.org/member/deborah-ross/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22North+Carolina%22%7D https://ross.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-ross-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rouzer, DavidNorth Carolina7RCongressman David Rouzer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the posted transcript on PBS for the film, "Climate of Doubt," he states on climate change that, "Well, you know, I don't necessarily listen to any one person. And I can't, you know, tick off a whole list of scientists that are pro-sea level rise and a whole list of scientists that aren't. I'm just coming at it from a common sense standpoint. The earth has been warming and cooling since day one. And you know, the effect on sea level change, what do we know about it?"00Congressman Roouzer supported executive actions by President Trump, which fast tracked the Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines. According to his website, in a press release, the congressman stated, "He(Trump) is wasting no time in getting down to business and acting on his promises to Make America Great Again. Already, President Trump has made it clear that he will put America first by clearing the path for approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Dakota Access Pipeline, both of which will create good paying jobs, increase our access to affordable energy and make America an even more dominate energy supplier for the world." The Congressman also supported the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating in a 2017 press release, "It simply isn’t fair for American manufacturers and other businesses to be held to a standard that their competitors in India and China are not. This was a bad deal for America and as promised during his campaign, President Donald Trump is putting American jobs and growth first." Congressman Rouzer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rouzer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/climate-of-doubt/transcript/ https://rouzer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rouzer-statement-trump-executive-actions https://rouzer.house.gov/2017/6/rep-rouzer-trumps-decision-withdraw-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://rouzer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=318Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Roy, ChipTexas21RAccording to a 2018 Huffington Post article when asked about climate change, Congressman Chip Roy stated, "I don’t know. What I know is that our lives are made so immeasurably better by the availability of affordable, abundant energy.” The same article quoted the Congressman stating that there is a, "hysteria around climate change." 00In 2017, the Congressman co-wrote an op-ed in The Hill titled, 'Trump should kill the failing Paris agreement.' In a press release, Roy said "Climate czar John Kerry is the poster child for the Biden administration's anti-energy policies that are destroying both our economy and national security. Now John Kerry is visiting China - the top threat to our national security and the world's number one polluter - to further hamstring energy freedom. It's time to defund anti-energy climate bureaucrats like John Kerry once and for all." Congressman Roy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Roy makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 op-ed written for Texas Policy, he wrote, "But supporters of a carbon tax are wrong. Carbon isn’t a commodity. And it’s not a form of injustice. It’s a building-block of life. Without it, plants, animals, and humans alike would not exist. Moreover, carbon-based fossil fuels have supported unmatched economic prosperity since the Industrial Revolution.We know what the effects of a carbon tax would be in America because we can already see them happening from such destructive policies in Europe where outrageously high prices of basic goods are forcing people to choose between food on the table and heating in the home." Congressman Roy was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.huffpost.com/entry/chip-roy-texas-21-election-lamar-smith_n_5be265e2e4b0769d24c69b14 https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/335908-trump-should-kill-the-failing-paris-agreement https://www.texaspolicy.com/multimedia/article/life-powered-brooke-rollins-chip-roy-on-carbon-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepChipRoy/status/1540352695814561794 https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-chip-roy-calls-defund-climate-czar-john-kerryOpposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ruiz, RaulCalifornia25DCongressman Ruiz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Energy and Environment page,' he states, "Investing in renewable energy is an important part of fulfilling our obligation as stewards of the environment, and it will also help create clean energy jobs in our communities and strengthen the local economy...We need a comprehensive national energy policy that will invest in clean energy and put us on the path to energy independence. This is an environmental, economic, and national security issue." It also states "Dr. Ruiz understands the importance of addressing climate change head-on with commonsense solutions. He advocated and voted for the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act – known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law – to make bold investments in our communities’ infrastructure and to combat the climate crisis."75100On Congressman Ruiz's 'Energy and Environment' page, he states, "In 2013, I joined 75 of my colleagues urging support for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to spur innovation in renewable electricity generation, sustainable transportation, and energy and cost-saving technologies for businesses and homes." Ruiz also discusses bills he has consponsored such as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act and Climate Action Now Act, demonstrating leadership in advocating for climate action.50Congressman Ruiz publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).10081.25https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/dr-ruiz-celebrates-earth-day https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/lawmakers-state-positions-possible-end-roe-versus-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rulli, Michael Ohio6RCongressman Rulli disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.00Congressman Rulli has no known stance on climate action.25Congressman Rulli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5025https://www.cantonrep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/06/05/ohio-special-election-2024-6th-district/73842775007/ https://twitter.com/michaelrulli/status/1521291609891037184Opposes Roe
Rutherford, JohnFlorida5RCongressman John Rutherford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by WJCT, when asked about sea level rise, the Congressman stated, "I agree that climate change is happening, and we certainly have sea level rise. I question what part of that is man made and what part of that is natural phenomenon.”00In 2019 Congressman Rutherford criticized the Green New Deal as a "socialist manifesto masquerading as an environmental proposal.” Congressman Rutherford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rutherford opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://news.wjct.org/post/how-green-new-deal-could-affect-storms-floods-and-heat-jacksonville https://rutherford.house.gov/issues https://news.wjct.org/first-coast/2019-02-21/rutherford-green-new-deal-a-socialist-manifesto-dressed-as-environmental-proposal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/JRutherfordFL/status/1219004067118243841Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ryan, PatNew York18DCongressman Pat Ryan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He has climate change as a top priority on his website, where he states that he "knows the greatest threat to our future is climate change." 1000Pat Ryan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2021, he released a plan for a Green New Deal for Ulster County. The plan, which consisted of over 30 goals and targets for Ulster County to reach, was one of the first of its kind in the country. Ryan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In June 2022, he tweeted, "Climate change is one of the defining challenges of our time," and listed funding the EPA, restoring the Clean Power Plan, blocking dirty energy projects, and building the clean energy economy of the future, as his priorities. On his website, he has demonstrated his commitment to climate action stating "achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030, putting the county's first electric busses on the road, and starting the Ulster County Green Careers Academy at SUNY Ulster." He makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congressman Ryan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5083.3333https://www.patryanforcongress.com/priorities https://oracle.newpaltz.edu/executive-pat-ryan-welcomes-green-new-deal-to-ulster-county/ https://twitter.com/PatRyanUC/status/1541481493972885506 https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/2022/09/06/naral-endorses-pat-ryan-to-us-house/Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Salazar, Maria Elvira Florida27RCongresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman states "Climate change is real, and the evidence is right here in Miami [...] Maria is working to secure federal funding and bring to South Florida the best engineering minds to tackle the threats that we face from climate change and preserve Miami Beach." In a 2021 interview with the Florida Director of the Environmental Defense Fund, Congresswoman Salazar states "...if you're here then you might as well just pay attention to what's surrounding you because you may not be here next time if we don't pay attention..."7529A 2021 'Florida Politics' article reported the congresswoman "back[ed] a resolution reinstating federal limits on methane emissions from oil and gas producers." A 2021 Orlando Sentinel article reported “Rep. Salazar said that ‘climate change is a real threat to South Florida’s coastlines and economic development over the long term.’” According to the 'Miami Herald,' in 2021, the congresswoman "supports Biden's decision to re-enter the Paris Climate Agreement." Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar's supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar has an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2018, the congresswoman "told the Miami Herald she would be open to a carbon tax proposal put forward by U.S. Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida’s 26th Congressional District," according to a 'Florida Politics' article. The 'Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy' states "The Curbelo proposal would impose a tax on carbon dioxide emissions that starts at $24/ton of CO2e in 2020, and it repeals the federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels." Despite this, the Congresswoman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5051https://mariaelvirasalazar.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnJDEXT6SzU https://floridapolitics.com/archives/440088-edf-action-ad-salazar-methane/ https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-gop-must-embrace-environmental-issues-20210701-6ntq7iybuzhgbj2jxmafjl7gwi-story.html https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article248674410.html https://floridapolitics.com/archives/277463-salazar-ad-environment-election/ https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/report/emissions-energy-and-economic-implications-curbelo-carbon-tax-proposal https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-politicians-react-to-supreme-courts-roe-v-wade-decision-14754648 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Salinas, AndreaOregon6DCongresswoman Salinas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "In Congress, Andrea will fight for the urgent action we need to protect our planet and natural resources. She knows we need to address climate change, but also focus on the profound and harmful impacts it has on low-income and BIPOC communities. Andrea wants to ensure that marginalized communities are provided with opportunities to prosper in a new, clean energy economy and not further harmed or marginalized by the impacts of climate change. Her approach to fighting climate change is simple: we must take bold steps, while making sure we create living wage jobs and not leave anyone behind in the process."100100Congresswoman Salinas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman has cosponsored climate action legislation such as H.Con.Res.37, expressing the sense of a climate emergency, and the Methane Emissions Research Act (H.R.4072). Responding to two of her bills being unanimously passed through committee, Congresswoman Salinas said in a press conference "These bills will strengthen the collaboration between government agencies to build resiliency to climate change and help ensure that Oregon farmers and communities have access to the latest emerging technologies. I thank Chair Lucas for his partnership and look forward to advocating for this legislation as it advances through Congress.”100Congresswoman Salinas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://salinas.house.gov/media/press-releases/salinas-bills-promote-energy-efficient-technology-help-farmers-adapt-climate https://www.andreasalinasfororegon.com/issues/ https://www.congress.gov/member/andrea-salinas/S001226?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Sánchez, LindaCalifornia38DCongresswoman Linda Sánchez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We are already witnessing the devastating effects of climate change. The science is clear that if we do nothing to reduce and eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, these effects will continue to worsen. Both current and future generations will pay a heavy price for our inaction."100100In a 2020 tweet, Congresswoman Sanchez states "The threat of climate change is real. Updating our nation’s water infrastructure is critical to making our communities more resilient to its effects." According to Solar Power World Online in 2021, "Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA) introduced the Residential Solar Opportunity Act, which would ensure working families and homeowners have the same access as corporations to tax incentives for deploying solar power generation." The Congresswoman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Sanchez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10093.75https://lindasanchez.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepLindaSanchez/status/1233508547389984770 https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/07/congresswoman-linda-sanchez-residential-solar-tax-credit-extension-bill/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://lindasanchez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/s-nchez-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scalise, SteveLouisiana1RCongressman Scalise disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 interview with CBS This Morning, when asked about climate change the Congressman, stated, "First of all, we do know that the earth's temperature changes -- it goes up and down... In the 1970's, they said we were entering a new cooling period." In a quote published by The Times-Picayune, the Congressman stated on climate change that, "While their global warming agenda continues to lose support, it's ironic that radical environmentalists are at it again, less than a month after NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), announced the Great Lakes had the most widespread ice coverage in over 35 years... Thirty years ago liberals were using global cooling to push new radical regulations. Then they shifted their focus to global warming in an effort to prop up wave after wave of job-killing regulations that are leading to skyrocketing food and energy costs." 00According to the The Times-Picayune, the Congressman supported President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "The radical United Nations Paris Accord on global warming is more about wealth redistribution than protecting the environment. It's a plan to allow the U.N. to take control of America's purse strings and take billions of dollars a year away from the United States and send it to other countries under the veil of a misguided global warming agenda, and I applaud President Trump for pulling out of this disastrous agreement." In a press release on the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The Obama Administration needs to finally abandon their radical climate change agenda that is killing jobs and increasing costs for American families.” Congressman Scalise demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0The Congressman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action. He is the lead sponsor of a 2021 resolution that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH). He lead the charge for the same resolution in 2016, 2018, 2019. In a press release supporting the 2018 resolution, he stated, ""I think the case is very clear by anybody who's looked objectively at what a carbon tax would do to the economy. It would be devastating to our manufacturing base, it would kill jobs, and I think most devastating, Mr. Speaker, it would rise in increased cost for families all across this country." He also signed the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge. In 2013, Rep. Scalise proposed an amendment that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H. Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). In a press release he stated, "President Obama’s plan to impose a tax on carbon would cause household electricity rates to skyrocket while destroying millions of American jobs. The House sent a strong bipartisan message to President Obama that a tax on carbon would devastate our economy and he needs to drop any idea of imposing this kind of radical regulation." 00https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scalise-sidesteps-climate-change-debate-earths-temperature-goes-up-and-down/ http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/un_global_warming_report_says.html http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/06/steve_scalise_paris_climate.html https://www.majoritywhip.gov/news/press_releases_newsroom_scalise-responds-to-reports-of-president-obamas-name-and-shame-climate-agreement/ https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-anti-carbon-tax-amendment-passed-house https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/24/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/89/text https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-carbon-tax-costly-burden-american-families https://scalise.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-republican-leadership-s-statement-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scanlon, MaryPennsylvania5DCongressman Mary Scanlon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing our nation and planet, and it deserves a serious response. Changing weather patterns have immediate and long-term consequences and pose grave risks to our national security and economic stability."100100According to the 'Clean Air Council,' “Methane pollution is the single largest human-controlled contributor to climate change and causes disastrous health and environmental impacts for all Americans. In my district, methane pollution contributes to exceptionally high rates of childhood asthma and related health disorders. Restoring the EPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for oil and gas facilities will go a long way toward protecting vulnerable communities and ensuring a safe, clean world for generations to come.” Congresswoman Scanlon's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Scanlon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://scanlon.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14979 https://cleanair.org/methanecra/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scanlon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=397Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schakowsky, JanIllinois9DCongresswoman Jan Schakowsky understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Climate change is real and it is in large part the result of human activity. It is the most serious threat to our environment, our health, and our way of life. We have taken some steps to reduce the risks of global warming, but much more can and should be done."100100Congresswoman Schakowsky has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. She did this through combating President Trump's climate change agenda, stating in a press release that, “More pollution, less science – that’s President Trump’s plan. Climate change is real, and it’s happening at an alarming rate. The majority of Americans and the rest of the world are clamoring for more aggressive and decisive action to combat climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet opposing the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman wrote, "Science matters. Climate change is real. We must act now, and you better believe we’re #Stillin — all the way." Rep. Schakowsky makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Schakowsky publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://schakowsky.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://schakowsky.house.gov/press-releases/schakowsky-statement-on-president-trumps-dirty-power-plan/ https://twitter.com/janschakowsky/status/930477778750922752 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://schakowsky.house.gov/media/press-releases/schakowsky-statement-49th-anniversary-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schneider, BradIllinois10DCongressman Schneider understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's environment page, it states, "Nothing is more fundamental than the air we breathe and the water we drink. And there is nothing more important for us to do than to protect our planet for the next generation. Climate change is a grave threat to the ecological and environmental health of our nation and planet. While some chose to deny the overwhelming scientific consensus, I recognize that the failure to address this challenge will, with certainty, result in further environmental degradation and incalculable damage to the world we pass on to our children."100100Congressman Schneider has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2021 press release, "Congressman Brad Schneider (IL-10) led 142 original cosponsors in introducing a resolution expressing support for the upcoming 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, also known as COP26, as well as reaffirming American support for global cooperation in combatting climate change." Rep. Schneider also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2022 press release responding to SCOTUS's decision to limit the EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions, he states, "In today's ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court is fundamentally hampering the EPA's ability to fulfill its mission. Climate change poses an existential threat that requires urgent federal and global cooperation. By restricting the authority of the EPA to regulate dangerous greenhouse gas emissions and protect public health, this decision takes away a critical tool in our fight against climate change. The clock is ticking on our window to take meaningful climate action. We cannot, and I will not, allow this set back to deter our efforts to protect the environment and secure our future from the dangers of climate change." Congressman Schneider makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2020 the Congressman introduced The Greener Transportation for Communities Act (H.R. 7318), stating in a press release, "Our country needs to get serious about transitioning to and ultimately achieving net-zero emissions. Transportation is a key contributor to emissions so we need to rapidly move to electrify our car and truck fleets."100Congressman Schneider publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. When asked on whether he supported a carbon fee (which he called a carbon tax) during a forum hosted by the Tenth Congressional District Democrats, he stated that, “I think a carbon tax is an example of a market mechanism and I think there are ways we can use the market that will create incentives for companies and consumers to lower their emissions. Yes.” Congressman Schneider voted against 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://schneider.house.gov/issues/environment https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/ahead-cop26-climate-change-conference-schneider-leads-resolution-142-house https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-curtail-epa-s-authority-regulate-carbon https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-introduces-bill-promote-cleaner-vehicles-fight-climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUldDdcuJuQ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scholten, HillaryMichigan3DCongresswoman Scholten understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Scholten said "I am fighting to curb climate change before it’s too late, and I stand firmly in defense of our Great Lakes. I am proud to lead the charge to invest in a new energy economy with tax credits for renewable energy innovations to create good paying jobs while reducing our reliance on foreign oil and lowering the cost of energy for all of us."100100Congresswoman Scholten has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, she said "I was so grateful to take part in this weekend’s climate roundtable as we celebrate incredible investments from the Inflation Reduction Act & Michigan’s role as a leader in implementing them." The Congresswoman has also cosponsored climate legislation such as the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congresswoman Scholten has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://hillaryscholten.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/RepScholten/status/1703516817577156650 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/member/hillary-scholten/S001221?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DSupports Roe
Schrier, KimWashington8DCongresswoman Kim Schrier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is real and we need to take immediate action. Dramatic, destructive weather systems and forest fires have grabbed the attention of our nation and the world, while the impacts of climate change run exponentially wider than that. From species extinction to oceanic ecosystems collapse, communities across America deserve to understand how their region’s forests, water resources, agricultural industries, and native species held dear will be impacted. Here in the 8th, we will see more wildfires, earlier growing seasons, reduced snowpack, warmer temperatures in our tributaries, a spike in waterborne infectious diseases affecting fish, and species extinction. We have the unique opportunity to champion policies that will create new, sustainable, clean energy jobs and grow our economy."100100Congresswoman Schrier has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website, Rep. Schrier states, "As we face the increasing threat of climate change, significant investments in forest management, wildland firefighting and mitigation, and agriculture research will allow for better wildfire preparedness and help specialty crop farmers. This legislation (The Build Back Better Act) also includes electric vehicle tax credits and other rebates that help save families money while moving our country toward a cleaner, more energy efficient future." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congresswoman wrote, "There is no denying it: climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety. Americans need action on climate change, and they need it now." Rep. Schrier makes climate change a top priority issue. In a speech on the House floor supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "In order to combat the effects climate change, we are all going to have to work together. Ours is a country that has always banded together to take on the greatest challenges of our times, and this is no exception. This is a time for the U.S. to not just partner, but lead the world in protecting this planet for our children and future generations."100Rep. Kim Schrier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an August 2018 interview with the Seattle Times, Rep. Schrier expressed support for the 2018 Washington State ballot initiative that would have implemented a fee on carbon. Rep. Schrier voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://www.drkimschrier.com/issues/climate-change-and-the-environment/ https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schrier-votes-pass-historic-build-back-better-act https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-bill-passes-rep-schrier-s-amendment https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/podcast-talking-taxes-trump-and-dino-rossi-with-kim-schrier-the-doctor-trying-to-flip-rep-dave-reicherts-seat-for-dems/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3671 https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schriers-statement-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schweikert, DavidArizona1RCongressman David Schweikert disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2014, Schweikert called climate change folklore and said "I don't see the data."00In a 2019 tweet on the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "If we are going to talk about a green agenda, we must look at how technology & science can help us. There are tech solutions available already that would not crash our economy, or require all straws to be taken out of restaurants." In 2014, according to a press release, the Congressman co-sponsored an amendment to the Electricity Security and Affordability Act that would limit the EPA's ability to curb greenhouse gasses (H.Amdt.576 to H.R. 3826). Congressman Schweikert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Schweikert opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO6QCQ30f24 https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna54104017 https://schweikert.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-schweikert-co-sponsors-amendment-curb-epa-overreach-power-plant https://schweikert.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://schweikert.house.gov/2013/01/22/schweikert-roe-v-wade-anniversary-my-fight-unborn/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scott, AustinGeorgia8RCongressman Austin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with NPR, when asked if he denied the scientific consensus that climate change is human caused, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely." 00On Congressman Scott's energy page, he states, "That is why I believe in an energy policy that includes increased domestic oil exploration, increased refining capacity within the United States and increased production of domestic oil, natural gas and clean coal." Scott has also used his platform to criticize the "woke climate agenda" such as in a 2023 Tweet. Congressman Scott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Scott opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.npr.org/2013/09/05/219177442/rep-scott-tired-of-the-u-s-getting-involved-in-others-disputes https://austinscott.house.gov/issues/energy https://twitter.com/AustinScottGA08/status/1658879292418162706 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://austinscott.house.gov/2022/6/rep-austin-scott-responds-to-scotus-decision https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scott, DavidGeorgia13DCongressman Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Agriculture, Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Also, as climate change worsens, I have worked closely with my colleagues in the House of Representatives to support evidence-based approaches in protecting our environment for the benefit of future generations of Georgians. Climatologists and environmental advocacy organizations predict Georgia will face an increase in droughts and extreme heat days as a result of worsening climate conditions. These conditions will pose a public health risk to vulnerable populations, including the elderly, pregnant women, and children. These conditions also pose risks to wildlife, oceans and air quality. Unfortunately, the Trump Administration has shown a lack of concern and action toward worsening climate conditions. That’s why, with the environment and economy in mind, I was proud to support and vote in favor of H.R. 9, the Climate Action Now Act, which requires the U.S. to rejoin the Paris Agreement—an international movement to combat the effects of climate change."100100In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on Climate Change's climate solutions report, the Congressman stated, "No one is more affected by climate change than our farmers and rural communities. We must continue to create energy from renewable sources rather than relying on only fossil fuels. At the intersection of the energy conversation and the climate conversation is the work we do on my subcommittee. The pursuit of plant-based renewable fuels and biobased products help us reduce our carbon footprint, while also supporting the agriculture market that keeps our farmers economically sustainable too. I’m excited to see how we can keep that conversation going in a way that makes sure we’re giving producers of these innovative green energy sources the support they need.” Congressman Scott's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://davidscott.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=2120 https://davidscott.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399407 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://davidscott.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399765Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scott, Robert C.Virginia3DCongressman Robert Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's energy and environment page, it states, "Congressman Scott believes that human activity has contributed to climate change and has been a consistent advocate of efforts to mitigate global warming. Scott has co-sponsored legislation in the House of Representatives that would promote investment in renewable energy, and is a supporter of the Green New Deal." 100100Congressman Scott has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "By recommitting the United States to the Paris agreement and calling for the necessary planning to meet our nation’s pollution reduction goals, the House of Representatives has taken an important first step. I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues to mitigate and adapt to climate change and, by doing so, avoid the worst of its consequences.” Rep. Scott also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While touring flood-prone peninsulas, the Congressman, stated, "If we don’t do something today a lot of the areas that are now populated will be underwater.” Congressman Scott makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release supporting the Clean Power Plan, he stated, "We have an obligation to reduce the impacts of climate change. That is why I supported the Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions, the Climate Action Plan and other efforts to ensure that climate change is taken into account in federal planning." 100Congressman Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://bobbyscott.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-house-passage-of-legislation-to-combat-climate-change https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/scott-tours-flood-prone-peninsula-neighborhoods-with-house-climate-crisis https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-president-trump-s-anti-environment-executive-order https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Self, KeithTexas3RCandidate Keith Self does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Self demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, Self said “Climate change extremism has served as the pretext for unrestricted encroachments on American liberty. The Biden administration’s latest proposal to curb emission standards hypocritically ignores the significant environmental harm that EV battery production causes and their toxicity." He has also been involved with anti-climate legislation such as various resolutions disapproving of EPA rules and regulations.0Keith Self opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://keithself.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-keith-self-condemns-biden-administration-proposed-rule-electric https://twitter.com/RepKeithSelf/status/1805354080820232701 https://www.congress.gov/member/keith-self/S001224?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Sessions, PeteTexas17RCongressman Pete Sessions does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Tribune-Herald,' Congressman Sessions states "And I will tell you that you would have to, in my opinion, think long and hard to ignore that there’s change going on."250In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Herald-Tribune,' Congressman Sessions states "I will tell you that some of the answers [to climate change] that are out there would disable America and our economy." Later in the interview, the congressman says "But I think that there are realistic things to do, but one of them is not killing our economy." Congressman Pete Sessions demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Sessions opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://wacotrib.com/opinion/interviews/negotiating-controversy-while-looking-to-return-to-the-fray-q-a-with-republican-congressional-candidate/article_154f9feb-c958-5bf7-9c9a-f405127f9c76.html https://www.kagstv.com/article/news/politics/national-politics/abortions-are-changing-pharmacists-give-medicine/499-5573966e-634c-41ba-ac15-ed7a3fcdce70 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sewell, Terri A. Alabama7DCongresswoman Terri Sewell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Extreme tornadoes. Raging wildfires. Unprecedented heat waves. Severe droughts & floods. We’re seeing the disastrous effects of climate change play out before our eyes & we cannot afford to wait. The #ClimateCrisis is urgent and requires bold action. NOW." 10085In a 2019 press release introducing the Carbon Capture and Sequestration Extension Act (H.R. 5156) Congresswoman Sewell stated, “It is critically important that Congress supports innovative approaches to reduce emissions, and carbon capture technology is essential to that fight.” But In a 2014 press release supporting coal, she stated, "Although we must prepare to diversify our energy production, I am committed to supporting coal as a viable source of energy in Alabama until alternatives become more economically feasible.” She also does not list climate change as an issue on her website. Congresswoman Sewell supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congresswoman Sewell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7577.5https://twitter.com/repterrisewell/status/1424823378616242182 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congresswoman-sewell-conversion-alabama-power-facility-greene https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-introduces-legislation-incentivize-carbon-capture-projects https://sewell.house.gov/issues-legislation https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sherman, BradCalifornia32DCongressman Sherman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Environment,' page, it states, "I co-sponsored the Climate Emergency Act, which will require the President to declare a national climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act, and take active steps to mitigate the climate crisis."100100Congressman Sherman has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting Our Environment,' page he advocates for protecting the Environmental Protection Agency, stating, "This administration and the EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt have shown time and time again that they do not fully believe in climate change or man’s contribution to it... It is a dangerous precedent to have an EPA Administrator that ignores decades of scientific research and studies." The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet defending the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) he writes, "Ignoring #ClimateChange won't make it go away. The Trump Admin’s latest effort to undo vital environmental protections would let federal agencies move forward with projects without factoring in the #ClimateCrisis. I joined 140 of my colleagues demanding that we #ProtectNEPA." Rep. Sherman makes climate change a priority issue as well. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated "I’m proud to stand and work with them to solve the #ClimateCrisis by co-sponsoring the #GreenNewDeal, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, and many other vital pieces of legislation that will help safeguard our environment."100Congressman Sherman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://sherman.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/bradsherman/status/1220502072283541505 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q https://twitter.com/BradSherman/status/1175160489921458176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sherman.house.gov/choiceSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro Climate
Sherrill, MikieNew Jersey11DCongresswoman Mikie Sherrill understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release in response to the IPCC's 2021 report titled 'Climate change 2021: The Physical Science Basis,' Congresswoman Sherrill stated, "The report released yesterday makes clear how critical it is to act now on the climate crisis. We need to increase our efforts to drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions and move towards a clean energy economy. We have only just begun to see the devastating effects of climate change. Increased warming will result in more frequent and severe weather events, hazards to human health, and threats to our national security."100100Congresswoman Sherrill has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), a bill that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." Rep. Sherrill also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2019 Well News article, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "as a resident of New Jersey and a member of both the Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space, and Technology Committee, it is clear to me that climate change poses a serious national security threat... Across the world, our critical military bases face the threat of rising sea levels, the impacts of climate change and the accompanying food and water scarcity create unrest, and the impacts on the global economy can trigger conflicts.” Congresswoman Sherrill makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Rep. Sherrill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Sherrill voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://sherrill.house.gov/media/press-releases/sst-environment-subcommittee-chair-rep-sherrill-statement-ipcc-climate-report https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=6&r=3 https://www.thewellnews.com/citing-threats-to-national-security-representative-mikie-sherrill-n-j-11-takes-climate-change-head-on/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Simpson, MikeIdaho2RCongressman Mike Simpson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's climate change page, it states, "Many scientists agree that the earth’s climate is changing, and these assertions are backed up by land managers who are witnessing changes in plants and animal behavior as the climate shifts. While scientists cannot explain the climate changes of the past few decades without including the effects of elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations resulting from the use of fossil fuels, there is widespread disagreement as to the magnitude of human influence on the climate and the degree to which any effort by humanity to reduce carbon output would slow or reverse the effects of climate change."00In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Proposed as an economic and environmental transformation, the Green New Deal is an irresponsible ploy that should have our nation green with nausea rather than envy... The crusade against “farting cows” might be considered noble or a bit funny by some in the Bronx, but to the ranchers who are up before the sun feeding cows, this isn’t a joke." Congressman Simpson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Simpson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his climate change page, he states, "I am concerned, however, regarding efforts to tax carbon output or to layer so many regulations on top of carbon-based energy sources that it they become unfeasible. I don’t think this is an answer to the energy crisis facing our nation—not only does it make energy production so expensive that American families will see their energy bills increase to unsustainable rates, but it also forces us to continue depending on foreign sources of energy." Congressman Simpson voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://simpson.house.gov/issuestatements/climatechange.htm https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398766 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399657Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Smith, AdamWashington9DCongressman Adam Smith understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, the 'Energy and Environment' page states, "It is an indisputable fact that the earth’s climate is warming and changing, and poses a grave threat to the entire world. Over the last century, the global temperature has risen and research suggests that the global average temperature today is among the highest since human civilization began flourishing. Over the course of human development, the use of fossil fuels, increased deforestation, agricultural production, and other types of human activity have increased the concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG), such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and tropospheric ozone in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide levels, for example, have risen by almost 40 percent over the last 150 years and are contributing to a 30 percent increase in ocean acidification. Two thirds of global GHG are produced by ten primary emitters: China, the United States, the European Union, India, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, and Iran."100100Congressman Smith has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release tying climate change to the Great American Outdoors Act (H.R. 1957), the Congressman stated, "As the impacts of climate change increasingly harm communities around the country, this bill is an enormously important investment in our children, our environment, and our quality of life that will help protect the great outdoors for generations to come.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In support of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis climate action plan, the Congressman stated, “The climate crisis is an existential threat that requires a comprehensive and drastic mobilization of resources." Rep. Smith makes climate change a top priority issue. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congressman Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://adamsmith.house.gov/energy-environment https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=50986B68-C735-46F9-B872-34F558C12322 https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=A677791F-8454-42A7-BBCD-E19139C9856B https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://adamsmith.house.gov/2022/5/rep-smith-statement-on-supreme-court-draft-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Smith, AdrianNebraska3RCongressman Adrian Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a May 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Leading the Way,' Congressman Smith wrote, I have long supported an “all of the above” approach to increase American energy production and efficiency, which in turn boosts our economic activity and keeps rates affordable for American families and businesses." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Smith makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a June 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Taxing More is not the Answer,' Rep. Bacon wrote, "Americans are being taxed enough already; it is well past time to get serious about reining in spending. Unfortunately, some in Congress have reached a different conclusion... There have been proposals to raise taxes on Social Security, gasoline, firearms, carbon emissions, and even to repeal the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017." The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).012.5https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/leading-way https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/reducing-carbon-emissions-right-way https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://adriansmith.house.gov/media/column/restoring-culture-life Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, ChrisNew Jersey4RCongressman Chris Smith understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "As a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, I believe it is equally imperative that we address environmental issues—such as climate change—on a global scale. Global warming is a real threat and an increasing danger to our environment. All major greenhouse emitting countries need to cooperate in reducing and stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of these gases, and the United States must play a leadership role in bringing nations together for a global solution to climate change."750Congressman Smith supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. The last time the Congressman advocated for a truly productive climate change bill dates back to the 2007 'International Climate Cooperation Re-engagement Act' (H.R. 2420), legislation that reduces fossil fuel dependence and ensures "a healthy environment for future generations."50Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2537.5https://chrissmith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3744 https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=70883 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, JasonMissouri8RCongressman Jason Smith disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 tweet, featuring a picture of cows, the Congressman wrote, "Saw these Missouri cows this morning. I didn’t have the heart to tell them their gases are the cause of climate change, at least that’s what the radicals in Washington with their Green New Deal think!"00In a 2019 newsletter opposing the Green New Deal, Congressman Smith wrote, "Newly elected radicals in the U.S. House of Representatives say the world will end in twelve years unless we pass their “Green New Deal.” Candidates for President have lined up to endorse the plan, which would completely overhaul our entire economy and ban affordable energy options. They say the climate is “our World War II,” but their plan is a war on working families and the American economy." Congressman Smith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/repjasonsmith/status/1102333032298614784 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1130 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4127 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smucker, LloydPennsylvania11RCongressman Lloyd Smucker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 debate reported on by the York Dispatch, the Congressman attempted to cast doubt on climate science, stating, "there's still some disagreement on how much human activity has led to that." In a 2017 candidate survey published by WGAL, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is too often politicized to advance the agendas of special interests and centralize power within the federal government, this should not be the objective. We must utilize science and be prudent to remain good stewards of our environment by working to achieve measurable environmental and health benefits. I support an 'All-of-the-Above' energy policy. We need a combination of shale, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, etc. to best position our country to not rely on foreign sources of energy."00In a debate reported on by State Impact, Congressman Smucker was quoted supporting pipelines. He said, "If the process has been followed, if landowners have been adequately compensated, then I would support that project.” In a 2019 tweet on the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "The #GreenNewDeal isn’t energy and climate policy. It's a plan for government control over each American’s economic life. #GreenNewDisaster." Congressman Smucker demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Smucker opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/news/local/2018/10/09/jess-king-rep-lloyd-smucker-clash-over-campaign-finances-first-debate/1574335002/ http://www.wgal.com/article/lloyd-smucker-vs-christine-hartman-see-where-the-candidates-in-the-16th-congressional-district-stand-on-the-issues/8050280 https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/10/11/congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-pipeline/ https://twitter.com/RepSmucker/status/1100463395491463169 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sorensen, EricIllinois17DCongressman Sorensen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Sorensen says "Climate change is not a partisan issue. There is not a single climate communicator in Congress who matches the communication and climate science backgrounds of Eric. Eric’s job was to communicate climate to help YOU in your day-to-day life. Climate change is real and serious. Now is the time to act, and we need an experienced climate communicator to lead."100100Congressman Sorensen's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, the Congressman said "The climate disasters we see today are a result of the warming only up to yesterday. We have to continue developing smart technology while broadening limits on emissions."75Congressman Sorensen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://www.ericforillinois.com/issues https://twitter.com/ERICSORENSEN/status/1724404965567857020 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Soto, DarrenFlorida9DCongressman Darren Soto understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "America should be at the forefront of the effort to reduce fossil fuel emissions and confront the threat of climate change. That's why I'm fighting in Congress to invest in renewable energy, protect our environment, and reduce the financial burden on students who graduate with degrees in science and technology. We have the opportunity to build a clean energy economy and drastically reduce our fossil fuel emissions; we can't afford to lose the progress we've made."100100Congressman Soto has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2020 town hall, the Congressman introduced the Climate Leadership and Environmental Action for our Nation’s (CLEAN) Future Act, which would ensure the United States achieves net-zero greenhouse gas pollution no later than 2050. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Energy & Commerce Committee Hearing on climate change, the Congressman described what needed to be done to protect future generations, stating, "To avoid surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius global carbon dioxide emissions would have to drop around 45% below 2010 levels by 2030 and reached zero emissions by around 2050... This challenge is not about the folks behind the dais it's not about most of the folks in the audience it's about Lincoln and his generation and what we're gonna do in 2050 we're gonna look back and say did we do what we needed to get done." Rep. Soto makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the Ban Fracking Act (H.R. 5857), a federal bill to phase out fracking nationwide in the United States. In a 2020 press release introducing the bill, he stated, "We cannot deny the overwhelming scientific consensus any longer—fracking is a threat to our health, safety and environment. If we want to transition from fossil fuel emissions as we work towards building a 100 percent clean economy, pulling back from fracking is a critical first step. Failure to act will only make the crisis at hand even more detrimental for future generations of Americans.”100Congressman Soto has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).7593.75https://www.darrensoto.com/climate-change/ https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-soto-unveils-clean-future-act-climate-change-town-hall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1PhYFhApnc&feature=emb_logo https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/soto-ocasio-cortez-sanders-merkley-unveil-bill-ban-fracking-nationwide https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepDarrenSoto/status/1540348797720481792 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Spartz, VictoriaIndiana5RCongresswoman Victoria Spartz disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the IndyStar, Congresswoman Spartz did not acknowledge the scientific consensus on climate change, saying that "there is real debate among scientists about how much climate change is natural and how much is man-made".00Congresswoman Spartz demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a August 2022 tweet, the congresswoman likened the Inflation Reduction Act's spending to "Russian propaganda calling an invasion - liberation". In August 2021, Representative Spartz criticized additional spending programs, including climate mitigation programs, arguing that "we’re spending so much money right now that we need to have a serious conversation" about overspending.0Congresswoman Spartz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/15/indiana-5th-congressional-district-candidate-victoria-spartz-stands-issues/5761497002/ https://twitter.com/RepSpartz/status/1556613675930329095 https://wibc.com/114639/spartz-on-spending-were-already-overspending-how-can-we-promise-more/ https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/24/supreme-court-roe-vs-wade-indiana-politicians-react-abortion-ruling/7580330001/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stansbury, MelanieNew Mexico1DCongresswoman Melanie Stansbury understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she wrote, "New Mexico and our planet are facing a climate crisis. Historic drought is amplifying water insecurity throughout our country and more frequent fires are devastating our public and private lands."100100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Washington Post, "climate hawks in the House say that Stansbury has earned a reputation as an unusually active freshman on climate and water issues. They describe her as a policy wonk with a staffer-level knowledge of these issues and a determination to tackle pressing environmental problems, from America's aging electric grid to the historic drought gripping the West." The article continues, stating that "In December, Stansbury introduced the WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act, which seeks to help tribes access clean drinking water amid a 'megadrought' that scientists say is fueled by the climate crisis. "100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://melaniefornm.com/en/issues https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/19/this-super-freshman-is-making-mark-climate-policy-house/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stanton, GregArizona4DCongressman Greg Stanton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release he said, Making a statement on the CHIPS and Science Act, Stanton said in 2024 "Our CHIPS and Science Act is turbocharging innovation here in the Valley, not just in advanced manufacturing, but in addressing the existential threat of climate change and drought." According to a 2021 Facebook post, the Congressman stated, "As climate change continues to impact the southwest with rising temperatures, forest fires and drought, protecting our water supply remains one of my top priorities.”100100Congressman Stanton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release in support of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Arizona is already experiencing the effects of climate change—extreme heat, prolonged drought, stress on our water sources, dangerous wildfires—we have to do our part and take bold action to reverse this trend.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a press release supporting The 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R. 5221) Congressman Stanton, stated, "Climate change is ravaging the Southwest, and Congress has an obligation to take bold action to combat it." Rep. Stanton makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 interview with Green Living when asked about his top priorities in his then-upcoming run for Congress, he stated, "We need to better support cities on the climate change action that they are taking."100Congressman Stanton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://stanton.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-bill-act-climate-change https://stanton.house.gov/media/in-the-news/4-az-dems-back-plan-100-clean-energy-2050 https://www.nytimes.com/video/climate/100000005337296/greg-stanton-on-fighting-climate-change.html https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1273880406368949 https://stanton.house.gov/2022/6/stanton-statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stauber, PeteMinnesota8RCongressman Pete Stauber does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Stauber stated, "President Trump made the right choice to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. This flawed accord tied the hands of American energy innovation, and ignored the strides made by the United States to reduce emissions without interference, and empowered the worst actors in the world to continue being the biggest polluters with little accountability. Instead of prioritizing foreign nations over our own, I stand with the President’s decision to put our workers and country first." In a written statement from October 2021, according to The Ripon Advance, the Congressman said 'We need a reliable and resilient energy grid that provides low-cost energy to American families. This can only be accomplished by supporting an all-of-the-above approach, not picking winners and losers from Washington, D.C.'" Congressman Stauber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Stauber makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Stauber co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://riponadvance.com/stories/stauber-gop-colleagues-urge-democrats-to-drop-carbon-tax-policy-proposal/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.weau.com/2022/06/24/minnesota-lawmakers-react-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steel, MichelleCalifornia45RCongresswoman Michelle Steel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking in regards to protecting the environment on her campaign website, Congresswoman Steel claims she is "fighting for common-sense and science-based policies."250Congresswoman Michelle Steel supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In response to receiving an endorsement from the 'American Conservation Coalition,' as a candidate in August 2020, Congresswoman Steel stated, "We need the leaders in Congress that understand the threat of climate change and will work towards science-based solutions that protect our environment." However, Steel fails to regularly and explicitly advocate for taking climate action, using her influence to push change.50Congresswoman Steel opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Steel voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2525https://www.michellesteelca.com/issues/ https://www.michellesteelca.com/2020/08/american-conservation-coalition-endorses-michelle-steel-for-congress/ https://twitter.com/MichelleSteelCA/status/1296967855976484864 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/michelle-steelOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stefanik, EliseNew York21RAt first glance, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik appears to understand the importance of climate action as a top priority issue, but it's all a lie. In an interview with Mountain Lake PBS, the Congresswoman when asked about climate change stated, "It is urgent and it's a generational issue. I'm one of the younger members of Congress no longer the youngest but this is something that my generation is going to inherit. I've been a leader when it comes to not only the acknowledgment of climate change but also the focus on science-based solutions. I've been a leader when it comes to promoting renewable energy both nationally but specifically in the district." According to Adirondack Daily Enterprise, "Elise Stefanik is funded by gas, oil, fracking, coal interests, Koch brothers and Karl Rove’s American Crossroads, yet she claims she takes climate change seriously. She invokes her 'all-of-the above' position – a phrase as uninforming as it was when President Obama used it. It indicates nothing about priorities."00Congresswoman Stefanik misrepresents everything about her position and action on climate change. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the 2021 Growing Climate Solutions act, legislation that she says would "help solve technical entry barriers that prevent farmers and private landowners from participating in carbon markets." This is beneficial, because, as stated by the Congresswoman herself, "farmers play a critical role in reducing global greenhouse emissions and creating sensible climate policy, and we must equip them tools and resources to be successful." Over 200 farmer, farmworker, environmental justice, climate, environmental, faith-based, animal welfare, and other groups rejected ‘Growing Climate Solutions Act.’0Congresswoman Stefanik makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmA8VucMk4Q https://stefanik.house.gov/press-releases?ID=30909EB9-3674-4955-A0BA-81F6E56768F5 https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2020/10/15/over-200-organizations-reject-growing-climate-solutions-act/ https://www.nny360.com/news/oswegocounty/congresswoman-elise-stefanik-responds-to-president-biden-s-state-of-the-union-address/article_cd3413ca-4718-501a-8714-95cc1cfea639.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POoT_3DbdjoOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steil, BryanWisconsin1RCongressman Bryan Steil agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he states, "I believe we can create opportunity, protect the environment, and address climate change at the same time." According to a 2018 E&E News article, during a 2018 forum, the Congressman stated, "I believe that climate change is real and I believe humans are a key component in that."500In a 2019 press release following his vote against the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Global climate change is real. To reduce carbon emissions, we must hold China and India accountable. We also need a technology-based approach. The Paris Agreement fails to hold China and India accountable, making the Agreement unworkable. Heavy-handed federal regulations drive up energy costs. Instead, we must encourage technology developments to address climate change.” During a 2019 listening session, reported on by the GazetteXtra, "Steil stuck with his support of President Donald Trump on a border wall but seemed to differ from the president slightly on climate change. While Trump has expressed skepticism of climate change theory, Steil said he believes it’s real and that human actions have caused it." Congressman Steil does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Steil opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2525https://steil.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.eenews.net/special_reports/2018_midterms_powershift/stories/1060107423 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/repbryansteil/status/1540348850837258245Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steube, GregFlorida17RCongressman Steube disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by the Florida Phoenix, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I think the climate has been changing since God created the Earth. I don’t think there are solutions that we as legislators can necessarily do. You’re obviously not going to change what’s happening on our climate with changing carbon emissions because there’s other partners in the world that aren’t doing that.”00In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated "Liberals want to use deadly weather events to justify their ridiculous climate spending when in fact the evidence shows the opposite. As the climate has been warming, tornadoes have actually dramatically decreased." Congressman Steube demonstrates a lack of leadership with public state'ments, advocacy, or votes against climate action.0Congressman Steube opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.floridaphoenix.com/2019/05/02/with-leadership-by-tampa-u-s-rep-kathy-castor-u-s-house-spurns-trump-on-global-climate-accord/ https://mobile.twitter.com/gregsteube/status/1470769533010989071 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://steube.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-steube-celebrates-the-end-of-roe-v-wade-applauds-courageous-supreme-courtOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stevens, HaleyMichigan11DCongresswoman Haley Stevens understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Protecting Our “Pure Michigan Environment,' page, it states, "I believe climate change is a serious problem and needs to be addressed immediately before it is too late. When an overwhelming number of scientists around the world have cited the realities and dangerous implications of climate change, this is not a partisan issue, but the global challenge of our generation that requires dedicated leadership to tackle."100100Congresswoman Stevens has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, “Climate change is real. The evidence is all around us. It’s time to take action to combat climate change and save our planet for future generations.” Rep. Stevens also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Energy hearing pertaining to climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is not just an environmental challenge. Unless we act now, we are putting our infrastructure, our economy, our public health, and our national security at risk." Congresswoman Stevens makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release supporting the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act (H.R. 729), the Congresswoman stated, “Coastal communities in Michigan and around the country are especially vulnerable to severe weather events, chronic flooding, and coastal erosion as the climate crisis worsens. The Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act will help coastal communities plan and prosper for a resilient future while preserving natural habitats and biodiversity.”100Congresswoman Stevens publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://www.haleystevensforcongress.com/priorities/environment/ https://twitter.com/rephaleystevens/status/1231942811915882497 https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=250307222557225 https://stevens.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-stevens-votes-bipartisan-bill-protect-great-lakes-communities-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://twitter.com/haleylive/status/1545031021745291266 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Strickland, Marilyn Washington10DCongresswoman Marilyn Strickland understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in a 2021 press release, Congresswoman Streickland stated, "As our planet warms and climate change takes hold, these extreme weather events are only becoming more common, costing lives, crippling our infrastructure, and destroying the great state of Washington. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create tens of thousands of jobs and build a brighter, more sustainable future. My state, our country, and our world, depends on it." " On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most serious long-term threats to our nation and the world. As Mayor, Marilyn committed Tacoma to the Paris Climate Accord and supported the creation of an Environmental Action Plan. She launched a citywide community gardens initiative, which expanded into a county-wide program now with dozens of community gardens throughout the region."100100Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in an October 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10)...deliver[ed] remarks on the House floor today urging Congress to address the climate crisis with historic investments in sustainable infrastructure, citing the damaging impacts of June and August’s unprecedented heat domes on Washington State. With several consecutive days well into the 100s, temperatures in the region soared to record highs, crippling the Pacific Northwest’s infrastructure and environment and costing hundreds of lives." Congresswoman Strickland also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to the 'KNKX Public Radio' in 2021, "...Strickland favors...those of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis — that would get to net-zero emissions electricity production in the U.S. in 20 years." The congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2020 article from 'The Intercept,' "Strickland, meanwhile, supports reentering the Paris climate agreement, and said in a statement to The Intercept that she 'supports impactful plans to address climate change that are attainable and effective to reduce carbon emissions, while creating and maintaining family-wage jobs, and ensuring a just and equitable transition to clean energy source.' She added that she supports the recommendations of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis..."100Congressman Strickland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://thesubtimes.com/2021/10/02/strickland-calls-for-transformational-climate-action-on-house-floor/ https://stricklandforwashington.com/priorities/climate-change/ https://www.knkx.org/environment/2020-10-29/contrasting-views-on-climate-action-in-the-race-for-washingtons-10th-congressional-district https://theintercept.com/2020/09/24/congress-marilyn-strickland-beth-doglio-environment-fires-climate-crisis/ https://strickland.house.gov/media/press-releases/strickland-statement-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Strong, DaleAlabama5RCongressman Strong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Strong demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, Strong voiced opposition to climate action saying "The Biden Admin continues to force its radical green agenda on Americans." Strong lists combatting inflation as a high priority, saying the solution is "more production of fuel and gas here in America.”0Congressman Strong opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/RepDaleStrong/status/1770538771160666347 https://www.waaytv.com/news/waay-31-your-voice-your-vote-dale-strong-5th-congressional-district-republican-candidate/article_7d251832-c67c-11ec-9e42-b369c9c0af03.html https://strong.house.gov/media/in-the-news/alabama-leaders-celebrate-countless-lives-saved-anniversary-roe-v-wade-being https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Suozzi, TomNew York3DCongressman Suozzi understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he said "Tom also knows that climate change is real and requires bold solutions to mitigate its impacts on Long Island. He was a leading member of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, a group of Republicans and Democrats who work together to combat climate change while also protecting our nation’s economic prosperity. When he returns to Congress, Tom will continue his leadership on protecting the Long Island Sound, ensuring we have clean drinking water, and working to address climate change."750Congressman Suozzi's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. Suozzi has a strong history of voting for climate action according to the League of Conservation Voters. Suozzi has also been involved with cosponsoring climate legislation such as the Clean Commute for Kids Act, and the Climate Resilience Workforce Act.100Congressman Suozzi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/thomas-suozzi https://suozziforcongress2024.com/tom-suozzis-10-point-plan/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/member/thomas-suozzi/S001201?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%2C%22sponsorship%22%3A%22cosponsored%22%7DSupports Roe
Swalwell, EricCalifornia14DCongressman Eric Swalwell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Swalwell's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I am working to encourage innovation in the field of renewable energy and energy conservation. Addressing the climate crisis is imperative for our national security, the ecosystems that feed us, our public health and safety, and our future economic well-being." On his campaign website, Swalwell said "Climate change is a real and looming threat to our national security, our economy, our environment, and our future. That is why I unapologetically support the Green New Deal."100100Congressman Swalwell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his House website, he states that "We have a responsibility to ensure that this country is preparing for a safe, reliable and secure energy future." In Congress, Swalwell has cosponsored bills such as the Green New Deal (H.Res.332), the Clean Energy Hydrogen Innovation Act (H.R.1788), and the GREEN Act of 2021 (H.R.848). 100Congressman Swalwell publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://ericswalwell.com/my-plan/ https://www.independentnews.com/news/swalwell-urges-students-to-take-on-climate-chaos/article_4dd25e90-d4f9-11e9-bd4b-6b2b2c67a379.html https://www.axios.com/eric-swalwell-2020-presidential-election-factsheet-e4d16242-d053-4df4-840e-b54e182e1268.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/332/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22:%5B%22The+Green+New+Deal+Resolution+of+2021%22%5D%7D&r=2&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://swalwell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-swalwell-supreme-court-decision-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sykes, EmiliaOhio13DCandidate Emilia Sykes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2020, the candidate stated "As the Democratic Leader of the Ohio House I am committed to fighting for environmental justice, equality, sustainability, and a state where we can live out our American dream. Climate change is one of our greatest threats and combined with systemically racist environmental policies is hindering current and future generations’ ability to fulfill the Ohio Promise," in response to an endorsement from the Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund PAC. 100100Congresswoman Sykes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters in 2022, "While in the state house, [Candidate Sykes] led efforts to repeal House Bill 6 – a disastrous and corrupt energy bill gutting clean energy and energy efficiency programs – and advocated for a proposed alternative Clean Energy Jobs plan that would establish a 50 percent renewable energy portfolio standard by 2050, encourage wind and solar development, expand weatherization programs for low-income communities and create training programs for clean energy jobs." In a Tweet, Sykes said "During my first term, I’ve made protecting the future of our environment a priority. I’m thrilled to announce @LCVoters has endorsed my reelection campaign and look forward to working with them to defend democracy and tackle climate change."100Congresswoman Sykes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5http://www.theoecactionfund.org/press-statements/esykesendorsement0920 https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-emilia-sykes-for-congress/ https://www.emiliasykesforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/EmiliaSykesOH/status/1735397226799829074Supports Roe
Takano, MarkCalifornia39DCongressman Mark Takano understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Takano's 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats we face as a global community. Greenhouse gas emissions have grown significantly since the Industrial Revolution, leading to an unprecedented rise in average global temperatures. From changes in weather patterns, to an unprecedented increase in droughts, floods, and superstorms, we have seen the effects of climate change firsthand. We must do more to combat the effects of climate change."100100Congressman Takano has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his House website, Congressman Takano has also makes prominent public statements on the issue, stating "I am proud to support the Green New Deal, a comprehensive and ambitious proposal to achieve global net-zero emissions by 2050. I am committed to bold, progressive reforms to cut carbon emissions, reduce our dependency on fossil fuels and foreign oil, and invest in green energy alternatives." In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), he stated, "Climate change is real — it is hurting our communities and it is threatening our future. There is no time to waste when it comes to fighting climate change, that’s why we are making the #ClimateActionNow Act a legislative priority. As a sponsor of the Green New Deal, I believe that we must rise to the challenge and lead the world in addressing the climate crisis." Rep. Takano makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman demonstrated this by co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries.100Congressman Takano has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://takano.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.facebook.com/RepMarkTakano/photos/a.265096313619446/1934117533383974/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://takano.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-takano-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tenney, ClaudiaNew York24RClaudia Tenney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.When asked if climate change was a significant threat, she replied, "No, I do not believe that climate change is a significant threat to our planet. The climate has always continuously changed and as of today there are no steps we could take that would reduce the global temperature."00Claudia Tenney does not oppose climate action. In a statement, she said "The fact is, we do not have to choose between clean, affordable energy and protecting our environment. We can and must do both."25Congresswoman Tenney opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://us11.campaign-archive.com/?e=[UNIQID]&u=c733071f6c5cb6b94ca6b76ce&id=a1a6aa62db https://tenney.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment-plan https://tenney.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-tenneys-statement-supreme-courts-decision-dobbs-v-jackson-womens https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thanedar, ShriMichigan13DCongressman Thanedar understands the importnace of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Thanedar said "The climate crisis is an extenstial threat to our way of life. As a scientist and chemist, I know firsthand how important it is to protect our environment."100100Congressman Thanedar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He has co-sponsored climate action such as the Green New Deal, Energy Resilient Communities Act, and the A. Donald McEachin Environmental Justice For All Act. In a Tweet, Thanedar said "We need to do more to protect Lake Michigan and our natural environment from the impacts of climate change. Give us the House majority, and let us get it done."100Congressman Thanedar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://shriforcongress.com/issues/ https://thanedar.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/ShriThanedar/status/1777673124487524588 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Thompson, Bennie G.Mississippi2DCongressman Bennie Thompson understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "To create the next generation of clean energy jobs, make our nation more secure and reduce the pollution that causes global warming, Congressman Thompson and Congressional Democrats are committed to investing in our nation’s clean energy future."75100Congressman Thompson supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In a 2021 Tweet, Thompson expressed his support for any of President Biden's executive actions which would combat climate change. 50Congressman Thompson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Thompson co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10081.25https://benniethompson.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/benniegthompson/status/1540442317231882241?lang=en Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Thompson, Glenn W.Pennsylvania15RCongressman Glenn Thompson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's website, Thompson states, "...I will remain committed to providing resources and outreach in the community, while continuing to advocate for... increases in domestic production of fossil fuels. Lands onshore and offshore contain significant amounts of natural gas, petroleum, and coal that can fuel our energy needs for centuries."00In a 2020 press release, the Congressman condemned calls to ban fracking, stating, "As we look ahead to future relief and recovery measures, we must continue to stand up against Democrat calls to “ban fracking” or incorporate extreme Green New Deal policies. We should instead support proposals to strengthen our supply chains, enhance our national security, and provide more Americans with access to affordable natural gas.” Congressman Thompson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Thompson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://thompson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-thompson-quizzes-agriculture-undersecretary-anf https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thompson, MikeCalifornia4DCongressman Thompson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is the greatest threat we face today. From sea level rise to extreme weather events and rising temperatures, no community will go untouched by the climate crisis. It is clear that climate action must remain a priority to secure a healthy future for generations to come. That's why I wrote the GREEN Act which made the largest investment in climate action that our country has ever seen."100100Congressman Thompson has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "If we do not address climate change with bold and immediate action, we will not have the same world to pass on to future generations. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 Congressional hearing discussing climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is real and the consequences are impacting our district. All of the expert witnesses in today’s hearing – Democrats and Republicans – agreed that this crisis is real and worsening. From the more devastating fires, to more frequent flooding, our communities face increased health and economic effects." Rep. Thompson makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the most existential threat we face today. I have long said that if we do not act now nothing else we do matters because there won’t be a planet to pass on to our children. That’s why I am a proud, original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a resolution stating the steps we must take to address climate change."100Congressman Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "That’s why I voted for legislation to require the Administration to draw up a plan to reduce emissions and why I support market-based solutions to regulating carbon emissions." Congressman Thompson voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://mikethompson.house.gov/issues/environment https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-votes-for-climate-action-now-act https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-highlights-health-impacts-of-climate-change-and-green-tax-code https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-statement-on-assault-on-womens-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tiffany, TomWisconsin7RTom Tiffany disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2022, he stated, “There is some slight warming that’s going on. But it is that caused by man. Because the policy makers are saying, let’s make these changes like the EPA in this case, they’re saying we have to make these changes. Let’s make sure that man is causing it.”00Tom Tiffany demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Earlier in 2022, Tiffany "sent EPA Administrator Michael Regan a letter urging him to support the proposed natural gas plant after the agency said a Supplemental Environmental Assessment failed to properly account for carbon emissions." Tiffany also "lobbied Gov. Scott Walker to cut funding for scientific research at the Department of Natural Resources, pushed to make thousands more acres of state forest eligible for logging, and supported a failed bid to boost the power of the governor by taking away the policy-setting powers of the state Natural Resources Board."0Congressman Tiffany opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.kfiz.com/tiffany-wants-to-make-sure-that-climate-change-is-man-made/ https://tiffany.house.gov/media/editorials-letters-and-articles/epas-climate-games-wisconsin https://archive.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/tom-tiffany-has-been-a-lightning-rod-on-environmental-issues-b99547320z1-320987941.html/ https://www.waow.com/news/politics/congressman-tom-tiffany-praises-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-decision/article_bc1d6186-f8b1-11ec-9f96-f79b5e32f177.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Timmons, WilliamSouth Carolina4RCongressman William Timmons disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2018 Congressional debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is not a United States issue. It is a global issue, and we are not going to be the one to solve it. The planet has to solve it."00In a 2022 Tweet, Timmons voiced his opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act, saying "Calling a tax, spending, and climate change bill the “Inflation Reduction Act” is peak Democrat nonsense. These are the same people who are trying to change the definition of recession, refuse to define “woman”, and believe inflation is currently at 0%." Congressman Timmons demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Timmons opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/local/2018/10/26/highlights-4th-congressional-district-candidate-forum/1772435002/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepTimmons/status/1558103481264766977 https://timmons.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=148Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Titus, DinaNevada1DCongresswoman Dina Titus understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2022, the Congresswoman spoke on the House Floor regarding Build Back Better, saying that "We must wake up to the realities of climate change, and the increasing intensity and cost of natural disasters. This (Build Back Better) will help to make our nation more resilient, and I ask my colleagues to support it."100100Congresswoman Titus has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 tweet, she stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time...Let's get to work." Rep. Titus also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a letter with other House Dems to President Biden regarding forming better climate provisions in Build Back Better, she stated, "The need to act on the climate crisis while centering environmental justice and creating and sustaining millions of good-paying union jobs has never been more important. In communities across the country, we are already seeing staggering climate damages. Climate change is driving more severe drought and wildfires in the West, larger and more frequent floods in the Midwest, and sea level rise and greater storm damage along our coasts." The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congresswoman Titus makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congresswoman Titus publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvM3PIKXJdw https://twitter.com/repdinatitus/status/1354503844076597252 https://mikelevin.house.gov/imo/media/doc/2022-01-31%20Frontline%20Letter%20on%20BBB%20Climate%20Provisions.pdf https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=12&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tlaib, RashidaMichigan12DCongresswoman Rashida Tlaib understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "Families have been harmed and many have died due to federal government inaction – President Trump must realize this and work on behalf of the American people to create a plan to curb carbon emissions and safeguard the health of people and our environment. The Climate Action Now Act is a needed step to take bold action against climate change and I look forward to working with my colleagues to protect frontline communities and ensure a just transition to a green economy happens swiftly and is as comprehensive as possible.”100100Congresswoman Tlaib has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 House Committee on Financial Services hearing, in which several executives from big banks were in attendance, the Congresswoman stated, "But for the sake of this hearing, I'll say that you are greenwashing your own track record and duping the American people into believing that you are helping address climate change. On the record, will any of your banks make a commitment to phase out your investments in fossil fuels and dirty energy?" Rep. Tlaib also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 interview with Jamal Simmons, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "I don't think people understand the true impact of doing nothing." Congresswoman Tlaib makes climate change a top priority issue. During an April 2019 rally in Wayne County, Michigan, the Congresswoman in support of the Green New Deal, stated, "A Green New Deal is not bold or radical. This is our life. If there is anybody who deserves a seat at the table it is us in Wayne County! We can’t sit back and let corporate greed tell us this is not possible!”100Congresswoman Tlaib has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-s-statement-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.newsweek.com/rashida-tlaib-banks-gaslighting-americans-funding-fossil-fuels-1391824 https://www.kolormagazine.com/lifestyle-culture/2019/8/21/krxcms1wsthdgeqhf58x4buaftmgdo https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/439841-tlaib-rallies-in-support-of-green-new-deal-at-detroit-town-hall https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/reprashida/status/1485086013470957568Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tokuda, JillHawaii2DCongresswoman Tokuda understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Tokuda says "Aggressive action needs to be taken to address climate change impacts and increase renewable energy production. Hawaii is in a climate crisis. Accelerated sea-level rise is threatening our infrastructure, with roads and homes increasingly at risk of oceanic erosion. We’re witnessing continued extreme weather patterns and rising ocean temperatures that are severely impacting our coral reefs and marine life."100100Congresswoman Tokuda's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. Congresswoman Tokuda maintains a strong record with the League of Conservation Voters indicating a history of voting in favor of climate action. Tokuda has also been involved with legislation such as H.Res.319 calling on the creation of a Green New Deal, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.75Congresswoman Tokuda has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://tokudaforhawaii.com/issues/ https://www.lcv.org/work/congressional-scorecard/?s-zip=96720 https://www.congress.gov/member/jill-tokuda/T000487?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Tonko, Paul D.New York20DCongressman Paul Tonko understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, the Congressman lays out a 'Framework for Climate Action in the U.S Congress,' stating, "We agree that climate change is real. We agree humans are driving it. We agree that we need to build solutions that meet the scale and urgency of the crisis we face. The principles outlined in this document are meant to provide a framework that moves the lines of our agreement forward and helps us build a comprehensive national climate action plan together."100100Congressman Tonko has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman voted against the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) due to its failure in addressing climate change, stating in a 2019 press release, "The United States must get serious about the challenge of a changing climate and build international cooperation and commitments through all vehicles available to us, including our trade agreements. Trade negotiations do not happen frequently, but their impact is felt for generations. I cannot support a deal which fails to even acknowledge the global climate crisis that future generations will be left to bear.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "While the Trump Administration wastes precious time denying the scientific realities of climate change, Americans are fleeing its devastating effects in the form of wildfires, flooding and storms unlike anything we have seen before. Decades of science-based evidence have made clear that bold action is necessary to prevent the deadliest and most costly effects of climate change." Rep. Tonko makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman led an amicus brief opposing the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) replacement of the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) with the Trump Administration’s Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. 100Congressman Tonko has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://tonko.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15252 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2947 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2923 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3038 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?IssueID=15237Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, NormaCalifornia35DCongresswoman Norma Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I have demonstrated a commitment to taking on challenges like drought and climate change that are impacting California. I’m proud to work hard to ensure that the land, air, and water are kept clean through supporting sensible legislation aimed at preventing pollution while balancing economic development and environmental conservation. My priorities include promoting energy efficiency, renewable energy sources like solar, as well as increasing investments in water infrastructure and funding development of new technologies that have the capacity to expand water recycling and desalination capabilities." 100100Congresswoman Torres has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release, the Congresswoman announced a legislative proposal that would have prevented President Trump from limiting cities and states, like California, from taking ambitious actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Fighting climate change is about our kids and grandkids. If we don't do our job, they're expected to live through three times as many wildfires, floods, and droughts. We're in a crisis—and we've got to take it seriously." Rep. Torres makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post the Congresswoman stated, "#ClimateChange is real whether the Trump Administration likes it or not. Inserting false information into environmental reports is dangerously misleading, undermines our government’s credibility, and worst of all, puts the future of younger generations at risk. This all-out attack on our environment for the sake of higher profits must end!."100Congresswoman Torres publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87). 100100https://torres.house.gov/issue/energy-and-environment https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-proposal-stop-president-trump-sabotaging-california-s-climate https://twitter.com/Norma4Congress/status/1443421500137115652 https://www.facebook.com/RepNormaTorres/posts/climatechange-is-real-whether-the-trump-administration-likes-it-or-not-inserting/3041103052581266/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-statement-overturning-roe-v-wade-supreme-courtSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, Ritchie New York15DCongressman Ritchie Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change."75100In response to a 2020, the 'League of Conservation Voters Action Fund' endorsement, Congressman Torres said, "In Congress, I look forward to fighting alongside them to address the greatest global environmental challenges including replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy, limiting carbon emissions, enacting a Green New Deal and righting the wrongs of environmental racism that have hurt Bronx residents.” In response to a tweet regarding a severe rainstorm in September 2021, the congressman replies saying "The climate has changed. And New York needs to change along with it." Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "The Green New Deal is not only an agenda for environmental justice, but it is also one for economic justice and racial justice. Severe pollution is lethal in communities like the Bronx, where 20% of children have asthma -- 12% higher than the national average. We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change." This is the only mention of climate action on his campaign website. Congressman Ritchie Torres’ website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Torres no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5075https://torres.nyc/issues/realizing-justice https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-ritchie-torres-congress/ https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1175101011389833216?lang=en https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1521296083506417665?lang=en https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Trahan, LoriMassachusetts 3DCongresswoman Trahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is real. It is an existential threat to our country and our planet. Every day that passes without Congress taking swift, bold action to tackle this issue is a day wasted, and a detriment to our children and grandchildren."100100Congresswoman Trahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Lori understands that climate change will affect low-income and minority communities, tribal nations, and Alaska Native villages. Lori will work towards comprehensive climate change policies that do not leave any demographic — including former mining communities — behind." Rep. Trahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), she stated, "Combating the climate crisis is a moral imperative that should compel us – regardless of political party -- to act to create a clean energy economy that can provide good-paying jobs to millions of Americans, cleaner air for everyone, and a sustainable future for our children and grandchildren to grow and thrive." In a 2019 tweet condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is a step in the complete wrong direction. Our children, our families, and our communities deserve so much better. Climate change is happening, it’s urgent, and it demands action."100The Congresswoman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. .The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=35 https://loritrahan.com/energy-and-the-environment/ https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=91 https://twitter.com/RepLoriTrahan/status/1191490502111182851 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://trahan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15046 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Turner, MichaelOhio10RCongressman Turner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman's website says "Congressman Turner has long supported an all-of-the-above approach to domestic energy production." Congressman Turner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Turner opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://turner.house.gov/media-center/columns/more-natural-gas-for-europe-is-good-for-us-alliances-and-jobs https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://turner.house.gov/energy https://www.miketurner.com/issues.phpOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Underwood, LaurenIllinois14DCongresswoman Lauren Underwood understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, she stated "The climate crisis presents an existential threat to our environment, our national security, our health, and our economy. Lauren supports policies that advance clean energy solutions, support good-paying american jobs, and promotes national security."100100Congresswoman Underwood has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced the 2021 'Farmers Fighting Climate Change' act, legislation that would "establish region-specific climate change mitigation bundles within CSP to support and promote agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration," which would help "producers expand their climate stewardship practices and empower more farmers to be leaders of America's response to climate change." Rep. Underwood also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 testimony in front of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman stated, "I am committed to ensuring Congress upholds its responsibility to communities like mine who are demanding meaningful, long-term solutions to climate change." Congresswoman Underwood makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 letter to the Secretary of Agriculture, the Congresswoman wrote, “Ignoring the link between climate change and extreme weather presents a direct threat to our national security, food security, and to the livelihoods of Illinois farmers and farmers throughout the country. Undermining public discourse on climate change by obfuscating research is dangerous.”100Congresswoman Underwood has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.underwoodforcongress.com/issues/climate https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-gallagher-introduce-bipartisan-climate-change-legislation-support https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-advocates-climate-change-solutions-house-select-committee-climate https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-works-prevent-administration-hiding-climate-change-information https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwoods-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Valadao, DavidCalifornia22RCongressman David Valadao does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with CNN in September 2021, the congressman acknowledged that "that he “is a person who thinks that the climate is changing” and admitting that his party could do more to push on the issue," but doesn't further elaborate on the cause of climate change.250Congressman Valadao does not oppose climate action. According to his official house website, Representative Valadao believes that "we need a diverse, “all of the above” energy plan that includes nuclear and clean coal power plants as well as oil and natural gas exploration, wind, solar, and hydro energy". In a September 2021 tweet, the congressman lauded the economic benefits of solar energy, writing that "renewable Solar continues to create opportunities for businesses and families in our community to convert to solar, and I look forward to seeing their continued innovation bring more projects like this to the Valley".25Congressman Valadao opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Valadao voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2518.75https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/18/politics/drought-climate-change-california-21-congressional-district/index.html https://valadao.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepDavidValadao/status/1437502666041561089 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2018363 https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/10/david-valadao-abortion-election-00044719Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Drew, JeffNew Jersey2RCongressman Jeff Van Drew agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release discussing the Green New Deal, he stated, "I believe that climate change is real, is driven mainly by human activity and that it is driving real-world changes such as extreme weather events, hotter temperatures, rising sea levels and ocean acidification. I believe that the United States has a moral and economic imperative to mitigate the impacts of climate change. However, I do not think that H.J. Res. 109, the Green New Deal is the right solution.”5014According to a 2020 Insider NJ Article, the Sierra Club revoked their previous endorsement, saying "Van Drew claims that he will protect our lands and is against offshore drilling, but voted in support of Trump’s Executive Order (EO 13817) which would ease safeguards and protections for leasing and mining on public lands. He also claims that he believes in climate change and supports our nation staying in and abiding by the Paris Climate Agreement, but he voted to strip federal funding to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the UN Convention on Climate Change." He demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Van Drew opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2522.25https://vandrew.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-jeff-van-drew-s-nj-02-statement-green-new-deal https://www.insidernj.com/sierra-club-revokes-van-drew-endorsement-backs-kennedy-cd2/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Duyne, Beth Texas24RCongresswoman Beth Van Duyne disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the 'Dallas Morning News- Voter's Guide,' the congresswoman states "The fact that our climate is changing is undeniable. Indeed it has been changing since the end of the last Ice Age and on a warming trend since the end of the little ice age hundreds of years ago. As a person who believes in conservation... I want our country to continue making advances in technology that reduce emissions, have a smaller footprint for energy generation, and contribute to cleaner air, water, and soil.”250According to a 2020 'Grist' article, "[Congresswoman Van Duyne] is not pro-regulation, calling Environmental Protection Agency rules 'crippling' for Texas’ cities." Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a July 2021 tweet, the congresswoman wrote "Joe and the Socialists say electric vehicles & climate change are 'infrastructure!' Help me stop their unfocused, wasteful, and insane spending spree!" Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Van Duyne opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/200514-Beth-Van-Duyne-Book-ONLINE.pdf https://grist.org/politics/climate-change-could-tip-the-scales-in-these-6-toss-up-house-races/ https://twitter.com/Bethvanduyne/status/1418727882826858496 https://twitter.com/repbethvanduyne/status/1540340622875185152 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Orden, Derrick Wisconsin3RCongressman Van Orden does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Van Orden demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, Van Orden said "Biden’s radical Anti-Energy policies are not just destroying the American Way of Life, they are crushing the free world", and in another asserted "We have to unleash American energy independence." The Congressman has also repeatedly cosponsored resolutions expressing disapproval of EPA rules and regulations meant to help the environment.0Congressman Van Orden opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1541568362052026379 https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1577703289981997062 https://www.congress.gov/member/derrick-van-orden/V000135?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1540352952036167684Opposes Roe
Vargas, JuanCalifornia52DCongressman Juan Vargas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Vargas writes "The climate crisis is here, and unless we take action at national and global level, it will only get worse. Underserved communities and people of color are disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. I support the Green New Deal to introduce green technology, cut carbon emissions, keep contaminants out of our water and soil, and address social inequities caused by climate change. I’m committed to working to protect our planet for the next generation."100100Congressman Vargas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release introducing the ESG Disclosure Simplification Act of 2019 (H.R. 4329), the Congressman stated, “Access to better ESG disclosures allows investors to direct capital toward more sustainable companies, ultimately encouraging companies to reduce their carbon footprints and address important issues like climate change, diversity, and labor rights.” The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Vargas publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 10093.75https://www.votevargas.com/priorities https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-juan-vargas-introduces-esg-disclosure-simplification-act-of-2019 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-vargas-votes-to-enshrine-reproductive-rights-into-federal-lawSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Vasquez, GabeNew Mexico2DCongressman Vasquez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Vasquez said "We have a basic responsibility to leave a better world for our kids, but unchecked pollution from dirty and outdated energy sources is putting the health and future of our children at risk. Ninety-nine percent of scientists, NASA, and the Department of Defense all agree that climate change is a threat – and we’re already seeing its impact in the forms of increasingly severe weather, drought, and wildfires."100100Congressman Vasquez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Vasquez has a strong history of voting for climate action according to the League of Conservation Voters, and has taken action such as supporting increasing climate action funding for the DoD and acquiring $63 million from the government for establishing electric truck charging stations and transitioning to electric vehicles.100Congressman Vasquez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2581.25https://gabeforcongress.com/issues/ https://vasquez.house.gov/issues/environment https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/gabe-vasquez https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports Roe
Veasey, MarcTexas33DCongressman Marc Veasey understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release supporting the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) he stated, “Today, I was proud to join my colleagues on the Energy and Commerce Committee to advance the historic Build Back Better Act. With today’s passage by the Committee, we are one step closer to making significant investments to American families and workers, revitalizing our economy, creating millions of new jobs, combatting climate change, and ensuring that no community is left behind.”75100In a press release in support of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA), Congressman Marc Veasey stated, "While I praise today’s passage of this legislation, I know that no deal is perfect. This deal alone will not solve the problems of outsourcing, income inequality or climate change. Therefore, USMCA is not a model moving forward, but it establishes important principles we can build from in future trade deals." Congressman Marc Veasey’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Veasey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7581.25https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-veasey-tx-33-on-energy-and-commerce-committee-passage-of-build-back https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-marc-veasey-tx-33-statement-on-passage-of-the-united-states https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://veasey.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-marc-veasey-tx-33-statement-on-the-supreme-court-decision-toSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Velázquez, Nydia M.New York7DCongresswoman Nydia Velázquez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change and Environment,' page, it states, "She also recognizes that climate change presents an existential threat to our nation, our planet and our future. She supports bold, meaningful action to address this problem... As our climate changes, New York may see additional flooding and storms in the future and it is important our City and neighborhoods be prepared."100100Congresswoman Velázquez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that "prohibits federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil." Rep. Velázquez also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release addressing the effect of climate change on people, she stated, "When it comes to combating climate change, we must all be in this together, as Americans and as global citizens living on this planet." Congresswoman Velázquez makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021, legislation that "requires the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy."100Congresswoman Velázquez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://velazquez.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857/cosponsors?r=10&s=1 https://velazquez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-vel-zquez-senator-markey-reintroduce-legislation-aid-people https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394/cosponsors?r=4&s=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://velazquez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/vel-zquez-scotus-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wagner, AnnMissouri2RCongresswoman Ann Wagner disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Riverfront Times, Rep. Ann Wagner was quoted stating, "The field of climate science is in its relative infancy and it appears that some within the public policy world have made dubious assessments of scientific information in order to further their own political agenda. Our policy response to this dilemma should not be based on inconsistent and unsound science or driven by the fear of a supposed catastrophe."00On Congresswoman Wagner's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe we must fully cultivate our oil resources by ending drilling moratoriums, increasing onshore and offshore production, and approving permits that would assist in transporting oil from North Dakota's Bakken." Congresswoman Wagner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Wagner makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was a co-sponsor and voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congresswoman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9a4dyp/missouris-climate-change-deniers https://wagner.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-3YK-dI08o Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Walberg, TimMichigan5RAccording to a 2017 Time Magazine article, during a town hall when asked his stance on climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe there’s climate change. I believe there’s been climate change since the beginning of time. Do I think man has some impact? Yeah, of course. Can man change the entire universe? No... Why do I believe that? Well, as a Christian, I believe that there is a creator in God who is much bigger than us. And I’m confident that, if there’s a real problem, he can take care of it.”00In a September 2019 interview on the Steve Gruber Show, the Congressman stated when asked about climate change, "These last several weeks of August it has been a huge issue especially when you see the Democratic candidates talking about it and the Green New Deal, but that is not going to work." In a 2023 press release, Walberg talked about introducing a bill which would greatly reduce the EPA's abilities to enforce emission regulations. Congressman Walberg demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Walberg makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release, after voting to oppose a national carbon tax, the Congressman stated, "For the Michigan families struggling each month to pay their bills, a new $10 oil tax would be yet another blow to their pocketbooks. During a time of sluggish economic growth, the last thing we need is a misguided tax that will increase energy prices and hurt job creation. America's energy policies should encourage more innovation and production, not try at every turn to make energy more expensive for consumers." Congressman Walberg was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://time.com/4800000/tim-walberg-god-climate-change/ https://stevegruber.podbean.com/e/tim-walberg-climate-change-the-green-new-deal-and-the-bacon-tax/ https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-opposes-higher-energy-prices-new-oil-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-statement-supreme-court-decision-dobbs-case https://walberg.house.gov/media/in-the-news/detroit-news-walberg-bill-would-bar-epa-implementing-strong-new-emission-rulesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Waltz, MichaelFlorida6RCongressman Michael Waltz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2019 article in the Woodwell Climate Research Center, "Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Florida) said that climate change impacts are indisputable, and that he wanted the United States “to lead this effort … with rapidly growing clean energy markets.”750In a 2017 article of E&E News, the Congressman was quoted stating, "We do need to — from a military standpoint, even a national security standpoint — deal with the effects of a warming Earth... The Defense Department [and] a number of admirals and generals [and] even [Defense] Secretary [Jim] Mattis in his confirmation testimony pointed to drought, famine, natural disasters and other effects of a warming Earth — of climate change — as a national security issue. Those issues led to failed states that terrorist groups are taking care of that we have to deal with. So I'd like to see the United States continue a leadership role." Congressman Waltz supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Waltz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2537.5https://www.woodwellclimate.org/woodwell-climates-dr-jennifer-francis-testifies-to-congressional-hearing-on-climate-change/ https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060096339 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://waltz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=629Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wasserman Schultz, DebbieFlorida25DCongresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "As a senior member of the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, I use my unique position to advocate for South Florida and Everglades restoration, take bold action on climate change and renewable energy, and improve the quality of our air and water. It is imperative, now more than ever, that we adequately fund ecosystem restoration and clean energy initiatives as Florida deals with the full effects of our global climate crisis."100100In 2017 Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz published an op-ed in the Miami Herald condemning the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, writing, "Sadly, the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement is only the latest anti-science, anti-conservation policy to emerge from the Trump administration. This is a president who appointed a vocal climate science denier to head the Environmental Protection Agency, then removed a majority of scientists from the EPA’s Board of Scientific Counselors. This is an administration that has worked to erode the safeguards protecting clean air and clean water at every opportunity — including gutting key funding for Everglades protection and restoration." Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15058 http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article154343914.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2850Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Waters, MaxineCalifornia43DCongresswoman Waters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In response to the World Bank President David Malpass’s denial of climate change, she stated, "President Malpass’s refusal to accept the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activity, specifically, the burning of fossil fuels, is the main driver of climate change is appalling...President Malpass’s unwillingness to acknowledge the central role that fossil fuel emissions play in climate change calls into question the Bank’s commitment to meeting the climate challenge, including efforts to help ensure a just transition away from fossil fuels in developing countries." In a 2017 press release rebuffing President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement Congresswoman Waters stated, "If Trump withdraws from the Paris agreement, it could cause the entire agreement to collapse, accelerating climate change and exacerbating its impacts on human communities, impacts which include deadly hurricanes, severe droughts, and rising sea levels."100100Congresswoman Waters has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's decision to slash California transportation funding, the Congresswoman stated, "We will continue to resist his heartless, corrupt, and cruel administration. We will win our lawsuit and protect our right to enforce strong emissions standards, fight climate change, and protect public health.” The Congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. During the nomination of Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, the Congresswoman released a statement stating, "Rex Tillerson’s record of misinformation on climate change is also a reason for grave concern about his ability to be a credible and effective Secretary of State. Recent evidence indicates that Exxon deliberately misled government agencies and the American public regarding the threat posed by climate change." The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2021, "Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services, gave the following statement at a Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions hybrid hearing entitled, 'Addressing Climate as a Systemic Risk: The Need to Build Resilience within Our Banking and Financial Institutions.'” The Congresswoman stated "Over the past year, we have witnessed examples of how climate change can disrupt our financial system. Meanwhile, the hundreds of bankruptcies in the oil and gas sector as a result of the economic fallout from COVID-19 has provided a preview of the type of pain our economy will likely face as climate change becomes worse. I am pleased that President Biden, Treasury Secretary Yellen, and policymakers at the Fed and elsewhere have listened to those of us who have raised concerns about urgent financial stability risks of climate change, and that they are beginning to take action."100Congresswoman Waters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409853 https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-reports-suggesting-president-trump-will-withdraw-us https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-trump-intimidating-california-slashing https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-waters-statement-nomination-rex-tillerson-secretary-state https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=408104 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409591Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Watson Coleman, BonnieNew Jersey12DCongresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a crisis that affects everyone. For this reason I have co-sponsored the Green New Deal. It is crucial that the United States demonstrates to the international community that many Americans still support the Paris Climate Agreement even though our President may not. We must reaffirm our commitment to the agreement and our effort to combat climate change." The Green New Deal is a set of policies that aim to fight climate change while also investing in the economy.100100Congresswoman Coleman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is the co-sponsor of H.Con.Res.31, legislation that "recognizes the need for the departments and agencies of the executive branch with delegated authority over energy and climate policy to prepare a climate recovery plan that puts the United States on a trajectory consistent with reducing global atmospheric carbon dioxide to below 350 parts per million by the year 2100." Rep. Coleman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a joint letter to President Biden with 59 of her colleagues, the Congresswoman called for change, saying that the "climate catastrophe is no longer some distant threat...it is here and now." Congresswoman Coleman makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Fracking Ban Act (H.R.5857), legislation that "prohibits federal agencies from issuing permits for the expansion of fracking or fracked oil and natural gas infrastructure, including infrastructure intended to extract, transport, or burn natural gas or oil."100Congresswoman Coleman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://watsoncoleman.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14894 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/31?s=1&r=11 https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/two-n-j-members-congress-join-letter-calling-transformational-climate-investments/ xhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5857?s=1&r=18 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Weber, RandyTexas14RCongressman Randy Weber disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on 'Vice,' they refer to Congressman Weber as a "climate change denier," and quote him saying, "I may want to get your cell phone, because if we go through cycles of global warming and then back to global cooling, I need to know when to buy my long coat on sale. I just don't know how y'all prove those hypotheses going back fifty, hundred, what you might say is thousands if not millions of years, and then postulate those forward." 00In a 2019 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Weber stated, "This legislation would bind us to the Paris Climate Accord and would be a step backwards. Staying in the Paris Climate Accord could mean losing 2.7 million American jobs and losing over $250 billion in GDP by 2025. Money funneled into the Paris Climate Accord is better spent investing in the private sector, which leads the way in technology and emissions reduction. Withdrawing from the Accord is not about seeking to do harm to the environment. Far from it. Instead, this is about investing in people and innovation. Regulation and false promises serve only to stifle real progress.” Congressman Weber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. ge leadership.0Congressman Weber makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://weber.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=526 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kfdm.com/news/local/randy-weber-releases-statement-praising-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Webster, DanielFlorida11RCongressman Daniel Webster disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 Committee on Space, Science, and Technology hearing on climate science, the Congressman stated, "So when I first ran for office, which is many years ago, long before this issue was an issue, there was another issue, and it was called the coming Ice Age. There was a big article in one of the magazines, I think it was Time magazine, when I was running for office... So you kind of wonder, we had some charts up here that started in late 1979. I don’t know, maybe those before that were the other way, and so the only growth in the temperature was a re-energizing what the temperature used to be before it was cooling. And so it just seems like there is such a short period of time. We’re looking at this data. It’s calculated within, you know, down to maybe four-tenths of a degree, and if we look back thousands of years, there might be a better pattern to see, and granted, we may not have that data but it seems like we’re basing a lot of things on current data, not on necessarily what’s happened in the world in general, and we’re blaming it on one set of circumstances, which may or may not have been the case for other things that occurred and in some cases there weren’t any humans."00Despite his lack of leadership, Congressman Webster introduced the PREPARE act, which would make sure Americans are prepared for extreme weather events, such as hurricanes. In a 2019 press release, the Congressman stated, "The PREPARE Act builds on the initiatives Florida pioneered. It is a thoughtful approach to improve disaster preparedness across federal agencies to better identify and proactively mitigate risk.” Congressman Webster demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Webster opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=800987 https://webster.house.gov/press-releases?ContentRecord_id=6D7BAC75-709B-4389-AF24-EDA3EA0972EC https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://webster.house.gov/2022/6/statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wenstrup, BradOhio2RCongressman Brad Wenstrup disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his energy page, the Congressman stated his opposition to the EPA regulating carbon, saying, "I also believe the EPA’s unilateral pursuit of regulatory action without congressional oversight, including the unaccountable attempt to regulate carbon, has created tremendous uncertainty for businesses and consumers at a time when we can least afford it." 00On Congressman Wenstrup's energy page he supports policies expanding fossil fuel production, stating, "I support policies that will expand access to all forms of American-made energy, which will create jobs and provide increased energy supplies, and increased American energy exploration on private and federal lands." According to a 2014 press release, the Congressman in a radio address criticized, "Obama for his stand on net neutrality, for his deal with the Chinese government on global warming, and other Obama environmental policies." Congressman Wenstrup demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Wenstrup opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://wenstrup.house.gov/priorities/issue/default.aspx?IssueID=126808 https://wenstrup.house.gov/updates/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398542 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wenstrup.house.gov/updates/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=405735Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Westerman, BruceArkansas4RCongressman Westerman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with CSPAN, Westerman stated "When we look at what's happening with climate, if you look at what we know from polar ice caps on the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, pre-industrial revolution in the modern period, it didn't get above 300 parts per million [...] now we are over 400 parts per million. Westerman lated added "I think that we can address the climate issue. Long term there are a lot of things that have to happen. It can't happen overnight, just like climate change doesn't happen overnight." In an interview with NC Newsline, Westerman doesn't reject the scientific consnensus on climate change but voices opposition to most climate action targeting fossil fuels saying "The Democrats’ approach is to remove fossil fuels, which maybe someday we can do that, but we’re a long way from getting to that point." 500Congressman Westerman supported President Trump's announcement to leave the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, “I applaud the Administration's decision to lead like America has historically led...by example. The United States can be more effective illustrating to the rest of the world what sound environmental stewardship looks like by innovating and continuing to be the best when we lead and set the standard versus signing agreements with foreign governments and allowing others to direct how we operate.” During a 2017 Congressional hearing, Rep. Westerman doubted climate change stating, “I assume if the climate’s changing, it’s changing in Arkansas, as well as other places. So I did a little research and found out the number of forest fires in Arkansas has actually decreased over the past 20 years. It’s either held level or slightly decreased as our management has continued to increase. So apparently the climate change isn’t affecting forest fires in my state. You would think even though it’s a more moderate or temperate climate if climate change was causing more fires we would see a lot more of them than what’s in the baseline.” Congressman Westerman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Westerman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://www.c-span.org/video/?475897-4/representative-bruce-westerman-climate-change https://ncnewsline.com/briefs/new-u-s-house-natural-resources-chair-opposes-limits-on-fossil-fuel-development/ https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/western-caucus-members-praise-paris-climate-agreement-withdrawal-potus https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/videos/bruce-westerman-questions-wildfire-prevention-house-subcommittee-federal-lands https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/westerman-reacts-reversal-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wild, SusanPennsylvania7DCongresswoman Susan Wild understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing her inclusion in the New Democrat Coalition’s Climate Change Task Force, she stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis that affects every aspect of our societies." According to her website's 'Issues' page, Congresswoman Wild states, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time and it must be treated with the urgency it demands. I, along with my colleagues, passed the Climate Action Now Act, which was the first congressional vote in over ten years to address the threats to our climate. This landmark legislation would bring America back in line with the Paris Accord, which aims to reduce worldwide carbon emissions, and it would require the President to detail to Congress his plans to meet emissions reductions."100100Congresswoman Susan Wild has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congresswoman stated, "Climate Change is real and we need #ClimateActionNow." On Congresswoman WIld’s website's 'Defending the Environment' page, it states, "It’s an embarrassment that we are the only nation on Earth not to sign the framework deal which aims to reduce carbon emissions. The Trump Administration’s disregard for basic science is putting America last on the global stage." On her website's 'Issues' section, the Congresswoman states, "Climate change and the influence of Big Oil are decimating our remaining natural wonders and seashores. I was proud to vote to protect our national resources and lands from offshore drilling, and I will vote against further attempts to ruin our national parks, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and offshore areas." Congresswoman Susan Wild's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Wild has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://wild.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-wild-lays-out-climate-change-priorities https://wildforcongress.com/environment-0 https://twitter.com/repsusanwild/status/1228102784198889475 https://wildforcongress.com/defending-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wild.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-wild-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Williams, BrandonNew York22RCongressman Williams disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a press release, Williams said "Yes, our planet’s climate is changing, but no amount of wishful thinking is going to change the laws of physics or thermodynamics."00Congressman Williams does not oppose climate action. Williams supports an “all of the above” strategy which includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congressman Williams opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://brandonwilliams.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1581 https://web.archive.org/web/20220711035711/https://twitter.com/Brandon4ny22/status/1540359850009534465/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes Roe
Williams, NikemaGeorgia5DCongresswoman Nikema Williams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Williams states "If we do not take bold action now to halt the harmful effects of the climate crisis, we are facing irreversible and life threatening changes - especially for those in Black and Brown communities.I fully support the Green New Deal, because as we have seen in Flint, Michigan and countless other instances in our country, environmental justice and the climate crisis are hand-in-hand. We already know what actions we must take as a country, and we must not wait any longer because people’s lives are at stake. With time, air and water pollution will continue to increase, temperatures will continue to rise, and the climate crisis will wreak havoc on our communities."100100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Nikema Williams states that she "support[s] the aggressive target of transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050, and the bold proposals of affordable public transit, good-paying environmentally friendly jobs, while providing for futures to come." Congresswoman Williams also makes public statements advocating for climate action, such as in a 2022 Tweet saying "I proudly voted YES to make the biggest climate investment in history, create new jobs and save folks money on healthcare." Congresswoman Williams' website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Nikema Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://www.nikemaforcongress.com/issues-new https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/issues/environment https://x.com/RepNikema/status/1559156340844630018 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/posts/congresswoman-nikema-williams-statement-before-voting-for-reproductive-rights-legislative-packageSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Williams, RogerTexas25RCongressman Roger Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Roger Williams demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to an article in 'Politi Fact,' Congressman Williams has undermined climate change solutions. The article states, "In a one-minute speech on Oct. 28 in Congress, Rep. Roger Williams, R-Austin, claimed: 'U.S. households are on track to spend $19 billion more on energy by 2030.'" In a press release, Williams said "President Biden's radical efforts to reduce fossil fuel production in order to appease climate change activists continues to have harmful impacts on American consumers and our global national security interests. From his first day in office, President Biden was determined to cripple domestic energy production at home."0Congressman Williams makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).06.25https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/30/roger-williams/williams-presents-estimate-based-biden-campaign-pr/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://williams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-williams-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-decision-to-overturn-roe-v https://williams.house.gov/issues/energy-independenceOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Wilson, FredericaFlorida24DCongresswoman Frederica Wilson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I am also convinced that climate change poses a serious threat to our state and our nation. As President Obama said in his Second Inaugural Address, we can no longer ignore devastating fires, crippling drought, dangerous storms, and rising sea levels. I am committed to smart energy policies that fight climate change by cutting carbon emissions and boosting renewable fuel production. As the solar industry has demonstrated, by investing in new clean technologies, we can not only protect our planet but also create new high-wage jobs."100100Congresswoman Wilson has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2020 press release, the Congresswoman was able to include provisions in The Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), which would, "establish several new programs that will reduce emissions, invest in new technologies, and improve resiliency." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the president's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "And, denying the obvious and claiming that global warming is a hoax is especially disconcerting for Floridians, where issues like the greenhouse effect on water levels and flooding are a major concern." Rep. Wilson makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 tweet, Congresswoman Wilson stated "Warmer temperatures from #ClimateChange are expected to expand the range of mosquitoes and ticks that carry diseases like Zika, yellow fever and West Nile virus. Congress must #ActOnClimate to protect the health and wealth of the American people. #ClimateFriday" 100Congresswoman Wilson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://wilson.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://wilson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/wilson-secures-florida-priorities-in-500-billion-infrastructure-bill https://wilson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-frederica-s-wilson-s-statement-on-the-united-states https://twitter.com/RepWilson/status/1068582228286935040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wilson.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-wilsons-statement-supreme-courts-abortion-decisionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wilson, JoeSouth Carolina2RCongressman Joe Wilson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On Congressman Wilson 'Energy,' page, it states, "I fully support domestic production of our natural resources. I believe we must continue to explore offshore, in locations where natural resources are abundant, for even more opportunities that may support American efforts to reduce dependency on foreign oil. A key energy project which would directly support our desire to wean ourselves of foreign oil while at the same time adding hundreds of thousands jobs here at home is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Trump Administration has supported the Keystone XL Pipeline, a project that would transport crude oil from Canadian oil sands to refineries along the Gulf Coast." Congressman Wilson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Wilson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://joewilson.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wittman, Robert J.Virginia1RCongressman Robert Wittman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, Congressman Wittman states, "We need to focus on ways we can address climate change."500In a press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Wittman stated, "The Democrats have put forth policies like the Green New Deal. These policies have me gravely concerned. Proponents of this proposals say it would address climate change and economic inequality by getting the United States to zero carbon emissions in 10 years. I see it as a gross abuse of government power that will pose disastrous damage to our economy, impose substantial costs on everyday Americans, and threaten our energy dominance and national security, all for little to no difference on global temperatures." Congressman Wittman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Owens opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://wittman.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=128027 https://wittman.house.gov/forms/form/?ID=112 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wittman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4263Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Womack, SteveArkansas3RCongressman Steve Womack disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 article by the Times Record when asked about climate change the Congressman stated, "The climate changes — it has throughout history. The real debate is who or what is causing it?... We have yet to find an exact answer, but there are a range of arguments and research to support varying views. Our goal should always be to put forth novel, market-based solutions that protect our environment and balance economic interests. America has been a leader of innovation in this sector, and it’s important that other countries also do their fair share. By being good stewards and advancing an all-of-the-above energy plan, we can support productivity and sustainability for the future.”00In 2021 Womack criticized the Green New Deal saying "This bill is undeniably more of a vehicle to appease the socialist left rather than a serious attempt to prioritize our nation’s infrastructure needs. The bloated, big-government approach implements more Green New Deal mandates than actual provisions to support roads and bridges." In a 2023 press release, Womack opposed climate action stating "America’s farmers and small businesses have suffered under constricting, hyper-regulatory policies, typical of the left’s agenda. The Interior Appropriations bill releases this chokehold by repealing the flawed WOTUS rule, halting permitting requirements for livestock emissions, and unleashing energy production" and voting to limit the EPA's powers.0Congressman Womack opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.swtimes.com/news/20181028/is-global-climate-change-man-made-or-not-arkansas-3rd-district-congressional-candidates-respond https://talkbusiness.net/2017/06/arkansas-congressional-delegation-applauds-trumps-withdrawal-from-climate-treaty/ https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404556 https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407395 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=405221Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Yakym, RudyIndiana2RCongressman Yakym does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2023 tweet, the Congressman bashed President Biden's budget as he said it, "reflects his far-left priorities. His budget mentions 'climate' 148 times and even 'transgender' 8 times but only mentions 'fiscally responsible' 3 times.250Congressman Yakym demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, he said "Once again, President Biden is putting the Left’s radical climate agenda ahead of American jobs and national security. Now our allies will have to turn to adversaries like China and Russia for their energy needs."0Congressman Yakym opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/RepRudyYakym/status/1636004645813248000 https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/290/rudy-yakym/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/RepRudyYakym/status/1750948197378261494Opposes Roe
Zinke, RyanMontana1RCongressman Zinke does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking to the Sacramento Bee, Zinke said "This is not a debate about climate change. There’s no doubt the [fire] season is getting longer, the temperatures are getting hotter.” However, he also disagreed with the scientific consensus that climate change is causing an increase in wildfires in the west, instead blaming it on logging and water use restrictions.250Congressman Zinke demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has been a long-time advocate for increased oil and gas production, and was a leading part of former president Trump's "energy dominance" agenda as Secretary of the Interior. In Congress he has cosponsored bills such as H.Con.Res.86 opposing a carbon fee, and has a very low score with the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a history of voting against climate action.0Congressman Zinke makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman sponsored H.Con.Res.86, which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.06.25https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2019/01/ryan-zinkes-real-legacy-is-rolling-back-environmental-protections-and-cozying-up-to-big-oil/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/86 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/ryan-zinke https://x.com/RyanZinke/status/1540346254948958210 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/13/us-interior-secretary-ryan-zinke-climate-change-environmentalistsOpposes Roe

2024 U.S. House Challengers

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Abolfazli, MaryamTennessee5DMaryam Abolfazli agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, she states "In addition, China is the world’s leading climate polluter. Their practices have made them the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases. We must ensure their cooperation to address climate change."50Maryam Abolfazli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.maryamforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Aboujaoude Jr., RockFlorida12DRock Aboujaoude Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his Instagram profile, he says "You may not be interested in climate change, but climate change is interested in you", but no further information is available.25Rock Aboujaoude Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Rock_Aboujaoude_Jr.Unclear Position on Roe
Adams, JenniferFlorida7DJennifer Adams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jennifer Adams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jenniferadamsforcongress.com/aboutUnclear Position on Roe
Adolph, KileyIndiana3DKiley Adolph does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Kiley Adolph has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kileyforcongress.org/issues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Sdoz6sqAISupports Roe
al-Aqidi, DaliaMinnesota5RDalia al-Aqidi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although on al-Aqidi's campaign website she criticizes Representative Omar and President Biden's "green agenda" for harming domestic energy production, she fails to take a defined stance on climate change and global warming.25Dalia al-Aqidi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.daliaforcongress.org/dalia-for-congress-issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Alexander, DanWashington7RDan Alexander does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Dan Alexander has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Dan_AlexanderUnclear Position on Roe
Alexander, MyrtleDistrict of Columbia1RMyrtle Alexander does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Myrtle Alexander has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://myrtle4congress.com/the-issuesOpposes Roe
Ali, AddulNorth Carolina12RAddul Ali does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Addul Ali has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.aliforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Allen, JackTennessee3DJack Allen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue, saying on his campaign website "We recognize the urgent threat of climate change and the need to protect our environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions" and talking about the need to transition to clean energy. 100Jack Allen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.jackallenforcongress.com/energyUnclear Position on Roe
Altman, SueNew Jersey7DSue Altman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue, stating on her website that it "is an existential threat to our communities and wildlife" and promises to take action if elected to Congress.100Sue Altman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.suealtman.com/issuesSupports Roe
Anderson, DerrickVirginia7RDerrick Anderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Derrick Anderson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/DerrickAndersonforVA/videos/my-life-story-is-pro-life-and-thats-how-i-will-serve-in-congress-my-mother-got-p/414067620643367/?locale=ms_MYOpposes Roe
Anderson, ElizabethAlabama6DElizabeth Anderson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign page, she states that "The climate crisis requires urgent action, and I am committed to passing comprehensive legislation like President Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to invest in green energy and climate change mitigation."100Elizabeth Anderson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On her campaign page, she states that Congress must "implement a federal carbon tax to incentivize the transition to clean energy."100100https://www.eaforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Anderson, JasonCalifornia19RJason Anderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He doesn't oppose green transition, but criticizes "coercion" used to achieve it. He falls short of recognizing human-made climate change, and on his website states "Zero emissions are a goal we all want to see someday and weather you believe human activity is causing the climate to change or not, we can get there together, and we don’t have to hurt one another to do it." 25Jason Anderson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jason4congress.us/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Ansari, YassaminArizona3DYassamin Ansari understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Ansari says "The climate crisis is the defining issue of our time. As a climate policy expert, Yassamin has pushed for international solutions to climate change at the United Nations and led bold efforts to clean up our air and water in Phoenix."100Yassamin Ansari has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://yassaminforcongress.com/issues-policy/Supports Roe
Archuleta, ValdamarColorado1RValdamar Archuleta agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign website states "America must continue to work at fighting climate change while rejecting the fearmongering rhetoric", a sentiment repeated in a Tweet where he said that "Climate change is real, but we are not going to all die in 12 years. Endless doomsday threats aren't helpful." 50Valdamar Archuleta has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.archuletaforcolorado.com/on-the-issues https://twitter.com/Archuleta4CO/status/1782494190535917841 https://twitter.com/Archuleta4CO/status/1777355838006440320Opposes Roe
Armendariz-Jackson, IreneTexas16RIrene Armendariz-Jackson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Responding to an interview question about climate action, Armendariz-Jackson referred to climate change as "the allegations of the left" which she said are financed by special interest factions. 0Irene Armendariz-Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://irenearmendarizjackson.com/issues/ https://www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/10/18/district-16-el-paso-election-veronica-escobar-irene-armendariz-jackson/69555376007/Opposes Roe
Atkins, JoeyFlorida26DJoey Atkins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Joey Atkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Joey_David_AtkinsUnclear Position on Roe
Atkinson, JimPennsylvania11DJim Atkinson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Atkinson says "Climate change poses a grave threat to our planet and our communities" and asserts "We now witness, with each passing year, tangible evidence of climate change." He speaks at length about the role of the fossil fuel industry in spreading climate denial propaganda, and lists actions he'd support such as investing in sustainable infrastructure.100Jim Atkinson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.atkinsonforcongress.com/priorities https://www.atkinsonforcongress.com/our-climateSupports Roe
Avlon, JohnNew York1DJohn Avlon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he said that "we all need to confront the fact that climate change is real and impacting our community and our economy right now. Decades of climate change denial from the far-right has hurt our ability to deal with this problem. Now Washington Republicans keep trying to cut environmental defense funding. This shouldn’t be a partisan political issue. We need to come together —Democrats, Republicans, and Independents -- to solve this problem here on Long Island."100John Avlon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.johnavlon.com/issuesSupports Roe
Baccam, LanonIowa3DLanon Baccam does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet for Earth Day, Baccam said "Today, we celebrate the beauty and diversity of our natural environment and commit to protecting it for future generations." However, Baccam does not take a position on whether or not climate change is occurring. 25Lanon Baccam has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lanonbaccam.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/lanon_baccam/status/1782435992223285452Supports Roe
Baez-Geller, LuciaFlorida27DLucia Baez-Geller understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an Earth Day Tweet, she said "Today, we come together to honor our planet's beauty and renew our commitment to protecting it. As Floridians, we know what is at stake if we don’t prioritize environmental and climate policy."75Lucia Baez-Geller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/lbgforcongress/status/1782503095496303005 https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article287530550.htmlSupports Roe
Bailey, YenFlorida2DYen Bailey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she speaks about the risks climate change poses to Florida, and states that "With climate change already impacting Florida, we need decisive action to protect our environment and communities. By investing in clean energy and preserving our natural beauty, we can secure a sustainable future for all."100Yen Bailey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.yenbaileyforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Baker, DennisOklahoma1DDennis Baker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Dennis Baker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dennislbaker.com/homeSupports Roe
Baker, KarenVirginia9DKaren Baker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Karen Baker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://townhall.virginia.gov/L./ViewComments.cfm?CommentID=37020Supports Roe
Balekian, AlexCalifornia30RAlex Balekian does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He posted a YouTube video where he stated that he supports "reasonable environmental regulations that don't increase our expenses or burden our economy" but falls short of ever recognizing human-made climate change.25Alex Balekian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://alexbalekian.substack.com/p/abortion-and-reproductive-rights https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk3MYD1f-Co https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79J1asZ86gQOpposes Roe
Barca, PeterWisconsin1DPeter Barca does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Peter Barca has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.barcaforwisconsin.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Barkley, MichaelCalifornia5DMichael Barkley understands the importance of climate change but not as a top priority issue. Points of his platform listed on his campaign website include "Increase the money in Joe Biden’s climate change funding", "Solve climate change", and "move towards an understanding that climate-change deniers are unfit for public office."75Michael Barkley publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, he states he wishes to "Phase in cap & trade, or better yet carbon fee and dividends."10078.75http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm https://www.uniondemocrat.com/news/article_4b834a94-c6dc-11ee-b074-cf18ea3a80e9.htmlSupports Roe
Barr, CallieMichigan1DCallie Barr understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a candidate forum, Barr spoke abotu "working with labor and environmental leaders so that we are ensuring energy reliability and dependence while we’re also moving forward towards cleaner energy that will help us here with climate and the climate change that we’re in right now."75Callie Barr has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://michiganadvance.com/2024/08/09/barr-bergman-will-face-climate-and-energy-issues-in-run-toward-november/ https://www.dailypress.net/news/local-news/2024/06/barr-says-she-understands-district-1s-needs/Supports Roe
Barrett, TomMichigan7RTom Barrett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tom Barrett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/05/04/abortion-roe-v-wade-supreme-court-leak/9628831002/Opposes Roe
Barry, MeganTennessee7DMegan Barry understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Barry promised "I’ll work to combat climate change, preserve our natural resources, and create a sustainable Tennessee for everyone." In another, she said climate change affects everything and warned that "if we ignore these challenges our children will pay the price."100Megan Barry has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://nashvillebanner.com/2024/03/26/former-nashville-mayor-megan-barry-congress/ https://twitter.com/MeganCBarry/status/1798368170132316572 https://twitter.com/MeganCBarry/status/1798368173865222641Supports Roe
Bashir, HaroonPennsylvania2RHaroon Bashir does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Haroon Bashir has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bashirforcongress.com/vision/Unclear Position on Roe
Baugh, ScottCalifornia47RScott Baugh understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it stated "Scott Baugh opposes drilling off of the California coast. He believes government and businesses need to respect the legitimate science behind the challenge and reject the science manipulators in order to work together to effectively deal with climate change in ways that do not cost jobs or harm the economy." In a Tweet, Baugh encouraged working together "ensuring a healthy environment for all."75Scott Baugh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Scott_Baugh https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-10-20/2022-california-midterm-election-porter-baugh-abortion-economy-environment https://x.com/ScottBaughCA47/status/1782433821025251682Opposes Roe
Baumgartner, MichaelWashington5RMichael Baumgartner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Michael Baumgartner makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Criticizing Governor Inslee's carbon pricing proposal, he said “What he said is a tax on polluters is in fact a tax on our manufacturers and our job creators" and questioned whether it would pass the Democrat-controlled House.021.25https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2014/dec/18/inslee-carbon-tax-plan-would-help-complete-north/ https://www.lmtribune.com/northwest/cantwell-baumgartner-clash-in-senate-debate/article_2216a32a-7c6d-50db-8d5c-0d464bdd2ef9.html https://whitmanwire.com/news/2024/04/25/micheal-baumgartners-wa-05-campaign/Opposes Roe
Begich, NickAlaska1RNick Begich disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. At the Alaska Oil and Gas Association's candidate forum Begich referred to climate change as the "carbon lie".0Nick Begich has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.juneauempire.com/news/peltola-begich-face-off-in-first-debate-at-alaska-oil-and-gas-industry-forum/ https://alaskabeacon.com/2024/08/28/u-s-house-candidates-seek-alaska-oil-and-gas-industry-support-in-forum/ https://alaskabeacon.com/2024/09/11/in-alaskas-u-s-house-race-begich-supports-nationwide-abortion-limit-peltola-and-howe-oppose/Unclear Position on Roe
Bell, WesleyMissouri1DWesley Bell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Bell states "Climate change is a crisis, and we need to be doing more to address it. Everyone should live in a clean and healthy environment regardless of their race, income, or ZIP code. Here in Missouri, the effects of climate change are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of vulnerable communities [...] We must work together to combat climate change in a way that grows the economy and creates jobs at the same time."100Wesley Bell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.bell4mo.com/issues/Supports Roe
Belnome, JosephNew Jersey11RJoseph Belnome disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Responding to onyourballot.com, Belnome said "I believe science is manipulated to exaggerate the effects of climate change and I don’t support taxing Americans and restricting their gas appliances or cars or banning pizza ovens, plastic straws or bags."0Joseph Belnome has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://onyourballot.vote411.org/m/race-detail.do?id=68198488#c68198963Opposes Roe
Bergman, LoreTennessee6DLore Bergman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she promises to fight climate change, demanding "Take money out of politics, so the fossil fuel industry cannot bribe politicians while they watch the earth die." She calls for an expansion of clean energy & less fossil fuels, protecting the EPA, protecting national parks, and saving endangered species.100Lore Bergman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://lorebergman.org/platform/Supports Roe
Bergmann, CharlotteTennessee9RCharlotte Bergmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although she expresses opposition to climate action and has criticized the EPA's policies, she does not take a clear position on climate change.25Charlotte Bergmann has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/charlotte.bergmann.9/posts/pfbid02PeyJjghfCmDRxxFQnnzB1viUUCS1SsQVa3RYwyo5x3M6cY8eEHm8JWMaD5uQz3dil https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/125367/charlotte-bergmannOpposes Roe
Bernal, BenitoCalifornia29RBenito Bernal does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Benito Bernal has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bernalforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Best, BryonSouth Carolina3DBryon Best understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with Greenville News, Best said he believes human action is affecting climate change and says it's important to mitigate its effects for future generations.75Bryon Best has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ljIpueqTy4 https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/2024/06/07/heres-where-upstate-congressional-candidates-stand-on-climate-change/74000453007/Supports Roe
Biggs, SheriSouth Carolina3RSheri Biggs disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has criticized taking climate action and the Democratic party's "alarmist climate change agenda" and supports an all-of-the-above approach.0Sheri Biggs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.thestate.com/opinion/article289340185.htmlOpposes Roe
Bish, ChristineCalifornia6DChristine Bish disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She Tweeted that climate change is a part of the "never-ending barrage of apocalyptic fearmongering on the news", and has frequently supported the idea that because the climate has always changed, current climate change isn't to be worried about. In an interview, she opposed taking any action, which she described as "the scheme to control people’s economies through reckless climate policies."0Christine Bish has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/BishForCongress/status/1258999850131091457 https://twitter.com/BishForCongress/status/1565757391060160513 https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284823641.html#storylink=cpy https://bishforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Bivings, MartellMichigan13RMartell Bivings agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a congressional debate, he rebukes Representative Thanedar's accusations of being a climate denier, saying "I understand what's going on in climate change and all that, do not try to make and associate me with the rest of my party."50Martell Bivings has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w7nFiCWyvU https://ballotpedia.org/Martell_BivingsUnclear Position on Roe
Black, DianeMississippi1DDianne Black understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Black lists "Tackling the climate crisis" as a priority.75Dianne Black has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.diannedodsonblackforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Blankenburg, EricNorth Carolina4REric Blankenburg disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although Blankenburg speaks at length about wanting a sustainable, green future on his campaign page, he doubts the scientific consensus about climate change. "There is very little doubt that the climate is changing, given that the climate is constantly changing. But there are serious and well-reasoned scientific objections to the belief that human activity is the primary cause, and that climate change will bring about the apocalyptic consequences that are being predicted by some." He continues to call the Biden administration's climate action "schizophrenic at best" and supports the perpetuation of fossil fuels.0Eric Blankenburg has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ericfornc.com/environment https://ericfornc.com/abortionOpposes Roe
Blood, CarolNebraska1DCarol Blood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Carol Blood has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.carolbloodforcongress.com/ https://nebraskapublicmedia.org/en/news/news-articles/state-sen-carol-blood-begins-us-house-campaign-against-rep-flood/Supports Roe
Boerbert, LaurenColorado4RLauren Boebert disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.0Lauren Boebert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview with Newsweek, Boebert said the carbon tax is "designed to wipe out all fossil fuels and destroy our economy in the process."00https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-quips-she-absolutely-believes-climate-change-1810605 https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boeberts-challenger-adam-frisch-more-confident-ever-after-poll-boost-1825511 https://boebert.house.gov/issues/pro-life-and-family-valuesOpposes Roe
Bohannan, ChristinaIowa1DChristina Bohannan understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Bohannan stated "My opponent denies that climate change is a real threat requiring immediate action. When in Congress, I will fight to secure our children’s future AND make Iowa a superpower in renewable energy." In another Tweet, she warned "Climate change will make food production harder and harder in the coming years if nothing is done."75Christina Bohannan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2022/09/26/miller-meeks-bohannan-trade-barbs-over-abortion-in-1st-district-debate/ https://twitter.com/BohannanIowa/status/1705027873919131834 https://twitter.com/BohannanIowa/status/1706480293501169690Supports Roe
Bohman, RachelMinnesota1DFLRachel Bohman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Bohman states "The climate crisis is a real public health and safety threat for families right here in Southern Minnesota. We must take steps so that our children, grandchildren and generations to come have a planet where they can live." She implores Congress to take climate action, cutting carbon pollution and bringing green manufacturing to the country. 100Rachel Bohman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.bohmanforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Boisseau, TheresaTexas10DTheresa Boisseau understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Boisseau said "Climate change is real… these changes in weather patterns will be far reaching." 75Theresa Boisseau has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.theresa4texas.com/theresa-s-top-4 https://twitter.com/Theresa4Texas/status/1793030893851779367Supports Roe
Bond, SteveHawaii2RSteve Bond agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Responding to the Star Advertiser, Bond said "I have always been concerned about how climate change can effect sea-level rise."50Steve Bond has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://votestevebond.com/ https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/07/17/election/2020-election-steven-r-bond/Unclear Position on Roe
Bono, PeterCalifornia50RPeter Bono does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He appears to not oppose climate action, stating to the San Diego Union-Tribune "I would love to hear from my constituents on this climate control topic. I would strive to learn how to adapt to the ever-changing environment responding to the ideology that we need to be pro-active to these changes. I am eager to listen to various ways to adapt. There are ways that we can preserve our environment." He also promises to be an advocate for reducing air and water pollution. However, Bono consistently fails to take a clear stance on whether or not climate change is human-made and driven by fossil fuels.25Peter Bono has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Peter_Bono https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2024-02-20/meet-the-candidates-for-50th-congressional-district-q-a-with-peter-bonoOpposes Roe
Booras, JohnIllinois3RJohn Booras does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Booras has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/john-booras https://ballotpedia.org/John_BoorasOpposes Roe
Boudreaux, MikeCalifornia20RMike Boudreaux disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.0Mike Boudreaux has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://thesungazette.com/article/news/2024/02/23/candidates-affirm-stances-at-house-district-20-debate/ https://www.kget.com/news/politics/your-local-elections/a-closer-look-at-kerns-2024-primary-candidates-1-on-1-with-cd20-hopeful-sheriff-mike-boudreaux/Opposes Roe
Boyda, NancyKansas2DNancy Boyda understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Boyda states "For the record, I believe science tells us we must make changes and soon. But the reality is we are mired in anger and distrust on this topic. Sadly, the more the climate changes, the hotter the tempers get on both sides and it feels like we will never make enough changes fast enough."75Nancy Boyda has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://boydaforcongress.com/home-page/issues/Supports Roe
Brannon, MaryOklahoma4DMary Brannon understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet linking to a news article about sever flooding, Brannon said "We must address Climate change."75Mary Brannon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/ElectBrannon/status/1416633365881626626 https://twitter.com/ElectBrannon/status/1673165392338984962Supports Roe
Bresnahan Jr., RobPennsylvania8RRob Bresnahan Jr. disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Bresnahan criticized incumbent Representative Cartwright saying he "decided to cowtail to Joe Biden and the climate crazies by voting to halt the exporting of LNG." He added that "When I am in Congress, I will always stand with PA oil and gas workers and for American energy independence!"0Rob Bresnahan Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/Rob4PA/status/1765758772608213290 https://robforpa.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Brewer, JebWashington1RJeb Brewer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Jeb Brewer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.heraldnet.com/news/qa-john-lovick-and-jeb-brewer-discuss-priorites-in-the-44th/ https://www.voteforjeb.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Briscoe, JohnCalifornia42RJohn Briscoe does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Contradictions are found in his public statements about climate change. In a Tweet, Briscoe criticized "climate denier surfers" for wanting to tear down a sea wall. Several Tweets from late 2020 also encouraged planting trees to offset excess carbon. However, in response to interview questions from Vote Smart, he criticized Rep. Lowenthal's "Green New Debacle/Deal", stating "This far left wing proposal would stop oil production and shut down hundreds of oil island union jobs. STOP the madness!!" In another Tweet he said that "#ClimateAlarmism is not the answer" and criticized solar and wind energy.25John Briscoe has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://johnbriscoe.us/key-issues/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/179398/john-briscoe https://twitter.com/search?q=%40johnfbriscoe%20carbon&src=typed_query&f=top https://twitter.com/search?q=%40johnfbriscoe%20carbon%20tax&src=typed_query&f=topOpposes Roe
Bristow, NigelNorth Carolina9DNigel Bristow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "Environmental Justice and Democracy issues rank among my top 5 priorities in Congress. To put it simply, we cannot continue to function as we do by allowing greedy corporations and corrupt officials to continue contributing to the pollution of our air, sea and land and allow them to ignore the adverse effect that it has had on climate change. We must hold corporations and corrupt officials accountable for their misdeeds and their greed. If allowed to continue it will have a devastating effect on the earth for generations to come."100Nigel Bristow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.nigelbristowforcongress.com/general-4 https://twitter.com/CongressNigel/status/1784961783691632672Supports Roe
Broderick, VictoriaTennessee4DVictoria Broderick does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Victoria Broderick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.victoria4tennessee.org/aboutmeSupports Roe
Bucco, CarmenNew Jersey10RCarmen Bucco does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Carmen Bucco has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://onyourballot.vote411.org/m/candidate-detail.do?id=68555598#c68555598Unclear Position on Roe
Buckhout, LaurieNorth Carolina1RLaurie Buckhout does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Laurie Buckhout has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dailyadvance.com/perquimans/news/local/buckhout-weighs-in-on-immigration-ukraine-abortion-ending-aca-smith-did-not-respond-to-questions/article_be28f2a0-cc4b-11ee-95b3-639f1f94923d.html#google_vignetteOpposes Roe
Buckner, DukeSouth Carolina6RDuke Buckner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.50Duke Buckner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://dukebuckner.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Burke, RobertMassachusetts8RRob Burke does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Rob Burke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.masscitizensforlife.org/voter_guideOpposes Roe
Buskirk, PaulKansas1DPaul Buskirk does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Paul Buskirk has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://buskirkforcongress.com/ https://ballotpedia.org/Paul_BuskirkSupports Roe
Butierez, DanielArizona7RDaniel Butierez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Daniel Butierez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://danielbutierez4congress2024.com/ https://www.facebook.com/butierezforUsSenate https://www.kgun9.com/news/local-news/elections/grijalva-butierez-set-for-cd7-showdown-ahead-of-2024-election https://www.pbs.org/video/district-7-candidate-interview-undecided-voters-teacher-shortage-4urfwb/ Opposes Roe
Butler, DarriusGeorgia8DDarrius Butler understands the importance of climate change but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign page, he states "This planet is our only home and we must protect it by promoting clean energy [...] It is important to advocate for strong environmental standards and hold polluters accountable. Let's work together to transition to a clean economy by 2050."75Darrius Butler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.darriusbutler.com/ https://twitter.com/RevDButler/status/1521456950768283650Supports Roe
Bynum, JanelleOregon5DJanelle Bynum understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Bynum states "The effects of climate change are felt close to home with brutal summers and the threat of wildfires year-round. I’m not waiting to get to Washington to tackle the climate crisis — we’re already part of the solution in the state legislature, sponsoring legislation to make Oregon the clean energy hub in the country. I’ll expand upon this work on the federal level, reducing our carbon footprint and creating good-paying union jobs."100Janelle Bynum has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.janellebynum.com/issuesSupports Roe
Calvarese, TrishaColorado4DTrisha Calvarese does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Trisha Calvarese has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/trisha4colorado/status/1768432882421284956Supports Roe
Cameron, KyleWyoming1DKyle Cameron understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the 'Platform' page states "The human consequences of climate change are profound, with communities worldwide experiencing increased challenges and risks. The urgency to mitigate its impacts is underscored by the threats to food security, natural habitats, and human populations. Addressing climate change is critical to safeguarding water resources, ecosystems, and livelihoods."100Kyle Cameron has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.cameronforwyoming.net/platformSupports Roe
Camp, LoriIndiana2D Lori Camp understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Camp states "Climate change is a direct threat to our personal safety, the environment, and our agricultural economy" and promises to expand upon programs that promote sustainable agriculture. In a Tweet, Camp criticized incumbent Representative Yakym for climate change denial. 75Lori Camp has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.campforcongress.com/blank https://x.com/campforcongress/status/1768302848557633583Supports Roe
Campbell, BillUtah1DBill Campbell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Bill Campbell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Bill_Campbell_(Utah)Unclear Position on Roe
Cardell, SimonTexas4DSimon Cardell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he advocates for protecting the environment, he fails to discuss and take a clear position on climate change.25Simon Cardell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.simon4texas.com/issuesSupports Roe
Cargile, MikeCalifornia35RMike Cargile disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He Retweeted a post denying that "fossil fuels" and CO2's role in climate change is a myth, saying that recognizing human-made climate change is political science rather than real science. He has also frequently dismissed climate action, such as in a Tweet where he said "It's not about the environment. It's about control and collapsing the U.S. economy."0Mike Cargile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.cargileforcongress.com/life https://twitter.com/CargileForCA35/status/1770306925894484055 https://twitter.com/CargileForCA35/status/1600581715332067328Opposes Roe
Carle, ThomasNew York23DThomas Carle does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website he states, "No matter where you stand on major environmental debate regarding climate change, the sheer scale of the issue is beyond the individual to effect change globally." Carle later recognizes the need to limit or eliminate fossil fuel emissions and take other climate action. However, he fails to take a definitive stance on the causes of climate change and uses weak, indecisive wording when discussing climate change.25Thomas Carle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.carle4congress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Carris, JimIllinois10RJim Carris does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign website states that he was an environmental lawyer and says he encourages the development of alternative energy sources, but doesn't discuss climate change.25Jim Carris has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://carrisforcongress.com/#issues-anchorSupports Roe
Cash, TambreiGeorgia9DTambrei Cash understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states that "If we don’t get serious about climate change, and protecting our environment now, our grandkids will be the ones paying the price. We need to work toward clean, renewable energy," and has frequently Tweeted about the need to take climate action, such as in one where Tambrei said "Sticking your head in the sand isn’t going to solve our climate crisis [...] We need to elect people who believe in science and not just their bottom line."100Tambrei Cash has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/cash4ga/status/1762510684691009936?s=46&t=khB-JoDLTp9JV-Twno8JWw https://www.cash4ga.com/issuesSupports Roe
Cass, JeanetteMissouri4DJeanette Cass does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jeanette Cass has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Jeanette_CassSupports Roe
Castillo, LupeIllinois4RLupe Castillo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Lupe Castillo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Lupe_CastilloUnclear Position on Roe
Centonze, LanaTexas18RLana Centonze does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Lana Centonze has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lanacentonzeforcongress.com/blank-1Unclear Position on Roe
Chalifoux, ThomasFlorida9RThomas Chalifoux does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Thomas Chalifoux has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wedu.org/vote/2024-elections/voter-guide/?section=u-s-house&candidate=thomas-chalifouxOpposes Roe
Chaudhry, MelissaWashington9DMelissa Chaudhry understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Her campaign website states "Melissa recognizes that our district is disproportionately affected by environmental challenges, and she’s ready to take decisive action to address them."75Melissa Chaudhry has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.votemelissa4congress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Chavez, JonathanGeorgia13RJonathan Chavez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, Chavez says he thinks the environment could be made better, and says he will "support and push for change throughout the community." However, he never explains what "this issue" is, whether it is CO2 emissions, water pollution, etc., and fails to take a stance on climate change.25Jonathan Chavez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.chavezforcongress.com/donate https://atlantaciviccircle.org/profile/jonathan-chavez/Opposes Roe
Chen, AnitaCalifornia17RAnita Chen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Ballotpedia she says, "The government has a responsibility to protect the environment, while meeting the needs of the people who live in it. Strengthening domestic production of energy, particularly in natural gas, nuclear energy, hydroelectric power, and various forms of renewable energy paves the path for energy independence and economic development." 25Anita Chen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://sites.google.com/view/anitaforcongress/home https://ballotpedia.org/Anita_ChenUnclear Position on Roe
Cheng Kramer, AnnaCalifornia15RAnna Cheng Kramer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, she states that the transition to green energy shouldn't come at the expense of taxpayers and the economy, but falls short of recognizing the threat of climate change or advocating for action.25Anna Cheng Kramer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ackramerforcongress.org/on-the-issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Ching, EricCalifornia38REric Ching does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Eric Ching has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBIo9LShrbI https://ericchingforcongress.com/solutions.htmlOpposes Roe
Christian, BobGeorgia7DBob Christian understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Christian's campaign website, he states "We can see the evidence of the undeniable climate crisis with our own eyes [...] Years of research clearly show a rise in catastrophic weather events both here and around the world. The empirical evidence should not be up for debate. He continues to describe climate change as a national security risk and calls on the U.S. to take the lead in combatting it through swiftly moving to renewable energy, researching green technology, and investing in EV charging grids along federal highways.100Bob Christian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://christianforga7.com/issues/Supports Roe
Christian, JerradOhio12DJerrad Christian understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Christian says "Climate change stands as one of the most significant challenges of our time, threatening our environment, economies, and societies. Its far-reaching impacts are already visible, from rising sea levels and extreme weather events to declining biodiversity and disrupted agricultural patterns. Addressing this crisis requires immediate and collective action."100Jerrad Christian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.christianforohio.com/issuesSupports Roe
Cisneros, GilCalifornia31DGil Cisneros understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Cisneros' campaign website states that "Gil understands the need for urgent action to protect our communities from climate disasters and supports legislation that invests in infrastructure that supports clean energy, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and ensures a sustainable future for our planet." This sentiment is echoed in a Tweet where he stated that "Climate change is here, and we cannot afford to sit on the sidelines any longer. We need real, coordinated action now to fight climate change."100Gil Cisneros publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. As a former U.S. House Representative, he cosponsored Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R.763). In a Tweet announcing his cosponsorship, he stated that "We must do everything in our power to combat climate change and reduce our carbon footprint."100100https://www.gilonthehill.com/on-the-issues/ https://twitter.com/gilcisnerosca/status/1304255336505839617Supports Roe
Clahchischilliage, SharonNew Mexico3RSharon Clahchischilliage does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Sharon Clahchischilliage has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sharonfornm.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Clancy, MikeVirginia10RMike Clancy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Clancy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mikeclancyforcongress.com/services-5Opposes Roe
Coester, MarkVermont1RMark Coester disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Coester retweeted a video promoting climate denial, with the caption "Facts will take down the climate lie."0Mark Coester has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/CMarkCoesterUnclear Position on Roe
Cohen, SethIllinois9RSeth Cohen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Seth Cohen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Seth_Alan_Cohen_(Illinois)Unclear Position on Roe
Cole, ThomasCalifornia24RThomas Cole disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he lists a priority as "Support fossil fuel and coal production policies that make America energy independent again and bring gas prices down. Stop funding green energy schemes that enrich Communist China." In a Tweet, he said that "It's a hoax. 10,000 years ago NYC was under a mile of ice. Now that was climate change."0Thomas Cole has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.thomascoleforcongress.com/ https://twitter.com/THOMASCOLE1776/status/1610315504530653184Unclear Position on Roe
Collier, ScottMaryland7RScott Collier does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Scott Collier has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/04/11/scott-collier/Opposes Roe
Collins, PaulaNew York21DPaula Collins agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Collins said "The research is clear - climate change is 100% real." 50Paula Collins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.paulacollinsforcongress.com/issues https://x.com/collinsforNY21/status/1793286066608181549Supports Roe
Conaway, HerbNew Jersey3DHerb Conaway understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he emphasizes the need for environmental protection and says he will support sustainable legislation and the expansion of EV charging infrastructure. In a Tweet, Conaway promised "We will take aggressive action to combat climate change while creating good-paying jobs for all Americans. When I’m elected to Congress, I’ll get it done."75Herb Conaway has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.herbforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/herbconaway/status/1788949264095162424Supports Roe
Conforti, NikiIllinois6RNiki Conforti agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Responding to the Shaw Local, Conforti said that human behavior is among the factors behind climate change, as well was natural causes.50Niki Conforti has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://conforti4congress.com/issues/ https://www.shawlocal.com/news/election/2022/06/24/where-6th-district-republicans-stand-on-climate-change-humanitys-role-in-it/Opposes Roe
Conroy, CarmelaWashington5DCarmela Conroy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a debate, she asserts that climate change is real and its effects are being felt, calling on climate action to be taken.75Carmela Conroy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://conroy4congress.com/issues/ https://www.spokanepublicradio.org/regional-news/2024-06-10/nine-eastern-washington-congressional-candidates-debate-at-north-central-high-schoolSupports Roe
Cooke, RebeccaWisconsin3DRebecca Cooke understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "From roundtables in rural corners of this district to downtown discussions in Eau Claire, La Crosse or Point – it’s clear that climate change and the environment are top of mind for constituents – what kind of legacy are we leaving for our children and grandchildren?" Cooke continues by making various climate action promises, such as addressing PFAS in water and holding corporate polluters accountable.100Rebecca Cooke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://cookeforwisconsin.com/en/priorities/Supports Roe
Cooper, KellyArizona4RKelly Cooper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Kelly Cooper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/KellyCooperAZ/status/1541864261668012034?s=20&t=S0DCC6GzOGDyGO1_Li61kgOpposes Roe
Corkery, SarahIowa2DSarah Corkery understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states "As your next member of Congress, I will support policies that lower energy costs, create clean energy jobs, and help make our country energy-independent [...] Yes, we need to have clean water and save our environment from climate change. We need to do everything we can to clean up our water and fields." In a Facebook post regarding the effects of climate change in Iowa, Corkery wrote "Climate change is real."100Sarah Corkery has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.corkeryforcongress.com/the-issues https://www.facebook.com/CorkeryForUSCongress/posts/122140089764087696/Supports Roe
Corvi, SteveRhode Island2RSteve Corvi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Steve Corvi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/04/05/metro/looks-like-us-representative-magaziner-will-have-republican-challenger/ https://corviforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Cotter Smasal, MissyVirginia2DMissy Cotter Smasal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Responding to a questionnaire, she listed rising sea levels caused by climate change as her district's biggest issue. "Rising seas threaten the investments we’ve made in our homes and our businesses, while current lawmakers waste time debating the reality of climate change. We cannot trust the solutions to the lawmakers who refuse to even acknowledge the problem. We must take action now, and the people of Virginia Beach need our Commonwealth to commit to helping us manage the short and long term challenges."100Missy Cotter Smasal has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://missy4congress.com/ https://www.wavy.com/news/politics/candidates/candidate-profile-missy-cotter-smasal/Supports Roe
Coughlin, KevinOhio13RKevin Coughlin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Coughlin refered to climate science as "sketchy." In Tweets, he's spoken against what he calls the "radical climate agenda", accusing the Biden administration of warring against American energy.0Kevin Coughlin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-mbvvZFCK4&t=3s https://twitter.com/KevinCoughlin/status/1783936311448965481 https://x.com/American_Bridge/status/1755339860603273684Opposes Roe
Coulombe, ChrisCalifornia2RChris Coulombe disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He acknowledges that climate change is occurring and doesn't oppose a shift to renewable energy, but in a Congressional candidate forum stated he feels that "what impact the human population has on [climate change] to be an unanswered question."0Chris Coulombe has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcpa7FaEgLw https://www.christocongress.com/environment/Unclear Position on Roe
Cox, AmyOhio10DAmy Cox understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Cox states "Climate change is wreaking havoc across our country and right here in the Miami Valley [...] The time for debate is over, and it’s time to act." 100Amy Cox has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://msmagazine.com/2023/09/08/ohio-issue-1-abortion-amendment/ https://voteamycox.com/issues/Supports Roe
Crank, JeffColorado5RJeff Crank does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jeff Crank has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jeffcrankforcongress.com/Opposes Roe
Craven, MikeKentucky3RMike Craven does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Craven has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Mike_CravenOpposes Roe
Cravens, RandyKentucky6DRandy Cravens does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he talks at length about the need to transition to cleaner energy in a Progress Kentucky candidate forum, he fails to take a stance on climate change itself.25Randy Cravens has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://randycravens.com/cravens-for-kentucky-the-issues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61Y02hpxF0ESupports Roe
Criswell, JeffGeorgia6RJeff Criswell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although Criswell frequently mentions climate change, he consistently fails to take a stance on whether not or not it is human-made. He Tweeted several times embracing green energy but saying something to the effect of "Whether or not the climate is "changing,'" and his campaign website recognizes "importance of balancing environmental protection and economic growth" while supporting the development of domestic energy sources, including oil, natural gas, and coal. 25Jeff Criswell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jeffcriswell.com/# https://twitter.com/search?q=%40JCriswell4Him%20climate&src=typed_query https://twitter.com/JCriswell4Him/status/1722138226431840281Opposes Roe
Cruz, GingerGuam1DGinger Cruz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. To her LinkedIn, she posted an article which made the argument for combatting climate change to be a matter of national security, and called on increased federal funding being sent to Guam to prevent climate change-driven problems.75Ginger Cruz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.gingercruz.com/key-issues https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gingercruz_climate-security-is-national-security-activity-7081053150169743360-N8v9Supports Roe
Dawson, MarshallColorado2RMarshall Dawson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has frequently criticized the Inflation Reduction Act, which contained significant climate action, but has not stated a position on climate change itself.25Marshall Dawson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cpr.org/2022/10/17/vg-2022-colorado-2nd-congressional-district-joe-neguse-marshall-dawson/ https://www.denver7.com/news/360/election-2022-your-colorado-voter-guideOpposes Roe
Day, DarrellTexas32RDarrell Day does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Darrell Day has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dayfortexas.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Delaney, JohnNew York8RJohn Delaney does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25John Delaney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/John_Delaney_(New_York)Unclear Position on Roe
DeSpain, MoniqueOregon4RMonique DeSpain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Responding to Vote411, DeSpain said "There is no doubt humans have a significant impact on the planet earth and surrounding environments" and warned against political agendas. She then expressed support for an all of the above energy strategy.25Monique DeSpain has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.moniqueforcongress.com/issues/ https://onyourballot.vote411.org/m/candidate-detail.do?id=68146839#c68146831 https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2023/11/17/air-force-veteran-monique-despain-will-challenge-val-hoyle-in-oregons-4th-congressional-district/Opposes Roe
Dexter, MaxineOregon3DMaxine Dexter understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Dexter states "As a lung and critical care physician, I witness the direct impact of climate change and poor air quality on people's health every day. [...] I will champion a swift transition to 100% renewable energy sources to eliminate our reliance on fossil fuels. This shift is crucial, especially for our socially and economically disadvantaged communities who bear the brunt of climate change's adverse health impacts." She goes on to list climate action she will support, including passing a Green New Deal and transition to a 100% decarbonized, green economy.100Maxine Dexter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://maxinefororegon.com/issuesSupports Roe
Diemer, MattOhio7DMatt Diemer understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. When asked to state his position on environment policy, Diemer said "I'm committed to combating climate change and protecting our natural resources. This means investing in renewable energy, enforcing environmental protections, and ensuring sustainable practices in resource management to preserve the planet for future generations."75Matt Diemer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://diemerforcongress.com/ https://ballotpedia.org/Matthew_Diemer https://onyourballot.vote411.org/race-detail.do?id=65168657&party=DemSupports Roe
Dobson, CaroleeneAlabama2RCaroleene Dobson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Caroleene Dobson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dobsonforcongress.com/ https://alabamareflector.com/2024/04/16/a-voters-guide-to-the-2nd-congressional-district-runoffs/Opposes Roe
Dodenhoff, AlexNew York10RAlex Dodenhoff does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Alex Dodenhoff has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-dodenhoff/Unclear Position on Roe
Doherty, LexyGeorgia10DLexy Doherty understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, it states that "We can't afford to ignore climate change [....] Lexy knows that alternative energy solutions aren’t just good for the environment - they are good for business, especially in the rural South."75Lexy Doherty has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lexydoherty.com/issuesSupports Roe
Downing, TroyMontana2RTroy Downing disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a LinkedIn post criticizing a judge's ruling recognizing climate change in Held v. Montana, Downing said "This is a dangerous precedent- activist lawyers, advancing false climate alarmism, used children to push their radical ESG agenda." Downing further stated opposition to taking climate action, saying in an interview with Montana Public Radio, "Congress should get out of the way and allow the private sector to innovate and find market-based solutions."0Troy Downing has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.linkedin.com/posts/troydowning_judge-rules-in-favor-of-montana-youths-in-activity-7096952285569708032-dDzC/ https://www.mtpr.org/montana-news/2024-05-21/q-a-troy-downing-republican-candidate-for-u-s-house-district-02Opposes Roe
Draper, CaitlinArkansas3DCaitlin Draper understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states that "Addressing climate change is one of the most critical challenges of our time. The importance of taking swift and comprehensive action cannot be overstated [...] Failing to tackle climate change jeopardizes not only the environment but also global stability, as it can exacerbate resource scarcity, displacement of populations, and social unrest."100Caitlin Draper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://caitlinforarkansas.com/issues/ https://www.kark.com/news/local-news/democratic-candidate-for-congress-says-failed-pregnancy-represents-need-for-more-reproductive-healthcare-in-arkansas/Supports Roe
Driscoll, JohnMontana2DJohn Driscoll understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. In an interview with the Montana Free Press, Driscoll said "After threats to our constitutional democracy, the greatest threat our country faces is climate change." In a recent, Driscoll quoted the UN saying "'The stakes could not be higher’: world is on edge of climate abyss,’" encouraging improvements to the electrical grid. 100John Driscoll publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a Tweet responding to Representative Ryan Zinke criticizing a carbon tax, Driscoll accused him of being bought by the fossil fuels industry "who know how effective will be a tax on carbon emissions," accusing him of lying on the matter.100100https://apps.montanafreepress.org/election-guide-2024/candidates/john-driscoll/ https://twitter.com/stewardmagazine/status/1788589803996418101 https://twitter.com/stewardmagazine/status/1770930155973677468 https://www.406independent.com/p/john-brian-driscoll-for-us-districtSupports Roe
Dues, JustinNorth Carolina8DJustin Dues does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Justin Dues has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Justin_DuesUnclear Position on Roe
Duran, GonzaloNew York15RGonzalo Duran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Gonzalo Duran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.gonzaloduran.nyc/Unclear Position on Roe
Dziados, ChristopherPennsylvania14DChristopher Dziados does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Christopher Dziados has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dziadosforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Ebers, DanielNebraska3DJohn Ebers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Ebers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/05/11/u-s-rep-adrian-smith-draws-challengers-in-nebraskas-3rd-district-house-race/Supports Roe
Eddy, ChrisFlorida25RChris Eddy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Chris Eddy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://onyourballot.vote411.org/m/race-detail.do?id=3851342#c68474317Opposes Roe
Ehasz, AshleyPennsylvania1DAshley Ehasz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Ehasz states "As a combat veteran, I view the climate crisis as a national security issue [...] We must address this threat to our homeland and abroad in a responsible manner."100Ashley Ehasz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.ehaszforcongress.com/issues https://www.ehaszforcongress.com/protecting-our-landSupports Roe
Ehr, PhilFlorida28DPhil Ehr understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Ehr has spoken frequently about the threats of the climate crisis; in a Tweet, he stated "Climate change is real and Floridians feel it [...] From our wetlands to our beaches we deserve leaders who will protect our environment. I will defeat Rick Scott and fight climate change." In another Tweet, Ehr affirmed "The truth is undeniable: our planet is overheating, and the GOP's inaction is costing lives and livelihoods."100Phil Ehr has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. A Tweet criticizing Matt Gaetz's "Green Real Deal" indicates possible support for it, but he falls short of taking a clear stance and advocating for a carbon fee.5092.5https://ehrforcongress.us/meet-phil/#priorities https://twitter.com/PhilEhr/status/1790939105779491223 https://twitter.com/PhilEhr/status/1694522255085023262 https://twitter.com/PhilEhr/status/1120471261069623299Supports Roe
Elfreth, SarahMaryland3DSarah Elfreth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it promises "On Capitol Hill, she will fight for climate justice, to speed our transition to clean energy, to help communities become more resilient to climate change, and to protect the Bay and its watershed." In a Tweet responding to an endorsement from the Sierra Club, Elfreth said "I will champion climate justice and make our communities resilient to climate change."100Sarah Elfreth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://elfrethformaryland.com/issues/ https://marylandmatters.org/2022/05/03/after-leak-of-draft-scotus-opinion-on-abortion-rights-maryland-lawmakers-and-candidates-pledge-action/ https://twitter.com/SarahForMD/status/1780378216709947449Supports Roe
Eller, RonMississippi2RRon Eller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he clearly opposes climate action, stating "We can not and should not cut our use of fossil fuels. We need all forms of energy to grow our nation and economy", he fails to take a stance on climate change or global warming.25Ron Eller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://voteroneller.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Engel, KirstenArizona6DKirsten Engels understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states that "I'm prepared to tackle the water and climate crisis that threatens Southern Arizona’s future." She has Tweeted frequently about the importance of tackling climate change, asserting that "small solutions won't solve this" and that "we need to address climate change comprehensively."75Kirsten Engels has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/EngelForArizona/status/1404131212990451715 https://www.engelforarizona.com/whyimrunning https://twitter.com/EngelForArizona/status/1539640383079993344Supports Roe
Enoch, VanessaOhio8DVanessa Enoch understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Enoch states "Climate change is one of the great challenges of our lifetime, and the clock is ticking. To avoid irreparable damage, experts tell us that we need to reduce carbon emission 45% (versus 2010 levels) by 2030, and we’re not even close [...] Together we can reverse the damage done by the previous administration and it’s enablers in Congress so that we preserve a clean environment and healthy planet for our children, grandchildren and future generations."100Vanessa Enoch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://enochforcongress.com/issue/climate-change-the-environment/ https://enochforcongress.com/issue/violence-against-women/Supports Roe
Eppler, SamTexas24DSam Eppler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he supports transitioning to green energy and protecting the environment, he fails to directly address climate change.25Sam Eppler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://sameppler.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Erickson, MikeOregon6RMike Erickson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Erickson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mikeericksonforcongress.org/ https://www.opb.org/article/2024/05/07/mike-erickson-david-russ-oregon-6th-congress/Opposes Roe
Esposito, AlisonNew York18RAlison Esposito does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although she has been critical of past climate action legislation, and in a radio interview called Governor Hochul's campaigning for environmental protection a "distraction", she fails to take a position on climate change itself.25Alison Esposito has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-ny/ny-state-of-politics/2022/08/23/esposito-calls-environmental--gun-issues--distractions- https://x.com/EspositoforNY/status/1791514597247082938Unclear Position on Roe
Evans, GabeColorado8RGabe Evans disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He frequently criticizes climate action as "draconian" or "climate alarmism", and supports an all of the above approach.0Gabe Evans has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.electgabeevans.com/issues-page/Opposes Roe
Evans, JerryIllinois11RJerry Evans does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with the Daily Herald, Evans stated "On the topic of climate change, we need to focus on real, attainable solutions, not the Green New Deal [...] I favor an all-of-the-above approach to finding solutions that are economically viable." Although he appears to be in favor of some climate action, he falls short of acknowledging the cause of climate change, and favors an all-of-the-above approach which would expand the production of domestic fossil fuels.25Jerry Evans has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jerryevansforcongress.com/issues/energy/ https://ballotpedia.org/Jerry_Evans_(Illinois) https://x.com/JerryEvans2024/status/1521320329028718592Opposes Roe
Fabbricatore, JohnColorado6RJohn Fabbricatore disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a series of Tweets, Fabbricatore promises that he is "not climate change crazy" and decries climate change as a leftist program. 0John Fabbricatore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/search?q=%40JohnE_Fabb%20climate&src=typed_query https://www.johnfabbricatoreforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Fallick-Wang, KatrinaUtah4DKatrina Fallick-Wang does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Katrina Fallick-Wang has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://katrinaforcongress.us/platformkat https://www.jejunemagazine.com/home/katrina-fallick-wang-utahs-4th-congressional-districtSupports Roe
Farnham, BethPennsylvania13DBeth Farnham does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Beth Farnham has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bethfarnhamforcongress.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Fedorchak, JulieNorth Dakota1RJulie Fedorchak disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked if she believes in climate change, Fedorchak said the world "is an example of the climate is always changing," and that "North Dakota was a tropical paradise at one point."0Julie Fedorchak has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Fedorchak recently recused herself from a case involving a CO2 pipeline, as her family was paid by Summit Carbon Solutions to store CO2 on their land, but has taken no position on a fee on carbon.507.5https://northdakotamonitor.com/2024/04/04/fedorchak-voices-support-for-federal-abortion-ban-as-she-campaigns-for-us-house/ https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/national-news/77021-us-house-candidates-discuss-ukraine-farm-program-and-climate-change https://northdakotamonitor.com/2024/02/15/fedorchak-enters-north-dakota-us-house-race-against-2-republican-challengers/Opposes Roe
Fegler, ScottNew Jersey6RScott Fegler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Scott Fegler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.fegler2024.com/on-the-issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Fields, CleoLouisiana6DCleo Fields does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Cleo Fields has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cleofields.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Figures, ShomariAlabama2DShomari Figures agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Alabama Reflector's article on him, Figures agrees that climate change is real and wants to listen to scientific experts.50Shomari Figures has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/16/alabama-2nd-congressional-district-race-democrat-shomari-figures-vs-republican-caroleene-dobson/73331327007/ https://alabamareflector.com/2024/04/10/2nd-congressional-district-shomari-figures-wants-to-build-up-communities/Supports Roe
Filler, PeterTexas2DPeter Filler understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he warns "Climate change caused by global warming leads to more rapidly forming and intense storms." Filler also states "As a whole we need consistency in our environmental standards across the globe [...] We need to be good stewards to guarantee the preservation and protection of our planet Earth for future generations to come." 75Peter Filler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://peterfiller.com/f/air-pollution-effects-and-the-solutions-to-cut-down-on-the-causes https://peterfiller.com/f/severe-thunderstorms-have-lead-to-river-flooding-in-houstonUnclear Position on Roe
Flores, MayraTexas34RMayra Flores does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mayra Flores has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/us/politics/mayra-flores-latina-republicans.html https://www.mayrafloresforcongress.com/real-solutionsOpposes Roe
Forte, TInaNew York14RTina Forte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Tina Forte has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.indy100.com/politics/tina-forte-car-rant-gunsOpposes Roe
Fox, WhitneyFlorida13DWhitney Fox agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 50Whitney Fox has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://whitneyfoxforcongress.com/ https://whitneyfoxforcongress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/FOX2416-Insurance-Prospectus_v3.pdfOpposes Roe
France, MikeConnecticut2RMike France does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike France has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ctinsider.com/politics/article/Joe-Courtney-Mike-France-debate-abortion-17488176.phpOpposes Roe
Franzese, DanFlorida22RDan Franzese does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Dan Franzese has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.danforusa.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Freeman, EsauKansas4DEsau Freeman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Esau Freeman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://freemanforkansas.com/ySupports Roe
Freeman, SarahTennessee8DSarah Freeman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "Protecting the earth is not just an environmental issue; it's a moral obligation to future generations. Together, we can build a greener, healthier world for everyone. I will work to protect our environment and address the urgent challenges of climate change. We must transition to renewable energy sources, reduce carbon emissions, and implement policies that promote sustainability and conservation."75Sarah Freeman has no known o an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.votesarahfreeman.com/health https://www.votesarahfreeman.com/childrenUnclear Position on Roe
Friedman, LauraCalifornia30DLaura Friedman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Her campaign website states that "Laura is uncompromising in her commitment to combating the climate crisis through increased utilization and development of clean energy and promoting sustainable methods of transportation for people and goods."100Laura Friedman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.lauraforcongress.org/ https://twitter.com/LauraFriedmanCA/status/1743408613442584892Supports Roe
Frisch, AdamColorado3DAdam Frisch does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he says "We know changing climates; we live it." However, Frisch continues to voice support for an all-of-the-above approach.25Adam Frisch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://adamforcolorado.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Furman, JayTexas28RJay Furman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jay Furman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/CommanderFurman/status/1769559427433001021 https://commanderfurman.com/Opposes Roe
Garcia Sharon, JennyTexas37RJenny Garcia Sharon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jenny Garcia Sharon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/jgs_TX/status/1747841249615454374Opposes Roe
Garza, AlanTexas29RAlan Garza does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Alan Garza has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/endorsements/article/alan-garza-gop-primary-congress-29-sylvia-garcia-18652368.phpOpposes Roe
Gassen, RiverColorado5DRiver Gassen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states "As River runs for the House of Representatives, she brings a strong foundation in science to address the climate crisis with data-driven solutions." Her issues page calls for the end of big oil's influence in politics and adds "With a focus on research on renewable technology, we can ensure energy independence and address the urgent threat of climate change."100River Gassen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://riverforcolorado.com/issues/ https://riverforcolorado.com/about/Supports Roe
Genant, PamNorth Carolina14DPam Genant understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "There is undeniable consensus on the existence of man-made climate change. Scientists also agree that there is a narrow window in which we can reverse the worst of the crisis." She then lists climate action she would take in Congress, such as expanding environmental protections and eliminating fossil fuel subsidies.100Pam Genant has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.pamgenant.com/issuesSupports Roe
Gill, BrandonTexas26RBrandon Gill does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Brandon Gill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://brandongillforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Gillen, LauraNew York4DLaura Gillen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Gillen said, "Climate change is wreaking havoc around the globe and in our local communities." After discussing environmental actions she's taken in other elected offices, she promised "As a Member of Congress, I will continue these efforts to preserve and protect our shorelines and our Earth."100Laura Gillen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/LauraAGillen/status/1557777595596476416 https://ballotpedia.org/Laura_Gillen https://lauragillen.com/Supports Roe
Gillespie, PatrickTexas33RPatrick Gillespie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Patrick Gillespie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://patrickgillespie4congress33.com/about-2/Opposes Roe
Goerge, JaneTennessee2DJane George understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, George says "Climate change is not a distant threat but an imminent crisis, and understanding its tipping points is crucial for humanity." She later urges that "It’s time for a collective commitment to preserving our planet for future generations. The choices we make today will determine whether we tip towards a sustainable future or irreparable environmental damage."100Jane George has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://janegeorgetn.com/ https://janegeorgetn.com/home/f/protecting-our-planetSupports Roe
Goers, CarmenWashington8RCarmen Goers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although she has been vocally critical of green energy projects, Goers has failed to established a clear position on climate change.25Carmen Goers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.carmenforwashington.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Goldman, CraigTexas12RCraig Goldman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although on his campaign website Goldman criticizes the "so-called Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) movement" for targeting fossil fuel energy, he fails to establish a clear position on climate change.25Craig Goldman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.craiggoldman.org/issues/Opposes Roe
Goldstein, MichaelConnecticut4RMichael Goldstein does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Michael Goldstein has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://themonroesun.com/republican-running-for-congress-opines-on-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes Roe
Goodlander, MaggieNew Hampshire2DMaggie Goodlander understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Goodlander espouses combatting climate change saying "Maggie believes deeply in advancing environmental justice and was proud to help to launch the Justice Department’s first-ever Office of Environmental Justice dedicated to protecting overburdened and underserved communities across America from the harm caused by pollution, environmental crimes, and the climate crisis."100Maggie Goodlander has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://maggiefornh.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Goodwin, AlfeiaPennsylvania5RAlfe Goodwin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Alfe Goodwin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://alfeforuscongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Govens, RodneyArkansas1DRodney Govens does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Rodney Govens has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rodneyforcongress.org/platform-issues/Supports Roe
Gray, AdamCalifornia13DAdam Gray understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an article he wrote for The Modesto Bee, he states that "Climate change is real and is a serious threat to the quality of life on our planet" and recognizes that he has a responsibility to address climate change. In the article he continues on to discuss how climate change legislation may look in different parts of California, but warns against overly ambitious or impactful action.75Adam Gray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.modbee.com/opinion/article163859513.html#storylink=cpy https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2022-10-13/2022-california-midterm-election-gray-duarte-abortion-economy-environment https://www.adamgrayforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Greene-Scott, MarquetteTexas22DMarquette Greene-Scott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Marquette Greene-Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://marquettegreenescott.com/issues/Supports Roe
Griffin, JimConnecticut1RJim Griffin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jim Griffin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Jim_Griffin_(Connecticut)Unclear Position on Roe
Groh, RogerCalifornia44RRoger Groh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Roger Groh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rogergroh.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Guinchard, Mary JoNew Jersey5RMary Jo Guinchard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Mary Jo Guinchard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.insidernj.com/gottheimer-ready-for-maga-mary/Opposes Roe
Gunderson, MattCalifornia49RMatt Gunderson agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a podcast interview, Gunderson stated "I am not a climate change denier," and when running for state senate in 2022, he promised to help California “lead on climate change." However, in a recent interview with The San Diego Union-Tribune and on his campaign website, he fails to call for any policies aimed at fossil fuels curbing emissions, and in a May 2024 Tweet criticized the Biden administration's climate policies and calls for an "all of the above approach."50Matt Gunderson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2024-02-20/meet-the-candidates-for-49th-congressional-district-q-a-with-matt-gunderson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ3alKkCshM https://twitter.com/GundersonForCA/status/1791522095945437256 https://thecoastnews.com/abortion-thrust-to-forefront-of-blakespear-gunderson-race/Supports Roe
Hall, BarbieFlorida11DBarbie Hall understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Responding to a Ballotpedia survey question, she listed "Ensuring that environmental issues are addressed" as a priority. In an interview, Hall stated that "Climate change is an issue all throughout the U.S. [...] it's not going to get better if our climate continues to decline."75Barbie Hall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Barbie_Harden_Hall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC7VryfSvAUSupports Roe
Hamadeh, AbrahamArizona8RAbraham Hamadeh disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Hamadeh criticized Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes saying, of her advocacy for fighting climate change, that it is akin to fighting the weather. In a Tweet, Hamadeh posted two maps of drought conditions in western states, saying "Stop climate hysteria."0Abraham Hamadeh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/AbrahamHamadeh/status/1699123731665404388 https://x.com/AbeWarRoom/status/1588732750185783296 https://x.com/AbeWarRoom/status/1785472554351866222Opposes Roe
Hammer, TrygveNorth Dakota1DTrygve Hammer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with WDAY Mid Day, Hammer said "[climate change] is among the most serious except what we have to think about it as we go after it, we have to be careful because you can't do things that are going to destroy jobs," but fails to take a clear stance on whether or not climate change is driven by human acitvity.25Trygve Hammer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.hammerfornd.com/priorities https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/regional-news/72846-nd-gubernatorial-candidate-trygve-hammer-climate-change-among-most-seriousSupports Roe
Hanson, TommyIllinois5RTommy Hanson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a virtual candidate forum held by the Daily Herald, Hanson said "I don't believe in global warming, I don't believe in the fact that it's man-made"0Tommy Hanson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://votetommyhanson.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQi74zlI2-0Opposes Roe
Harbour, JoannaOregon3RJoanna Harbour does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Joanna Harbour has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://joanna4oregon.com/key-issues/Opposes Roe
Haridopolos, MikeFlorida8RMike Haridopolos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Mike Haridopolos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/53952/mike-haridopolos?categoryId=2&type=V,S,R,E,F,POpposes Roe
Harrigan, PatNorth Carolina10RPat Harrigan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with the Charlotte Observer, he said that "To the extent that human behavior is contributing to climate change, we should see it as an economic opportunity to grow new jobs in North Carolina through renewable energy sources." On his campaign website, Harrigan voices support for an all-of-the-above approach, including further domestic oil production and fracking.25Pat Harrigan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.harriganforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Harris, MarkNorth Carolina8RMark Harris disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked if he believes climate change is a fact, he simply answered "No."0Mark Harris has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://markharrisforcongress.org/issues https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/climate-change-fact-god-no-gopers-say-msna313571Opposes Roe
Harris, ShawnGeorgia14DShawn Harris understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Responding to a questionnaire, Harris said "Climate change poses both short- and long-term challenges [...] To address the cause, we need to diminish our reliance on fossil fuels by moving from offshore drilling to offshore wind energy. We also need to acknowledge that this is a national security threat."100Shawn Harris has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.2588.75https://www.shawnforgeorgia.com/on-the-issues/ https://www.branch.vote/questionnaire-response/6627db1b68afdebbc5c10d6dSupports Roe
Hart, CodyWashington2RCody Hart does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Cody Hart has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. free on carbon.5028.75https://codyhart.org/Opposes Roe
Hart, RhondaTexas14DRhonda Hart does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Rhonda Hart has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.hart4congress.com/Supports Roe
Hartman, RayMissouri2DRay Hartman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the 'Issues' page states "We must act to address the threat of climate change and pass down a sustainable world to our children and grandchildren. Ray will champion efforts to protect our wildlife, preserve our public lands and improve the quality of air and water throughout the nation. We must invest in green technologies that protect farmlands and natural resources while creating American jobs."100Ray Hartman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.rayhartmannforcongress.com/new-pageSupports Roe
Harvey, KathrynSouth Carolina4DKathryn Harvey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although she lists sustainable growth and environmental stewardship as priorities on her campaign website, Harvey fails to establish a clear position on climate change.25Kathryn Harvey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kathrynforcongress.com/priorities/protect-reproductive-rights/ https://www.kathrynforcongress.com/priorities/sustainable-growth/Supports Roe
Hayes, JamesPennsylvania12RJames Hayes does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25James Hayes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.pafamilyvoter.com/candidate/hayes-james/Opposes Roe
Hendricks, JeanneMinnesota6DJeanne Hendricks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Hendricks states "Climate change is real; we must be good stewards of our environment, not only for economic and national security issues, but also for the existential threat to all humanity. Our future generations are counting on us to leave them a world with clean water and air; free from climate-induced natural disasters and excessive weather events, such as wildfires and flooding." 100Jeanne Hendricks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://hendricksformn.com/issues/Supports Roe
Herman, TomCalifornia33RTom Herman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, it states that "Wind and solar will never be able to supply all our needs, so lets return to the tried and true until some better technology comes along" but he fails to discuss climate change anywhere.25Tom Herman has no known or an inconsistent stance on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.tomhermancongress.com/platformUnclear Position on Roe
Hernández Rivera, Pablo JosePuerto Rico1PPD (Democratic)Pablo Jose Hernández Rivera does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Pablo Jose Hernández Rivera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/BuenasNuevasLiv/status/1643094533201092610Supports Roe
Hernandez, PeterCalifornia18RPeter Hernandez disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign page, Hernandez promises to protect farmers stating that "The far left of the democrat party is emulating this radical authoritarian route [...] in the name of the climate change cult." He disagrees with the need to take climate action, stating in a Tweet that "Democrats like @repzoelofgren are so fixated on climate change that they've lost sight of the everyday challenges facing hardworking Americans."0Peter Hernandez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://hernandezforcongress.com/vote-hernandez-to-protect-our-farms/ https://twitter.com/hernandez_CA18/status/1714265001630871594Unclear Position on Roe
Herrell, YvetteNew Mexico2RYvette Herrell disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Herrell said “I can’t see the connection there with fossil fuels,” Herrell said of the wildfires. “We can all go back and look at trends with the weather." She added that "“At the end of the day, I think we all take for granted the fossil fuel industry. If we’re getting into climate, wouldn’t it be smarter to rely on American companies? We know our energy is cleaner and better for the environment."0Yvette Herrell makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The former congresswoman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.yvetteherrell.com/shared-values https://www.currentargus.com/story/news/2022/08/04/yvette-herrell-defends-new-mexico-oil-gas-climate-change-concerns-election-congress-permian-basin/65389560007/Opposes Roe
Hertel Jr., CurtisMichigan7DCurtis Hertel Jr. understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "Curtis understands that climate change is already having a significant impact on the lives and livelihoods of Michiganders. Taking action now means both addressing the immediate needs of communities affected by climate change and working towards a more sustainable future built with good-paying, union jobs." In a Tweet, Hertel Jr. said "Proud to be part of a party that debates solutions for Climate Change instead of being the party that denies its existence."75Curtis Hertel Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.hertelformichigan.com/on-the-issues/ https://twitter.com/search?q=%40curtisherteljr%20climate&src=typed_query&f=topSupports Roe
Hesketh, MissiMissouri7DMissi Hesketh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Missi Hesketh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/MissiforMO/status/1755067710545817682Supports Roe
Hewett, DonWashington10RDon Hewett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Don Hewett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Don_HewettUnclear Position on Roe
Hewitt, PattiGeorgia1DPatti Hewitt understands the importance of climate change but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Hewitt talks about the threat that climate change poses to coastal communities due to sea-level rises and extreme weather. She is also lays out her support for green energy, reducing carbon emissions, and investing in green infrastructure and transporation.75Petti Hewitt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://pattiforgeorgia.com/priorities/equal-healthcare-access/ https://pattiforgeorgia.com/priorities/assure-the-future-of-our-planet/Supports Roe
Holder, DerrickIndiana4DDerrick Holder understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In response to a question from Based in Lafayette, Holder stated "Congress must take decisive action on climate change by implementing comprehensive environmental legislation [...] It's imperative to safeguard our planet for future generations while ensuring economic stability and growth through sustainable development." He continues to call for renewable energy, stricter emissions standards, and other means of climate action. On his campaign website he also discusses how the primarily agricultural district he wishes to represent can better adapt to climate change and be more sustainable.100Derrick Holder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.derrickholder.com/blog/blog-post-title-one-7w7b8 https://www.derrickholder.com/blog/agriculture-in-indiana-navigating-challenges-and-seizing-opportunities-for-a-sustainable-future https://www.basedinlafayette.com/p/primary-candidate-q-and-a-us-houseSupports Roe
Holloway, LaShondaFlorida4DLaShonda Holloway recognizes the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. At her campaign kickoff she said "Not only for our health, but for our future, we have to combat climate change", and in an interview stated that climate change will be one of the issues she will work on.75Lashonda Holloway has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.hollowayforcongress.com/platform https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezOah8xoWGM https://news.wjct.org/first-coast/2019-12-03/lashonda-holloway-running-against-florida-rep-al-lawsonSupports Roe
Holmes, TomAlabama1DTom Holmes does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Tom Holmes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Tom_Holmes_(Alabama) https://tomholmesal.com/ Unclear Position on Roe
Hook, KristinTexas21DKristin Hook understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an article Hook wrote for the Caller times, she said "We are seeing firsthand the devastating impacts of climate change, which are projected to get worse." In a Tweet criticizing Representative Roy for not understanding the link between climate change and national security, Hook said "Chip and the rest of the science illiterati have got to go."100Kristin Hook has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.caller.com/story/opinion/2018/10/29/election-perspective-scientist-corpus-christi-texas/1807384002/ https://twitter.com/Kristin_Hook/status/1801260117138059535 https://twitter.com/Kristin_Hook/status/1778462292213891389Supports Roe
Hooper, JamesMichigan12RJames Hooper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25James Hooper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jameshooperforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Horn, MadisonOklahoma5DMadison Horn understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Horn said that "to fight against climate change and continue the conservation of natural resources, we must heighten our attention to protecting our home for future generations."75Madison Horn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/MadisonHornOK/status/1517490908664578048 https://twitter.com/MadisonHornOK/status/1540412129093746694Supports Roe
Houlahan, StephenCalifornia48DStephen Houlahan understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Houlahan encouraged "Remember, think Green! ♻️♻️♻️ Now more than ever we need to do something about the climate crisis!" In an interview with The San Diego Union-Tribune, Houlahan stated that "Tomorrow’s costs of ignoring climate change will vastly exceed today’s costs of reducing greenhouse gases. Spending money to mitigate climate change today is not a cost. It is an investment in our future."75Stephen Houlahan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on. carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/electhoulahan/status/1363979120686768131 https://electhoulahan.com/issues/ https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2022-08-12/2022-election-stephen-houlahan-48th-congressional-district-candidateSupports Roe
Howard, RisieArkansas4DRisie Howard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Risie Howard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.howardforcongress.com/ https://www.magnoliareporter.com/news_and_business/regional_news/article_f3f1a2fa-892f-11ef-b019-a7af8ae7a6c3.htmlSupports Roe
Hubbard, ChuckNorth Carolina5DChuck Hubbard understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Hubbard states he's running in part to fight the climate crisis.75Chuck Hubbard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://hubbardforcongress.com/platform https://twitter.com/ChuckHubbardNC/status/1728544552620007753Supports Roe
Hudson, PaulMichigan3RPaul Hudson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Hudson dismissed the role of humans in driving climate change saying " I believe that it is important to acknowledge the role of faith and the belief that our environment is ultimately in God's hands."0Paul Hudson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.ourmidland.com/news/article/michigan-s-8th-congressional-candidates-respond-19554038.php https://michiganadvance.com/2022/09/17/abortion-ballot-initiative-drama-sparks-new-focus-on-michigan-supreme-court-races-this-fall/Opposes Roe
Hundley, EvangelineSouth Carolina5DEvangeline Hundley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Hundley states "Our beautiful planet Earth needs urgent attention. Global warming is real. Climate change is happening, like it or not [...] I will be a vote for the Green New Deal. It is past time to take bold actions. And we need to act now before it’s too late."100Evangeline Hundley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ehundleyforcongress.com/clean-energy-water-food-air/ https://ehundleyforcongress.com/womens-rights/Supports Roe
Hunt, TreyTexas12DTrey Hunt understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Hunt promised "When I am elected to Congress, I will use my position to fight climate change."75Trey Hunt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://treyonthehunt.com/platform https://twitter.com/Hunt4House/status/1410964630483111947Supports Roe
Hurd, JeffColorado3RJeff Hurd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Jeff Hurd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cpr.org/2024/06/03/vg-2024-colorado-primary-elections-congressional-district-3-candidate-jeff-hurd/Opposes Roe
Hurt, ErikIndiana8DErik Hurt understands the importance of clime action as a top priority issue. His campaign website states "Fighting against climate change should be a top priority for our country. We need to invest in renewable energy, and more importantly find ways to use less energy. We need to put the weight of Americas might behind renewable energy sources."100Erik Hurt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.erikhurtforcongress.com/policiesSupports Roe
Hyman, MalSouth Carolina7DMal Hyman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Q&A on Reddit, he said that climate denial was the tipping point in deciding to run. "The country and the world was in crisis and for me, the silence was a betrayal. The Republican congressional stance on climate change is a crime against humanity. They are threatening the planet and our national security and the security of generations to come. That is why it is more important than ever for all of us to fight harder than ever."100Mal Hyman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://gwdcountydems.org/2017/12/18/first-time-running-mal-hyman/ https://malhyman.com/environment https://www.facebook.com/Mal4Congress/photos/i-will-fight-to-protect-access-to-abortion-on-a-federal-level-reproductive-healt/955612399908020/?_rdrSupports Roe
Jack, BrianGeorgia3RJack Brian does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Jack Brian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-04-28/republicans-seeking-georgia-congressional-seat-debate-limits-on-abortion-and-immigrationOpposes Roe
Jenkins, KevinTennessee1DKevin Jenkins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Kevin Jenkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/216485/kevin-jenkinsSupports Roe
Jenkins, MatthewNew Jersey4DMatthew Jenkins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Jenkins criticized Florida governor Ron DeSantis, saying "The signs are all around us. While people like Ron DeSantis pumps sea water out of south Florida he says climate change is a hoax. The signs are all around us." On his campaign website, Jenkins says "America has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in our collective climate future" and lists climate goals such as reducing carbon emissions and investing in NJ's coastal wind energy. 75Matthew Jenkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://mattjenkinsforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/MattJenkinsNJ/status/1688543240792735744Supports Roe
Johnson, DrewNevada3RDrew Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Johnson said "Funny, when I think "climate," I think either: 1) The general weather conditions in an area over a long period, or 2) Something used to trick people into accepting socialist policies."0Drew Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/DrewForNevada/status/1693075535021171193 https://news3lv.com/news/local/kkk-abortion-strip-clubs-how-a-clark-county-commissioner-race-turned-into-mud-slinging https://drewfornevada.com/priorities/Unclear Position on Roe
Johnson, JulieTexas32DJulie Johnson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Johnson says "Climate change is the defining challenge of our time, and I support bold action to address it." In a Tweet, Johnson said "The sweltering triple-digit heat is a stark reminder of the immediate need to address climate change."100Julie Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/juliejohnsonTX/status/1694127505513251152 https://juliejohnson.com/issues/Supports Roe
Johnson, LizGeorgia12DLiz Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Liz Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Liz_Johnson_(Georgia) https://www.lizjohnsonforus.com/Supports Roe
Johnson, SherylSouth Dakota1DSheryl Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Sheryl Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sdmomforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Johnson, WayneGeorgia2RWayne Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Wayne Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.johnsoncongress.com/wayne_johnson_candidate_u_s_congress_georgia_s_second_districtOpposes Roe
Jones, AndrewMissouri1RAndrew Jones does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Andrew Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Andrew_Jones_Jr._(Missouri)Opposes Roe
Jones, LauraTexas8DLaura Jones understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She Tweets frequently about the threat posed by climate change, such as in one where she encouraged more aggressive approaches towards combatting climate change due to increased risks found by scientists.100Laura Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/CongressLaura/status/1646114373813907458 https://twitter.com/CongressLaura/status/1801291743310029282Supports Roe
Jones, MarcusArkansas2DMarcus Jones does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Marcus Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://marcusjonesforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Jones, MondaireNew York17DMondaire Jones understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Jones said that "I'm part of a generation that stands to be devastated by the effects of climate change. Career politicians have failed to act with the urgency this crisis requires, so it's up to us to fight to save this planet."100Mondaire Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/StrikeNy/status/1253731842752208901 https://twitter.com/MondaireJones/status/1759946976177569807Supports Roe
Jones, SteveNew Mexico1RSteve Jones disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has dismissed the issue, saying "Climate change has existed since the dinosaur."0Steve Jones has known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.abqjournal.com/news/q-a-2nd-congressional-district-candidate-steve-jones/article_62ce93e0-a094-5a2a-83c1-88c1c443230c.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Jude, TadMinnesota3RTad Jude does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tad Jude has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://tadjude.com/on-issues.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Junge, PaulMichigan8RPaul Junge does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Paul Junge has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://michiganadvance.com/2024/08/01/republicans-seeking-to-flip-8th-congressional-district-talk-border-security-jobs-and-energy/Opposes Roe
Kale, Andrea DoriaFlorida18DAndrea Doria Kale understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Kale says "I am not an Environmental Specialist either but I would have to be asleep not see the damage Climate Change has done to the U.S. and our Planet [...] Unless we act expeditiously at home and abroad with other nations to reverse or stop it, our children and futures generations will have a largely uninhabitable planet. We need strong leadership and a Congress that will address the Climate Crisis head on."100Andrea Doria Kale has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.andreadoriakale.com/priorities#prioritiesSupports Roe
Kane, CarolineTexas7RCaroline Kane disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, she says "The Climate change agenda is a fraud." 0Caroline Kane makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a Tweet, she challenges Elon Musk to question his own logic in response to him calling for a tax on carbon.00https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/endorsements/article/caroline-kane-gop-congress-lizzie-fletcher-18672843.php https://twitter.com/CarolineKaneTX/status/1694687133594718675 https://twitter.com/CarolineKaneTX/status/1754315486118981833Opposes Roe
Kaufman, JoeFlorida23DJoe Kaufman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Joe Kaufman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kaufmanforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Keller, MauraGeorgia3DMaura Keller understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Keller states "Every year, the planet is changing in front of our eyes [...] Maura champions a bold stance on climate justice, for both the planet and the people. If we don’t take action now, the damage to our planet will soon be irreversible."100Maura Keller publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Speaking to LaGrange Daily News, Keller said “Climate change is a huge bit [...] While everybody is saying that climate is just weather, we have to say no, it isn’t. We’ve got to find better ways, more research and development. We need to look at carbon tax, so we can put money back into our budgets."100100https://maurakeller.com/issues https://www.lagrangenews.com/2024/05/07/candidates-make-case-for-democratic-nomination-for-us/Supports Roe
Kemp, PatFlorida15DPat Kemp does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Kemp's website lists "Preserving our Environment" as something she stands for, and she calls herself "an extraordinary advocate for equal rights & the environment." However, Kemp fails to define what such actions encompass and take a clear position on climate change.25Pat Kemp has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. As a county commissioner she voted against a proposal to enact carbon capture, citing concerns that it's not in the environment's best interest and many environmental groups oppose it, but doesn't take a stance on a carbon fee.5028.75https://www.votepatkempforcongress.com/ https://twitter.com/PatKempFL/status/606469091289919489 https://www.tampabay.com/news/tampa/2024/04/18/hillsborough-leaders-greenlight-carbon-capture-proposal/Supports Roe
Kenderes, BrianOhio14DBrian Kenderes does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Brian Kenderes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.the-daily-record.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/10/20/7th-us-congressional-race-has-2-write-ins-along-with-party-candidates/69519397007/Opposes Roe
Kennedy, MikeUtah3RMike Kennedy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he is in support of some climate action, he promotes an all-of-the-above approach and increasing domestic oil production.25Mike Kennedy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mikekennedyforutah.com/issues/ https://www.parkrecord.com/news/senate-candidate-mike-kennedy-talks-daca-climate-change-and-donald-trump-in-park-city/ https://www.deseret.com/utah/2024/06/12/utah-candidates-for-3rd-congressional-district-debate-energy-ukraine-abortion/Opposes Roe
Kennedy, SandyFlorida8DSandy Kennedy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She lists climate change as a priority and some policies she would support if elected. 75Sandy Kennedy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://sandykennedyforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Kent, JoeWashington3RJoe Kent disagrees disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a debate, Kent said he doesn't believe climate change could cause a crisis and "I think that we could be going through a cycle right now where the world is getting a little bit hotter. These things go in cycles. I’m open to more data. But right now, most of the information that’s been provided so far has such a strong bias towards this green sector in this globalist...certain our power…"0Joe Kent has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.opb.org/article/2022/07/25/washingtons-3rd-congressional-district-debate-republican-joe-kent-and-democrat-marie-gluesenkamp-perez/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/joe-kent-abortion-slavery-1235030528/Opposes Roe
Kerr, JoeCalifornia40DJoe Kerr understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states "We should be tired of politicians that talk about climate change but do nothing about it. I have concrete solutions that will reduce our carbon footprint and mitigate climatic extremes." In a Tweet, Kerr promised he will "bring the unique perspective of a firefighter to the fight for climate action."75Joe Kerr has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.joekerrforcongress.com/issues https://ballotpedia.org/Joe_KerrSupports Roe
Kilbourn, KyleWisconsin7DKyle Kilbourn understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Kilbourn says "it’s clear that our environment is in danger due to the recklessness of special interests and the politicians in their pockets. Whether it’s PFAS in our water, invasive species in our lakes, or the threat of climate change, without urgent action, the next generation will be left with a world with extreme heat and wildfires, failing crops, climate refugees, and extreme weather catastrophes. Kyle will champion legislation that creates good-paying green jobs for Wisconsin families while transitioning our economy away from fossil fuels. A truly energy-independent future is one where the next generation will thrive on a livable planet."100Kyle Kilbourn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.kylekilbourn.com/to-do-listUnclear Position on Roe
Kim, DavidCalifornia34DDavid Kim understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, a dedicated page to climate justice states that "We’re running out of time. Due to the failure of governments to curb carbon emissions, the world is experiencing record high temperatures, more extreme weather events, and an unprecedented number of climate disasters." He adds that "we need bold leadership to break free from dirty energy pushed by corporations, to heal our communities and the planet" and lists climate action priorities, such as passing a Green New Deal and creating a Civilian Climate Corps.100David Kim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://davidkimforca.com/platform/climatejustice/ https://ballotpedia.org/David_Kim_(California)Supports Roe
King, PaulNew York5RPaul King understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "It is indisputable that global temperatures and sea levels are rising [...] it is logical for humans to both reduce potentially harmful activities and research solutions that would remove greenhouse gases from our atmosphere." He later adds "Turning the tide on climate change will take decades and encourages reducing carbon emissions, but urges against "radical action" if other countries continue to pollute.75Paul King has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://king2024.us/plans/Unclear Position on Roe
King-Hinds, KimberlynNorthern Mariana Islands1RKimberlyn King-Hinds understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a statement, King-Hinds said "“Climate change is real. No one knows how to solve the problem without having unintended consequences and the best we can do is do our part [...] We also hope to realize some savings from policies and procedures that make us less reliant on non-green energy sources."75Kimberlyn King-Hinds has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.saipantribune.com/news/local/cpa-targets-zero-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-2050/article_694eb41b-07ad-540a-af98-d1ca6ab86427.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Klacik, KimMaryland2RKim Klacik disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Denying the role of carbon emissions in driving climate change, Klacik said in a Tweet "Hate to point out the obvious but, if we continue in this direction, you won’t live to see the results of minimizing emissions in just the US. Another obvious here, there will be 0 results."0Kim Klacik has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/kimKBaltimore/status/1540373169328078849 https://twitter.com/kimKBaltimore/status/1638846457649168384Opposes Roe
Knott, BradNorth Carolina13RBrad Knott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Bradd Knott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bradknottforcongress.com/Opposes Roe
Koppie, ChadIllinois7RChad Koppie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Chad Koppie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/chad-koppieOpposes Roe
Koslow, MichaelCalifornia26RMichael Koslow does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Koslow stated that "climate change, regardless of what your position on it is, recognizes that there are going to be times, regardless of what the causes are, that there are going to be drought periods" failing to take a clear stance on whether or not climate change is human-made and from fossil fuels.25Michael Koslow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votemichaelkoslow.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAJuAiyTIOo&t=2597sUnclear Position on Roe
Kregler, WilliamNew York7RWilliam Kregler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25William Kregler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kreglerforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Kripchak, MichaelOhio6DMichael Kripchak agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with The Repository, Kripchak said ""the science is settled that we are causing global warming." 50Michael Kripchak has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.kripchak.com/issues-policies https://www.cantonrep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/06/05/ohio-special-election-2024-6th-district/73842775007/Supports Roe
Kruttiventi, VinCalifornia14RVin Kruttiventi understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his Linkedin page in two separate posts he says, "Taking action on climate change is necessary for our planet's future...I will advocate for policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect our environment." 75Vin Kruttiventi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.vin4congress.com/priorities https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vin4congress_addressing-climate-change-is-crucial-for-activity-7212515461882683393-5xni/ https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vin4congress_our-future-depends-on-how-we-address-climate-activity-7230997573883375618-LC-s/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPgWHDUBvnk Opposes Roe
Kuaea, LuisaAmerican Samoa1DLuisa Kuaea does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Luisa Kuaea has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kuaeaforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Largey, PatrickHawaii1RPatrick Largey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Patrick Largey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.freedom4hawaii.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Latimer, GeorgeNew York16DClimate change is an urgent threat with long-term repercussions, which demands immediate and decisive action to safeguard our future [...] in Congress he will be an advocate for combating climate change, investing in renewable energy sources to transition away from fossil fuels, and creating sustainable green jobs. As George believes it is our shared responsibility to preserve the planet for future generations, he will support passing a Green New Deal to enact comprehensive policies that address environmental degradation, promote conservation efforts, and mitigate the impacts of climate change on communities across the nation."100George Latimer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://latimerforny.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Lee, JohnNevada4RJohn Lee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/American_Bridge/status/1506678007506817043 https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/local-las-vegas/should-biden-declare-climate-change-an-emergency-these-las-vegans-think-so-3055168/Opposes Roe
Lee, JustinCalifornia52RJustin Lee disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with The San Diego Union-Tribune, Lee argued that "Contrary to popular belief, scientific data reveals that the Earth's temperature was higher 250,000 years ago, yet life flourished as it does today. Our planet undergoes natural cycles of heating and cooling, largely unaffected by human activity."0Justin Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2024-02-20/meet-the-candidates-for-52nd-congressional-district-q-a-with-justin-leeOpposes Roe
Lerner, KariFlorida19DKari Lerner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, she recognizes that "Florida faces a dire environmental crisis that demands our action" and calls for action. However, she fails to address human-made, fossil fuel climate change and focuses instead on pollution and water. 25Kari Lerner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.karilernerforflorida.com/Supports Roe
Levitt Flisser, MiriamNew York16RMiriam Levitt Flisser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Miriam Levitt Flisser has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/11/03/ny-16th-congress-jamaal-bowman-miriam-flisser-gun-control-abortion/69614651007/?fbclid=IwAR37PnYvrliOcNEMt6AV3YZm9tM0y8rX4tR1KVOnLVVMJ5lDSAQb5xlj_tUOpposes Roe
Lewis, MarcusIllinois1RMarcus Lewis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Marcus Lewis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/marcus-lewis https://marcuslewisforcongress.org/Opposes Roe
Liccardo, SamCalifornia16DSam Liccardo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it warns that "Given the march of climate change in the coming years, it will get worse before it gets better." He has also Tweeted frequently about it, promising to "meet the crisis of climate change w/ bold & immediate action" and listing climate change among the nation's greatest challenges. 100Sam Liccardo publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, he lists one of his climate action priorities as implementing a carbon dividend, which he promises to be "the most powerful market-based approach to holding the fossil fuel industry accountable."100100https://samliccardo.com/plan/ https://twitter.com/sliccardo/status/1458219456165863429 https://twitter.com/sliccardo/status/1785807586912260323 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sam-liccardo-a9a1759_today-we-should-be-celebrating-the-anniversary-activity-7155262842189811712-5SIl/Supports Roe
Liddell, TeddyNew Jersey1RTeddy Liddell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Teddy Liddell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://teddyliddellforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Limon, SantosTexas23DSantos Limon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Santos Limon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://limonforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Lincoln, KevinCalifornia9RKevin Lincoln understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with the Sacramento Bee, he stated that "Climate change is a pressing issue, and it’s essential to take steps towards a healthier planet [...] It’s crucial to support the shift towards cleaner forms of energy [...] it’s essential to move towards a cleaner and greener future while considering the economic realities of our communities."75Kevin Lincoln has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284830706.html https://www.kevinlincolnforcongress.com/our-agendaOpposes Roe
Linderman, HankKentucky2DHank Linderman understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Linderman stated "The so-called *Free Market* doesn't have a workable answer for climate damage without global regulation. Saving humanity just isn't going to be profitable in the next quarter." In another Tweet, he encouraged "No matter who you are - conservative, progressive, young, old, no matter your race - climate change is going to need your attention."100Hank Linderman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/hank4ky/status/1438121558707408899 https://twitter.com/hank4ky/status/1448247060331913222 https://www.wbko.com/2022/11/04/2nd-district-us-representative-race-hank-linderman/Supports Roe
Lineberger III, ErnestTexas26DErnest Lineberger understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he says "There is no getting away from it. We are here in it" and that " Smog and other environmental issues are not simple one person or even one company choices. Our national leadership has to set the expectations for all to follow. Reducing our environmental impact is important." 75Ernest Lineberger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.linebergerforuscongress.com/positionsSupports Roe
LiPetri, MichaelNew York3RMike LiPetri does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although LiPetri lists environmental conservation as a concern of his, and wants "New York to promulgate legislation promoting energy diversity while lowering its carbon emissions," LiPetri fails to explicitly agree with the scientific consensus on climate change. On his campaign website, he further criticizes "unrealistic and misguided policies being pushed by climate activists" which he considers not even worth discussing, such as the Green New Deal.25Mike LiPetri has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/TheMikeLiPetri/status/1142297073649405953 https://www.lipetriforcongress.com/issues#environmentOpposes Roe
Litaker, RobinAlabama7RRobin Litaker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Robin Litaker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.robinforalabama.com/ https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/robin-litaker/policies/social/abortion Opposes Roe
Lloyd, TanyaTexas27DTanya Lloyd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tanya Lloyd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.tanyafortx27.com/jennaSupports Roe
Logan, GeorgeConnecticut5RLogan George does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Logan George has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ctmirror.org/2022/10/20/ct-5th-district-debate-jahana-hayes-george-logan-show-sharp-divisions-abortion-economy/Opposes Roe
Lopez, MannyFlorida17DManny Lopez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he reaffirms the Democratic Environment Caucus' platform stating that "The climate crisis is upon us, and Florida’s welfare and natural resources are at the epicenter of climate risks."100Manny Lopez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, it calls to "develop a state-level program to support the carbon fee & dividend concept."100100https://www.mannyforcongress.com/climate-change-environment https://www.mannyforcongress.com/reproductive-human-rightsSupports Roe
Lorenzen, MarkTexas17DMark Lorenzen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states he is committed to addressing it and to advocate for green energy and cut carbon emissions. In a Tweet, Lorenzen also said "Climate change is a challenge we must face together. Dr. Lorenzen advocates for bold actions to protect our planet for future generations."100Mark Lorenzen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://marklorenzen.org/issues.php https://twitter.com/DrMarkLorenzen/status/1797580280888209631Supports Roe
Lou, BruceCalifornia11RBruce Lou does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Bruce Lou has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.bruceforcongress.org/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Love III, JohnTexas6DJohn Love III understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Love stated "I am committed to fighting climate change," and in another stresses the need to achieve carbon neutrality and transition oil workers to green energy.75John Love III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/LoveForTX/status/1590476206277025794 https://twitter.com/LoveForTX/status/1593648518845145089 https://twitter.com/LoveForTX/status/1604380142792577025Supports Roe
Low, EvanCalifornia16DEvan Low understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states that "Climate change significantly threatens our planet, impacting weather patterns, sea levels, and ecosystems." He later adds that "There is no silver bullet piece of legislation when it comes to tackling our climate challenges, which means we must take a multifaceted approach building upon our record in California and the steps forward made by the Inflation Reduction Act." On his assembly member website he asserts that "Addressing climate change is the civil rights issue of our generation" and calls for action.100Evan Low has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.evanlowforcongress.com/priorities https://a26.asmdc.org/press-releases/20150912-assemblymember-low-expresses-support-legislation-combat-climate-changeSupports Roe
Loyd, JoshuaIllinois13RJoshua Loyd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign website states "Our nation must protect and ensure the longevity of the natural environment and its resources, and Joshua Loyd will work to enforce this." Loyd also says he is not opposed to resource extraction, but wants to prevent the pollution that could come from that. However, Loyd fails to take a position on climate change and what action might be needed to ensure the longevity of the environment.25Joshua Loyd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://loydforcongress.com/issues https://www.sj-r.com/story/news/politics/elections/congressional/2024/02/07/who-is-joshua-loyd-virden-man-runs-for-congressional-district-13-seat/72357339007/Opposes Roe
Lubin, RobNew York2DRob Lubin understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Lubin said "Long Island has a right to breathable air and a livable future [...] the consequences of global warming are here." In another Tweet, Lubin urged "Invest in our children’s futures by putting money behind climate resiliency now."75Rob Lubin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://roblubinforcongress.com/ https://x.com/RobLubinforNY/status/1736877710134083672 https://x.com/RobLubinforNY/status/1666517300508237843Supports Roe
Lynch, MichaelMichigan2DMichael Lynch does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he lists climate change as a factor in an economic crisis facing the agricultural industry, shows concern for pollution, and advocates for renewable energy, Lynch fails to take a stance on whether or not climate change is driven by burning fossil fuels.25Michael Lynch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://electmichaellynch.com/#issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Lyrely, KristinWisconsin8DKristin Lyerly does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Kristin Lyerly has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kristinforwisconsin.com/our-values/Supports Roe
MacEwan, DrewWashington6RDrew MacEwan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Drew MacEwan makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release MacEwan criticized attempts to create a carbon tax in Washington state.021.25https://drewmacewen.src.wastateleg.org/sen-macewen-calls-committee-chair-hear-2117/ https://crosscut.com/politics/2024/07/competitive-field-open-us-house-seat-was-6th-district https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/2-democrats-1-republican-face-off-in-competitive-wa-6th-district-race/Unclear Position on Roe
Mackenzie, RyanPennsylvania7RRyan MacKenzie disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he criticizes plans that "prioritize a radical climate agenda," and when asked if the climate is changing said "the science is all over the place." 0Ryan Mackenzie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, Mackenzie voices opposition to "cap-and-tax schemes" calling them a part of a radical climate agenda.00https://armchairlehighvalley.substack.com/p/ryan-mackenzie-touts-his-conservative https://www.mackenzieforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Maher, MichaelCalifornia21RMichael Maher does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In Tweet he stated that "We must seek diplomatic solutions for peaceful resolutions and lower the global temperature" but fails to take a stance on whether or not climate change is human-made and driven by burning fossil fuels. In an article he wrote for GV Wire, he stated that "Regardless of one’s beliefs about climate change, its effects [...] are undeniable" but again fails to take a position on whether or not it is human-made and driven by fossil fuels.25Michael Maher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.michaelmaher.com/ https://twitter.com/Maher4Congress/status/1757983176788779137 https://gvwire.com/2023/08/29/maui-climate-massacre-was-the-result-of-low-energy-leadership/?amp=1Unclear Position on Roe
Mann, BethanyMissouri3DBrittany Mann understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Mann states "Climate change will impact Missouri’s farmland significantly. We must protect against this environmental threat [...] We should adopt green initiatives that foster energy efficiency and reduce waste, which will not only create jobs but also save taxpayer dollars."100Brittany Mann has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://bethanymannforcongress.com/platform/Supports Roe
Mannion, JohnNew York22DJohn Mannion understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Speaking with In Focus, he spoke of the impact of climate change on extreme weather in New York and how it can be mitigated. This concern was reiterated in a Tweet by Mannion where he said that "We also discussed the need to address other water and flooding issues like climate change, extreme weather, and pollution issues."75John Mannion has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.mannionforny.com/ https://spectruminfocus.com/section/in-focus/in-focus/2024/01/28/efforts-in-new-york-to-combat-climate-change--extreme-weather https://twitter.com/SenJohnMannion/status/1751994540209111205Supports Roe
Manuel, MelLouisiana1DMel Manuel understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, they address Senator Kennedy saying "Get this straight, John: No matter how much it costs to combat climate change, we still have to do it."75Mel Manuel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.mel4louisiana.com/why https://twitter.com/Mel4Louisiana/status/1654821789778825216Supports Roe
Marecki, AnthonyNew York26RAnthony Marecki does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels25Anthony Marecki has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Anthony_MareckiUnclear Position on Roe
Marlinga, CarlMichigan10DCarl Marlinga understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a questionnaire, Marlinga listed fighting climate change as a top 3 priority, promising he will "propose legislation mandating increased research, development and utilization of renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, geothermal and tidal power." Responding to an endorsement from the Michigan LCV, Marlinga said "Saving the environment is a moral obligation that we owe to ourselves but more importantly to our children and our grandchildren."100Carl Marlinga has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.lcv.org/media-center/haley-stevens-carl-marlinga-and-shri-thanedar-earn-lcv-action-fund-endorsements-to-fight-for-michigan-communities-in-congress/ https://wdet.org/2024/07/29/michigan-primary-2024-voter-guide-10th-congressional-district/Supports Roe
Marshall, DerekCalifornia23DDerek Marshall understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, a page is dedicated to his climate action plan where he recognizes "this era of rapid climate change" and calls for a climate Marshall Plan. He lays out numerous detailed strategies for eliminating carbon emissions, switching to green energy, and taking other impactful climate action steps.100Derek Marshall publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, he promises to work on creating mandatory carbon fees while in Congress. 100100https://www.derekmarshallca.com/issues?id=904765e2-67b9-4ada-8313-f36007b5d330 https://www.derekmarshallca.com/issues?id=fc1ef3a8-de94-464b-9950-c217954a8b34Supports Roe
Marshall, ErinKentucky1DErin Marshall understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with Progress Kentucky, Marshall said "it's obvious that the climate is changing and it's going to have really far-reaching consequences, for not only us but really our children [...] we have to continue to investigate ways to to make a difference and make a change, and I don't know, I I think it's obvious we haven't done enough."75Erin Marshall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/news/2024/03/20/democrat-challenging-rep--james-comer-says-abortion-ban-inspired-her-to-run https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI_tu8YwVEgSupports Roe
Marter, JimIllinois14RJim Marter disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, Marter stated that "There is not specific, concrete evidence that human activity has a significant impact on the “theory of man-made climate change”, while in contrast there is direct evidence implicating those responsible for promoting that theory of fabrication and falsification of data and evidence to support their claims. There is much evidence to support that climate change occurs naturally and has been for ages, from one ice-age to another, via a multitude of factors."0Jim Marter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://marter4congress.us/issues/ https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/1/22/21062693/james-marter-congress-14th-district-democratic-primary-candidate-2020-election-house-repOpposes Roe
Martinez, DanielCalifornia31RDaniel Martinez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign website states that "If we want a reduction in Greenhouse gases [...] we need a long term plan towards energy independence." He continues by discussing both green energy and fossil fuels, recognizing certain energy sources are cleaner than others, but falls short of recognizing the climate crisis as being human-made.25Daniel Martinez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Daniel_Martinez https://twitter.com/Dan4CA31/status/1777548499430896086Opposes Roe
Massey, MichaelConnecticut3RMichael Massey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Michael Massey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLxfDzFaDu4 https://www.masseyforcongress.com/index.php/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Matveyuk, SergeiColorado7RSergei Matveyuk does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Sergei Matveyuk has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sergeiforcongress.com/aboutUnclear Position on Roe
May, PamMissouri6DPam May understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, May says "We spend unimaginable amounts of money dealing with the effects of climate change. Images of people trying to cope with weather extremes are seen regularly on nightly news broadcasts. We cannot continue to ignore the signs of our changing planet. I’m committed to working together for sustainable and obtainable solutions."75Pam May has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.pammay4congress.com/opportunities-for-missouri-1Supports Roe
Mayfield, DariusNew Jersey12RDarius Mayfield does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Darius Mayfield has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/dariusmayfieldforamerica/photos/a.110264104384048/116818383728620/?type=3Opposes Roe
McBride, SarahDelaware1DSarah McBride understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, McBride said "Climate change poses an urgent threat to both our planet and our home, Delaware, the nation’s lowest-lying state. President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act was the single largest investment in green infrastructure and the most profound attempt to rescue our climate in history. Building on that progress must be a top priority for Delaware’s sole member of Congress."100Sarah McBride has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.sarahmcbride.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
McCallion, RandiMissouri8DRandi McCallian understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet endorsing Andrew Romanoff, she commended him for focusing on the most pressing issues we face, including climate change.75Randi McCallian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.randimccallian.com/mo-8-priorities https://x.com/RandiMcCallian/status/1264305923096317953Supports Roe
McClain-Delaney, AprilMaryland6DApril McClain-Delaney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states "April believes climate change poses an existential threat to our planet’s future. The climate crisis is a threat to national security, our economic prosperity, the world’s species and our environmental stability. The Inflation Reduction Act was transformative – it needs to be protected – but more needs to be done."100April McClain-Delaney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it implored Congress to enact carbon pricing, and promises "In Congress, April will both work for a low carbon future and be an unwavering champion for protecting our natural world, including by protecting the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts."100100https://www.aprilmcclaindelaneyforcongress.com/on-the-issues/Supports Roe
McDermott, GeorgeMaryland4RGeorge McDermott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the Capital Gazette, "McDermott said he fears the United States has reached the point of no return with climate change. “If we don’t do something very, very soon, we are going to be in a climate crisis we cannot recover from.” The actions listed in the Green New Deal are a start, he said. He said he worries his grandchildren won’t experience the same world he did in the ’50s and ’60s and hopes something can be done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and eliminate the need for fossil fuels."100George McDermott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/04/11/george-mcdermott/ https://www.capitalgazette.com/2020/10/17/marylands-4th-district-george-mcdermott-runs-again-for-sixth-time-challenges-rep-anthony-brown/Supports Roe
McDonald Rivet, KristenMichigan8DKristen McDonald Rivet understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Speaking of climate action bills she sponsored, Rivet said "When we’re thoughtful, we can tackle climate change and boost our economy at the same time. These bills give Michigan businesses, agribusinesses, and local governments an optional tool to develop property in ways that benefit the environment and their bottom lines. These commonsense policies are examples of how wins for our environment and economy can overlap.” 75Kristen McDonald Rivet has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://senatedems.com/mcdonaldrivet/2023/06/29/pro-environment/ https://x.com/McdonaldRivet/status/1820499912880013341Supports Roe
McDonough, MelissaTexas38DMelissa McDonough does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Melissa McDonough has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://melissaforcongress.com/platform/Supports Roe
McDowell, AddisonNorth Carolina6RAddison McDowell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Addison McDowell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mcdowellfornc.com/issuesOpposes Roe
McGovern, JayFlorida5DJay McGovern does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a response to the Ballotpedia survey, he stated "We need to be better stewards of our environment." However, he failed to take a clear stance on whether or not climate change is human-made and driven by fossil fuels, stating in a floridapolitics.com questionnaire, "Regardless of its cause, the climate is changing. Our government, through its representatives, needs to responsibly deal with the measurable changes in our climate and better protect our citizens and environment from disasters like the increasingly impactful hurricanes and flooding we’ve seen in Jacksonville in recent years."25Jay McGovern has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jaymcgovern.com/our-focus https://floridapolitics.com/archives/352584-meet-jay-mcgovern-a-democrat-running-for-house-district-15/ https://ballotpedia.org/Jay_McGovernSupports Roe
McGraw, JoeIllinois17RJoe McGraw does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Joe McGraw has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://judgejoeforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
McGuire, JohnVirginia5RJohn McGuire has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.25John McGuire has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://wset.com/news/local/q-a-abc13s-mark-spain-interviews-5th-district-republican-candidate-john-mcguire-virginia-may-2024Opposes Roe
Meadows, SamanthaOhio2DSamantha Meadows does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with demcastusa.com, Meadows said "I strongly believe that we need to improve our community’s involvement and understanding of climate and environmental issues." However, Meadows fails to establish a definitive position on climate change.25Samantha Meadows has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/SMeadows4OH2/status/1766286867870122270 https://demcastusa.com/2022/06/23/meet-the-candidate-samantha-meadows-oh/Supports Roe
Mehta, LeslieVirginia1DLeslie Mehta understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she lists addressing climate action head-on as a priority.75Leslie Mehta has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://lesliemehta.com/Supports Roe
Melton, RyanIowa4DRyan Melton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Melton states "Climate change is threatening our very livelihoods in the district [...] We need to prioritize a move towards clean, renewable energy sources. We need to listen to the science and to our experts, and there is a clear consensus among them that we are running out of time to address climate change. It is an existential threat."100Ryan Melton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has been critical of carbon capture and sequestration, considering it to not be helpful in the fight against climate change and only benefiting corporations, but has failed to back a carbon fee,5092.5https://www.meltonforiowa.com/the-issues https://www.meltonforiowa.com/campaign-vision https://www.iowapublicradio.org/political-news/2022-08-16/democratic-congressional-candidate-ryan-melton-pushes-for-quality-of-life-investmentsSupports Roe
Mercuri, RobPennsylvania17RRob Mercuri does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has criticized climate action taken by the Biden administration as "out of touch & disastrous", but doesn't take a clear position on climate change.25Rob Mercuri makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon.I encourage Gov. In a press release responding to Josh Shapiro's proposed energy plan, Mercuri stated "I encourage Gov. Shapiro to release the throttle by ending the appeals and litigation related to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and canceling his plans for a new carbon tax."021.25https://www.reprobmercuri.com/News/33818/Latest-News/--RGGI-by-Another-Name-Mercuri-Opposes-Shapiro-Energy-Plan- https://x.com/mercuri4pa/status/1737156459694063709 https://www.newsweek.com/republican-scrubs-anti-abortion-comments-campaign-website-1820377Opposes Roe
Merrin, DerekOhio9RDerek Merrin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Derek Merrin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.notus.org/2024-election/mike-johnson-derek-merrin https://www.derekmerrin.com/Opposes Roe
Messmer, MarkIndiana8RMark Messmer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although Messmer has a history of refusing to take climate action, he has taken no clear stances on whether climate change is real.25Mark Messmer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.markmessmer.com/issues/ https://www.jconline.com/story/news/2022/01/27/lafayette-confront-climate-crisis-disappointed-bill-dies/9226037002/Opposes Roe
Miller, AdamOhio15DAdam Miller understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Respond to vote411's voter guide, Miller said "Climate change is a national security issue. And combatting it is not a zero-sum game [...] we can lead and make [green energy] here, putting Americans to work building the future. This requires investment in people, technology, and education."75Adam Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Adam_Miller_(Ohio) https://onyourballot.vote411.org/m/candidate-index.do?c=30510002#c65168819Supports Roe
Miller, BlaneMaryland1DBlane Miller understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Miller states "Global warming is a topic that stirs enthusiastic discussions. On one hand, there is a sense of urgency—our planet is undeniably warming, and its consequences are far-reaching." He then encourages a moderate approach saying "Some argue that the severity of global warming may not be as dire as portrayed. They question the effectiveness of certain policies and emphasize economic stability. Balancing these perspectives is crucial. [...] Collaboration, rather than alienation, will lead us toward a more resilient and prosperous future."75Blane Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.miller4maryland.com/blane-on-issuesSupports Roe
Min, DaveCalifornia47DDave Min understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "The science is clear: we are facing tectonic changes to our basic way of life unless we begin to aggressively reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and turn the tide on carbon emissions, and the longer we wait, the more terrifying the consequences." He continues on to call for "urgency and smart policy", addressing the climate change everywhere possible.100Dave Min has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://davemin.com/issuesSupports Roe
Mitchell, KenVirginia6RKen Mitchell understands the importance of climate action. On his campaign website, Mitchell states "Climate change is real; the need is urgent." On his website he talks about climate action that should be taken and how to make the agricultural industry more green.75Ken Mitchell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://augustafreepress.com/news/ken-mitchell-is-the-kind-of-democrat-who-can-win-in-our-part-of-virginia/ https://www.kenmitchellforvirginia.com/issuesSupports Roe
Mohan, RajeshNew Jersey3RMohan Rajesh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mohan Rajesh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Rajesh_MohanUnclear Position on Roe
Moher, BillVirginia4RBill Moher does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Bill Moher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.billmoherforcongress.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Montague, WillieFlorida10RWillie Montague disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 0Willie Montague has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.teamwillie.com/ https://twitter.com/WillieJMontague/status/1839638356709318794Opposes Roe
Moore, MichaelSouth Carolina1DMichael Moore understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Moore says "The threat posed by climate change is real, and we must take decisive action to protect our flourishing coastal communities from environmental disaster." Speaking with the Citizens' Climate Lobby, Moore referred to climate change as an existential crisis, and asserted "We need these issues to be a cultural phenomenon. People of both parties have to recognize this is something we have to do.”100Michael Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.michaelbmoore.com/issues https://yourislandnews.com/deford-moore-talk-about-climate-energy/Supports Roe
Moore, RileyWest Virginia2RRiley Moore disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Moore said “The climate has been changing in the world since Earth was created,” adding “Whether these greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to the warming of the globe, I’m not sure I necessarily agree with that."0Riley Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.mooreforwv.com/issues https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/05/climate/republican-treasurers-climate-change.htmlOpposes Roe
Moore, TimNorth Carolina14RTim Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tim Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.carolinajournal.com/berger-moore-pledge-to-enforce-n-c-abortion-laws-blocked-by-roe-casey/Opposes Roe
Morrison, KellyMinnesota3DFLKelly Morrison understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Morrison's campaign website states "Kelly also believes that as we see more wildfires, floods and other extreme weather [...] we need to take swift action to tackle climate change and plan mitigation strategies. This will not only help avert catastrophic warming and protect our environment – it will also create good, clean energy jobs." 100Kelly Morrison publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Morrison has frequently stressed the importance of reducing carbon emissions, and is listed as a supporter of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act.100100https://www.kellyforcongress.org/priorities https://energyinnovationact.org/all-supporters/Supports Roe
Morse, AndreaNew York11DAndrea Morse understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she talks about how climate change has created the necessity to invest in infrastructure such as sea walls.75Andrea Morse has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.andreamorseforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Morse, JessicaCalifornia3DJessica Morse understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She has Tweeted frequently about her stance on climate change and the threats it poses for California, such as in a Tweet stating "Together, we are going to fight climate change, defend clean air and water, and create healthier communities for all."75Jessica Morse has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/search?q=%40Morse4America%20climate&src=typed_query https://x.com/Morse4America/status/1785330308075942174 https://morseforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Mundy, KeithOhio5DKeith Mundy understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states "Keith Mundy’s dedication to making a difference is our only chance to save us.The effects of climate change are already here and we're seeing them across the state. But it's not just in Ohio. There is no Planet B. So today we all need to do our part to commit to fighting to protect our environment for future generations. [...] We must ensure climate change is front and center."100Keith Mundy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.keithmundyforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Munn, JohnCalifornia4RJohn Munn disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign page, he poses "Is climate changing? This is actually a simple question, since it always has" before saying that we can't yet know if the climate is truly changing or not, and whether or not it's man-made. He then goes on to question the role of carbon dioxide in increasing greenhouse gasses. 0John Munn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 507.5https://ballotpedia.org/John_Munn https://munnforcongress.com/Opposes Roe
Navarro, JesusFlorida24RJesus Navarro does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Jesus Navarro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/election/article268290522.htmlOpposes Roe
Nez, JonathanArizona2DJonathan Nez understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a testimony to House of Representatives while he was President of the Navajo Nation, he stated that "climate change is real and the effects from climate change are directly impacting our way of life as Navajo people" as well as delving into its impacts on air quality, water access, and land rights for the Navajo Nation. Addressing a legal challenge to a revised federal rule which undercut the Clean Water Act, he also stated "At this point in time, with climate change occurring around the world, it’s more prudent than ever to protect our land, water and air."75Jonathan Nez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF00/20200708/110874/HHRG-116-IF00-Wstate-NezJ-20200708.pdf https://apnews.com/general-news-7b39b239131b446dadd29d58de4d185b https://watch.myarkansaspbs.org/video/texas-immigration-case-jonathan-nez-assisted-living-new-law-v6wcy3/Supports Roe
Niemeyer, RandyIndiana1RRandy Niemeyer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Randy Niemeyer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/04/21/three-republicans-vying-for-chance-to-unseat-mrvan/Opposes Roe
Nouri, PrestonPennsylvania16DPreston Nouri does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Preston Nouri has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.prestonforpa.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Olsen, ErikWisconsin2RErik Olsen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Erik Olsen has no known, or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon fee. 5028.75https://olsenforliberty.com/Opposes Roe
Olszewski, JohnnyMaryland2DJohnny Olszewski understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "From combating climate change to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay, protecting our environment is one of the most important issues that we face. Congress must act with urgency to address the climate crisis and invest in the green energy economy of the future." He promises to take bold, science-based actions to combat climate change and reduce carbon emissions. 100Johnny Olszewski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Olszewski has been a vocal supporter of attempts to go carbon neutral, he has not embraced a fee on carbon.5092.5https://gojohnnyo.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Onder, BobMissouri3RBob Onder disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Facebook post, he dismissed record heat waves driven by climate change as it just being the summer.0Bob Onder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1032214878461215&set=a.418257813190261&type=3 https://www.senate.mo.gov/19web/statement-from-sen-bob-onder-regarding-the-introduction-of-pro-life-legislation-on-the-anniversary-of-roe-v-wade/Opposes Roe
Pan, DavidCalifornia46RDavid Pan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a response to The Orange Register, Pan stated that he supports removing climate-oriented subsidies and policies that burden the economy. Instead, he proposed "support cap and trade policies that would create demonstrable progress toward climate goals" but fails to define what climate goals are and what challenges the climate is facing. 25David Pan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ocregister.com/2024/01/20/david-pan-ca-46-candidate-2024-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Parrott, NeilMaryland6RNeil Parrott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he opposes some existing climate action stating "we continue to impose more environmental restrictions that send our manufacturing jobs to places like China [...] These laws are not helping the environment, but instead, are transferring our wealth and jobs to other countries." Despite these comments, Parrott fails to take a position on whether or not climate change is real and human-made.25Neil Parrott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.neilparrott.org/issues https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/04/11/neil-c-parrott/Opposes Roe
Peck, TimIndiana9DTim Peck does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tim Peck has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://timpeckforcongress.com/beliefs-%26-valuesSupports Roe
Penelope Yee, RoseCalifornia1DRose Penelope Yee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Medium post, she states that we "face an existential threat from climate change" and promises to "advocate for legislation that will serve to jump start a green economy that curbs fossil fuel use, seeking to halt the existential threat of climate change to humanity."100Rose Penelope Yee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://medium.com/rose-penelope-yee/my-case-for-wethechange-ba3daa51ed5a https://roseforcongress.com/ https://democratsofshastacounty.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/DCCSC-Candidate-Forum-May-2022-report.pdfSupports Roe
Peters, JohnMinnesota7DFLJohn Peters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with the Minnesota Bio-Fuels Association, Peters said "Given that climate change is the premier issue for future generations, it is important to understand the total impact of any fuel on the environment." During his campaign for state senate, he stated "Climate Change is real and it affects the livelihood of our rural communities. As your Senator, I will work to mitigate climate change and prepare our communities for the future."100John Peters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.ajpetersforcongress.org/ https://twitter.com/ajohnpeters/status/1299094585189322758 https://mnbiofuels.org/media-mba/blog/item/2902-candidates-biofuels-a-john-peters-julie-rosenUnclear Position on Roe
Peterson, KayleeIdaho1DKaylee Peterson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She has Tweeted several times criticizing incumbent Representative Fulcher for being a climate change denier, as well as promising to sign her name to legislation combatting climate change. 75Kaylee Peterson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://kayleeforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/search?q=%40kaylee4congress%20climate&src=typed_query&f=topSupports Roe
Piccinini, KatherineCalifornia10RKatherine Piccinini disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a post on her campaign website, she states that "Climate change and Ukraine are hoaxes and money laundering schemes – CHILDRENS FREEDOM IS WASTED ON THOSE 2 LIES." 0Katherine Piccinini has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://piccinini4congress.com/from-the-desk-of-k-p https://piccinini4congress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Pickard, RonaldUnited States Virgin Islands1RRonald Pickard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Ronald Pickard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Ronald_PickardUnclear Position on Roe
Pickett, DeborahIndiana5DDeborah Pickett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Deborah Pickett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wishtv.com/news/election/pickett-concern-over-loss-of-rights-prompted-me-to-run/ https://pickettforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Pierce, FrankNorth Carolina13DFrank Pierce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Franklin Pierce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.frankpierce4congress.com/platform/8/Supports Roe
Prempeh, BillyNew Jersey9RBilly Prempeh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Billy Prempeh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://twitter.com/BillyPrempeh/status/1581726953643864064Opposes Roe
Prescott, RussellNew Hampshire1RRussell Prescott does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Russell Prescott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/21396/russell-prescottOpposes Roe
Pridgen, MarlandoNorth Carolina7DMarlando Pridgen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although Pridgen speaks at length about reducing pollution and improving water, soil, and air quality, he fails to take a decisive position on climate change.25Marlando Pridgen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75http://pridgenforcongress.com/platform/Unclear Position on Roe
Propst, EdNorthern Mariana Islands1DEd Propst understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Propst says "Our islands are on the frontlines of the climate crisis, and rebuilding our lives from disaster is not cheap. I will push for more waivers on local matching and BABA requirements for programs across the federal family that mitigate climate and disaster impacts and strengthen the CNMI’s resilience against future storms."100Ed Propst has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.edpropst.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Raitport, MenachemNew York9RMenachem Raitport does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Menachem Raitport has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Menachem_RaitportUnclear Position on Roe
Ramos, AshleyIllinois2RAshley Ramos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Ramos' campaign page, it states "We need to all care about being good stewards of the environment and taking care of the natural world around us [...] we have to be addressing this continually to keep the safety of the life on our earth a priority." However, Ramos consistently fails to mention or take a stance on human-made climate change and the planet's rising temperatures.25Ashley Ramos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.electashleyramos.com/policy-positions https://ballotpedia.org/Ashley_RamosOpposes Roe
Randall, EmilyWashington6DEmily Randall understands the importnace of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, a page named 'Fighting Climate Change' states "We must make a just and fair transition away from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy jobs and infrastructure [...] I am committed to building an economy that is sustainable, and that protects those among us most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. We must focus on renewable energy, and climate-neutral industry that protects not only today’s economy, but the ability for our grandchildren to live and work as well."100Emily Randall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://electemilyrandall.com/issues/abortion/ https://electemilyrandall.com/issues/fighting-climate-change/Supports Roe
Rapoport, AlanOhio11RAlan Rapoport disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he criticizes the EPA accusing it of attempting to enforce a "climate agenda" with no credible connection to climate, referring to it as "administrative tyranny of the worst kind." On his website Rapoport also criticizes the "irrational war against fossil fuel" and calls for a free market all-of-the-above approach.0Alan Rapoport has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://rapoport4congress.com/issues.htmlOpposes Roe
Raybon, CraigMississippi4DCraig Raybon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Craig Raybon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Craig_RaybonUnclear Position on Roe
Recile, RudyCalifornia8RRudy Recile does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Rudy Recile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Rudy_Recile https://rudyforuscongress.com/index.php/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Reddy, PrasanthKansas3RPrasanth Reddy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Prasanth Reddy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://reddyforkansas.com/Opposes Roe
Reed, ChrisWest Virginia1DChris Reed does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Chris Reed has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Chris_Reed_(West_Virginia)Unclear Position on Roe
Rey, JuanCalifornia37N/AJuan Rey 25Juan Rey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Juan_ReyUnclear Position on Roe
Rice, MarkIllinois8RMark Rice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mark Rice has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/mark-rice https://rice4congress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Riley, CherylMaryland8RCheryl Riley disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Riley called climate activists "LUNATIC Activists, desperate to push the absolute false climate hoax narrative so elites can make $$$$ and gain control." In another Tweet, she referred to "Ukraine, the rona, fake climate change, the open borders" as tragedies created by globalists in order to remain in power. 0Cheryl Riley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/04/11/cheryl-riley/ https://twitter.com/Cheryl4moco/status/1702842017447866387 https://twitter.com/Cheryl4moco/status/1711125572208742833Opposes Roe
Riley, JoshNew York19DJosh Riley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he says "We are facing existential threats to our environment. They require bold action." He then lists policies he would support in Congress such as ending the use of fossil fuels, and empowering the EPA to fight climate change. In a Tweet, Riley refers to climate change as "a real and present danger" requiring urgent action, responding to incumbent Representative Molinaro claiming it is too soon to talk about climate change.100Josh Riley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/JoshRileyUE/status/1672625376277987328 https://joshrileyforcongress.com/policy-positions/Supports Roe
Rivas, LuzCalifornia29DLuz Rivas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She has frequently made public statements about the climate crisis and taken actions to address it as an assemblymember. In response to Governor Newsom signing a bill she wrote, she Tweeted "Climate change education will now be a K-12 requirement in California. We will educate and give our next generation the tools to shape their futures in the wake of our current climate crisis." In another Tweet Rivas promised "In Congress, I will continue to be a champion for bold climate policies."100Luz Rivas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/LuzRivas/status/1711161905338064942 https://www.politico.com/newsletters/california-climate/2023/09/22/three-questions-for-assemblymember-luz-rivas-00117769 https://twitter.com/LuzRivas/status/1748375976323785122 https://twitter.com/LuzRivas/status/1745115167778889845Supports Roe
Roberts, BrianIllinois12DBrian Roberts does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Brian Roberts has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Brian_RobertsUnclear Position on Roe
Robertson, MarkNevada1RMark Robertson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change, he stated that it's always been happening over millions of years. Although Robertson said we should take care of the planet and avoid polluting it, he has criticized climate action such as the Green New Deal saying it is more to do with "controlling people than it is about controlling the climate."0Mark Robertson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://robertsonforcongress.com/ https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/on-the-record-republican-congressional-district-1-candidate-mark-robertsonOpposes Roe
Robinson, DavidSouth Carolina2DDavid Robinson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a video posted to his campaign YouTube channel, Robinson states that "Climate change is a fact [...] our scientists raised an alarm a long time ago, we see things happening right now, here in South Carolina." On his campaign website, Robinson lists "Enhance climate change initiatives" as a position he stands for.75David Robinson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://davidrobinsonforcongress.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjSzPzDosysSupports Roe
Rochford, RobertFlorida14RRobert Rochford does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Robert Rochford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://onyourballot.vote411.org/race-detail.do?id=3851071&party=RepOpposes Roe
Rogers, TimWisconsin4RTim Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tim Rogers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.rogersforwisconsin.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Rollins, WillCalifornia41DWill Rollins understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states "climate change is an existential threat that is already damaging our health, communities, and economy [...] I support taking bold and decisive action on climate change." He continues to lay out a clean energy agenda and discuss the possibilities of green economy jobs.100Will Rollins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://willrollinsforcongress.com/on-the-issues/Supports Roe
Roth, DavidIdaho2DDavid Roth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Roth said "We should all be fighting like hell for the future of our planet. I have two boys, & I know that acting to preserve our climate NOW will have a real impact on their futures." In another, he promises to fight for the climate. 100David Roth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://rothforidaho.org/mike-simpson-bragged-about-supporting-an-ivf-ban/ https://x.com/rothforIdaho/status/1567948158201643008 https://x.com/rothforIdaho/status/1564619701107441671Supports Roe
Ruby, DanOregon2DDan Ruby understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview, Ruby called climate change "the defining science issue of our lifetime" and proposed a statewide climate change education curriculum. In another interview with COIN Oregon, Ruby called for multinational, global action to combat climate change.100Dan Ruby has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ruby4or.com/ https://ashland.news/ashland-school-board-candidates-mostly-in-agreement-on-the-issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofAI6nv5d64Supports Roe
Rudow, CalebNorth Carolina11DCaleb Rudow does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he does talk about environmental conservation and promotes net zero carbon emissions by 2050, the development of clean domestic energy, and other climate action. Despite this, Rudow fails to go beyond listing policies he'd support and take a clear stance on climate change.25Caleb Rudow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://wcti12.com/news/nation-world/with-new-veto-proof-majority-republicans-introduce-bill-banning-most-abortions-in-north-carolina-house-bill-533 https://www.rudowforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Russell, Ronald C.Maine1RRonald C. Russel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Ronald C. Russel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Ronald_Russell_(Maine_congressional_candidate)Unclear Position on Roe
Sadwick, GreggNew York25RGregg Sadwick does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he criticized the Inflation Reduction Act, claiming "it pushed the "Green Agenda'", Sadwick fails to take a definitive stance on climate change.25Gregg Sadwick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://sadwickforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Salas, RudyCalifornia22DRudy Salas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in Yahoo News, Salas has called out his opponent for voting against the Inflation Reduction Act, a Biden Administration legislative initiative that invested $369 billion in clean energy, accelerating the transition to renewable energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and incentivizing the adoption of electric vehicles and energy-efficient technologies.25Rudy Salas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rudysalas.com/priorities https://www.yahoo.com/news/swing-central-valley-congressional-district-100030335.htmlSupports Roe
Salerno, JoeNew Jersey2DJoe Salerno does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Joe Salerno has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://joesalernoforcongress.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Salvesen, JohnGeorgia5RJohn Salvesen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Salvesen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.bongoforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Schaffner, KatrinaArizona5DKatrina Schaffner understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states that "The climate crisis, economy, and healthcare system go hand in hand" and calls for action to protect air and water quality while holding Big Oil accountable for "price gouging while wrecking havoc on the planet."75Katrina Schaffner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.katrinaforarizona.com/issues/Supports Roe
Schmidt, DerekKansas2RDerek Schmidt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Derek Schmidt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-abortion-presidential-legislature-cd8d1d6f24da4612b7faeb325a4611bfOpposes Roe
Schmitz, JohnIndiana7RJohn Schmitz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Schmitz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/schmitz4Indiana/Unclear Position on Roe
Schneider, JanFlorida16DJan Schneider understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states "Jan Schneider is convinced that climate change is a global emergency largely driven by human activities. The United States and other countries must accelerate transitions away from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy sources. We can help save the planet by building a thriving, clean energy economy for present and future generations."100Jan Schneider has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://votejan.com/environment/climate-change/ https://votejan.com/reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Schultz, JenniferMinnesota8DFLJennifer Schultz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Schultz states "Global climate change is affecting every part of the world, including Minnesota. [...] The science is clear: these issues will get worse unless we take urgent action. I see an amazing opportunity for Northern Minnesota to be at the forefront of addressing climate change." In a Tweet, Schultz criticized state legislature republicans after a vote on recognizing the climate crisis, saying "Republicans vote against amendment that declares climate change is real. Is science not real either?"100Jennifer Schultz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.jenschultzforcongress.com/priorities https://twitter.com/RepJenSchultz/status/591062816494374912Supports Roe
Scott Jr., RalphNorth Carolina10DRalph Scott Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Ralph Scott Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Ralph_Scott_Jr.Unclear Position on Roe
Serpa, DavidCalifornia39RDavid Serpa does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25David Serpa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://davidserpaforcongress.com/faqsSupports Roe
Sessler, JerrodWashington4RJerrod Sessler disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Sessler posted to his Facebook a nearly 50 minute long video titled "Dismantling the Climate Change Hoax", saying "Does the climate change? Sure, there is a natural cycle that is likely 150-400 years and may not be consistent [...] But the idea that humans have any significant or even measurable effect on climate change is complete hogwash."0Jerrod Sessler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.facebook.com/jerrod4congress/videos/dismantling-the-climate-change-hoax/336079846052627/ https://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/government/elections/central-wa-congressional-candidates-align-with-national-party-platforms-on-abortion/article_4e107e8c-4eca-11ef-920e-7b3280dfbd0b.htmlOpposes Roe
Shah, AmishArizona1DAmish Shah understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a debate, Shah listed fighting climate change among the things that are the most important to him.75Amish Shah has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_jEjqWV4fM https://x.com/DrAmishShah/status/1749477685447758152Supports Roe
Shreve, JeffersonIndiana6RJefferson Shreve does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Jefferson Shreve has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://shreveforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Silva, TomCalifornia7RTom Silva does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When questioned in an interview about what steps Congress should take to address the climate crisis, he responded encouraging Congress to hold other countries, such as China and India, accountable for their emissions, rather than stating what American policy should be. 25Tom Silva has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284828651.html https://www.silvaforcongress.com/aboutOpposes Roe
Simon, LateefahCalifornia12DLateefah Simon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet accepting the endorsement of several climate action organizatinos, she stated that "The climate crisis is the single biggest threat to our existence. I'm ready to fight for policies that protect the environment so our children and grandchildren inherit a better planet." In a Facebook post, she later added that "We need leaders in Congress that will not sacrifice our people and planet for their own profit."100Lateefah Simon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://twitter.com/lateefahsimon/status/1716896622440026295 https://twitter.com/lateefahsimon/status/1760087065595625795 https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=787905869820291&set=a.153456486598569&type=3Supports Roe
Sitka, JohnVirginia3RJohn Sitka agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website he recognizes the environment threats it poses to Virginia, such as coastal flooding and harsh nor'easters, and calls for the further development of nuclear energy in the state.50John Sitka has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://sitkaforcongress.com/on-the-issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Smiley, HeatherMichigan6RHeather Smiley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Heather Smiley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Heather_SmileyUnclear Position on Roe
Smith, QuacyArizona9DQuacy Smith understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states that "He emphasizes international collaboration to address global environmental challenges and advocates for well-crafted regulations to address environmental concerns", recognizing the role of traditional energy source in climate change while supporting a "gradual and realistic" transition to clean energy.75Quacy Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://quacysmithforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Smith, SeanMissouri5RSean Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Sean Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a. U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Sean_Smith_(Missouri)Unclear Position on Roe
Somberg, NickMichigan11RNick Somberg disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, Somberg says "I believe that the climate has always and will always change. While recognizing the importance of environmental stewardship, I do not believe that stifling industry or giving the government more money will significantly alter our climate. There is a clear distinction between alarmism and genuine concern for pollution."0Nick Somberg has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://picknickforcongress.us/issues/Opposes Roe
Sonza, OrlandoOhio1ROrlando Sonza does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Orlando Sonza has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://heartlandsignal.com/2024/03/13/ohio-gop-congressional-candidate-walks-back-anti-abortion-stance-partially-due-to-issue-1s-success/Opposes Roe
Srivastava, SandeepTexas3DSandeep Srivastava understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he says "We need leadership willing to talk about tough topics, such as climate change, while looking ahead to the opportunities that come with solving the crisis [...] the frequency with which we are seeing severe, billion-dollar environmental disasters is increasing in frequency." Srivastava warns "The threat of catastrophic climate change is real" but points out the economic opportunity combatting it will bring.100Sandeep Srivastava has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://sandeepforcongress.com/issues.aspxSupports Roe
St Mosley, ClintonMichigan9DClinton St Mosley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Clinton St Mosley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/Clint4CongressUnclear Position on Roe
Stamper, KatyGeorgia11DKaty Stamper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. (EXAMPLES). 25Katy Stamper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://katylstamper.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Steele, DaynaTexas36DDayna Steele understands the imoprtance of climate action as a top priority issue. Recognizing it may be too late to prevent catastrophic climate change, Steele said "I refuse to give up, we can at least try to save what we can. We owe it to them.​ I don’t give up that easily." 100Dayna Steele has no known or an inconsistent opsition on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ballotpedia.org/Dayna_Steele https://jeffpearlman.com/2018/03/08/dayna-steele/Supports Roe
Steinberger, RobertMaryland3RRobert Steinberger understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he stated "We are stewards of our environment for our children and generations beyond. We are keenly aware of this here in the Chesapeake Bay area and understand how easily actions in other areas can affect the state of the bay. Environmental policies can be good for our environment and for business. These are not mutually exclusive goals." 75Robert Steinberger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.robsteinbergerforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Steinhoff, BenWisconsin5DBen Steinhoff does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Ben Steinhoff has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wisconsinforben.com/issuesSupports Roe
Stelson, JanellePennsylvania10DJanelle Stelson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although acknowledged the need for the federal government to take a role in mitigating climate change's worst effects, Stelson doesn't elaborate on what is causing climate change or the types of action the government should take.25Janelle Stelson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://janellestelson.com/my-priorities/ https://www.pennlive.com/news/2023/10/former-news-anchor-janelle-stelson-launches-bid-for-congress-in-pas-10th-district.htmlSupports Roe
Stockton III, JamesFlorida6DJames Stockton III does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25James Stockton III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/James_StocktonUnclear Position on Roe
Stutzman, MarlinIndiana3RMarlin Stutzman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Marlin Stutzman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.gomarlin.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Subramanyam, SuhasVirginia10DSuhas Subramanyam understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "We are facing a climate emergency that poses a grave threat to the future of our planet [...] I cannot imagine leaving my daughters with a world that is less habitable and more unstable because of a problem that we have the resources and knowledge to tackle now. As a Senator and Delegate, I have advanced a bold climate agenda, while creating jobs and promoting economic opportunity for small businesses."100Suhas Subramanyam has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.suhasforvirginia.com/issuesSupports Roe
Sullivan, DanMassachusetts9RDan Sullivan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Sullivan criticized climate action saying "While supporting eco-friendly projects and reasonable carbon emission reductions, Dan criticizes Joe Biden and Progressives' decarbonization efforts as unattainable and harmful to the economy." However, Sullivan fails to establish a clear position on climate change.25Dan Sullivan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://nursedanforcongress.org/Unclear Position on Roe
Swain, AlanNorth Carolina2RAlan Swain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Alan Swain has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://swainforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Swartz, JessicaMichigan4DJessica Swartz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She has Tweeted several times about the impacts of climate change being felt and promises to help in fighting it. In one such Tweet, Swartz said "The climate crisis is here,and we deserve leaders who will ensure we have clean air to breathe. If you elect me, I will be one of those leaders."75Jessica Swartz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.jessicaswartz.vote/why-im-running https://twitter.com/JessicaForMI/status/1694691025632002177Supports Roe
Talkington, MichelleMaryland5RMichelle Talkington disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the St. Mary County's League of Women Voters primary guide, Talkington stated "We are a global example and leader in clean energy policy, so we must return to energy independence[...] I would support industrial efforts that focus on green technologies in addition to energy independence." However, Talkington fails to take a stance on climate change and the role fossil fuels play in it.25Michelle Talkington has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.talkington4congress.com/ https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/04/11/michelle-talkington/ https://assets.nationbuilder.com/lwvmaryland/pages/5234/attachments/original/1711990031/2024_St_Marys_Primary_VG.pdf?1711990031Opposes Roe
Taylor, DavidOhio2RDavid Taylor disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, Taylor speaks of education indoctrination which "terrifies young children with apocalyptic tales of humanity’s imminent demise due to climate change."0David Taylor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://davetaylorforcongress.com/on-the-issues/Opposes Roe
Teirab, JoeMinnesota2RJoe Teirab does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Joe Teirab has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.axios.com/local/twin-cities/2023/10/18/joe-teirab-gop-challenger-minnesota-2nd-congressional-districtOpposes Roe
Theriault, AustinMaine2RAustin Theriault does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with News Center Maine, Theriault stated that he recognizes the climate is changing, but didn't elaborate on his position and the role of human activity in climate change.25Austin Theriault has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sunjournal.com/2024/01/22/jared-golden-and-republican-challengers-differ-sharply-on-abortion-issue/ https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/local/207/207-interview-republican-congressional-candidate-austin-theriault-maine-politics-congress-legislature/97-fecd35a2-5a3d-4573-a5b6-8f84113dd14bOpposes Roe
Thompson, LarryCalifornia32RLarry Thompson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, it states that "I am for allowing all alternate forms of energy and American oil to compete in a free market" and doesn't address his position on whether or not climate change is human-made and driven by fossil fuels.25Larry Thompson has no known or an inconsistent stance on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.larrythompsonforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Todd, BobOregon1RBob Todd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Bob Todd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Bob_Todd_(Oregon)Unclear Position on Roe
Toomim, MelissaCalifornia36RMelissa Toomim disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet supporting the Guyanan president's pro-oil statements, she said "People lecturing about climate crisis: 1. Are in the pocket of WEF; 2. distort the facts; and 3. continually move the catastrophe goal posts, because their hysterical predictions never come true." In another Tweet, Toomim stated that "The climate change narrative is a BS manipulation."0Melissa Toomim has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/MToomim/status/1779891221516927140 https://x.com/MToomim/status/1774482577761702199Unclear Position on Roe
Torres, JerryVirginia8RJerry Torres agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. "Republicans are concerned about the environment. We’re concerned about climate change. I think that you don’t have to exaggerate the condition of the planet to mobilize Americans,” Torres said. “I’m just going to continue to mobilize a credible, logical approach towards addressing our environmental issues.”25Jerry Torres has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://floridapolitics.com/archives/527522-jerry-torres-hopes-experience-in-uniform-and-as-ceo-sets-him-apart-in-crowded-cd-15-field/Unclear Position on Roe
Torres, RuthTexas5DRuth Torres does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Ruth Torres has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://truthincongress.com/political-issues-texas-politics-congress-nationalsecurity-womensrights-abortion-equity-dei-economy-affordablehousing-healthcare-education/Supports Roe
Tran, DerekCalifornia45DDerek Tran understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, he stated that “California continues to experience the effects of extreme weather and climate change [...] I will fight for increased investment into climate solutions when I am in Congress.” In another Tweet responding to the League of Conservation Voters endorsement, he promised “I will fight for clean energy, clean water, clean air, and a safe and healthy environment for us and our children.”75Derek Tran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.derektranforcongress.com/ https://twitter.com/derektranCA45/status/1747659372917121504 https://twitter.com/derektranCA45/status/1786509575476421073 Supports Roe
Tran, JenniferCalifornia12DJennifer Tran understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it states that "The only experts with credibility are scientists who spend their lives studying the earth and its systems" and "Incremental changes to human behavior are minimal and have taken decades to agree upon. We need solutions that can make an impact NOW."100Jennifer Tran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://drtranforcongress.com/solutions/climate-change-policy/ https://drtranforcongress.com/solutions/abortion-womens-health/Supports Roe
Tranel, MonicaMontana1DMonica Tranel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Speaking to the Montana Free Press, Tranel said "We put someone on the moon and we can solve the energy and climate issues before us. … This is an incredible opportunity.” She continues to express support for climate action, including the Inflation Reduction Act and expanding green energy, and calls for an aggressive timeline to successsfully transition away from fossil fuels.100Monica Tranel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.monicatranel.com/issues?id=32266f90-fcd3-466e-a110-f0f9efe8e863 https://montanafreepress.org/2022/09/22/zinke-tranel-energy-priorities/ https://apps.montanafreepress.org/election-guide-2024/candidates/monica-tranel/Supports Roe
Turner, SylvesterTexas18DSylvester Turner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Speaking to the Texas Tribune, he said "It’s clear that the climate is getting warmer and the storms are coming with greater frequency and greater intensity and costing even more. It’s not getting better. It’s getting worse.” As the chair of the Climate Mayors coalition, Turner has dedicated himself to switching to renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions for Houston, launching the city's Climate Action Plan.100Sylvester Turner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://sylvesterturner.com/platform/ https://www.texastribune.org/2021/03/05/watch-cities-climate-change/ https://www.climaterealityproject.org/sylvester-turnerSupports Roe
Urban, LibbiMichigan5DLibbi Urban does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Libbi Urban has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://electlibbiurban.org/about-libbi-urbanSupports Roe
Valdes, AnthonyNew Jersey8RAnthony Valdes does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he stated in an interview with the J City Times that he wants to "curb inflation by ramping up production of oil, gas, and coal to become energy independent" he fails to take a stance on whether or not the climate is changing. 25Anthony Valdes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://jcitytimes.com/election-2024-anthony-valdes-answers-ten-questions/Unclear Position on Roe
Valimont, GayFlorida1DGay Valimont understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. Speaking of the 2023 hurricane season, Valimont Tweeted "this year is just further proof that climate change is a real issue that requires a serious response." In another Tweet addressed to Representative Gaetz, she said "Hopefully youll acknowledge the climate crisis threatening your constituents homes while you are at it. If not I will!" On her campaign website, she stresses Florida's vulnerability to climate change and promises to take climate action such as investing in clean energy.100Gay Valimont has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://gayforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/gayforcongress/status/1782809680730902928 https://twitter.com/gayforcongress/status/1696172986347205019 https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/4/6/2233806/-Abortion-is-officially-on-the-Ballot-in-FL-Every-seat-is-in-play-Especially-Matt-Gaetz-sSupports Roe
Vallejo, MichelleTexas15DMichelle Vallejo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Vallejo stated that "We can’t deny it any longer—climate change is real, and the impacts of it are already here. We can’t debate the facts: we need to take immediate climate action to protect our communities and our planet and ensure our young people have a bright future."100Michelle Vallejo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.michellefortx15.com/issues https://x.com/MichelleVforTX/status/1699067611433345227Supports Roe
Vargas, RubenNew York13RRuben Vargas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Ruben Vargas has no known or inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Ruben_VargasUnclear Position on Roe
Vargas, TonyNebraska2DTony Vargas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Vargas says "Climate change is a serious threat to our children, businesses, and environment, and the need to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources is both an environmental and economic necessity [...] We also need to do everything we can to ensure that we are being good stewards of our environment and leaving our state a better place for future generations." In a Tweet, Vargas stated "I’m a former science teacher. We need leadership in Congress that believes in climate change and has solutions to address it."100Tony Vargas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.vargasfornebraska.com/issues https://twitter.com/TonyVargas/status/1581795351094099968Supports Roe
Verlato, AprilCalifornia28RApril Verlato does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25April Verlato has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://verlatoforcongress.com/?page_id=120Unclear Position on Roe
Villafañe Ramos, WilliamPuerto Rico1PNP (Republican)William Villafañe Ramos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although Ramos said in a Tweet "We are faithful believers in the duty we have to conserve and preserve the environment and our resources," he fails to establish a clear position on climate change.25William Villafañe Ramos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/William_Villafa%C3%B1e_RamosUnclear Position on Roe
Vindman, EugeneVirginia7DEugene Vindman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Eugene Vindman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://vindmanforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Von Meter, MichaelVirginia11RMike Van Meter does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Van Meter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.vanmeterforvirginia.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Wade, BrandonOklahoma2DBrandon Wade understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his 2022 senate campaign website, Wade stated "This is a very serious issue that has been impacting civilians worldwide. We must do all we can to reduce the impact we have on our environment. We will do this by winging America and the rest of the world off of fossil fuels. We must push and demand the change over to more cleaner green energies."75 Brandon Wade has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Brandon_Wade https://twitter.com/Wade4OKCD2/status/1520647440977776640Supports Roe
Wagenhauser, DavidNew York24DDavid Wagenhauser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25David Wagenhauser has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.daveforupstate.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Waldman, AmandaPennsylvania9DAmanda Waldman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Waldman said "We were given one planet to live on", referring to fossil fuels as a necessary evil that she wants America to move on from through being a leader in green technology. However, Waldman fails to establish a position on climate change and its causes.25Amanda Waldman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_vZJSR--4I https://www.standardspeaker.com/news/election/9th-congressional-district-candidates-comment-on-election-integrity-abortion-climate-change-and-ukraine/article_0703c5a5-721d-515c-a98d-d9282cf0185b.htmlSupports Roe
Waltz, KevinNew York20RKevin Waltz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Kevin Waltz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Kevin_WaltzUnclear Position on Roe
Weeks, IanCalifornia25RIan Weeks does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Ian Weeks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/06/03/q-a-36th-assembly-district-candidates-discuss-inflation-salton-sea-more/7477271001/Opposes Roe
Wells, BillCalifornia51RBill Wells disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a video posted to Twitter, Wells stated "I admit there is some warming, but I think it's a natural trend" and insists that climate action "will be for naught."0Bill Wells has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/MayorBillWells/status/1661416940995215376 https://www.kpbs.org/news/midday-edition/2018/02/20/el-cajon-mayor-bill-wells-says-hell-run-hunters-se https://www.wellsforcongress2024.com/meetbillOpposes Roe
Wells, TomFlorida3DTom Wells understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he states "We are rushing headlong into the abyss of Global Climate Collapse. The donor-owned Congress, by denial of science, has allowed this problem to fester. And Congress is where we must resolve the problem." In a Tweet Wells echoes that sentiment, saying "Under the actual Constitution we'd address Climate at a WWII 42% GDP scale - that's what's needed."100Tom Wells publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Wells has Tweeted several times encouraging a carbon tax, and Newton Borough Council reported Tom Wells encouraging local municipalities to call upon Congress to pass the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R.763).100100https://www.tomwellsforcongress.com/issues.html https://x.com/TomWells2022/status/1701098981630099491 https://evogov.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/meetings/71/minutes/6182.pdf https://x.com/search?q=%40TomWells2022%20co2&src=typed_query&f=topSupports Roe
Wendelin, StevenWest Virginia2DSteven Wendelin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Wendelin lists reversing climate change as a priority, stating "It’s time to stop debating the obvious and come together to fix the problem. We did it in the 1940s when fascism threatened democracy and our country emerged as the strongest and richest nation in the world. We need to show that kind of global leadership again for ourselves and our children."100Steven Wendelin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://wendelinforcongress.com/the-issues-1Supports Roe
Whalen, JohnConnecticut1RJohn Whalen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Whalen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.delawarepublic.org/politics-government/2024-09-13/key-takeaways-from-delawares-first-general-election-candidates-forumOpposes Roe
Whitesides, GeorgeCalifornia27DGeorge Whitesides understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He has spoken publicly about climate change, such as in a Tweet where he stated that "It is clear that anthropogenic climate change is real. In another, he promises that "In Congress, I’ll be a champion for our clean air, water, and climate." 75George Whitesides has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/gtwhitesides/status/1654593256473378816 https://x.com/gtwhitesides/status/1782472678181597298 https://x.com/gtwhitesides/status/1772709946657747152Supports Roe
Whitlow, StuartTexas31DStuart Whitlow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Whitlow states " I will enact and support policies that safeguard our natural landscapes, reduce pollution, and combat climate change. It's our responsibility to leave a healthier planet for our children and grandchildren, allowing them to enjoy the richness of our state just as we have."100Stuart Whitlow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.whitlowforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Whitten, GregArizona8DGreg Whitten does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview in Yahoo News he said, "By and large, the Biden Administration’s policy on climate change has been one of hysteria, fear, and misuse of taxpayer monies to reward political allies. I would work to tone down the rhetoric and gather real data on whether or not 'climate change' is as perilous as some on the Left claim it is."25Greg Whitten has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. carbon dividend.5028.75https://whittenforaz.com/priorities/ https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-8th-congressional-district-candidates-120252153.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANwjVDoASz_TS_592XAmzsIC63F8GCq8cnoOVm4bnDZcfbQmUX4WJKmF0utaiRwGOekSNUg2aS4qHhJUcINbL_DL_ZOm7rjRX5N8UDRLtfMKOMBzuj7fhmounfQyBdrlHlmdiDza8j9itBcAhQnpEV94OmIoeME36XhQhRna0mX8 Supports Roe
Wied, TonyWisconsin8RTony Wied does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Tony Wied has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wpr.org/news/tony-wied-wins-gop-primary-wisconsin-8th-congressional-districtOpposes Roe
Williams, Lily TangNew Hampshire2RLily Tang Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Lily Tang Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lilytangwilliams.com/congress/issues/Opposes Roe
Williams, SteveCalifornia43RSteve Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Steve Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.steve4congress.com/about/Unclear Position on Roe
Wilson, TamieOhio4DTamie Wilson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Wilson states "How many more warnings do we need before we act decisively against the climate crisis? [...] I will combat the climate crisis and take necessary steps to protect our environment to ensure we have clean air, energy, and water." 100Tamie Wilson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.tamiewilson.com/all-issues/Supports Roe
Winkler, DavidPennsylvania4RDavid Winkler disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Winkler said "Climate change is a scam."0David Winkler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://winklerforpa4.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/DJWinklerForPA4/status/1730017686015324568Opposes Roe
Wirth, CindeIndiana6DCinde Wirth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with the Daily Journal, Wirth stated "I think we are in a global climate crisis. We know we are; we’ve known for over 30 years that we are [...] We have to shut the carbon source off at the tap, and one of the ways to do that is to look at alternative energy sources. It’s not anything that’s new. In a Tweet, Wirth said that "Earth day is coming to a close but the fight for climate justice never does [...] Demand climate action now!"100Cinde Wirth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://wirth4congress.com/ https://dailyjournal.net/2022/10/09/democrat-cinde-wirth-says-upholding-democracy-most-pressing-issue-in-district-6-race/ https://twitter.com/cwirth4congress/status/1517684757437599746Supports Roe
Witkop, ThomasFlorida21DThomas Witkop understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority. Witkop's campaign website states "Our Treasure Coast is uniquely vulnerable to ongoing climate change [...] By funding clean energy, we will prevent countless catastrophes and make our nation energy independent." In a Tweet, Witkop said "I'm committed to addressing the climate crisis with effective legislation."75Thomas Witkop has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://twitter.com/Thomas_Witkop/status/1785802141145178468 https://witkopforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/Thomas_Witkop/status/1770233076842447198Supports Roe
Witt, GloriaVirginia5DGloria Witt understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with the Nelson County Democratic Committee, Witt listed "expansion of renewal energy, support the transition to electric cars over time, and investment in reforestation and advance innovative agricultural solutions" as climate action Congress needs to take.75Gloria Witt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.gloriawittforcongress.com/issues https://www.bluenelson.org/news-posts/2024/gloriawSupports Roe
Womer, ZacherayPennsylvania15DZacheray Womer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article he wrote for the Washington Examiner, Womer criticized the Democratic party's policies towards the coal industry, stating Democrats "wrongly believed that to be pro-climate, you must be anti-coal." Womer expresses concern for Pennsylvanian coal workers under President Biden's "radical environmental policies" which he believes could leave many poeple behind. Despite this, Womer fails to establish a clear position on climate change and the role of fossil fuels in driving it.25Zacheray Womer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Zach_Womer https://www.womeforpa.com/issues https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/3014800/coal-country-democrat-running-congress-party-wrongly-abandoned-us/Supports Roe
Woodward, NathanielUtah2DNathaniel Woodward does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Nathaniel Woodward has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ksl.com/article/51024942/utah-democrats-name-attorney-nathaniel-woodward-as-nominee-for-2nd-district-house-seatUnclear Position on Roe
Wright, GlennUtah3DGlenn Wright understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Wright states "Climate Change is real. It is causing increased natural disasters, increasing involuntary migration, and producing trillions in economic losses. The principal effects on Utah are Drought, poor air quality, and forest fires. I support comprehensive plans to slow and reverse Climate Change."100Glenn Wright publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Wright had been involved in lobbying retiring incumbent Representative Curtis to vote for a climate fee. “I'm hoping to not only give my point of view, but maybe even move him a little bit in our direction. And one of the activities I'm getting engaged with here in Summit County is with Citizens Climate Lobby, which is pushing the carbon fee and dividend, which is really a conservative, originally Republican point of view on how do we address climate change. So I would try to encourage him to move a little bit further on that and actually propose it in Congress and vote for it.”100100https://wrightforutahcongressionaldistrict3.com/issues https://www.kpcw.org/summit-county/2022-03-08/county-councilor-glenn-wright-seeks-spot-on-ballot-for-congressSupports Roe
Wright, StevenTexas35RSteven Wright disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Wright said "It’s not climate change that’s causing heat waves this summer but no one wants to explain why." In another, he called climate action "Farce climate control."0Steven Wright has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://twitter.com/SteveWr47845528/status/1640153959850549248 https://twitter.com/SteveWr47845528/status/1684559836141309952 https://twitter.com/SteveWr47845528/status/1796630795827695690Opposes Roe
Xiong, MayMinnesota4RMay Xiong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25May Xiong has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://minnesotareformer.com/2022/09/22/minnesota-republicans-stay-mum-on-grahams-national-abortion-ban-bill/Opposes Roe
Young Jr., NeilPennsylvania6RNeil Young Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Neil Young Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.neilyoungforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Young, MichaelOhio3RMichael Young disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Michael Young has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Michael_Young_(Ohio)Unclear Position on Roe
Yu, EugeneGeorgia4REugene Yu does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Eugene Yu has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.yuforhouse.com/platformOpposes Roe
Zarbano, JohnWisconsin6DJohn Zarbano does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25John Zarbano has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://johnzarbano.com/Supports Roe
Zink, JeffArizona3RJeff Zink does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jeff Zink has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jeffzink4uscongress.com/Opposes Roe
Zmich, ThomasNew York6RThomas Zmich does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Thomas Zmich has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Thomas_ZmichUnclear Position on Roe
Zumbluskas, MichaelNew York12RMichael Zumbluskas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, Zumbluskas does express support for transitioning to green energy. He encourages the development of carbon-free energy, researching CO2 removal technologies, and taking climate action to reduce greenhouse gasses. Despite this, Zumbluskas fails to take a clear stance on whether or not cliamte change is real and human-made. 25Michael Zumbluskas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.electmikez.us/ https://www.westsiderag.com/2022/08/12/whys-a-republican-running-in-a-district-like-thisOpposes Roe